Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.


All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1503 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 61  Next   
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 1:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2011 5:41 pm
Posts: 4077
Hmmm...I wonder if that rhesus monkey has a black lawyer suit. :P

4th Appellate District Division 3
Quote:
Case Summary
Trial Court Case: 30-2012-00582135
Court of Appeal Case: G047746
Division:
Case Caption: Taitz v. Occidental College
Case Type: CV
Filing Date: 12/03/2012
Oral Argument Date/Time:
Cross Referenced Cases:
G045351 Taitz v. Dunn

Docket
Quote:
Date Description Notes
12/10/2012 Notice of appeal lodged/received. by aplt Orly Taitz - also appealing date 11/7/12
12/10/2012 Default notice sent-appellant notified per rule 8.100(c).


Future Scheduled Actions
Quote:
Taitz v. Occidental College
Case Number G047746

Description Due Date Notes
Record on appeal filed. 03/04/2013
Civil case information statement filed. 12/20/2012
Appeal dismissed per rule 8.100(c). 12/26/2012

_________________
"Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication." -Leonardo da Vinci


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 1:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 10:42 pm
Posts: 4450
Location: The 808
Occupation: World-class procrastinator and perpetual late-bloomer.
](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,)

It's like she wants to get sanctioned.

_________________
"And with the advent of LexisNexis and WestLaw, there is no more need for attorneys to spend hours researching. The relevant case law simply comes straight to the computer, ready to be copied to a word processor."
--Larry "Leisure Suit" Klayman


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 1:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 1:22 pm
Posts: 13154
Location: Supreme Court of clerks
Occupation: Petite treason procurer
AnitaMaria wrote:
Case Caption: Taitz v. Occidental College

So it looks like Taitz is just appealing her sanction.

_________________
Image x 2 Image Image x 3 Image x 3

ASSUME ANYTHING WRITTEN HERE WILL END UP ON TAITZ'S SITE AND FACEBOOK. AND JEROME CORSI WILL POST SCREENSHOTS TO WND. AND WILL BE FILED BY A BIRTHER AS AN EXHIBIT IN FEDERAL COURT. NOW HAVE FUN!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 1:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 27301
2010 California Rules of Court
Rule 8.100. Filing the appeal


Quote:
(c) Failure to pay filing fee

(1) The reviewing court clerk must promptly notify the appellant in writing if:

(A) The reviewing court receives a notice of appeal without the filing fee required by (b)(1), a certificate of cash payment under (e)(5), or an application for, or order granting, a fee waiver under rule 8.26;

(B) A check for the filing fee is dishonored; or

(C) An application for a waiver under rule 8.26 is denied.

(2) A clerk's notice under (1)(A) or (B) must state that the court may dismiss the appeal unless, within 15 days after the notice is sent, the appellant either:

(A) Pays the fee; or

(B) Files an application for a waiver under rule 8.26 if the appellant has not previously filed such an application.

(3) If the appellant fails to take the action specified in a notice given under (2), the reviewing court may dismiss the appeal, but may vacate the dismissal for good cause.

(Subd (c) amended effective July 1, 2009; previously amended effective January 1, 2007, and January 1, 2008.)

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


Image x 4 Image x 34


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 1:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2011 5:41 pm
Posts: 4077
I think she's going to argue that she can't defend herself against the sanctions without seeing Obama's Oxy records because she believes that they will show that Obama is a usurper and that her jihad against democracy is justified.

_________________
"Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication." -Leonardo da Vinci


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 2:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2012 1:20 am
Posts: 56
Location: Western NY. Middle of nowhere nearish Buffalo
Occupation: Small business owner
I have two questions.

1) Would they even have Obama's records after all these years?

2) Aren't said records protected under US privacy laws?

If the answer to one or the other is yes then isn't she just ](*,) ?

_________________
My mind is aglow with whirling, transient nodes of thought careening through a cosmic vapor of invention.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 2:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 1:22 pm
Posts: 13154
Location: Supreme Court of clerks
Occupation: Petite treason procurer
Liz wrote:
2) Aren't said records protected under US privacy laws?

