#AZAudit Maricopa & Other Arizona County Election Audits - #CyberNinjas / Jovan Pulitzer / Fann / Birther Ken Bennett

[roadscholar]

And supporting the OSG drove them literally insane, some of them.

Q2HzSpt.jpeg (89.15 KiB) Viewed 1866 times

[LM K]

Arizona Supreme Court delays release of election audit records

The Arizona Supreme Court said Tuesday that contractors hired by the Republican-led state Senate to conduct the Maricopa County 2020 election audit would not need to release records from their review by next week.

This is only a temporary delay, as Kathryn King, a justice on the state's high court, put a hold on a lower court ruling that ordered the documents released by Aug. 31 while the case is under consideration.


"It is ordered extending the stay to enable the Court to fully consider the issues raised in the petition for review. However, this order does not relieve the Petitioners from continuing to review and produce documents Petitioners have already agreed to produce," King wrote on Tuesday.

[Luke]

Mary Jo Pitzl @maryjpitzl 21m
Attorneys for the GOP Senate team that will review the @cyberninjas 2020 election audit say they have not yet received any draft, partial or otherwise

[LM K]

Mary Jo Pitzl @maryjpitzl 21m
Attorneys for the GOP Senate team that will review the @cyberninjas 2020 election audit say they have not yet received any draft, partial or otherwise

Fann is so fucking full of shit.

[Jim]

Mary Jo Pitzl @maryjpitzl 21m
Attorneys for the GOP Senate team that will review the @cyberninjas 2020 election audit say they have not yet received any draft, partial or otherwise

Fann is so fucking full of shit.

For such an important audit with implications through-out the voting systems of multiple states and getting the correct winner in the WH, 9 months is an awful long time after the election to STILL be trying to figure out how to run an audit.

[Luke]

What drugs kicked in for Kelli on this Newsmax interview? Whoooosh!




And new...

The AZ - abc15 - Data Guru @Garrett_Archer 1m
#AZAudit update. This morning's meeting between state senate team and some audit leaders did take place but due to the covid situation with the auditors no report, partial or otherwise was reviewed.

[raison de arizona]

Mary Jo Pitzl @maryjpitzl 21m
Attorneys for the GOP Senate team that will review the @cyberninjas 2020 election audit say they have not yet received any draft, partial or otherwise

Fann is so fucking full of shit.

It would appear so. She can't get her story straight, here is what she told the Arizona Daily Independent yesterday (Tuesday):

But Cyber Ninjas’ CEO Doug Logan and two other key audit officials recently tested positive for COVID-19, Fann announced. That resulted in only a fraction of the draft being sent to Fann on Monday, although the rest of Cyber Ninjas’ draft report is expected in the coming days.

On Wednesday, Fann will oversee a nine-person confidential meeting to begin the review of what was received from Cyber Ninjas. The final audit report will not be released to the public until it is delivered to Sen. Warren Petersen, chair of the Senate’s Judiciary Committee.

As to what information will be included in that final audit report, Fann is adamant information and data from sources unrelated to the Senate or the Cyber Ninjas’ audit team will not be considered.

https://arizonadailyindependent.com/202 ... y-ballots/

Also, too:

[LM K]

It would appear so. She can't get her story straight, here is what she told the Arizona Daily Independent yesterday (Tuesday):

But Cyber Ninjas’ CEO Doug Logan and two other key audit officials recently tested positive for COVID-19, Fann announced. That resulted in only a fraction of the draft being sent to Fann on Monday, although the rest of Cyber Ninjas’ draft report is expected in the coming days.

On Wednesday, Fann will oversee a nine-person confidential meeting to begin the review of what was received from Cyber Ninjas. The final audit report will not be released to the public until it is delivered to Sen. Warren Petersen, chair of the Senate’s Judiciary Committee.

As to what information will be included in that final audit report, Fann is adamant information and data from sources unrelated to the Senate or the Cyber Ninjas’ audit team will not be considered.

https://arizonadailyindependent.com/202 ... y-ballots/

Also, too:

So they didn't discuss the report ... at all? WTF.

[Ben-Prime]

So... who has the Tallit of invisibility?

I lost it while doing the laundry.

I mean, it's *invisible*, alright?

[raison de arizona]

Kyra Haas
@kc_haas
·
Aug 25, 2021
Senate liaison Randy Pullen said Cyber Ninjas did not submit a report & that the meeting today was focused on planning & "the process of getting the report completed and out the door."

"There's no report," Pullen said. He did not have a timeline for when to expect a draft.

Half past never.

► Show Spoiler

[Slim Cognito]

So... who has the Tallit of invisibility?

I lost it while doing the laundry.

I mean, it's *invisible*, alright?

It's with all their missing socks.

[Gregg]

There are some people who are reading those message boards, with all that ''fuck this, get your guns and let's go make them" postings and who also know the "audit" found bupkis.

Those people are scared, because when a cult collapses its not uncommon for a lot of people to die.

[raison de arizona]

Not only are they looking to stiff them on the voting machine costs, but they are looking to stiff them on ALL sales tax for the year??? WTF.

Attorney general: Maricopa County supervisors violated law by not complying with election audit subpoena

The Maricopa County Board of Supervisors violated state law by not fully responding to subpoenas from the Arizona Senate related to the ongoing review of the 2020 election, Attorney General Mark Brnovich has concluded.

The finding means the supervisors have until Sept. 27 to comply or face the prospect of losing hundreds of millions of dollars of sales-tax revenue the state shares with the county.

The supervisors contended they broke no laws because the Senate had no ability to enforce its subpoena powers once the legislative session ended on June 30.

But the Attorney General investigation found that argument only speaks to a remedy to enforcing a subpoena and does not address the fact that ignoring a subpoena is illegal.

