#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case

[bob]

Brooke is quite a piece of work.

(And, yeah, I see #TampoonTim is trending.)

[Slim Cognito]

Brooke is quite a piece of work.

(And, yeah, I see #TampoonTim is trending.)

Maybe because I'm female, albeit post-menopausal female, I don't see the problem.

[Ben-Prime]

(And, yeah, I see #TampoonTim is trending.)

Maybe because I'm female, albeit post-menopausal female, I don't see the problem.

They are trying to get traction with the idea that, because the bill required the tampons to be available to transmasc students using the boys' bathrooms but (of course) still menstruating because of not yet transitioning medically, Tim Walz is himself personally responsible for turning girls into boys. Or something like that. We kind of need an actor to do the Billy Bob the MAGA Faux-Rage Translator, I think. Because I do get confused.

[Slim Cognito]

I'd like to hand those bozos a rag doll and ask them to tell me where the student hurt them.

[pipistrelle]

Brooke is quite a piece of work.

With 261 followers and a tagline of "MAGAMEGAULTRAMAGA," it could be a piece of work, paid to bot-troll.

[bob]

Grifter gotta.

[RTH10260]

just had to laugh over his xitter profile:

Loy Brunson @BrunsonSCOTUS
Official Twitter account of Loy Brunson, who’s case has been docketed by the Supreme Court of the U.S. by a rule 11 emergency.

[realist]

Grifter gotta.

7 Powerful Constitutional Discoveries that since 1787 ONLY LOY BRUNSON has discovered.

[Ben-Prime]

just had to laugh over his xitter profile:

Loy Brunson @BrunsonSCOTUS
Official Twitter account of Loy Brunson, who’s case has been docketed by the Supreme Court of the U.S. by a rule 11 emergency.

I mean, in fairness, it's now part of his identity. He still loses points for not knowing the difference between the possessive 'whose' and the abbreviation of 'who is', though.

[bob]

The reckoning date for this zombie grift keeps getting pushed back: October, before the election, after the election, now ("at least") before inauguration.

You can show these cultists SCOTUS' docket, and they'll say there's a sekrit military NDA, and the public denials are just for show.

[Foggy]

You have entered the 21st Century Zone,
doo doo do do, doo doo, do, do

Mommy, hold my hand, I'm scared!

[scirreeve]

He'll be at an event in Idaho in Nov. with a bunch of other nutz.

Capture.JPG (79.24 KiB) Viewed 2728 times

[neonzx]

He'll be at an event in Idaho in Nov. with a bunch of other nutz.Capture.JPG

I think I am happy to say I don't recognise of any featured guests on that flyer.

[RTH10260]

He'll be at an event in Idaho in Nov. with a bunch of other nutz.Capture.JPG

"Open the heavens - let god arise"

Since when would a deity need their residence "be opened" to let them "arise"

I thought the entity was said to be allmighty - in no need of assistance

[pipistrelle]

I see “Open the Heavens” is associated with Meri Crouley on the flier.

IMG_7807.jpeg (457.69 KiB) Viewed 2675 times

[bob]

Grifter gotta.

With rather slick production values, Loy is trying to somehow revive his suit that died last year.

Nb. Loy's site:

July 7th the petition for Re-Hearing was Docketed. A Conference date for this Case # 22-1028, will most likely be set after SCOTUS returns from recess in October.

That was in 2023. And the rehearing petition was denied on August 21, 2023.

[bob]

BRUNSON CASE AT SCOTUS!!!:

Sure, this person isn't related to Loy or Raland, and this case has nothing to do with the 2020 presidential election.

But [a] Brunson has a[n unrelated] case at SCOTUS!

[northland10]

Sure, this person isn't related to Loy or Raland, and this case has nothing to do with the 2020 presidential election.

But [a] Brunson has a[n unrelated] case at SCOTUS!

And he will have more. Dude's a serial file. Besides the 2 that show up for 23 and 24, I counted around 7 more docket entries. A Google search brings up many, many, many state and federal case stretching back to the aughts. It's his hobby but it might get harder as a court stated he used up his pro se IFP 3 strike (Heck?)

The tweet cutoff the part that said rehearing denied.

[northland10]

Grifter gotta.

With rather slick production values, Loy is trying to somehow revive his suit that died last year.

Nb. Loy's site:

July 7th the petition for Re-Hearing was Docketed. A Conference date for this Case # 22-1028, will most likely be set after SCOTUS returns from recess in October.

That was in 2023. And the rehearing petition was denied on August 21, 2023.

That would explain why no Brunson is mentioned on today's order list from the long conference. Raland and that other unrelated Brunson had their rehearing petitions denied in the summer.

[bob]

Raland and that other unrelated Brunson had their rehearing petitions denied in the summer.

:

"Headed to."

[bob]

I'm watching this. I'm familiar with the Brunsons' litigation, and Loy's fanfiction about their cases is amazing. What he describes is pure and has no basis in reality.

[northland10]

I'm watching this. I'm familiar with the Brunsons' litigation, and Loy's fanfiction about their cases is amazing. What he describes is pure and has no basis in reality.

Did he file a suit against the Federal district court or are these the defendants in his previous case? If he filed something, it must be in the Utah state court because I see nothing on PACER. Unless it gets bounced quicker, I assume any case he might have filed will get removed, just like Raland's case again the 3 Supremes.

The alternative is he nuts or just making stuff up as he goes.

You have to register or at least pay an initial $5 one-time fee for Utah court cases and there are fees for queries and docs though they will be deducted from the $5. Not interested in bothering with that for now.

[bob]

Did he file a suit against the Federal district court or are these the defendants in his previous case? If he filed something, it must be in the Utah state court because I see nothing on PACER. Unless it gets bounced quicker, I assume any case he might have filed will get removed, just like Raland's case again the 3 Supremes.

I saw no evidence of another filing, although admittedly I did not delve deeply into the Utah state courts.

The alternative is he nuts or just making stuff up as he goes.

Given how much he lies, I'm comfortable concluding he's just lying again.

[bob]

I lurve how, in true Brunsonian fashion, no Brunson will just plainly say this.

So the rumors and lies will continue. Because they help the grift.

[RTH10260]

NDAs are so trumpian and the SCOTUS in the pocket of impotus it can only mean that SCOTUS NDAs are a thing