Stephanie Clifford aka Stormy Daniels v Donald J. Trump aka David Dennison, U.S. District Court, Central California

User avatar
Reality Check
Posts: 15135
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: Stephanie Clifford aka Stormy Daniels v Donald J. Trump aka David Dennison, et. al. CA Superior Court

#26

Post by Reality Check » Fri Mar 09, 2018 3:33 pm

woodworker wrote:
Fri Mar 09, 2018 3:03 pm
I just noticed your tag about Anita Hill. Ditto, and a big reason why Joe Biden will never get my vote for president (in the primaries).
That wasn't one of Joe's better moments was it? It's still an effing shame that lying, molesting, POS Clarence Thomas sits on the highest court.


"“If you’re not outraged, you’re not paying attention.”

Heather Heyer, November 2016

User avatar
woodworker
Posts: 2673
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 2:54 pm

Re: Stephanie Clifford aka Stormy Daniels v Donald J. Trump aka David Dennison, et. al. CA Superior Court

#27

Post by woodworker » Fri Mar 09, 2018 3:45 pm

Reality Check wrote:
Fri Mar 09, 2018 3:33 pm
woodworker wrote:
Fri Mar 09, 2018 3:03 pm
I just noticed your tag about Anita Hill. Ditto, and a big reason why Joe Biden will never get my vote for president (in the primaries).
That wasn't one of Joe's better moments was it? It's still an effing shame that lying, molesting, POS Clarence Thomas sits on the highest court.
I must confess that I don't have as high an opinion of Justice Thomas as you do. Bless his heart (and may it give out as soon as we have a Democratic president again - and I actually wouldn't mind a coma until then).

I guess I am channeling my inner Rudy Davis and engaging in imprecatory prayer (apologies for any mis-spelling -- to lazy to check right now).


Pence / Haley -- 2020 "I Won't Call Her Mother" and "We Will Be The Best Team Ever, But Never Alone Together"

User avatar
Volkonski
Posts: 18874
Joined: Sat Mar 02, 2013 4:44 pm
Location: Texas Gulf Coast and North Fork of Long Island
Occupation: Retired Mechanical Engineer

Re: Stephanie Clifford aka Stormy Daniels v Donald J. Trump aka David Dennison, et. al. CA Superior Court

#28

Post by Volkonski » Fri Mar 09, 2018 4:13 pm



CNN

@CNN

Stormy Daniels' attorney confirms that Michael Cohen used his Trump Organization email while negotiating details of a $130,000 payment
http://
cnn.it/2DcyU0h

3:04 PM - Mar 9, 2018


Image“If everyone fought for their own convictions there would be no war.”
― Leo Tolstoy, War and Peace

User avatar
Mikedunford
Posts: 9719
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 9:42 pm

Re: Stephanie Clifford aka Stormy Daniels v Donald J. Trump aka David Dennison, et. al. CA Superior Court

#29

Post by Mikedunford » Fri Mar 09, 2018 6:14 pm

We lost the election to these mooks. SMH.


"I don't give a fuck whether we're peers or not."
--Lord Thomas Henry Bingham to Boris Johnson, on being asked whether he would miss being in "the best club in London" if the Law Lords moved from Parliament to a Supreme Court.

User avatar
NMgirl
Posts: 3991
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2016 12:02 am

Re: Stephanie Clifford aka Stormy Daniels v Donald J. Trump aka David Dennison, et. al. CA Superior Court

#30

Post by NMgirl » Fri Mar 09, 2018 11:15 pm

Fogbow's Mimi posted this on Twitter, so I'm passing it on:

the-stormy-daniels-contract-is-a-dumpster-fire

http://www.adamsdrafting.com/the-stormy ... ster-fire/


Stern: Come back. My posts are becoming sloppy and ill-thought out.

User avatar
GreatGrey
Posts: 9570
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2009 6:06 am
Location: Living in the Anthropocene

Re: Stephanie Clifford aka Stormy Daniels v Donald J. Trump aka David Dennison, et. al. CA Superior Court

#31

Post by GreatGrey » Fri Mar 09, 2018 11:27 pm

NMgirl wrote:
Fri Mar 09, 2018 11:15 pm
Fogbow's Mimi posted this on Twitter, so I'm passing it on:

the-stormy-daniels-contract-is-a-dumpster-fire

http://www.adamsdrafting.com/the-stormy ... ster-fire/


I am not "someone upthread".
Trump needs to be smashed into some kind of inedible orange pâté.

