Sovcit nutz
Sovcit nutz
I don't see a place to post about random sovcit nutz here. If there is please delete this Foggy.
Anyway, this one from Trent is special.
Anyway, this one from Trent is special.
-
- Posts: 4491
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 4:50 pm
- Location: Down here!
- Foggy
- Dick Tater
- Posts: 11310
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 8:45 am
- Location: Fogbow HQ
- Occupation: Dick Tater/Space Cadet
- Verified: grumpy ol' geezer
Re: Sovcit nutz
Sounds like somebody dropped LSD and watched Monsters, Inc.
I'm Foggy and I forget if I approved this message.
- Flatpoint High
- Posts: 1671
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:58 am
- Location: Hotel California, PH523, Galaxy Central, M103
- Occupation: professional pain in the ass, voice actor & keeper of the straight face
- Verified: ✅
Re: Sovcit nutz
Florida sovcit gets his window busted a bit after 2 minutes into this video. The dude narrating it is kind of funny.
-
- Posts: 512
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:58 am
- Location: San Mateo, Calif
- Occupation: Slave to my cats
Re: Sovcit nutz
It's the sovcit/freeman/poot fantasy meeting reality.
Upon becoming "woke" the individual imagines he can free himself from all that car insurance-driver's license-auto registration-traffic laws-parking fees tyranny that is oppressing him.
We see the shock and rage upon seeing that fantasy so throughly trashed.
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:31 pm
Re: Sovcit nutz
Not sure where this belongs but here seems appropriate. Love the judge wish they were all like her
https://lawandcrime.com/crazy/larry-nas ... ons-watch/
https://lawandcrime.com/crazy/larry-nas ... ons-watch/
Knowledge is power, power corrupts. Study hard be evil.
Re: Sovcit nutz
Ha Ha - that is the Apple Bistro pretend attorney (Placerville CA). I love the Van Balion channel.Wanderinglord wrote: ↑Tue Mar 23, 2021 1:56 am Not sure where this belongs but here seems appropriate. Love the judge wish they were all like her
https://lawandcrime.com/crazy/larry-nas ... ons-watch/
https://www.mtdemocrat.com/news/2-cafes ... -licenses/
-
- Posts: 2263
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:13 pm
- Location: England
Re: Sovcit nutz
So refreshing to see a judge not entertaining any nonsense whatsoever from one of these loons. Hopefully some of the other deluded wannabe “lawyers” and their prospective, possibly pro se, “clients” will see the video.Wanderinglord wrote: ↑Tue Mar 23, 2021 1:56 am Not sure where this belongs but here seems appropriate. Love the judge wish they were all like her
If you can't lie to yourself, who can you lie to?
Re: Sovcit nutz
The response is inevitably, "Of course they failed; they didn't say the correct magick words. Which I will teach you, for three easy payment installments...."Uninformed wrote: ↑Tue Mar 23, 2021 7:43 amSo refreshing to see a judge not entertaining any nonsense whatsoever from one of these loons. Hopefully some of the other deluded wannabe “lawyers” and their prospective, possibly pro se, “clients” will see the video.Wanderinglord wrote: ↑Tue Mar 23, 2021 1:56 am Not sure where this belongs but here seems appropriate. Love the judge wish they were all like her
-
- Posts: 4491
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 4:50 pm
- Location: Down here!
Re: Sovcit nutz
And look who shows up in the article - "... Kris Ann Hall, who peddles a conspiracy theory that most of the federal government is unconstitutional and therefore its laws can be ignored."Dave from down under wrote: ↑Fri Mar 26, 2021 2:04 am Another elected LEO who is dangerous
https://coloradotimesrecorder.com/2021/ ... ist/35340/
You can't wait until life isn't hard anymore before you decide to be happy.
-
- Posts: 2263
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:13 pm
- Location: England
Re: Sovcit nutz
From the above quoted article:
“ CORRECTION 3/25/2021 — The phrases “sovereign citizens” and “sovereign citizens” were changed to “sovereign being” and “sovereign beings.”
Anybody aware of the difference between sovereign “citizens” and “beings”? An attempt avoid the bad reputation of “sovereign citizens”?
