Mississippi Ballot Challenge (ACT I & I.5) :)

User avatar
Plutodog
Posts: 11151
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 10:11 pm

Mississippi Ballot Challenge (ACT I & I.5) :)

Post #5026 by Plutodog » Mon Sep 24, 2012 6:43 pm

OK, I paypal'd up. This should be great! And that's on top of the fantastic work of our bootz on ground! :hug: Glad that (according to our fashion report) all the bootz and defendants' attorneys were impeccable and sexy and smelled good and stuff. \ :D / Wish rikker had been behind Taitz for another soul-sucking vision! :twisted: :dazed:


The only good Bundy is an Al Bundy.

User avatar
Foggy
Posts: 22351
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 12:00 pm
Location: Fogbow HQ (Rawly NC)
Occupation: Dick Tater

Mississippi Ballot Challenge (ACT I & I.5) :)

Post #5027 by Foggy » Mon Sep 24, 2012 7:09 pm

Yeah, I'm looking forward to RC Radio too. So is Foggy going to run the show tonight?

Yes. Between now and then, I hope to catch up with the threads!



User avatar
Mark
Posts: 2307
Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 8:47 pm

Mississippi Ballot Challenge (ACT I & I.5) :)

Post #5028 by Mark » Mon Sep 24, 2012 7:16 pm

What's the anticipated cost for the expedited transcript?


And that's all I have to say about that. :smoking:

User avatar
Sugar Magnolia
Posts: 6732
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2012 6:44 am

Mississippi Ballot Challenge (ACT I & I.5) :)

Post #5029 by Sugar Magnolia » Mon Sep 24, 2012 7:16 pm

The Taitz hearing report got about a minute and a half on WLBT. A short statement from Orly on camera, but one question was answered. There was a younger (that's a relative term in this instance) woman there who seemed a bit out of place but they showed her walking into the building talking on a phone so she must be an attorney.WLBT is pretty good about updating their website so the segment may be available soon.



User avatar
SuzieC
Posts: 1042
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 1:27 pm
Location: Swing State Central

Mississippi Ballot Challenge (ACT I & I.5) :)

Post #5030 by SuzieC » Mon Sep 24, 2012 7:38 pm

Clicked the Contribute to Fogbow button.



User avatar
GreatGrey
Posts: 7995
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2009 6:06 am
Location: Living in the Anthropocene

Mississippi Ballot Challenge (ACT I & I.5) :)

Post #5031 by GreatGrey » Mon Sep 24, 2012 7:58 pm




User avatar
Mikedunford
Posts: 6648
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 9:42 pm

Mississippi Ballot Challenge (ACT I & I.5) :)

Post #5032 by Mikedunford » Mon Sep 24, 2012 8:02 pm

What's the anticipated cost for the expedited transcript?

Expedited transcripts can run 6-10 dollars per page or more. Given the apparent length of this hearing and how quickly Orly talks, it wouldn't shock me if the transcript runs 50+ pages.


"Sticklers unite, you have nothing to lose but your sense of proportion, and arguably you didn't have a lot of that to begin with."
--Lynne Truss
Eats, Shoots & Leaves

User avatar
DrConspiracy
Posts: 587
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 3:04 pm

Mississippi Ballot Challenge (ACT I & I.5) :)

Post #5033 by DrConspiracy » Mon Sep 24, 2012 8:03 pm

There's a lot of that going on....The defense asked for sanctions against Taitz back way back in March when the case was in state court. Then Orly filed a complaint against Whoever with the California Bar Association (declined) and filed a demand for sanctions in federal court because the defense asked for the court to take judicial notice (they didn't) of a forged document (it isn't). Finally, Whoever threatened Taitz today with a motion for sanctions if she adds more plaintiffs without a darned good reason.

Yeah - the motion for sanctions goes to the court and the judge decides that, while the bar complaint goes to the bar association for them to decide on.

I apologize I was inelegant in my question. I was referring to the reason. I thought the reason for sanctions was because judicial notice of the COLB or something because Whoever & Begley had dared enter it into the record. But I think that was dealing with the bar complaint.




User avatar
Mikedunford
Posts: 6648
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 9:42 pm

Mississippi Ballot Challenge (ACT I & I.5) :)

Post #5034 by Mikedunford » Mon Sep 24, 2012 8:03 pm

And the Judge seemed quite well prepared.

Hell, he even watched her DVD.

Are you shitting me??? Seriously???


"Sticklers unite, you have nothing to lose but your sense of proportion, and arguably you didn't have a lot of that to begin with."
--Lynne Truss
Eats, Shoots & Leaves

User avatar
listeme
Posts: 4495
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 11:09 am

Mississippi Ballot Challenge (ACT I & I.5) :)

Post #5035 by listeme » Mon Sep 24, 2012 8:05 pm

What's the anticipated cost for the expedited transcript?