Yes, but as Taitz artfully articulated in the superior court,* there's an exception for national security!

* NOT.

_________________
Image x 2 Image Image x 3 Image x 3

ASSUME ANYTHING WRITTEN HERE WILL END UP ON TAITZ'S SITE AND FACEBOOK. AND JEROME CORSI WILL POST SCREENSHOTS TO WND. AND WILL BE FILED BY A BIRTHER AS AN EXHIBIT IN FEDERAL COURT. NOW HAVE FUN!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 2:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 1:30 pm
Posts: 3037
Location: Virginia
Occupation: FEMA Camp Activities & Re-Education Coordinator.
I have a IANAL question too. If it were her intent to appeal the sanction, wouldn’t she have been required to do so before she became delinquent on paying it? Or did she somehow slip that one under the wire?

_________________
On the June day of 14, 192011.
MsDaisy makes fun of the stupid @: http://crazyinternetpeople.blogspot.com/
ImageImageImageImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 2:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 6:19 pm
Posts: 2802
Location: Hollywood (okay, the Valley)
Occupation: Some-time, big-time studio numbers shuffler; full-time gadfly
How much is the fee? Just trying to see how quickly she is pruning Yossi's money tree. Which I just love.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 2:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:56 pm
Posts: 10413
MsDaisy wrote:
I have a IANAL question too. If it were her intent to appeal the sanction, wouldn’t she have been required to do so before she became delinquent on paying it? Or did she somehow slip that one under the wire?


Those are basically two separate timelines. Filing a notice of appeal doesn't keep the judgment creditor from collecting on the debt. That would require a stay in the trial court. Usually, such a stay is obtained by putting up a supersedeas bond, which stays collection pending the outcome of the appeal, as well as satisfying the debt if the appeal is denied.

The odds of Orly doing this? Zero.

I'm not sure if she appealed on time, but it would be a separate issue.

_________________
"I no doubt deserved my enemies but I don't believe I deserved my friends." -- Walt Whitman


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 2:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 1:30 pm
Posts: 3037
Location: Virginia
Occupation: FEMA Camp Activities & Re-Education Coordinator.
A Legal Lohengrin wrote:

Those are basically two separate timelines. Filing a notice of appeal doesn't keep the judgment creditor from collecting on the debt. That would require a stay in the trial court. Usually, such a stay is obtained by putting up a supersedeas bond, which stays collection pending the outcome of the appeal, as well as satisfying the debt if the appeal is denied.

The odds of Orly doing this? Zero.

I'm not sure if she appealed on time, but it would be a separate issue.


Thanks

_________________
On the June day of 14, 192011.
MsDaisy makes fun of the stupid @: http://crazyinternetpeople.blogspot.com/
ImageImageImageImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 2:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 9:27 am
Posts: 4406
Liz wrote:
I have two questions.

1) Would they even have Obama's records after all these years?

I recall another member posted the Occidental records retention policy a while ago. No, they have nothing except the grade transcripts. All the other crap she and others seek was destroyed back in the Reagan era.

_________________
@Orly: "No one is listening to you anymore. And that’s the way it should always be." - Scott J. Tepper (11/5/2012)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 2:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 1:22 pm
Posts: 13154
Location: Supreme Court of clerks
Occupation: Petite treason procurer
A Legal Lohengrin wrote:
I'm not sure if she appealed on time, but it would be a separate issue.

I don't have the dates in front of me, but her filing the NOA was relatively prompt after the judge dismissed the case.

And, as Irion learned in the 6th Circuit, a sanction order is not a final, appealable order.

_________________
Image x 2 Image Image x 3 Image x 3

ASSUME ANYTHING WRITTEN HERE WILL END UP ON TAITZ'S SITE AND FACEBOOK. AND JEROME CORSI WILL POST SCREENSHOTS TO WND. AND WILL BE FILED BY A BIRTHER AS AN EXHIBIT IN FEDERAL COURT. NOW HAVE FUN!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 2:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:56 pm
Posts: 10413
bob wrote:
A Legal Lohengrin wrote:
I'm not sure if she appealed on time, but it would be a separate issue.