“ CORRECTION 3/25/2021 — The phrases “sovereign citizens” and “sovereign citizens” were changed to “sovereign being” and “sovereign beings.”
Anybody aware of the difference between sovereign “citizens” and “beings”? An attempt avoid the bad reputation of “sovereign citizens”?
If you can't lie to yourself, who can you lie to?
- fierceredpanda
- Posts: 590
- Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:11 pm
- Location: BAR Headquarters - Turn left at the portrait of George III
- Occupation: Criminal defense attorney. I am not your lawyer. My posts != legal advice.
Re: Sovcit nutz
I did a double-take at this, because I am much more accustomed to SovCits and their ilk arguing that Marbury v. Madison usurped the constitutional order and must be overturned, because it arrogated power to the Judiciary not granted in the Constitution. I know Roy Moore wrote opinions to that effect when he was on the bench. And you can kind of (just barely) see the faintest semblance of a point there, because John Marshall did kind of invent the notion of judicial review, until you remember that there'd be no fucking point to having a Judicial Branch at all if they didn't have some means to interpret the Constitution and tell the other two branches what it means.It was at the end of one of these perfectly reasonable responses, in this case to a man who was insisting the Supreme Court’s Marbury v. Madison ruling gives all Americans the right to ignore laws they don’t like, that Reams called state Rep. Leslie Herod (D-Denver) a “terrorist.”
On the other hand, this guy's reading of Marbury is just entertaining, and I encourage him to try it in court sometime, preferably where there are cameras.
"There's no play here. There's no angle. There's no champagne room. I'm not a miracle worker, I'm a janitor. The math on this is simple. The smaller the mess, the easier it is for me to clean up." -Michael Clayton
- noblepa
- Posts: 2616
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 2:55 pm
- Location: Bay Village, Ohio
- Occupation: Retired IT Nerd
Re: Sovcit nutz
Some sovcits argue that the phrase "sovereign citizen" is an oxymoron. If you're a citizen, you are, by definition, not sovereign. That is why some insist that they are not sovereign citizens, all the while screaming "I do not consent" and proclaiming that laws don't apply to them. They're not objecting to the "sovereign" part, but rather the "citizen" part.Uninformed wrote: ↑Fri Mar 26, 2021 7:07 am From the above quoted article:
“ CORRECTION 3/25/2021 — The phrases “sovereign citizens” and “sovereign citizens” were changed to “sovereign being” and “sovereign beings.”
Anybody aware of the difference between sovereign “citizens” and “beings”? An attempt avoid the bad reputation of “sovereign citizens”?
Many sovcits also claim to have renounced their US citizenship. Of course, they claim that, as non-citizens, the laws don't apply to them.
-
- Posts: 2263
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:13 pm
- Location: England
Re: Sovcit nutz
If only they would also see the “oxy” is redundant.
If you can't lie to yourself, who can you lie to?
- noblepa
- Posts: 2616
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 2:55 pm
- Location: Bay Village, Ohio
- Occupation: Retired IT Nerd
Re: Sovcit nutz
I believe that Marshall's reasoning was something like this. The Constitution states that it is the supreme law of the land. If further provides a process for amending the document, when the need arises. This process is distinctly different from the process to pass an ordinary statute. Therefore, Congress can not amend the Constitution by ordinary statute.fierceredpanda wrote: ↑Fri Mar 26, 2021 7:27 amI did a double-take at this, because I am much more accustomed to SovCits and their ilk arguing that Marbury v. Madison usurped the constitutional order and must be overturned, because it arrogated power to the Judiciary not granted in the Constitution. I know Roy Moore wrote opinions to that effect when he was on the bench. And you can kind of (just barely) see the faintest semblance of a point there, because John Marshall did kind of invent the notion of judicial review, until you remember that there'd be no fucking point to having a Judicial Branch at all if they didn't have some means to interpret the Constitution and tell the other two branches what it means.It was at the end of one of these perfectly reasonable responses, in this case to a man who was insisting the Supreme Court’s Marbury v. Madison ruling gives all Americans the right to ignore laws they don’t like, that Reams called state Rep. Leslie Herod (D-Denver) a “terrorist.”