User avatar
NMgirl
Posts: 3991
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2016 12:02 am

Re: Stephanie Clifford aka Stormy Daniels v Donald J. Trump aka David Dennison, et. al. CA Superior Court

#32

Post by NMgirl » Fri Mar 09, 2018 11:31 pm

I hope this hasn't been posted upthread. If so, sue me.

Unverified Twitter rumor:
Michael Avenatti - Stormy Daniels's attorney- says Michael Cohen does not appear to be licensed in Calif - where he filed the arbitration. Oh dear.
What would that mean in terms of any agreements, arbitration, etc., in which Cohen participated :?:


Stern: Come back. My posts are becoming sloppy and ill-thought out.

User avatar
Sterngard Friegen
Posts: 43903
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Location: Over the drawbridge

Re: Stephanie Clifford aka Stormy Daniels v Donald J. Trump aka David Dennison, et. al. CA Superior Court

#33

Post by Sterngard Friegen » Fri Mar 09, 2018 11:47 pm

An arbitrator can permit an out of state attorney to appear at an arbitration in California. Was Cohen the attorney in the arbitration? Did he apply to Judge Connor for pro hac status?



TexasFilly
Posts: 17964
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 12:52 pm

Re: Stephanie Clifford aka Stormy Daniels v Donald J. Trump aka David Dennison, et. al. CA Superior Court

#34

Post by TexasFilly » Fri Mar 09, 2018 11:53 pm

Sterngard Friegen wrote:
Fri Mar 09, 2018 11:47 pm
An arbitrator can permit an out of state attorney to appear at an arbitration in California. Was Cohen the attorney in the arbitration? Did he apply to Judge Connor for pro hac status?
I don’t think he was the attorney for the arbitration. Geragos was on tv and said he heard the dumpsters were using their usual local counsel but wouldn’t name them. He also said there’s a line of cases saying arbitrators can’t issue temporary injunctions.


I love the poorly educated!!!

I believe Anita Hill! I believe Dr. Ford!

User avatar
Sterngard Friegen
Posts: 43903
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Location: Over the drawbridge

Re: Stephanie Clifford aka Stormy Daniels v Donald J. Trump aka David Dennison, et. al. CA Superior Court

#35

Post by Sterngard Friegen » Sat Mar 10, 2018 12:14 am

Not quite. C.C.P. sec. 1281.8 allows a party to an arbitration, or who seeks to be a party to an arbitration, to seek a TRO or other provisional relief in court without waiving the party's right to arbitrate.
(a) As used in this section, “provisional remedy” includes the following:

(1) Attachments and temporary protective orders issued pursuant to Title 6.5 (commencing with Section 481.010) of Part 2.

(2) Writs of possession issued pursuant to Article 2 (commencing with Section 512.010) of Chapter 2 of Title 7 of Part 2.

(3) Preliminary injunctions and temporary restraining orders issued pursuant to Section 527.

(4) Receivers appointed pursuant to Section 564.

(b) A party to an arbitration agreement may file in the court in the county in which an arbitration proceeding is pending, or if an arbitration proceeding has not commenced, in any proper court, an application for a provisional remedy in connection with an arbitrable controversy, but only upon the ground that the award to which the applicant may be entitled may be rendered ineffectual without provisional relief. The application shall be accompanied by a complaint or by copies of the demand for arbitration and any response thereto. If accompanied by a complaint, the application shall also be accompanied by a statement stating whether the party is or is not reserving the party’s right to arbitration.

(c) A claim by the party opposing issuance of a provisional remedy, that the controversy is not subject to arbitration, shall not be grounds for denial of any provisional remedy.

(d) An application for a provisional remedy under subdivision (b) shall not operate to waive any right of arbitration which the applicant may have pursuant to a written agreement to arbitrate, if, at the same time as the application for a provisional remedy is presented, the applicant also presents to the court an application that all other proceedings in the action be stayed pending the arbitration of any issue, question, or dispute which is claimed to be arbitrable under the agreement and which is relevant to the action pursuant to which the provisional remedy is sought.
From that one may infer that arbitrators can't effectively issue provisional relief, but I know of no cases that so hold.



