INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith

Abandon reality, all ye who enter here. *Democracy*Under*Threat*
User avatar
Slim Cognito
Posts: 7443
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 9:15 am
Location: The eff away from trump.
Occupation: Hats. I do hats.
Verified:

INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith

#1026

Post by Slim Cognito »

Cue circus theme music.
May the bridges I burn light my way.

ImageImageImage x5
User avatar
Rolodex
Posts: 1783
Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2023 12:06 pm

INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith

#1027

Post by Rolodex »

It's worth opening the whole document to read it. Just 6 pages, but it's a humdinger. Clownlawyer LLC gets a clapback.
Do the right thing. It will gratify some people and astonish the rest. - Mark Twain
User avatar
pipistrelle
Posts: 7967
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:27 am

INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith

#1028

Post by pipistrelle »

Rolodex wrote: Tue Sep 24, 2024 4:44 pm It's worth opening the whole document to read it. Just 6 pages, but it's a humdinger. Clownlawyer LLC gets a clapback.
I skimmed a few bits and was :rotflmao:
User avatar
Estiveo
Posts: 2732
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 9:50 am
Location: Inland valley, Central Coast, CA
Verified:

INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith

#1029

Post by Estiveo »

I think my favorite line was towards the bottom of pg 2, a clear indicator that defense is about to get ever so politely bitch slapped
For completeness, however, the court will address more broadly Defendant's new and sundry arguments about pretrial schedule, none of which articulate a cognizable prejudice.
Image Image Image Image
User avatar
Greatgrey
Posts: 931
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 9:53 am
Location: Unimatrix Zero
Verified: 💲8️⃣

INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith

#1030

Post by Greatgrey »

I’m sure I’m missing something, but if I was Jack Smith I woulda had the 180 pages queued up and ready to send once Chutkan gave the OK. Get it on the docket.

Ya know Trump is gonna appeal this, even though it would be groundless.
What's the Frequency, Kenneth?
User avatar
Foggy
Dick Tater
Posts: 11328
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 8:45 am
Location: Fogbow HQ
Occupation: Dick Tater/Space Cadet
Verified: grumpy ol' geezer

INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith

#1031

Post by Foggy »

In theory, a federal appeals court might not think that's an appealable order. But then the Supreme Court might get another chance to interfere with the election on Trump’s behalf, and I don't trust them any more than I trust Trump. It's no fun having crooks up there.

Trump knows, all he has to do is appeal everything to SCOTUS, and they'll put a thumb on the scales of justice for him.
User avatar
RTH10260
Posts: 17168
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:16 am
Location: Switzerland, near the Alps
Verified: ✔️ Eurobot

INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith

#1032

Post by RTH10260 »

Jack Smith files evidence under seal against Trump in Jan. 6 case

Rebecca Falconer
15 hours ago

Special counsel Jack Smith filed a sealed legal brief in former President Trump's federal Jan. 6 case Thursday, outlining legal arguments for criminally prosecuting the Republican presidential nominee over efforts to overturn the 2020 election results.

Why it matters: U.S. District Court Judge Tanya Chutkan will decide whether or not to publicly release the brief containing previously unseen evidence, or a redacted version of it, and it's possible this could occur before November's presidential election.

Context: Smith in August filed a slimmed-down, superseding indictment that Trump's legal team opposes, after the conservative-majority U.S. Supreme Court ruled that presidents have immunity for "official acts."



https://www.axios.com/2024/09/27/trump- ... iling-seal
User avatar
RVInit
Posts: 4649
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 8:48 am

INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith

#1033

Post by RVInit »

:pray: :pray: :pray:
"It actually doesn't take much to be considered a difficult woman. That's why there are so many of us."

--Jane Goodall
User avatar
RTH10260
Posts: 17168
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:16 am
Location: Switzerland, near the Alps
Verified: ✔️ Eurobot

INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith

#1034

Post by RTH10260 »

Special counsel pushing for public release of key filing in Trump's Jan. 6 case
Jack Smith wants to file a public version of the sealed brief he filed Thursday.

ByKatherine Faulders, Alexander Mallin, and Peter Charalambous
September 27, 2024, 8:35 PM

A day after filing a sealed brief seeking to justify his superseding indictment against Donald Trump, special counsel Jack Smith is pushing to file a public version of the brief that includes "substantive" summaries of what investigators learned from witnesses in the former president's federal election interference case.

In his lengthy brief filed under seal on Thursday, Smith presented his case for how the Supreme Court's ruling on presidential immunity does not apply to Trump's criminal case, in which the former president is accused of seeking to overturn the results of the 2020 election.

In their filing Friday, prosecutors argued that releasing a version of the brief that removes the names of witnesses other than Vice President Mike Pence -- and also redacts nonpublic information sources -- would respect the court's orders and serve the public's interest in the case.



https://abcnews.go.com/US/special-couns ... =114294940
User avatar
Greatgrey
Posts: 931
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 9:53 am
Location: Unimatrix Zero
Verified: 💲8️⃣

INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith

#1035

Post by Greatgrey »

What's the Frequency, Kenneth?
User avatar
RVInit
Posts: 4649
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 8:48 am

INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith

#1036

Post by RVInit »

Oh goodie. More light reading.
"It actually doesn't take much to be considered a difficult woman. That's why there are so many of us."