On the other hand, this guy's reading of Marbury is just entertaining, and I encourage him to try it in court sometime, preferably where there are cameras.
If Congress passes a law that is contrary to the Constitution, and that law were allowed to stand, that statute would, effectively, be an amendment to the Constitution, even though it did not go through the prescribed process for amendments.
Therefore, any law that is contrary to the Constitution is no law. If the court were not allowed to overturn a law as unconstitutional, then Congress could and would run roughshod over the Constitution, passing all kinds of things that exceed the authority granted to them by that document.
On a practical level, the notion of Judicial Review has worked remarkably well for 230 years, keeping Congress in check and not allowing them to exceed their authority. It is not perfect, and reasonable people can disagree (without being disagreeable, to quote Ronald Reagan) over a particular decision, but, all in all, the process works pretty well.
The sovcits are the first to agree that a law that is contrary to the Constitution is no law, ab initio, to use one of their favorite latin phrases. Where they go wrong is that they think that they, themselves, get to decide that a law is unconstitutional. In our system, right or wrong, it is the court system, particularly the Supreme Court that makes that determination. I can have an opinion about whether a law is constitutional or not, but my opinion carries no legal weight. If SCOTUS says a law is constitutional, then it IS constitutional.
Re: Sovcit nutz
No true SovCit would say the wrong magick wordz.bob wrote: ↑Tue Mar 23, 2021 1:58 pmThe response is inevitably, "Of course they failed; they didn't say the correct magick words. Which I will teach you, for three easy payment installments...."Uninformed wrote: ↑Tue Mar 23, 2021 7:43 amSo refreshing to see a judge not entertaining any nonsense whatsoever from one of these loons. Hopefully some of the other deluded wannabe “lawyers” and their prospective, possibly pro se, “clients” will see the video.Wanderinglord wrote: ↑Tue Mar 23, 2021 1:56 am Not sure where this belongs but here seems appropriate. Love the judge wish they were all like her
- northland10
- Posts: 6609
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 6:47 pm
- Location: Northeast Illinois
- Occupation: Organist/Choir Director/Fundraising Data Analyst
- Verified: ✅ I'm me.
Re: Sovcit nutz
And yet, they must be because they keep losing when they try them. It's ap0rtia wrote: ↑Fri Mar 26, 2021 10:27 amNo true SovCit would say the wrong magick wordz.bob wrote: ↑Tue Mar 23, 2021 1:58 pmThe response is inevitably, "Of course they failed; they didn't say the correct magick words. Which I will teach you, for three easy payment installments...."Uninformed wrote: ↑Tue Mar 23, 2021 7:43 am
So refreshing to see a judge not entertaining any nonsense whatsoever from one of these loons. Hopefully some of the other deluded wannabe “lawyers” and their prospective, possibly pro se, “clients” will see the video.
When you hear a window smash, it means another SovCit got their wings.
Attempting to find consistency in SovCit claims is likely finding empathy in Trump. It just ain't there. That's because all of the claims, ideology, and magic words are based on 2 core beliefs:
1. Nobody can tell me what to do.
2. Everybody is out to get me.
101010
Re: Sovcit nutz
If anybody likes watching breakdowns of the more dedicated sovcits I'd recommend watching Arty's corporate fiction on YouTube. There's a couple really good ones with Trent starting with him losing his shit in the comments it's great :p
"...don't teach a man to fish. He's a grown man and fishings not that hard." Ron Swanson the worlds only good libertarian
- Gregg
- Posts: 5502
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 1:54 am
- Location: Cincinnati, Gettysburg
- Occupation: We build cars
Re: Sovcit nutz
crossing the Rio Grande
Supreme Commander, Imperial Illuminati Air Force
You don't have to consent, but I'm gonna tase you anyway.
You don't have to consent, but I'm gonna tase you anyway.
Re: Sovcit nutz
Big pile of stoopid at this NH site.
https://cosnh.com/
https://cosnh.com/
Re: Sovcit nutz
Thought this might be parody but looked at his page and NOPE. Total nutter. Might not be a sovcit so maybe wrong thread but whatever. Found it while looking at Flatcap stuff.