Kamala Devi Harris Birthers - Ammunition: Birthers v Reality: Round 2

[Dr. Ken]

Not birther related but it's been making the rounds today on the bird site. Trumpers are so gullible in they fall for every fake news site out there. The source is a kbsf-tv.com which after running the whois domain search I learned it was create in the last two weeks but then references supposed news articles from July. The site also seems to be based in Iceland

[RTH10260]

Link to above story off xitter: https://kbsf-tv.com/kamala-harris-hit-a ... ime-scene/

[RTH10260]

FWIW

https://x.com/shipwreckedcrew/status/18 ... 0892664020

Shipwreckedcrew@shipwreckedcrew

On the "KBSF-TV" story.

As a television station, "KVSF" does not exist. The call letters belonged to a Kansas station that was a CBS affiliate, but when its operations were combined with another CBS affiliate, the call letters were abandoned.

BUT, as a website, "KBSF-TV" has a fairly extensive archive of stories from the SF Bay Area.

Did the website operator take the opportunity to grab the domain name once the TV station ceased to exist? The name suggests it is a TV station, but nothing on the website itself is a claim to be a TV station.

Some have posted it is Russian owned.

I haven't looked into it that closely.

But now I'm 100% sure we will hear later today this is Putin's opening salvo to help Trump win.

Maybe that is reverse psychology -- maybe this was created by the Harris campaign, outsourced to a Ukrainian outfit, to create disinformation that the Harris campaign could blame on Trump.

"We need to get the Gold Star families and Arlington Cemetary off the front page. Let's drop the "fake Hit & Run story, and blame it on Putin."
6:49 PM · Sep 3, 2024

[bob]

Don't know if that channel actually is associated with the youngest child (but I doubt it is).

[W. Kevin Vicklund]

Telling that Monkeyboy uses every opportunity to deadname Harris (using the wrong middle name).

[Walt Tuttle]

Hmmm...

https://www.freep.com/picture-gallery/n ... 109533530/

[RTH10260]

Hmmm...

https://www.freep.com/picture-gallery/n ... 109533530/

H/T - and for me a cause I skipped the image search myself

[bob]

This i He, Lucas Smith-esque: Images lifted from other sources, internal inconsistencies, no corroboration, etc.

[pipistrelle]

I just saw that on Twitter and found this story.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/fa ... rcna154315

[Dr. Ken]

I just saw that on Twitter and found this story.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/fa ... rcna154315

Yeah this is the guy who was pushing the story that zelensky and his wife owned lots of mansions paid for with us taxpayer money

[bob]

California Globe*: Kamala’s Upbringing Would Have Been Quite Troubling to America’s Founders:

Barack Hussein Obama infamously pronounced upon winning the election that he planned to “fundamentally transform America.” . . .

Neither Congress nor the Supreme Court has definitively defined what “natural born citizen” means when it comes to qualifying for being President. A genuine dispute remains whether simply being born in the U.S. is sufficient, or whether one must be born to parents who are U.S. citizens, or at least one of whom is. Depending on the interpretation, Obama may not have qualified, and Harris certainly would not qualify.

*

California Globe is an independent, professional news website obsessively chronicling everything political throughout the state of California. We are pro-growth and pro-business, non-partisan and objective; we report what we see and hear without fear or favor.

**

James Breslo is a civil rights attorney and host of the “Hidden Truth Show”*** podcast. He was formerly a partner at the international law firm Seyfarth Shaw and a public company president. He has appeared numerous times as a legal/political expert on Fox News and CNN.

***

He recently gained acclaim for landing the first ever sit down interviews with Bruce Paddock, brother of the Las Vegas shooter, and Sophia Hutchins, the transgender partner of Caitlyn Jenner, and Malik Obama, half brother of President Barak Obama on his Hidden Truth Show.

Breslo has an active California bar card.

[northland10]

Seyfarth Shaw has around 450 partners, which accounts for half of their total attorneys. IANAL, but that does not sound all that prestigious.