User avatar
Sterngard Friegen
Posts: 43903
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Location: Over the drawbridge

Re: Stephanie Clifford aka Stormy Daniels v Donald J. Trump aka David Dennison, et. al. CA Superior Court

#36

Post by Sterngard Friegen » Sat Mar 10, 2018 12:26 am

OK, there appears to be some dictum saying an arbitrator can't issue provisional relief:
In this case, Badgley's complaints in case Nos. 706719 and 745339 both sought provisional relief, relief that is ordinarily unavailable in arbitration. (See Knight et al., Cal. Practice Guide: Alternative Dispute Resolution (The Rutter Group 1992) Contractual Arbitration, ¶ 4:365, p. 4-66; cf. Outdoor Services, Inc. v. Pabagold, Inc. (1986) 185 Cal. App.3d 676, 685 [230 Cal. Rptr. 73].) Specifically, the complaint in case No. 706719 sought the appointment of a receiver to protect Badgley's interest in the Property pending the outcome of the litigation. Likewise, the amended complaint in case No. 745339 sought a preliminary injunction, an injunction that the trial court granted. Since Badgley's complaints both sought provisional relief that was beyond the authority of an arbitrator to grant, the trial court properly overruled Van Upp's demurrers. In order to preserve her right to arbitration, Van Upp was required to seek a stay of the arbitrable portion of the litigation. (Charles J. Rounds Co. v. Joint Council of Teamsters No. 42, supra, 4 Cal.3d at p. 899.) Having failed to do so and having continued to litigate this matter for nearly two decades, Van Upp is not in a position to seek arbitration at this late date.3
Badgley v. Van Upp (1993) 20 Cal.App.4th 218, 221-222. That's it; there is no "line of cases" so holding. I am sure bob will correct me if I am wrong.



User avatar
NMgirl
Posts: 3991
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2016 12:02 am

Re: Stephanie Clifford aka Stormy Daniels v Donald J. Trump aka David Dennison, et. al. CA Superior Court

#37

Post by NMgirl » Sat Mar 10, 2018 1:21 am

TexasFilly wrote:
Fri Mar 09, 2018 11:53 pm
Sterngard Friegen wrote:
Fri Mar 09, 2018 11:47 pm
An arbitrator can permit an out of state attorney to appear at an arbitration in California. Was Cohen the attorney in the arbitration? Did he apply to Judge Connor for pro hac status?
I don’t think he was the attorney for the arbitration. Geragos was on tv and said he heard the dumpsters were using their usual local counsel but wouldn’t name them. He also said there’s a line of cases saying arbitrators can’t issue temporary injunctions.
(CNN)The lawyer handling the Stormy Daniels scandal for President Donald Trump's corporate and personal representative, Michael Cohen, comes from the same small New York law firm that earned thousands of dollars from the Trump campaign at the end of last year.

Cohen's use of a law firm connected to Trump's campaign and his company further blurs the line that Cohen is trying to draw in arguing that his payments to Stormy have no involvement of the president. :snippety:

The law firm LaRocca Hornik Rosen Greenberg & Blaha has worked for the Trump campaign since fall 2016, and the Trump Organization for years. :snippity:

LaRocca Hornik partner Larry Rosen told CNN in an email Friday that the firm's late 2017 earnings from the Trump campaign were unrelated to Daniels "nor have we ever represented the Trump campaign in any way related to Ms. Clifford." (Stephanie Clifford is the porn star's legal name; her stage name is Stormy Daniels.)

He declined to say what the Trump campaign paid for the law firm to do last year. Rosen added that his firm is currently representing Cohen's company Essential Consultants in arbitration over the hush agreement and the payment it used for Daniels.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/09/politics ... index.html

http://www.lhrgb.com/home.php#Attorneys

I'm too tired to look it up right now, but I think Rosen is another Skadden Arps meanie alum.


Stern: Come back. My posts are becoming sloppy and ill-thought out.

User avatar
NMgirl
Posts: 3991
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2016 12:02 am

Re: Stephanie Clifford aka Stormy Daniels v Donald J. Trump aka David Dennison, et. al. CA Superior Court

#38

Post by NMgirl » Wed Mar 14, 2018 11:35 am

The hearing is now set for July 12, 2018 at 8:30am at the LA Superior Court. :shootin:


Stern: Come back. My posts are becoming sloppy and ill-thought out.

