Further to Hanson’s article, The Post & Email proposes the following questions be asked by a Special Counsel or Justice Department prosecutor
Rondeau still hasn't figured out that Mueller works for the DOJ, and that he was appointed "special counsel" by it due to the possibility of the White House exerting its influence over subordinate executive branch employees. If, for example, Obama or Clinton were ever investigated, a regular ole DOJ prosecutor could do the job because they are not in the White House.
And it is clear that years of playing journalist have not helped Rondeau's ability to play lawyer, as she has no concept of "personal knowledge" or why lawyers ask the questions they do. To illustrate, I'll answer as if I were Obama:
[1.] Why did you not simply send in the required fee and request form, either over the Internet or by U.S. mail, to obtain the documents?
Chain of custody (it is a legal thing; go ask a real lawyer to explain it do you), in case it was ever needed to document how the birth certificate got from Hawaii to D.C. Without it, birthers would claim it was switched in the mailroom, or something other weird conspiracy.
2. Is the image posted at whitehouse.gov, now archived, representative of the documents Corley retrieved from the Health Department?
Yes, and the Hawaii Department of Health verified that under oath. Roxy will also verify this.
3. What is your response to the investigation carried out under the authority of the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office, headed by then-Sheriff Joseph M. Arpaio, which announced in three separate press conferences between 2012 and 2016 that the “long-form” birth certificate image uploaded to the White House blog is a forgery?
Arpaio is a racist clown, that's my response. Next question!
4. Why did your first press secretary, Robert Gibbs, say that the “Certification of Life Birth” released by an unconfirmed individual on or about June 12, 2008, was the only “birth certificate” available to you as an individual allegedly born in Hawaii?
YOU WOULD HAVE TO ASK GIBBS. But he probably made a mistake; it is human nature. See, e.g., all the typos in the P&E.
5. Why was your FBI aware of the findings that the long-form image is fraudulent but conducted no investigation into who might have committed the felony of fabricating a government document?
YOU WOULD HAVE TO ASK THE FBI whether it was aware of Arpaio's dog-and-pony show. And if it was, it probably went to the bottom of the pile of zillions of nutjob "tips" that real law enforcement receives. Too also: there's no evidence to support the racist clown's "findings."
What did your first FBI director, Robert S. Mueller, III, or your second, James B. Comey, know about the reported “long-form” forgery?
THAT'S TWO QUESTIONS; GET YOUR NUMBERING STRAIGHT! And why do you keep asking me what is in other people's minds, like I'm some sort of psychic?
6. The same questions apply to your purported Selective Service registration form, which Arpaio’s investigators also found to be fraudulent.
The same answer applies: why would anyone take a racist clown's "findings" seriously? Grown-ass men playing with date stamps is just sad, really.
Why was your Selective Service System director, Lawrence Romo, unwilling to allow Arpaio and chief investigator Mike Zullo access to your original Selective Service registration form or a certified copy on location?
AGAIN THE DOUBLE QUESTIONS! And, again asking me what someone else was thinking. But the answer is so obvious that even you should see it: THEY HAD NO WARRANT. This is, like, "Law & Order" 101.
7. Why did the Justice Department suddenly say, after Arpaio made the request to see the form, that all such records from that era were destroyed, contrary to longstanding government policy?
You know "the Justice Department" is a construct, and not a human that can actually speak, right? I have no idea which human freakin' being said that. (And your question smells hinky because the Selective Service System is not part of the DOJ.) But -- and I'm spitballing here -- maybe the policy was changed?
8. Did your campaign or administration coordinate with members of the mainstream media a disinformation effort to discourage the American people from discovering the truth about your origins, background and what has been found to be fraudulent documentation?
No, and lay off the Alex Jones.
9. Did your administration coerce, threaten or intimidate anyone into silence or into disseminating false information about your short-form birth certificate, long-form birth certificate, or Selective Service registration form?
"To your knowledge, did anyone in your administration threaten anyone?" is the question you are trying to ask. And, no.
Was Perkins Coie involved in disseminating false or misleading information?
ANOTHER BONUS QUESTION, I SEE! Is my name "Perkins" or "Coie"? Because if it isn't, I'm guessing you already know my response.
10. Why did MSNBC host Chris Matthews say on December 18, 2007 that you were “born in Indonesia”?
DO I LOOK LIKE CHRIS MATTHEWS?
11. Why did NPR report in 2008 that you were “Kenyan-born“?
MY NAME IS CHRIS MATTHEWS, AND I WORK FOR MSNBC, NOT NPR.
12. Why did your first literary agent, Acton & Dystel, publish a biographical sketch of you in 1991 which claimed that you were “born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia and Hawaii”?
I'm guessing you read the Breitbart article where SHE SAID IT WAS HER MISTAKE, so you should already know the answer to this.
Why was that information changed in April 2007 to say that you were “born in Hawaii”?
YET ANOTHER BONUS QUESTION! Some humans have a funny quirk of wanting to correct mistakes; not you, obviously.
13. Why did your wife Michelle say that Kenya is your “home country”?
Why did JFK say Ireland was his home country? Because it is a FIGURE OF SPEECH. Are you a robot and/or alien?
Why have members of the Kenyan Parliament said you were born there and not Hawaii?
You are officially over your 17 questions, but -- and stop me if you heard this one -- GO ASK THEM.
14. Why has the mainstream press put forth differing accounts of your life story, particularly relating to your early years?
Different reporters have differing levels of competency. [Knowing look.]
15. What documentation do you possess which shows that you are a “natural born Citizen” as Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution requires for the president and commander-in-chief?
A copy of the U.S. Consitution, a birth certificate from a U.S. state, and the favorable decisions from over 200 court cases. You?
16. Why did Sheriff Arpaio say that based on what he claims the investigation unearthed, you would not qualify to work as a Maricopa County employee, let alone the White House?
Because he's a racist idiot who is a walking HR problem?
17. Why do disinformation agents continue to closely monitor any reportage of the “birth certificate” issue?
WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK IS A "DISINFORMATION AGENT"? WHO SAYS "REPORTAGE" ANYWAY? But, obviously: for the yuks.
Do they fear that the Trump administration, once past the “Russia collusion” probe, might turn its attention to the origins of the PDF image given that Trump himself was the first prominent person to publicly question your presidential eligibility?
Objection! That assumes there's an end to the "Russia collusion" probe. And the current president hasn't publicly birthed since October 2016; have you figured out yet that you were played?
A question from the audience
Rondeau wrote:From a reader: “Mr. Obama, now that you are out of office and a private citizen, in order to resolve the lingering questions about your place of birth, will you instruct the Kapi’olani Hospital in Honolulu, Hawaii that you are waiving any claims of confidentiality under HIPAA laws and that the hospital officials are specifically requested to formally confirm, as you have claimed, that you were born there on Aug. 4, 1961 to Stanley Ann Dunham-Obama and Barack H. Obama, Sr.?”
?; sure. Will I: No, because that will shut exactly zero (of the three remaining) birthers up.