[bob]

P&E: Donald Trump is a Red Corvette*:

As we approach one of the most consequential elections since the founding of the Republic, perhaps a brief, very brief refresher course in some of the fundamentals is in order. Yes, faithful P&E readers, foremost among those fundamentals is the issue of whether Kamala Devi Harris is even eligible under the Constitution to serve as President.

* For the sadists:

All Corvettes are Chevrolets, but not all Chevrolets are Corvettes. Trump is a red Corvette. Harris is a 4-cylinder powder-blue Chevy Malibu masquerading as a Corvette.

[neonzx]

Gosh. He is friggin annoying.

Here.

► Show Spoiler

[northland10]

I think I will take the Malibu over the whiny red Corvette.

[qbawl]

Back when I was rallying us folks with TR6s called them plastic fantastics (not a compliment).

[keith]

Yeah, well, I was never a vette fan either, but you gotta admit it was superior to the successor to the TR6.

I won't say its name, but I'm sure Fogbowsers can count. My buddy couldn't keep his piece of crap on the road for more than a week at a time.

[qbawl]

Totally agree on the 6's follow-on. And IMHO it was uggleee!

[Kendra]

Just my $.02, but it's time for CNN to put Scott Jennings out to pasture. His R bias is showing, big time, and seems to get worse every day. He just scorched Harris and the MSNBC interview with Ruhl.

[bob]

The hearing took place as scheduled. On Friday Sibley told this writer, “As I expected, the Judge refused to vacate his dismissal order. Now I will file my notice of appeal on Tuesday and prepare an emergency petition for certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court. I hope to have that filed by September 7.

Sibley's blog substack: N.Y. Appellate Court Expedites Appeal in V.P. Harris Eligibility Lawsuit:

and waiting on SCOTUS filing . . .

After the dismissal of my Ku Klux Klan Act lawsuit claiming New York’s Chief Election Official was violating my federal right to a “natural born Citizen” President by including V.P. Harris on the November 5th New York Ballot, on September 3rd I took an appeal of that dismissal to the Appellate Division, Third Department in Albany. On September 9th, I filed my Motion to Expedite.

Much to my surprise, the same day, I received an Order from the Court expediting the appeal by setting an expedited briefing schedule with Oral Argument set in Albany, N.Y. for October 18, 2024. I have filed my Initial Brief with the Court and am awaiting the Answer Brief from the N.Y. Attorney General’s Office. In that Brief, I argue that I have the federal right secured by Article II, Section 1 to a “natural born Citizen” which I believe V.P. Harris is not. We will see what the Court thinks of that.

Hint: .

It looks as if Sibley realized he's no Brunson Grifter, as he raised only $125 to tilt at SCOTUS. So Sibley's going the usual route of an appeal.

The court's expedition order and Sibley's opening brief.

Executive summary: Sibley contends his complaint also alleged that state election officials violated his federal rights by placing Harris on the ballot. And the trial court's summary denial failed to acknowledge this particular claim.

My WAG is the appellate court will affirm the dismissal, saying, "Even if indulge Sibley's , he still fails to state a claim for relief."

[realist]

They’re all crawling out from under their rocks and are gonna be very disappointed. Again.

[bob]

P&E: State Attorneys General have “Standing” to Challenge Presidential Eligibility, Researcher Says

P&E: Segue: “nbC” Researcher Contacts Congress on Harris Eligibility, Challenges BHO on X:

On Friday, The Post & Email published the first part of a recent interview with Theodore T. Moran, a long-term researcher of the constitutional term “natural born Citizen,” having begun his work in 2008 for the late Atty. Mario Apuzzo.

* * *

A registered Florida voter for the last 11 years, Moran contacted Attorney General Ashley Moody contending that sitting Vice President and 2024 Democrat presidential nominee Kamala Harris is not a “natural born Citizen” given her birth in California to parents who were admitted to the United States on student visas and were therefore not U.S. citizens at the time of her birth.