Expedited transcripts can run 6-10 dollars per page or more. Given the apparent length of this hearing and how quickly Orly talks, it wouldn't shock me if the transcript runs 50+ pages.

Wasn't it a couple hours? It would be at least 80 pages.


Say what you mean.

User avatar
Plutodog
Posts: 11151
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 10:11 pm

Mississippi Ballot Challenge (ACT I & I.5) :)

Post #5036 by Plutodog » Mon Sep 24, 2012 8:10 pm

I guess that fits within 50+. But :shock: we're approaching $1K. Keep that paypal kachinging! Maybe we can get the FM's to chip in? :lol:


The only good Bundy is an Al Bundy.

User avatar
GreatGrey
Posts: 7995
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2009 6:06 am
Location: Living in the Anthropocene

Mississippi Ballot Challenge (ACT I & I.5) :)

Post #5037 by GreatGrey » Mon Sep 24, 2012 8:12 pm

What's the anticipated cost for the expedited transcript?

Expedited transcripts can run 6-10 dollars per page or more. Given the apparent length of this hearing and how quickly Orly talks, it wouldn't shock me if the transcript runs 50+ pages.

Wasn't it a couple hours? It would be at least 80 pages.

From my notes there was just under 2 hours of actual court time.



neonzx
Posts: 4413
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 9:27 am

Mississippi Ballot Challenge (ACT I & I.5) :)

Post #5038 by neonzx » Mon Sep 24, 2012 8:15 pm

:evil: [link]http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=313534,http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=313534[/link] :evil:


Report on MS. Case moves on, next hearing in about a month. The judge stated on the record that he watched the press conference by Sheriff Arpaio. Did not issue judicial notice of Obama’ BC as Dems wanted





Posted on | September 24, 2012 | No Comments





I am now changing planes and am flying to Indiana. MS case was not dismissed. Summons to Obama, Pelosi, “Obama for America”, Astrue and others were issued by the federal court. Judge Wingate stated that he watched the video that I submitted into evidence of Arpaio’s press conference and witness testimony in GA. Judge did not issue a judicial notice as Dem party sought.





I was able to catch Dem party attorney Scott J. Whoever lying in court and demanded sanctions. He claimed that he never sought a judicial notice of Obama’s birth certificate. After he gave a 10 minute tirade, I read his own pleadings where he asked for judicial notice.





[highlight=#ffff00]At this point I was able yo elevate Arpaio’s affidavit to the same level as Onaka’s statement.[/highlight] :-? Judge stated that he wants my pleadings and service of the remaining parties within 3 weeks, rebuttal from the defendants in a week and he will hold another hearing then,





I have to catch the next plane




User avatar
Sterngard Friegen
Posts: 38010
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Location: FEMA Camp 17

Mississippi Ballot Challenge (ACT I & I.5) :)

Post #5039 by Sterngard Friegen » Mon Sep 24, 2012 8:17 pm

She didn't catch him lying. He said Taitz sought sanctions for seeking judicial notice of the LONG FORM BIRTH CERTIFICATE she herself had attached to her papers. Whoever and Begley's client sought judicial notice of STATEMENTS MADE BY THE HAWAII DOH relating to the long form. There is a difference between the two but Taitz can't figure it out. Which is why she's TWLITHOTU.


The Sternsig rule: Orly Taitz will find an infinite number of ways to screw things up; Larry Klayman will continue to call attention to a court finding that "on more than one occasion [he] act[ed] in a grossly inappropriate manner with [his] children."

User avatar
bob
Posts: 18953
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Mississippi Ballot Challenge (ACT I & I.5) :)

Post #5040 by bob » Mon Sep 24, 2012 8:19 pm

[imgwidth=450]http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a72/zerodin/orlycover.png[/imgwidth](Courtesy of Obama Conspiracy commenter, [/break1]obamaconspiracy.org/2012/09/obot-observers/#comment-214196]Andrew Vrba, PmG.)


Imagex4 Imagex2 Imagex2 Imagex2

User avatar
ObjectiveDoubter
Posts: 3290
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 6:19 pm
Location: Hollywood (more or less)

Mississippi Ballot Challenge (ACT I & I.5) :)

Post #5041 by ObjectiveDoubter » Mon Sep 24, 2012 8:20 pm

Checked in at PayPal, and filled in the blank after the $, and clicked. If we don't get enough, let us know how much more is needed. I missed most of the middle of the day and only catching up now, away from computer and cannot listen to the show tonight, will have to play a repeat after. :(





Fabulous reporting, all you boots. I still am reading! Mr. Whoever was his awesome self of course, even as a phantom voice on the phone. Who knew that being there only by phone would tick off the Evil Moldovan all the more. Nice strategy!



ducktape
Posts: 5334
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 5:09 pm

Mississippi Ballot Challenge (ACT I & I.5) :)

Post #5042 by ducktape » Mon Sep 24, 2012 8:22 pm

Another outstanding job by TFB Boots Brigade! I'm looking forward to the radio tonight.Thanks to all!