--Jane Goodall
User avatar
MN-Skeptic
Posts: 3933
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:03 pm
Location: Twin Cities

INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith

#1037

Post by MN-Skeptic »

If you can’t see that tweet, here’s the link to Jack Smith’s filing -

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... .252.0.pdf
Tim Walz’ Golden Rule: Mind your own damn business!
User avatar
pipistrelle
Posts: 7967
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:27 am

INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith

#1038

Post by pipistrelle »

RVInit wrote: Wed Oct 02, 2024 4:12 pm Oh goodie. More light reading.
The opening is written clearly. Immune? Hell, no.
User avatar
poplove
Posts: 1545
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:20 pm
Location: Las Vegas NV
Occupation: ukulele ambassador
Verified: ✅💚💙💜☮️💐🌈⚽️🥥🌴✅

INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith

#1040

Post by poplove »

Jack E. Smith ⚖️
@7Veritas4
Lady Justice right now...
User avatar
Kendra
Posts: 11197
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 10:17 am

INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith

#1041

Post by Kendra »

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrum ... 8507169039
The release of this falsehood-ridden, Unconstitutional, J6 brief immediately following Tim Walz’s disastrous Debate performance, and 33 days before the Most Important Election in the History of our Country, is another obvious attempt by the Harris-Biden regime to undermine and Weaponize American Democracy, and INTERFERE IN THE 2024 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION. Deranged Jack Smith, the hand picked Prosecutor of the Harris-Biden DOJ, and Washington, D.C. based Radical Left Democrats, are HELL BENT on continuing to Weaponize the Justice Department in an attempt to cling to power. “TRUMP” is dominating the Election cycle, leading in the Polls, and the Radical Democrats throughout the Deep State are totally “freaking out.” This entire case is a Partisan, Unconstitutional, Witch Hunt, that should be dismissed, entirely, just like the Florida case was dismissed!
He seems upset. :biggrin:
User avatar
Kendra
Posts: 11197
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 10:17 am

INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith

#1042

Post by Kendra »

https:// www.foxnews.com/politics/judge-unseals- ... inst-trump

:snippity:
Trump campaign spokesman Steven Cheung told Fox News Digital the release of the "falsehood-ridden, unconstitutional J6 brief immediately following Tim Walz’s disastrous debate performance is another obvious attempt by the Harris-Biden regime to undermine American Democracy and interfere in this election."

"Deranged Jack Smith and Washington DC Radical Democrats are hell-bent on weaponizing the Justice Department in an attempt to cling to power," Cheung said. "President Trump is dominating, and the Radical Democrats throughout the Deep State are freaking out.

"This entire case is a partisan, Unconstitutional Witch Hunt that should be dismissed entirely, together with ALL of the remaining Democrat hoaxes."
:snippity:
Dave from down under
Posts: 4491
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 4:50 pm
Location: Down here!

INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith

#1043

Post by Dave from down under »

He sounds scared

And desperate

:)
User avatar
pipistrelle
Posts: 7967
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:27 am

INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith

#1044

Post by pipistrelle »

Harris-Biden? Didn’t think POTUS could be demoted.
User avatar
neonzx
Posts: 7400
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:01 am
Location: FloriDUH Hell
Verified: 🤩✅✅✅✅✅🤩

INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith

#1047

Post by neonzx »

From p. 142 of Jack Smith's filing:

"Upon receiving a phone call alerting him that Pence had been taken to a secure location, [PERSON 15] rushed to the dining room to inform [Trump] in hopes that the defendant would take action to ensure Pence’s safety. Instead, after [P15] delivered the news, the defendant looked at him and said only, “So what?""
New Turtle
Posts: 778
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2021 2:43 pm

INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith

#1048

Post by New Turtle »

When Trump told the staffer he would not pay the private lawyer spearheading his legal challenges unless the challenges were successful, the staffer told Trump that the private attorney would never be paid. That prompted a laugh and a “we’ll see” from Trump, the filings said. (The private attorney is identified by prosecutors as co-conspirator 1, who CNN has previously identified as Rudy Giuliani.)
:rotflmao:
User avatar
RTH10260
Posts: 17168
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:16 am
Location: Switzerland, near the Alps
Verified: ✔️ Eurobot

INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith

#1049

Post by RTH10260 »

Tsk tsk tsk - DonOld got what he asked for --> each and every un- and nonpresidential listed in detail.Now let his lawyers file a reply and show his presidential capacities :twisted:

ps. and he better pay them well and in advance :violin:
User avatar
Greatgrey
Posts: 931
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 9:53 am
Location: Unimatrix Zero
Verified: 💲8️⃣

INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith

#1050

Post by Greatgrey »

Can’t tell the players without a program….


IMG_0795.jpeg
IMG_0795.jpeg (91.7 KiB) Viewed 494 times
IMG_0794.jpeg
IMG_0794.jpeg (99.3 KiB) Viewed 494 times
What's the Frequency, Kenneth?
Post Reply

Return to “The Big Lie & Aftermath of The Former Guy”