* * *

Several days after writing to Moody, Moran sent a letter to his congressman, Rep. Mike Waltz (R) . . . .

The Post & Email commented, “You brought up the phrase ‘subject to the jurisdiction thereof,'” and Moran replied:

► Show Spoiler

Let me explain something else to you: Kamala Harris is not even a citizen of the United States. She should not even have held the office of Senator. It goes to ‘subject of the jurisdiction.’ Even taking Wong Kim Ark, said to be ‘subject to the jurisdiction,’ your domicile must be in America, what you call your home. What that means is that people who came here on immigrant visas and changed their home from their previous country to this country, those aliens’ children could become citizens because the parents were subject to the jurisdiction. But if you come here on a student visa, that’s a non-immigrant visa; you are expected to return home, and they had Kamala. Now Kamala legally had the right to be included in their visa, and at the age of 18 she could get her own green card. If they became citizens before she turned 21, then she could become a citizen: a naturalized citizen. History proves she is not a citizen.”

Moran added that the 14th Amendment was ratified solely to extend citizenship to former slaves. “It wasn’t about the future,” he said.

“How do you think this morphing of the meaning of the 14th Amendment came about?” we asked.

Are you familiar with “Motor Voter?”

“Yes, the NVRA.”

Yes. If you get a driver’s license, you’re put on the voter list. If you’re born in an American hospital, the hospital gives you a birth certificate. Take that birth certificate to the post office and say, “I was born in America,” and they automatically give you a passport without checking whether you were “subject to the jurisdiction” or not. As a matter of fact, most bureaucrats let that slide.

Let me also tell you why Obama and Kamala were chosen — and I say “chosen” purposely — because of their “un-natural” born Citizen status.

A natural born Citizen who’s going to betray his country will probably get cold feet, because he still has a connection. That’s what a natural born Citizen is: you have an innate connection to the other people in America. In other words, “I can feel your pain; I know what your hopes and dreams are because they’re mine.” Kamala and Obama don’t have that connection because they are the people who can betray America without remorse.

“Do you think Wong Kim Ark was decided correctly?” we asked, referring to the 1898 Supreme Court case in which a man born in San Francisco to Chinese parents temporarily in the U.S. challenged the government’s arrest warrant after he re-entered the United States following his second trip to China to visit them. Upon his detention, the district attorney claimed Ark was “not a U.S. citizen.”

For the high court’s majority opinion, Associate Justice Horace Gray wrote:

By the constitution of the United States, congress was empowered ‘to establish an uniform rule of naturalization.’ In the exercise of this power, congress, by successive acts, beginning with the act entitled ‘An act to establish an uniform rule of naturalization,’ passed at the second session of the first congress under the constitution, has made provision for the admission to citizenship of three principal classes of persons: First. Aliens, having resided for a certain time ‘within the limits and under the jurisdiction of the United States,’ and naturalized individually by proceedings in a court of record. Second. Children of persons so naturalized, ‘dwelling within the United States, and being under the age of twenty-one years at the time of such naturalization.’ Third. Foreign-born children of American citizens, coming within the definitions prescribd by congress. Acts March 26, 1790, c. 3 (1 Stat. 103); January 26, 1795, c. 20 (Id. 414); June 18, 1798, c. 54 (Id. 566); April 14, 1802, c. 28 (2 Stat. 153); March 26, 1804, c. 47 (Id. 292); February 10, 1855, c. 71 (10 Stat. 604); Rev. St. §§ 2165, 2172, 1993.