"That argument, which addresses only the possible remedy for violating a legislative subpoena, is irrelevant to whether (the board) is in violation of state law in the first place," Solicitor General Brunn "Beau" W. Roysden III wrote in the report.

State Sen. Sonny Borrelli, R-Lake Havasu City, used a power lawmakers created several years ago that triggers an investigation into possible violations of state law by cities, towns and counties. If found in violation, the local governments face the prospect of losing state-shared revenue.

In this case, Maricopa County gets a share of state sales tax that last year amounted to $715 million.

https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/po ... 601498001/

[Slim Cognito]

Does the AG have the final word or can this be taken up in court? It sounds like some idiot in the AZ Senate can ask for anything, no matter how ridiculous, knowing it can't be turned over, and then strip the county of funding for noncompliance.

[neeneko]

Does the AG have the final word or can this be taken up in court? It sounds like some idiot in the AZ Senate can ask for anything, no matter how ridiculous, knowing it can't be turned over, and then strip the county of funding for noncompliance.

The Attorney General's report suggested there are ways to remedy the standoff without the prospect of losing tax revenue. For example, the supervisors could reach a negotiated settlement with the Senate, hand over the materials or take the matter to court.

So looks like they have options, though a negotiated settlement seems unlikely since I doubt the senate really wants the information in the first place.

[Gregg]

Somebody, anybody, has to step in a put an end to this madness. This is Lewis Carol on Acid government.

[LM K]

Lawyers:

Questions.

-The senate hasn't tried to enforce the subpoenas. They could vote to hold MCBOS in contempt, but they decided not to because they don't have enough votes to do that. They haven't asked a judge to enforce the subpoenas.

-The senate has constantly said this was about the election. They have subpoenaed all the physical routers or images of the routers and a map of the entire county network.

Can the MCBOS take this to court to argue that they aren't required to provide the entire network's information.

-Cyber Ninjas, in April, said the Dominion machines weren't connected to the internet. If MCBOS goes to court to squash the subpoena, would a judge squash this part of the subpoena for that reason?

-MCBOS doesn't have the passwords for Dominion's machines. Dominion won't give MCBOS the passwords. If MCBOS can't provide what they don't have, what then?

-The senate said for a week that a draft report was finished. It isn't. But would MCBOS have a solid argument that the network info isn't necessary because the preliminary report is allegedly completed?

-Using the AG was a work around because the senate won't come back in session to vote to hold MCBOS in contempt (they truly don't have the votes) and because they don't want to go Infront of a judge whom would likely squash the subpoena.

The senate won't do it's job.

[woodworker]

Re: "can the Senate sue . . . "

Yes, the Senate can sue, can file any complaints they want and can file any objections they want. Remember, anyone can sue, draft a "complaint" and pay the filing fee. The question is whether or not an AZ court will listen to their suit and their objections. I have some trust in AZ courts and if a complaint, etc. were to end up in the court that decided that the Senate had to turn over records, I would have some confidence that the court would actually rule based on the law and facts. But remember that most of the AZ judges are republicans and pray that their honor their oaths to be non-partisan.

[Foggy]

It was crazy to give CN all the actual ballots, with no procedures or oversight.

So who knows how deep the crazy might go? We're in uncharted waters here, as we have been for 5 years.

[raison de arizona]

So how long does a few CN's being sick buy them? A week so far. I wonder how many weeks this one will turn into. Anyway, in the meantime, Senator Rogers is still focused (when she's not criss-crossing the country performing in the rigged election melodramas.)



SB1487 is the law that lets the legislature withhold funding to cities, towns, counties that are found by the AZ AG to have violated state law.

[RTH10260]

So how long does a few CN's being sick buy them? A week so far. I wonder how many weeks this one will turn into. Anyway, in the meantime, Senator Rogers is still focused (when she's not criss-crossing the country performing in the rigged election melodramas.)
https:// twitter.com/PatrickDowns/status/1431397883576651777

https:// twitter.com/Steve_Gallardo/status/1431409234743234561
SB1487 is the law that lets the legislature withhold funding to cities, towns, counties that are found by the AZ AG to have violated state law.

Which part of "the legislature" (not the executive!) has the power to block the finances? Remember the legislators are currently not in session to vote on such a measure.

[raison de arizona]

So how long does a few CN's being sick buy them? A week so far. I wonder how many weeks this one will turn into. Anyway, in the meantime, Senator Rogers is still focused (when she's not criss-crossing the country performing in the rigged election melodramas.)
https:// twitter.com/PatrickDowns/status/1431397883576651777

https:// twitter.com/Steve_Gallardo/status/1431409234743234561
SB1487 is the law that lets the legislature withhold funding to cities, towns, counties that are found by the AZ AG to have violated state law.

Which part of "the legislature" (not the executive!) has the power to block the finances? Remember the legislators are currently not in session to vote on such a measure.

Here’s the law: https://www.azleg.gov/legtext/52leg/2r/ ... b1487p.pdf

I’ll have to read it more carefully, but it seems to me that after the AG is involved, that office works directly with the state Treasurer to withhold funds, I’m not sure the legislature is actually involved at that point anymore other than receiving reports.

I could be wrong, it’s early and the language is confusing me.

[sugar magnolia]

This is one of those situations where "Fine. Let them withhold all the money and see how fast people move to "our side" of the argument." is an argument that works for me. Sort of like Desantis threatening to withhold school board salaries. Back those motherfuckers into a corner all day long.

[RTH10260]

When is the next vote or election due in Maricopa County ?

[raison de arizona]

When is the next vote or election due in Maricopa County ?

Next set of local elections are all mail on 11/2.
https://recorder.maricopa.gov/elections ... endar.aspx