Sharon Rondeau's The Post & Email - Sharon Bess Hanjian Wirth Rondeau Rated F "Questionable Source"

[Luke]

Thank gosh! The wait is over everybody! All everybody's been talking about at The Fogbow has been... "When is 'Joseph DeMaio's' PART III coming out?

It's here, it's here! The only sad news? It's the CONCLUSION. There were at least 4-5 more articles he could have written that folks like Chuckles were looking forward to.


A Critique of “On the Meaning of ‘Natural Born Citizen,’” Part III


https://www.thepostemail.com/2024/04/08 ... -part-iii/

Won't say anymore, I'm sure everyone is RUSHING to click and read this BREAKING, NEWSWORTHY, TIMELY, RELEVANT conclusion! But Spoiler if you just can't wait:

► Show Spoiler

Deep Dive Conclusion



All of the foregoing verbiage aside – from the arguments of two very smart former officials of the Solicitor General’s Office to those of your humble servant – the end resolution of the nbC question lies either in a binding decision of the Supreme Court or a ratified amendment of the Constitution. Neither of those two solutions seems likely in the near term, lamentably, because the vast majority of the body politic is simply indifferent to the issue. So the debate will continue. Move along…, nothing to see here. Sad.

Realist and I still have our GO BAGS ready. Just in case this is Universe Shattering and they begin rounding up OBOTS.

[noblepa]

Deep Dive Conclusion



All of the foregoing verbiage aside – from the arguments of two very smart former officials of the Solicitor General’s Office to those of your humble servant – the end resolution of the nbC question lies either in a binding decision of the Supreme Court or a ratified amendment of the Constitution. Neither of those two solutions seems likely in the near term, lamentably, because the vast majority of the body politic is simply indifferent to the issue. So the debate will continue. Move along…, nothing to see here. Sad.

That is a remarkable acceptance of reality on his part. There is an implicit admission in that statement, that, in our legal system, the Constitution says what the Supreme Court says it does. SCOTUS is the final arbiter regarding the interpretation of the document. He also explicitly admits that neither a SCOTUS decision nor an amendment are forthcoming.

One is free to have an opinion on the matter. One is even free to disagree with a SCOTUS interpretation, but that doesn't make your opinion the law, as many birthers and sovcits seem to believe.

[bob]

That is a remarkable acceptance of reality on his part. There is an implicit admission in that statement, that, in our legal system, the Constitution says what the Supreme Court says it does. SCOTUS is the final arbiter regarding the interpretation of the document. He also explicitly admits that neither a SCOTUS decision nor an amendment are forthcoming.

One is free to have an opinion on the matter. One is even free to disagree with a SCOTUS interpretation, but that doesn't make your opinion the law, as many birthers and sovcits seem to believe.

As long as there's one birther to still flap gums, the issue remains "unresolved" and "worthy" of "debate."

"DeMaio" is, again, repeating his announcement never to shut up, and never to admit that he's wrong.

[p0rtia]

Oh, Bob, how you sacrifice for the cause!

[bob]

P&E: Ten Most Wanted:

1. BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA.

* * *

2. JOE “BIG GUY” BIDEN.

* * *

3. SECRETARY OF STATE ANTONY BLINKEN.

* * *

4. JOHN PODESTA & STEVE ELMENDORF.

* * *

5. HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON.

* * *

6. NANCY PELOSI.

* * *

7. GYORGY SCHWARTZ AKA GEORGE SOROS.

* * *

8. MOST POLITICIANS.*

* * *

9. MOST REPORTERS AND JOURNALISTS.

* * *

10. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY (CIA). I could include the Department of Justice (DOJ) in the final of my “ten most wanted.”

Where to start?

1. This isn't ten! It is like tens of thousands!

2. Why do only Clinton and Obama get their middle names highlighted?

3. How is Joooooo! Soros not in the Top 3, if not the top spot?


*

I am not going to name any names. Suffice it to say (and I often do) that a decided majority of our elected and appointed federal government workers (whose salaries we pay) are, pardon the expression, “CROOKS.”

Glad that includes the Republicans' presumptive presidential nominee, who literally starts his first criminal trial on Monday.

[pipistrelle]

"Big Guy" Biden?

[bob]

"Big Guy" Biden?

