US v. Trump - Espionage Act - (9:23-cr-80101) District Court, S.D. Florida
US v. Trump - Espionage Act - (9:23-cr-80101) District Court, S.D. Florida
Re: The ex-parte meeting about defense strategy.
Recall that Smith requested several months ago that the defense reveal their strategy ASAP. This was in response to fuckhead talking about using an ineffectiveness of counsel strategy. Don't recall all the details, but his point was that they needed to know that to have time to prepare. Cannon nixed Smith's suggested earlier date (shockface) and set this hearing. I _think_ I recall that she said defense didn't have to make it public till the Big March Status Hearing (5th?)
Recall that Smith requested several months ago that the defense reveal their strategy ASAP. This was in response to fuckhead talking about using an ineffectiveness of counsel strategy. Don't recall all the details, but his point was that they needed to know that to have time to prepare. Cannon nixed Smith's suggested earlier date (shockface) and set this hearing. I _think_ I recall that she said defense didn't have to make it public till the Big March Status Hearing (5th?)
- RTH10260
- Posts: 17167
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:16 am
- Location: Switzerland, near the Alps
- Verified: ✔️ Eurobot
US v. Trump - Espionage Act - (9:23-cr-80101) District Court, S.D. Florida
Trumps lawyers have filed stuff, then Teh Donald went on to TV shows and blathers stuff. Jack Smith says thank you and will use these statements in court.
MTN Ben Meiselas
MTN Ben Meiselas
- RTH10260
- Posts: 17167
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:16 am
- Location: Switzerland, near the Alps
- Verified: ✔️ Eurobot
US v. Trump - Espionage Act - (9:23-cr-80101) District Court, S.D. Florida
Judge Cannon seems to have rejected some of the former guys filings and granted Jack Smith a sur-reply.
MTN Ben Meiselas as usual cannot stop hearing himself speak
MTN Ben Meiselas as usual cannot stop hearing himself speak
► Show Spoiler
- MN-Skeptic
- Posts: 3933
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:03 pm
- Location: Twin Cities
US v. Trump - Espionage Act - (9:23-cr-80101) District Court, S.D. Florida
Trump's Motion to Dismiss Counts 1 - 32 Based On Presidential Immunity -
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... .324.0.pdf
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... .324.0.pdf
Tim Walz’ Golden Rule: Mind your own damn business!
- raison de arizona
- Posts: 20219
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:21 am
- Location: Nothing, Arizona
- Occupation: bit twiddler
- Verified: ✔️ he/him/his
US v. Trump - Espionage Act - (9:23-cr-80101) District Court, S.D. Florida
tfg seems to think that the fact that he was once president gives him immunity to criminality forever. It doesn’t.
“Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.” —John Adams
- pipistrelle
- Posts: 7967
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:27 am
US v. Trump - Espionage Act - (9:23-cr-80101) District Court, S.D. Florida
Presumably he's convinced his attorneys.raison de arizona wrote: ↑Sat Feb 24, 2024 9:36 pm tfg seems to think that the fact that he was once president gives him immunity to criminality forever. It doesn’t.
- raison de arizona
- Posts: 20219
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:21 am
- Location: Nothing, Arizona
- Occupation: bit twiddler
- Verified: ✔️ he/him/his
US v. Trump - Espionage Act - (9:23-cr-80101) District Court, S.D. Florida
Nah.pipistrelle wrote: ↑Sat Feb 24, 2024 9:37 pmPresumably he's convinced his attorneys.raison de arizona wrote: ↑Sat Feb 24, 2024 9:36 pm tfg seems to think that the fact that he was once president gives him immunity to criminality forever. It doesn’t.
$$$.
“Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.” —John Adams
US v. Trump - Espionage Act - (9:23-cr-80101) District Court, S.D. Florida
tfg comes up with new beliefs every day..
- MN-Skeptic
- Posts: 3933
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:03 pm
- Location: Twin Cities
US v. Trump - Espionage Act - (9:23-cr-80101) District Court, S.D. Florida
Link to government's surreply in opposition defendants' motion to compel discovery - https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... 37.0_1.pdfKyle Cheney
@kyledcheney
JUST IN: Jack Smith cites the Hur Report to argue that Trump's handling of classified docs was significantly more aggravated/willful than Joe Biden's.
Tim Walz’ Golden Rule: Mind your own damn business!
- RTH10260
- Posts: 17167
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:16 am
- Location: Switzerland, near the Alps
- Verified: ✔️ Eurobot
US v. Trump - Espionage Act - (9:23-cr-80101) District Court, S.D. Florida
Among the filings by the T team there seems to be a motion to drop the case for "vindictive prosecution". Jack Smith has filed a reply.
MTN Michael Popok discusses Jack Smiths reply
MTN Michael Popok discusses Jack Smiths reply
-
- Posts: 4491
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 4:50 pm
- Location: Down here!
US v. Trump - Espionage Act - (9:23-cr-80101) District Court, S.D. Florida
Is Cannon starting to see her future if she continues to be too blatant in her bias?