I don't have the dates in front of me, but her filing the NOA was relatively prompt after the judge dismissed the case.

And, as Irion learned in the 6th Circuit, a sanction order is not a final, appealable order.


Of course, this is a case in which no party, to my knowledge, has ever appeared, and the sanctions dispose entirely of the only issue ever raised in the case, that is, the motion to compel a non-party. It seems the case would have to be dismissed before it is final as to all parties, but then, Orly has utterly failed even to serve it on anyone, so who will file such a motion?

I suppose it may languish for a while before being dismissed sua sponte for failure to prosecute, but I am pretty sure Occidental can go forward with collection, should they choose to do so.

What is a civil rights decedent to do?

It's a pickle!

_________________
"I no doubt deserved my enemies but I don't believe I deserved my friends." -- Walt Whitman


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 3:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 1:22 pm
Posts: 13154
Location: Supreme Court of clerks
Occupation: Petite treason procurer
A Legal Lohengrin wrote:
I suppose it may languish for a while before being dismissed sua sponte for failure to prosecute, but I am pretty sure Occidental can go forward with collection, should they choose to do so.

IIRC, the trial court dismissed the entire action. (That's when Taitz was bragging she didn't have to pay the sanction because it wasn't referenced in the final order.)

_________________
Image x 2 Image Image x 3 Image x 3

ASSUME ANYTHING WRITTEN HERE WILL END UP ON TAITZ'S SITE AND FACEBOOK. AND JEROME CORSI WILL POST SCREENSHOTS TO WND. AND WILL BE FILED BY A BIRTHER AS AN EXHIBIT IN FEDERAL COURT. NOW HAVE FUN!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 3:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 27301
bob wrote:
A Legal Lohengrin wrote:
I suppose it may languish for a while before being dismissed sua sponte for failure to prosecute, but I am pretty sure Occidental can go forward with collection, should they choose to do so.

IIRC, the trial court dismissed the entire action. (That's when Taitz was bragging she didn't have to pay the sanction because it wasn't referenced in the final order.)


http://www.scribd.com/doc/112555117/CA- ... g-Petition

http://www.scribd.com/doc/115057011/CA- ... -Prejudice

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


Image x 4 Image x 34


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 3:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 12:36 pm
Posts: 2770
neonzx wrote:
All the other crap she and others seek was destroyed back in the Reagan era.


Reagan!

Wow, the Obama Conspiracy goes deeper than we thought!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 3:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 12:52 pm
Posts: 13321
There are just so many things wrong right with this!

This board requires you to be registered and logged-in before you can view hidden messages

_________________
"All this talk about blowjobs makes me want to SUE SOMEBODY"-- Sterngard Friegen (quoting Thomas Jefferson)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 3:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 6:47 pm
Posts: 4195
Location: USA
Occupation: Cat petter, RN with license voluntarily inactive, just like Michelle Obama's law license.
neonzx wrote:
Liz wrote:
I have two questions.

1) Would they even have Obama's records after all these years?

I recall another member posted the Occidental records retention policy a while ago. No, they have nothing except the grade transcripts. All the other crap she and others seek was destroyed back in the Reagan era.


According to them, they still had his picture that was sent in with his application.

Quote:
Neither Obama’s image nor name appear in any Occidental yearbooks or weekly student newspaper for the years he attended. The picture featured on this page is the only one we have of the senator; it was sent in with his Occidental application.


http://web.archive.org/web/200809150017 ... /x7992.xml

_________________
Why is it easier to be a conservative than a liberal?
Because it’s much easier to give people the finger...
than to offer a helping hand. -Mike Royko


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 3:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:56 pm
Posts: 10413
bob wrote:
A Legal Lohengrin wrote:
I suppose it may languish for a while before being dismissed sua sponte for failure to prosecute, but I am pretty sure Occidental can go forward with collection, should they choose to do so.

IIRC, the trial court dismissed the entire action. (That's when Taitz was bragging she didn't have to pay the sanction because it wasn't referenced in the final order.)