A right-wing meme about Hunter's business deals:

When asked about a 2017 email from one of his business associates proposing that Joe Biden accept a share of profits from a prospective deal with a Chinese energy firm -- the infamous "10 held by H for the big guy" email -- Hunter Biden said the person who sent it, James Gilliar, had no basis for the suggestion.

"I truly don't know what the hell that James was talking about," Hunter Biden said.

[pipistrelle]

How interesting that the man who wasn't president was the "big guy" then.

[Luke]

Bob, was skeered to to scroll down that list because it might have said OBOTS! We dodged a bullet.

Asked ChatGPT to reply just to Tom Arnold's first points about Obama and Biden. ChatGPT was not impressed.

► Show Spoiler

The article you provided is rife with unsubstantiated claims, conspiracy theories, and inflammatory language. Let's address each section:

Barack Obama:

Fact Check: Barack Obama was born in Honolulu, Hawaii, on August 4, 1961. His birth certificate has been verified multiple times by Hawaiian officials and independent fact-checkers. Claims of forgery are baseless.

Analysis: The characterization of Obama as an "anti-American Manchurian Candidate" lacks evidence and relies on conspiracy theories. Mentioning a book alleging Obama's involvement in criminal activities without credible sources undermines the argument's credibility.

Joe Biden:

Fact Check: Accusations of Biden's ties to organized crime are unfounded and lack credible evidence. Claims of election fraud have been thoroughly investigated and debunked. Biden's immigration policies aim to address humanitarian concerns and uphold U.S. asylum laws.

Analysis: Referring to Biden as the head of a "Biden Crime Family" and accusing him of treason without evidence is defamatory. The language used, such as "Big Guy" and "crime boss," is highly derogatory and inappropriate for a serious discussion.

Additional Claims Against Biden's Policies:

Fact Check: Accusations of Biden's policies leading to terrorism, racism, and the destruction of democratic principles lack empirical evidence and rely on fear-mongering rhetoric. Claims of Biden enriching himself through corrupt practices lack credible evidence.

Analysis: Implying that Biden's administration is actively working to dismantle democracy and implement communist or fascist ideologies is a conspiracy theory unsupported by factual evidence. The language used, such as "Fourth Reich," is hyperbolic and inflammatory.

Now, let's draft a response to the article:

Debunking Baseless Claims: Responding to Birther Allegations

Recently, an article surfaced making outrageous claims about former President Barack Obama and President Joe Biden. It's crucial to address these allegations with facts and evidence to prevent the spread of misinformation.

Barack Obama's Citizenship:
The article alleges that Obama was not born in the United States and presented a forged birth certificate. However, Hawaiian officials and independent fact-checkers have verified the authenticity of Obama's birth certificate multiple times. These claims are baseless and perpetuate debunked conspiracy theories.

Accusations Against Joe Biden:
The article accuses Joe Biden of ties to organized crime and election fraud without any credible evidence. These claims are defamatory and lack any factual basis. Biden's immigration policies aim to address humanitarian concerns and uphold U.S. asylum laws, not commit treason as alleged.

Additional Claims Against Biden's Policies:
The article suggests that Biden's policies have led to terrorism, racism, and the destruction of democratic principles. However, these accusations lack empirical evidence and rely on fear-mongering rhetoric. Implying that Biden is actively working to dismantle democracy is a baseless conspiracy theory.

In conclusion, it's essential to critically evaluate information and rely on credible sources. Baseless allegations and conspiracy theories only serve to sow division and undermine trust in democratic institutions. Let's focus on constructive discourse based on facts and evidence rather than unfounded accusations.

This response aims to provide a balanced and evidence-based rebuttal to the claims made in the original article. It's important to counter misinformation with accurate information backed by credible sources.

Rondeau should run all P&E articles through ChatGPT so she can be sure her reader is getting the accurate, well-written content he craves.

[Ben-Prime]

Bob, was skeered to to scroll down that list because it might have said OBOTS! We dodged a bullet.

Although we'd be accused by the makers of such lists as coming under a certain three-letter agency at the bottom. And paid for by Soros. So make with the , already.

[W. Kevin Vicklund]

Arnold heard a traffic copter and panicked at the thought of a swarm of lethal wiener dogs.

O was it a traffic copter