US v. Trump - Espionage Act - (9:23-cr-80101) District Court, S.D. Florida
I hope so. But she's a slow learner.
"Choose your leaders with wisdom and forethought. To be led by a coward is to be controlled by all that the coward fears… To be led by a liar is to ask to be told lies." -Octavia E. Butler
- John Thomas8
- Posts: 6265
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 7:42 pm
- Location: Central NC
- Occupation: Tech Support
US v. Trump - Espionage Act - (9:23-cr-80101) District Court, S.D. Florida
Looks like a minor bone thrown out to calm the waters she's stirred up so far.
- RTH10260
- Posts: 17167
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:16 am
- Location: Switzerland, near the Alps
- Verified: ✔️ Eurobot
US v. Trump - Espionage Act - (9:23-cr-80101) District Court, S.D. Florida
Just enough so she doesn't get rebuked by the 11th Circuit
US v. Trump - Espionage Act - (9:23-cr-80101) District Court, S.D. Florida
Cannon's decision: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... 46.0_2.pdf
I don't know enough about the CIPA issues to critique the decision, but someone who does posted that she wrongly rejected the Special Prosecutor's statutory analysis and said that the defendants' arguments were better... and then grudgingly acknowledged that 11th circuit authority compelled her to deny the defendants' motion.
And there are off-putting phrases that ... it's hard to explain succinctly, but they don't seem quite normal in the context of this motion. To me they give off creepy vibes:
"although Defendants raise compelling arguments"
"the Special Counsel’s suggestion ... while
commonplace in the CIPA § 4 context—serves as a hollow stand-in for the traditional adversarial posture"
"good-faith arguments raised by Defendants"
I don't know enough about the CIPA issues to critique the decision, but someone who does posted that she wrongly rejected the Special Prosecutor's statutory analysis and said that the defendants' arguments were better... and then grudgingly acknowledged that 11th circuit authority compelled her to deny the defendants' motion.
And there are off-putting phrases that ... it's hard to explain succinctly, but they don't seem quite normal in the context of this motion. To me they give off creepy vibes:
"although Defendants raise compelling arguments"
"the Special Counsel’s suggestion ... while
commonplace in the CIPA § 4 context—serves as a hollow stand-in for the traditional adversarial posture"
"good-faith arguments raised by Defendants"
US v. Trump - Espionage Act - (9:23-cr-80101) District Court, S.D. Florida
Kind of showing her hand there.
Do the right thing. It will gratify some people and astonish the rest. - Mark Twain
-
- Posts: 4491
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 4:50 pm
- Location: Down here!
US v. Trump - Espionage Act - (9:23-cr-80101) District Court, S.D. Florida
She’s hoping for a SCOTUS seat if Donnie ever gets back in.
- SuzieC
- Posts: 1047
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:25 am
- Location: Blue oasis in red state
- Occupation: retired lawyer; yoga enthusiast
- Verified: ✅
US v. Trump - Espionage Act - (9:23-cr-80101) District Court, S.D. Florida
Chancery just want to say that you are doing yeoman's work for The Fogbow. Greatly appreciate.chancery wrote: ↑Wed Feb 28, 2024 4:39 pm Cannon's decision: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... 46.0_2.pdf
I don't know enough about the CIPA issues to critique the decision, but someone who does posted that she wrongly rejected the Special Prosecutor's statutory analysis and said that the defendants' arguments were better... and then grudgingly acknowledged that 11th circuit authority compelled her to deny the defendants' motion.
And there are off-putting phrases that ... it's hard to explain succinctly, but they don't seem quite normal in the context of this motion. To me they give off creepy vibes:
"although Defendants raise compelling arguments"
"the Special Counsel’s suggestion ... while
commonplace in the CIPA § 4 context—serves as a hollow stand-in for the traditional adversarial posture"
"good-faith arguments raised by Defendants"
- pipistrelle
- Posts: 7967
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:27 am
US v. Trump - Espionage Act - (9:23-cr-80101) District Court, S.D. Florida
Mueller She Wrote had the same take.
- RTH10260
- Posts: 17167
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:16 am
- Location: Switzerland, near the Alps
- Verified: ✔️ Eurobot
US v. Trump - Espionage Act - (9:23-cr-80101) District Court, S.D. Florida
IMHO the ruling by Cannon was to be on the sure side of CIPA. The two codefendants of the former guy, Nauta and De Oliveira, were never government officials and never were cleared to have access to government documents, especially the classified stuff.
- keith
- Posts: 4406
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:23 pm
- Location: The Swamp in Victorian Oz
- Occupation: Retired Computer Systems Analyst Project Manager Super Coder
- Verified: ✅lunatic
US v. Trump - Espionage Act - (9:23-cr-80101) District Court, S.D. Florida
Time for Sotomayer to retire!Dave from down under wrote: ↑Wed Feb 28, 2024 5:21 pm She’s hoping for a SCOTUS seat if Donnie ever gets back in.
Be assured that a walk through the ocean of most souls Would scarcely get your feet wet