Well, as Emily Litella might say: "Never mind!"

_________________
"I no doubt deserved my enemies but I don't believe I deserved my friends." -- Walt Whitman


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 3:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2010 5:10 pm
Posts: 6647
Location: My business address is in Pennsylvania
bob wrote:
A Legal Lohengrin wrote:
I'm not sure if she appealed on time, but it would be a separate issue.

I don't have the dates in front of me, but her filing the NOA was relatively prompt after the judge dismissed the case.

And, as Irion learned in the 6th Circuit, a sanction order is not a final, appealable order.


The NOA is timely, yes the case was dismissed, and the timeline for appealing the sanctions is not the same one as for the case-in-chief.

This is not the 6th Circuit. Further, affiant sayeth naught.

_________________
ImageImage
Image
ImageImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 3:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2009 6:06 am
Posts: 5779
Location: Glocca Morra
bob wrote:
AnitaMaria wrote:
Case Caption: Taitz v. Occidental College

So it looks like Taitz is just appealing her sanction.


Umm... How can she appeal something she so stridently asserted didn't happen?

Orlylogic is a pickle.

_________________
"What's it like being an atheist? It's like being the only sober person in a car full of drunks, and they refuse to let you drive." Thomas Jefferson

Birtherism is so ridiculous that I no longer feel obligated to treat proponents w/slightest degree of respect or civility


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 4:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 4:17 am
Posts: 5950
Location: between the candle and the star
Occupation: Manager, FEMA Camp 2112
realist wrote:
bob wrote:
A Legal Lohengrin wrote:
I suppose it may languish for a while before being dismissed sua sponte for failure to prosecute, but I am pretty sure Occidental can go forward with collection, should they choose to do so.

IIRC, the trial court dismissed the entire action. (That's when Taitz was bragging she didn't have to pay the sanction because it wasn't referenced in the final order.)


http://www.scribd.com/doc/112555117/CA- ... g-Petition

http://www.scribd.com/doc/115057011/CA- ... -Prejudice


Those just crack me up. She failed to properly serve three different people in 3 totally different ways, and had 3 uncorrectable, fatal errors to her petition, resulting in a dismissal with prejudice. HOW can you fuck up that many ways in ONE try?

_________________
I am gray...

I stand between the candle and the star
...between the darkness and the light

-- Paraphrased from "Babylon 5" created by J. Michael Straczynski

"Ignorance and prejudice and fear walk hand in hand'
-- from "Witch Hunt" by Rush on their "Moving Pictures" album.

Facebook
Shadows in Wonderland
- we stand in the sun and look back in our tracks
an image of self in grays and in blacks
laughter and joy hold us in there sweet thrall
but even in Wonderland shadows must fall


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 5:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 3:38 pm
Posts: 2029
Location: about 26,000 light years from the center of the Milky Way Galaxy,
Occupation: Chemtrail Scheduling Supervisor, Southwest Division
lyssandri wrote:
She failed to properly serve three different people in 3 totally different ways, and had 3 uncorrectable, fatal errors to her petition, resulting in a dismissal with prejudice. HOW can you fuck up that many ways in ONE try?


Sterngard Friegen wrote:
If there are a finite number of ways to screw something up, Orly Taitz will find an infinite number of ways to do so.

_________________
“I wish I would have a real tragic love affair and get so bummed out that I'd just quit my job and become a bum for a few years, because I was thinking about doing that anyway.”
Jack Handey


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 5:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 5:41 pm
Posts: 7175
Location: Edmonds, WA
lyssandri wrote:
Those just crack me up. She failed to properly serve three different people in 3 totally different ways, and had 3 uncorrectable, fatal errors to her petition, resulting in a dismissal with prejudice. HOW can you fuck up that many ways in ONE try?


Simple. Dr. Orly is the avatar of the God of Legal Fuck-Ups.

_________________
Bad Fiction - The Intersection of Bad Movies and Worse Politics


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1503 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 61  Next   

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: obot 1024 and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
View new posts | View active topics



Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group