“No, I think it was decided corruptly,” Moran responded. “Did you know that Gray was appointed by Chester A. Arthur? The first case of “birtherism” was initiated by the Democrats back with Chester A. Arthur. They accused him of being from Canada, because the truth is he was born about 15 miles from the Canadian border in Vermont. His father was from Canada and thus a British citizen who came to America and married his mother. They were back and forth into Canada as he was growing up. Arthur burned his father’s naturalization record that would have shown the date. Gray had to make the decision he did because if it came out that Arthur was not a natural born Citizen, Justice Gray’s appointment to the Supreme Court would have been in jeopardy. So he could not take into account Sen. Trumbull, who was the architect of both the 1866 Civil Rights Act and its codification in the 14th Amendment. He said, “What do I mean by ‘subject to the jurisdiction?’ I mean not owing any allegiance to any foreign power.” He came right out and said it. That is like putting your car key into the ignition and turning it. He took “subject to the jurisdiction,” aligned it to Jay’s letter, and boom, it was perfect.

“We also had the Chinese Exclusion Act signed by Arthur in 1882,” Moran added.

The Act, which was in force from 1882 to 1902, extended beyond Wong Kim Ark, which was decided in 1898. Wikipedia‘s entry on Wong states:

The case highlighted disagreements over the precise meaning of one phrase in the Citizenship Clause—namely, the provision that a person born in the United States who is “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” acquires automatic citizenship. The Supreme Court’s majority concluded that this phrase referred to being required to obey U.S. law; on this basis, they interpreted the language of the Fourteenth Amendment in a way that granted U.S. citizenship to children born of foreigners (a concept known as jus soli), with only a limited set of exceptions mostly based in English common law.[2] The court’s dissenters argued that being subject to the jurisdiction of the United States meant not being subject to any foreign power[9]—that is, not being claimed as a citizen by another country via jus sanguinis (inheriting citizenship from a parent)—an interpretation which, in the minority’s view, would have excluded “the children of foreigners, happening to be born to them while passing through the country”.[10]

“A natural born Citizen was to keep foreign powers who wanted to influence America away from those positions of power,” Moran said. “It wasn’t meant to discriminate against anyone. It all goes back to Jay’s letter. What they did at that time was to show that America was a land of unity, that the president was unifying in his allegiance and commitment to America. If you take a look at the two terms between English common law and Vattel, one is a ‘natural-born subject’ and the other is a ‘natural born Citizen.'”

“‘Subject,’ he said, “goes back to our founding. Did government create citizens? No. If you look at Minor v. Happersett, it clearly states that the citizens created the government, hence ‘We the People…in Order to form…’ So the citizens had to exist before the government. In other words, the government cannot create citizens without the express permission of the preexisting citizens, which is naturalization. Mario and I used to have this discussion every day for eight years.”

“Wong Kim Ark should be overturned for cause,” Moran added, “and the Supreme Court is the only court that can define the terms in the Constitution.”

Contacting Moody and Waltz was only a first step in his mission to bring attention to the “natural born Citizen” issue, particularly as it pertains to Harris, Moran told us. The next, he said, is a letter-writing campaign to “every Republican member of Congress.”

The same Congress that has adjourned until after the election so its members can campaign?

Last Thursday after our interview, Moran took the opportunity to challenge Obama on X as to Harris’s eligibility after Obama urged Americans to vote for her in November. . . .

In response, Moran wrote, “How can Kamala be President when she is not a vanilla Citizen of the United States? Both her parents were in America under a non-immigrant student visa, and that makes her fail the domicile test of Wong Kim Ark. Is she pulling a Barry O. but on a grander scale?”



In explaining his comment, Moran told us, “Vanilla is your basic ice cream, I ran out of characters on x. I wanted to say ‘plain old vanilla.'”

One of his goals, Moran told us, is to initiate an online conversation on “natural born Citizen,” beginning with his new website, naturalborncitizen.us.

“Why am I doing this now?” he remarked as the interview concluded. “Because if we don’t do it now, we will lose our country, and we’ll become debt slaves, worse than we are now.”

[neonzx]

"she is not a vanilla Citizen"

Open Mouth, insert foot.

[RTH10260]

The next, he said, is a letter-writing campaign to “every Republican member of Congress.”


Just send the surplus stock of Sheriff kits

[Sam the Centipede]

They’re all crawling out from under their rocks and are gonna be very disappointed. Again.

Has Sibley washed his kilt for nothing?