Fogbow

raison de arizona wrote: ↑Fri Jan 26, 2024 5:06 pm Does he have to post an appeal bond to appeal? Is that a thing?

In federal court, you may appeal without posting a bond.

A court may direct a costs bond, that is, funds to cover the appellee's costs to defend an appeal.

But you must post a bond to stay enforcement of the judgment.

Third take today from Lisa Rubin (who did a great job reporting the verdict live from in from of the courthouse:

I paraphrase: Al Habba was a disaster in the courtroom with all her blunders (gives the example of the the poster board she wanted to use in closing, but couldn't, because they hadn't admitted it into evidence), and she (Rubin) has to wonder how long she's going to last as TFG's lawyer.

Love ya, Lisa. Nice pivot.

Kendra wrote: ↑Fri Jan 26, 2024 5:02 pm https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrum ... 0073262515

Absolutely ridiculous! I fully disagree with both verdicts, and will be appealing this whole Biden Directed Witch Hunt focused on me and the Republican Party. Our Legal System is out of control, and being used as a Political Weapon. They have taken away all First Amendment Rights. THIS IS NOT AMERICA!

Something missing there... Hmmm.... What is it? Something he tends to rant about in this context... Hmm... Can't put my finger on it.....

bob wrote: ↑Fri Jan 26, 2024 5:14 pm But you must post a bond to stay enforcement of the judgment.

Would such a bond be equal to the amount of the judgement?

If he doesn't post such a bond, does that mean the Ms. Carroll can ask for a court order, compelling him to immediately pay the $83M?

I expect there will be a third case to be filled in short time

Kendra wrote: ↑Fri Jan 26, 2024 5:02 pm https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrum ... 0073262515

Absolutely ridiculous! I fully disagree with both verdicts, and will be appealing this whole Biden Directed Witch Hunt focused on me and the Republican Party. Our Legal System is out of control, and being used as a Political Weapon. They have taken away all First Amendment Rights. THIS IS NOT AMERICA!

He didn't write that. That has decent sentence structure, proper capitalization, very few "!", does not refer to himself in the third person, sounds like an actual human, etc etc.

noblepa wrote: ↑Fri Jan 26, 2024 5:26 pm

bob wrote: ↑Fri Jan 26, 2024 5:14 pm But you must post a bond to stay enforcement of the judgment.

Would such a bond be equal to the amount of the judgement?

If he doesn't post such a bond, does that mean the Ms. Carroll can ask for a court order, compelling him to immediately pay the $83M?

Yes. $83M smackers.

He put up the $5 mill following Carroll 2 in order to appeal. There was some reporting about how he was paying more than he had to due to lost interest or penalty for withdrawal or some such.

I have CNN on the tv in the other room. Just heard Ms. Habba holding an impromptu press conference and lambasting the court.

Once again, she brought up the fact that the orange shitgibbon is leading in the polls, as if that means he can't be held accountable for his words and actions.

She (Habba) also bashed NY (and DC) juries. Summary: Da fix is in because, Blue states! Biden!

noblepa wrote: ↑Fri Jan 26, 2024 5:26 pm Would such a bond be equal to the amount of the judgement?

Judge's discretion; it also could be secured by property.

Nb.: The judge who he just endlessly insulted and was disrespectful toward.

If he doesn't post such a bond, does that mean the Ms. Carroll can ask for a court order, compelling him to immediately pay the $83M?

Not immediately; there's a relatively brief automatic stay.

A president obviously has the power to pardon someone accused or convicted of a federal crime. I think we all assume that, if he is elected in November, the first document he signs as president will be a self-pardon for his federal crimes.

Does a president have any similar power in a federal civil matter? IOW, as it is probably unlikely that he will be writing a check to Ms. Carroll before Jan 20, can he do anything to mitigate the judgement? I'm not referring to a normal appeal.

noblepa wrote: ↑Fri Jan 26, 2024 5:33 pm Does a president have any similar power in a federal civil matter? IOW, as it is probably unlikely that he will be writing a check to Ms. Carroll before Jan 20, can he do anything to mitigate the judgement? I'm not referring to a normal appeal.

-ish. Civil litigation against the sitting president usually is stayed during the presidency, to deter those who would lawfare the president.

As Dictator on day one (which will be every future day while he breathes)..

He will do whatever he wants.

He will order RETRIBUTION !!!
Carrol
Her lawyers
The judge
The jury

That's Shawn Crowley, whom we know from RC's great tweet thread clips, on Carroll's right.

https://x.com/MacFarlaneNews/status/175 ... 04653?s=20

Scott MacFarlane @MacFarlaneNews wrote: Per @GrahamKates just now on @cbsnews - When the judge read verdict form in Trump- E.Jean Carroll defamation damages trial, the Judge asked jurors: Does the “M” on this form mean “millions”?

Defense attorneys appeared dejected at that moment

I guess we know what happens now when yer pretty lawyer fakes being smart.

Also...

Acyn @Acyn wrote: Habba: You are not allowed to be told that you can't bring it up…

Reality Check, thanks again for the great work posting all those Xits from @InnerCityPress, I read them all with great interest and I felt like I had a good clue about what was going on in the courtroom. You gave us a ton of useful information.

And I saw Flatpoint predict another case, and I agree. Fully agree. Bring it. But for me, the best part of today's eighty three point three million dollar verdict is that it doesn't get the quadfectee out of Judge Engoron's case about the fraud, and it doesn't get him out of a single one of the 91 felonies for which he still might go to prison.

No, this is just eighty three point three million dollars to teach him to be a loudmouth lying asshole who tells a dozen lies before breakfast, just to get warmed up for the day.

That's my favorite part.

I read that Jean Carroll's friend, on cross, had texted that Jean was a narcissist.and I thought, hmmmmm, that's how he will be taken down, narcissist versus narcissist, both doubling down every time.
Her certainly not getting tired because this is feeding her needs and he is running away. I like it.

https://x.com/mehdirhasan/status/175100 ... 82847?s=20

Mehdi Hasan @mehdirhasan wrote: Much more important than the 83 million dollar verdict is the recognition from a member of the U.S. judiciary that Trump and his supporters remain a violent threat to ordinary Americans.

erica orden @eorden wrote: Judge Kaplan, to jurors: "My advice to you is that you never disclose that you were on this jury."

If she is a Narcisist (I have no idea), she is certainly not having as many threats to her self esteem as he is. He is exhausting himself attacking multiple threats to him at the moment to little effect, whereas she only has one, and she is winning constantly on that.

She would have lots of steam and he would have hardly any to spare.

I would like to say it again:

Eighty three point three million dollars.



I am compliments to the foreperson. Good discussion had, says I.

Ya know....I'm starting to get the impression that this Habba lady might not be very good at this lawyerin' stuff....

Frater I*I wrote: ↑Fri Jan 26, 2024 6:04 pm Ya know....I'm starting to get the impression that this Habba lady might not be very good at this lawyerin' stuff....

I don't understand how she could have lost. She's pretty, right? Does that not count for anything anymore? What is this America we are living in?

I suppose we should celebrate with an appropriate gif.

Need a new poll: does she see any of the money?