User avatar
Reality Check
Posts: 15135
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: Stephanie Clifford aka Stormy Daniels v Donald J. Trump aka David Dennison, et. al. CA Superior Court

#39

Post by Reality Check » Wed Mar 14, 2018 11:37 am

NMgirl wrote:
Wed Mar 14, 2018 11:35 am
The hearing is now set for July 12, 2018 at 8:30am at the LA Superior Court. :shootin:
:pray: let it be on my teevee.


"“If you’re not outraged, you’re not paying attention.”

Heather Heyer, November 2016

User avatar
NMgirl
Posts: 3991
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2016 12:02 am

Re: Stephanie Clifford aka Stormy Daniels v Donald J. Trump aka David Dennison, et. al. CA Superior Court

#40

Post by NMgirl » Wed Mar 14, 2018 12:24 pm

Reality Check wrote:
Wed Mar 14, 2018 11:37 am
:snippity:
:pray: let it be on my teevee.
My brief and uninformed reading of the rules makes me hopeful that, yes, properly authorized media will be allowed to film. :pray:

http://www.lacourt.org/newsmedia/mediar ... merapolicy


Stern: Come back. My posts are becoming sloppy and ill-thought out.

User avatar
RTH10260
Posts: 18073
Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 8:52 am
Location: Near the Swiss Alps

Re: Stephanie Clifford aka Stormy Daniels v Donald J. Trump aka David Dennison, et. al. CA Superior Court

#41

Post by RTH10260 » Wed Mar 14, 2018 1:36 pm

NMgirl wrote:
Wed Mar 14, 2018 11:35 am
The hearing is now set for July 12, 2018 at 8:30am at the LA Superior Court. :shootin:
July? Time for many Storms to pass the TV screens until then :lol:



User avatar
Dolly
Posts: 12632
Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2012 7:32 pm

Re: Stephanie Clifford aka Stormy Daniels v Donald J. Trump aka David Dennison, et. al. CA Superior Court

#42

Post by Dolly » Wed Mar 14, 2018 1:40 pm

Off Topic
Stormy Daniels launches fundraising drive for Trump lawsuit

Adult film actress Stormy Daniels has launched an online fundraising drive over her legal fight against President Trump.

The drive can be accessed on the Crowd Justice website and has raised more than $4,000 as of early Wednesday afternoon. Proceeds are intended to help void a nondisclosure agreement Daniels and Trump attorney Michael Cohen signed in October of 2016.

Daniels, whose real name is Stephanie Clifford, has offered to return the $130,000 she was paid under the agreement in exchange for the freedom to talk publicly about her alleged affair with Trump years earlier.
.................

"I need funds to pay for: attorneys' fees; out-of-pocket costs associated with the lawsuit, arbitration, and my right to speak openly; security expenses; and damages that may be awarded against me if I speak out and ultimately lose to Mr. Trump and Mr. Cohen," she said.

Daniels's attorney, Michael Avenatti, retweeted a Washington Post story on the fundraising drive. <SNIP the tweet and remainder>
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing- ... -for-trump


Avatar by Tal Peleg Art of Makeup https://www.facebook.com/TalPelegMakeUp

User avatar
Sterngard Friegen
Posts: 43903
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Location: Over the drawbridge

Re: Stephanie Clifford aka Stormy Daniels v Donald J. Trump aka David Dennison, et. al. CA Superior Court

#43

Post by Sterngard Friegen » Wed Mar 14, 2018 1:49 pm

So now Avenatti wants other people to pay him for the publicity stunt?

Please



User avatar
Reality Check
Posts: 15135
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: Stephanie Clifford aka Stormy Daniels v Donald J. Trump aka David Dennison, et. al. CA Superior Court

#44

Post by Reality Check » Wed Mar 14, 2018 3:28 pm

Sterngard Friegen wrote:
Wed Mar 14, 2018 1:49 pm
So now Avenatti wants other people to pay him for the publicity stunt?

Please
Yes, that's disappointing. Clifford is going to eventually make a lot of money off this without begging and so will Avenatti, Esq.


"“If you’re not outraged, you’re not paying attention.”