User avatar
June bug
Posts: 5048
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 3:29 pm

Mississippi Ballot Challenge (ACT I & I.5) :)

Post #5043 by June bug » Mon Sep 24, 2012 8:26 pm

Judge stated that he wants my pleadings and service of the remaining parties within 3 weeks, [highlight]rebuttal from the defendants in a week[/highlight] and he will hold another hearing then,

Boots on the ground call this a lie!



tjh
Posts: 2848
Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 4:18 pm

Mississippi Ballot Challenge (ACT I & I.5) :)

Post #5044 by tjh » Mon Sep 24, 2012 8:29 pm

I don't call that a lie ... it's just a mis-understanding. (She accidentally missed the "60 day" part).



A Legal Lohengrin
Posts: 10415
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:56 pm

Mississippi Ballot Challenge (ACT I & I.5) :)

Post #5045 by A Legal Lohengrin » Mon Sep 24, 2012 8:30 pm

What's the anticipated cost for the expedited transcript?

Expedited transcripts can run 6-10 dollars per page or more. Given the apparent length of this hearing and how quickly Orly talks, it wouldn't shock me if the transcript runs 50+ pages.

I wouldn't be surprised if it tops 100, at least if it lasted 3 hours.



Msottement
Posts: 183
Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2012 6:24 pm

Mississippi Ballot Challenge (ACT I & I.5) :)

Post #5046 by Msottement » Mon Sep 24, 2012 8:35 pm

And the Judge seemed quite well prepared.

Hell, he even watched her DVD.

Are you shitting me??? Seriously???

Maybe he likes horror/comedies? No accounting for taste...



hitch
Posts: 616
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 5:52 pm

Mississippi Ballot Challenge (ACT I & I.5) :)

Post #5047 by hitch » Mon Sep 24, 2012 8:39 pm

:evil: [link]http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=313534,http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=313534[/link] :evil:


Report on MS. Case moves on, next hearing in about a month. The judge stated on the record that he watched the press conference by Sheriff Arpaio. Did not issue judicial notice of Obama’ BC as Dems wanted





...





Judge stated that he wants my pleadings and service of the remaining parties within 3 weeks, rebuttal from the defendants in a week and he will hold another hearing then,


Hmmmm. don't those being newly served have 60 days to reply--at least the federal defendants? in her world she gets 3 weeks to serve and fashion her pleadings and the defendants only get a week?





even if true, it wouldn't help Orly; no amount of time is going to cure the defects in her filings. and i'm sure that even a newly minted, competent lawyer could produce a professional rebuttal rather quickly if need be.



User avatar
Chilidog
Posts: 5246
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 11:36 am

Mississippi Ballot Challenge (ACT I & I.5) :)

Post #5048 by Chilidog » Mon Sep 24, 2012 8:40 pm

For :geezer: :Is Taitz appearing PHV in either the Mississippi state courts, or this federal district court?

Not officially.

I ask because the dreaded amended complaint that added those eeeeevil federal questions also added these plaintiffs:

BRIAN FEDORKALAURIE ROTHLEAH LAXTOM MacLERAN

...surely the federal judge would be interested in knowing who is representing these plaintiffs.... :-

If they are all pro se, won't they all share in the glory of the smack down?



User avatar
Plutodog
Posts: 11151
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 10:11 pm

Mississippi Ballot Challenge (ACT I & I.5) :)

Post #5049 by Plutodog » Mon Sep 24, 2012 8:42 pm

She didn't catch him lying. He said Taitz sought sanctions for seeking judicial notice of the LONG FORM BIRTH CERTIFICATE she herself had attached to her papers. Whoever and Begley's client sought judicial notice of STATEMENTS MADE BY THE HAWAII DOH relating to the long form. There is a difference between the two but Taitz can't figure it out. Which is why she's TWLITHOTU.

Ten minute tirade? =)) Caught Whoever in a lie? =)) =)) Arpaio elevated to Onaka level? =)) =)) =))


The only good Bundy is an Al Bundy.

User avatar
GreatGrey
Posts: 7995
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2009 6:06 am
Location: Living in the Anthropocene

Mississippi Ballot Challenge (ACT I & I.5) :)

Post #5050 by GreatGrey » Mon Sep 24, 2012 8:45 pm

She didn't catch him lying. He said Taitz sought sanctions for seeking judicial notice of the LONG FORM BIRTH CERTIFICATE she herself had attached to her papers. Whoever and Begley's client sought judicial notice of STATEMENTS MADE BY THE HAWAII DOH relating to the long form. There is a difference between the two but Taitz can't figure it out. Which is why she's TWLITHOTU.

AND... it wasn't 10 minutes by Mr. Whoever. Less than 2.But it seemed much longer to Lena, she really squirmed when Judges Land and Carter were mentioned.




Return to “State Ballot Challenges”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest