Bragg Manhattan DA charges tfg? Hush money. tfg “INDICATED!” - CONVICTED!!

Ben-Prime · #2051

TFG is always on the lookout for the reincarnation of Roy Freakin' Cohn.

#2052

It's generally pretty easy to get a witness like this really angry during cross-examination.

'Course, people who lose their temper start making mistakes. And there are all kinds of physical things happening in your body when you really get angry - muscles tense, blood flows change, and anger is quite painful. Your head hurts.

If t'were I, my strategy in cross-examination would be to needle him to death explosion. Hopefully a really big explosion.

Let's allow the jury to see the full character of Robert Costello.

p0rtia · #2053

Ben-Prime wrote: ↑Tue May 21, 2024 6:48 am TFG is always on the lookout for the reincarnation of Roy Freakin' Cohn.

I've always thought that one of the reason's TFG chose Cohen was because of his name. Well, that and. his bullying style and sycophancy.

#2054

Gift link to NYTime's updates for today. The defense has now rested.

Live Updates: Defense Rests in Trump’s Criminal Trial

#2055

Even with the gift link, the failing NY Times refuses to say who the second witness for the defense was, or what they testified to. However, they did bring us the all-important news about all the stupidity that the yammering monkeys outside court had to say.

RTH10260 · #2056

BUT... But.... but.... Teh Donald promised to give evidence, shireley a man to stand by his words

#2057

The mean judge wasn't gonna let him testify without cross-examination. So unfair.

#2058

: Estiveo_20240521_085051.jpg (171.96 KiB) Viewed 879 times

Kendra · #2059

I heard reports Junior showed up today. Haven't heard the list of who else showed up to hold tfg's pants up.

Dr. Ken · #2060

Maybe he lost the rock?

W. Kevin Vicklund · #2061

Foggy wrote: ↑Tue May 21, 2024 11:46 am Even with the gift link, the failing NY Times refuses to say who the second witness for the defense was, or what they testified to. However, they did bring us the all-important news about all the stupidity that the yammering monkeys outside court had to say.

They talked about the first witness when they were called on the stand a previous day. They work for the law firm repping Trump, and presented some details on some documents. Nothing of any import.

andersweinstein · #2062

Foggy wrote: ↑Tue May 21, 2024 11:46 am Even with the gift link, the failing NY Times refuses to say who the second witness for the defense was, or what they testified to. However, they did bring us the all-important news about all the stupidity that the yammering monkeys outside court had to say.

The first defense witness testified very briefly yesterday (Monday) before Costello was called. He was a custodial witness, paralegal Daniel Sitko, testifying about phone records used to construct a chart showing calls between Costello and Cohen. The Times' live blog for Monday did have some notes about it. It was kind of eclipsed by the fireworks with Costello.

Dr. Ken · #2063

This is getting more pathetic every day. His actual supporters aren't showing up so he gets lackeys to show up.

Kendra · #2064

OK, I recognize Junior. I think that's Sebastian Gorka on the left, anyone recognize the others?

Dr. Ken · #2065

Kendra wrote: ↑Tue May 21, 2024 12:19 pm

OK, I recognize Junior. I think that's Sebastian Gorka on the left, anyone recognize the others?

The guy talking is the LT Governor of Texas Dan Patrick. Was that Ronny Jackson on the side?

tek · #2066

Yes, indeed! Dr. Feelgood showing his support!

They all look like they really need to take a good dump.

New Turtle · #2067

They like to use the word "sham." It must have tested well some time ago. Elise Stefanik started using it for the first impeachment.

#2068

I think D.A. Bragg's decision not to vigorously cross-examine Costello is a missed opportunity, but I admit it's a judgment call, and they may be trying to get it over with. It sure sounds like Costello's testimony is worthless for the defense in any case.

But now we get a whole week off from any activity in this case. And the jury gets a whole week to just think about things, before they come back to work. Again, I am so jealous.

Next Tuesday, the judge will try to fit in all the final arguments plus giving his jury instructions on the open record, all in a single day (hopefully a little less, giving the jury time to get started before going home for the night). Then they'll have three full days for deliberation next week.

I'm gonna try to stay hopeful, but I remember the verdicts after Malheur and Bundy Ranch, so I know that juries do crazy things sometimes.

Dr. Ken · #2069

former comedian Joe Piscopo was also there today

#2070

Where is Chachi?

#2071

Gift link - the New York Times has obtained early drafts of proposed jury instructions -

Prosecutors and Trump’s Lawyers Will Jockey for an Edge With Jurors

The two sides are expected to lay out their dueling visions for how the judge should instruct the jury as it prepares to weigh the charges against Mr. Trump — 34 felony counts of falsifying business records.

Jury instructions are typically meant to translate legal treatises into something intelligible to the 12 laypeople who will decide the case. The instructions provide jurors with a road map to help them apply the law to the facts they have gleaned from the witnesses, documents and other evidence that have been presented to them.

The New York Times has obtained early drafts of each side’s proposed jury instructions, which were filed with the court in recent days and will underpin their arguments to the judge, Juan M. Merchan. That conference will take place outside the presence of the jury.

More at the link above

jemcanada2 · #2072

We’ll, this seems like an appropriate clip for Piscopo.

#2073

https://x.com/KatiePhang/status/1793023255701282979

Katie Phang
@KatiePhang

BOVE: Next on my list is a proposed jury instruction about involvement of counsel, despite Merchan's pre-trial rulings that Trump himself could not argue that he was convinced of the lawfulness of his conduct because lawyers were involved/he relied on his lawyers.

MERCHAN: This is an issue that’s been going on for a very long time. Going back to I think it was December of '23, I’m not sure. The People filed a motion asking this court to require the defense to require and give notice whether defense was going to rely on advice of counsel. I wrote a decision on this on Feb 7 and I directed defense to provide disclosure by March 11, and to produce all discoverable statements and comms by same date. In response, the answer was we are not relying on advice of counsel. Later on, defense advice of counsel morphed into something called presence of counsel, which I had never heard of, not familiar with, but addressed it in a motion in limine.

MERCHAN: I ordered that you were precluded from arguing this legal claim. There was no such thing. Just a way to get around having to turn over docs.

MERCHAN: Now it’s morphed into involvement of counsel. I understand why you want this instruction from the court. But my answer hasn't changed and I find it disingenuous.

MERCHAN: It was concerning when the terms changed to "presence of counsel." I couldn't believe when i saw it again now calling it "involvement of counsel."

MERCHAN: My ruling is the jury will not hear that instruction from the bench nor are you permitted to make that argument. Period.

sugar magnolia · #2074

They left out "existence of counsel."

Slim Cognito · #2075

Moseyed by of counsel.