Heather Heyer, November 2016

User avatar
Dolly
Posts: 12632
Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2012 7:32 pm

Re: Stephanie Clifford aka Stormy Daniels v Donald J. Trump aka David Dennison, et. al. CA Superior Court

#45

Post by Dolly » Wed Mar 14, 2018 8:38 pm

I don't know if this is "important" or if it is just a way to stay in the news. :?
Trump Organization lawyer worked on Stormy Daniels nondisclosure case
A lawyer at the Trump Organization was involved in the legal efforts to try and stop adult film star Stormy Daniels from speaking out about an alleged affair with President Trump.

Jill A. Martin, an attorney for the Trump Organization, is listed as a counsel in legal documents for an arbitration demand by a company created by Trump’s personal lawyer Michael Cohen, the Wall Street Journal first reported Wednesday.
..................
Martin said in a statement to the Journal that she worked on the filing “in her individual capacity” until a New York-based lawyer was approved to practice in California.

“The company has had no involvement in the matter,” she said.
............
“She is a full-time employee as evidenced by the state bar. And so there can be no question that the Trump Organization was representing [Essential Consultants] LLC in connection with this arbitration," Avenatti said. <SNIP>
http://thehill.com/homenews/administrat ... osure-case
Off Topic
A fogbow search for Jill Martin shows:
NBC: Donald Trump's Attorneys Oppose Unsealing Some Documents In Trump University Case:
52 Documents, more than 1,000 pages currently sealed in Trump University case

Donald Trump’s attorney opposes unsealing some of the documents the Washington Post requested to be made public related to the Trump University class-action lawsuit, according to court documents filed Monday.

Rancho Palos Verdes Attorney Jill Martin has filed her opposition on behalf of Trump. According to the filing with the San Diego federal court where the November trial will be heard, Martin opposes unsealing some of the 52 documents “filed in support of and in opposition to” the class-action lawsuit. The documents consist of 1,200 pages.
http://www.thefogbow.com/forum/viewtopi ... in#p768649


Avatar by Tal Peleg Art of Makeup https://www.facebook.com/TalPelegMakeUp

TexasFilly
Posts: 17964
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 12:52 pm

Re: Stephanie Clifford aka Stormy Daniels v Donald J. Trump aka David Dennison, et. al. CA Superior Court

#46

Post by TexasFilly » Wed Mar 14, 2018 8:44 pm

I don’t think Jill is very smart. Her representation of him in the Trump University case was an astonishing success too!


I love the poorly educated!!!

I believe Anita Hill! I believe Dr. Ford!

User avatar
Reality Check
Posts: 15135
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: Stephanie Clifford aka Stormy Daniels v Donald J. Trump aka David Dennison, et. al. CA Superior Court

#47

Post by Reality Check » Wed Mar 14, 2018 9:29 pm

It goes against statements that Cohen has made that neither Trump nor the Trump organization was involved.

I suppose this answers the question some raised about Cohen not being admitted to practice in California. She was the stand in for Cohen.


"“If you’re not outraged, you’re not paying attention.”

Heather Heyer, November 2016

User avatar
Sterngard Friegen
Posts: 43903
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Location: Over the drawbridge

Re: Stephanie Clifford aka Stormy Daniels v Donald J. Trump aka David Dennison, et. al. CA Superior Court

#48

Post by Sterngard Friegen » Wed Mar 14, 2018 9:46 pm

TexasFilly wrote:
Wed Mar 14, 2018 8:44 pm
I don’t think Jill is very smart. Her representation of him in the Trump University case was an astonishing success too!
Address:
Trump National Golf Club Los Angeles
1 Trump National Dr
Rancho Palos verdes, CA 90275-6173



chancery
Posts: 1599
Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 5:51 pm

Re: Stephanie Clifford aka Stormy Daniels v Donald J. Trump aka David Dennison, et. al. CA Superior Court

#49

Post by chancery » Wed Mar 14, 2018 9:58 pm

Delurking:

I assumed that Stern was trolling us with the golf club address, but I looked it up and it's true. :swoon: :rotflmao:

Hidden Content
This board requires you to be registered and logged-in to view hidden content.



User avatar
Sterngard Friegen
Posts: 43903
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Location: Over the drawbridge

Re: Stephanie Clifford aka Stormy Daniels v Donald J. Trump aka David Dennison, et. al. CA Superior Court

#50

Post by Sterngard Friegen » Wed Mar 14, 2018 10:29 pm

Hidden Content
This board requires you to be registered and logged-in to view hidden content.



Post Reply

Return to “Trump Administration”