INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith
INDICATED #3! USA v. Donald Trump, Defendant - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith
You certainly are correct there. She laid out what she wants and basically says tell me which is which. Problem is they essentially want all material protected. And it’s not and is not
Going to be.
Lawyer seems incapable of taking a hint.
Going to be.
Lawyer seems incapable of taking a hint.
X 4
X 33
INDICATED #3! USA v. Donald Trump, Defendant - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith
Windom is doing a little better now, later in the hearing.
X 4
X 33
INDICATED #3! USA v. Donald Trump, Defendant - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith
What a read. HIghly recommended.
So Windom FINALLY says what the DOJ's position is-- ALL of them are sensitive (at bottom).
And having elicited this, and established that Defense is bluntly saying it believes fuckhead has the right to say whatever he wants because he's in a political race, Chutkan makes her move:
So Windom FINALLY says what the DOJ's position is-- ALL of them are sensitive (at bottom).
And having elicited this, and established that Defense is bluntly saying it believes fuckhead has the right to say whatever he wants because he's in a political race, Chutkan makes her move:
INDICATED #3! USA v. Donald Trump, Defendant - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith
- Attachments
-
- Screenshot 2023-08-11 at 11.12.59 AM.png (114.99 KiB) Viewed 1127 times
INDICATED #3! USA v. Donald Trump, Defendant - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith
Thanks for the links Portia. Thread unroll: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1690 ... 18402.html
INDICATED #3! USA v. Donald Trump, Defendant - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith
That was excellent. Thanks for the link.
X 4
X 33
INDICATED #3! USA v. Donald Trump, Defendant - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith
Truth Social rant coming in 5...4...3...2...1...
- Slim Cognito
- Posts: 7264
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 9:15 am
- Location: Too close to trump
- Occupation: Hats. I do hats.
- Verified: ✅
INDICATED #3! USA v. Donald Trump, Defendant - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith
Good one.… have client read transcripts…
x5
- Volkonski
- Posts: 12338
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:06 am
- Location: Texoma and North Fork of Long Island
- Occupation: Retired mechanical engineer
- Verified: ✅
INDICATED #3! USA v. Donald Trump, Defendant - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith
Judge Chutkan says Trump’s right to free speech in January 6 case is ‘not absolute’
https://www.cnn.com/2023/08/11/politics ... index.html
https://www.cnn.com/2023/08/11/politics ... index.html
US District Judge Tanya Chutkan said that she plans to put serious limits over how sensitive evidence is handled in the Donald Trump 2020 election interference case, in a dramatic hearing Friday in Washington, DC, that could set the tone for the upcoming trial.
The former president has a right to free speech, but that right is “not absolute,” Chutkan said. “Mr. Trump, like every American, has a First Amendment right to free speech, but that right is not absolute. In a criminal case such as this one, the defendant’s free speech is subject to the rules.”
This is the first hearing before Chutkan. She has already shown a habit of responding quickly and tersely on the docket to debates between the parties over scheduling. An Obama appointee and former public defender who has overseen several cases regarding the events of January 6, 2021, Chutkan has been outspoken about the harm the US Capitol attack caused to American democracy.
Trump pleaded not guilty to four criminal charges related to his efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election last week, and the judge warned Trump about any possible intimidation of witnesses.
Whether or not Trump’s public statements are covered by the protective order that’s issued, she said, if they result in the intimidation of a witness or the obstruction of justice, “I will be scrutinizing them very carefully.”
Trump’s lawyer John Lauro said: “President Trump will scrupulously abide by his conditions of release.”
Chutkan adopted restrictions proposed by prosecutors that would bar Trump from publicly disclosing information from interview transcripts and recordings from the investigation, including from witness interviews with investigators that took place outside of the grand jury.
“If everyone fought for their own convictions there would be no war.” ― Leo Tolstoy, War and Peace
- RTH10260
- Posts: 16633
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:16 am
- Location: Switzerland, near the Alps
- Verified: ✔️ Eurobot
INDICATED #3! USA v. Donald Trump, Defendant - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith
Trump reading documents without his lawyers present? And then is expected to make a true and complete statement for his defense from that
- noblepa
- Posts: 2604
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 2:55 pm
- Location: Bay Village, Ohio
- Occupation: Retired IT Nerd
INDICATED #3! USA v. Donald Trump, Defendant - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith
Has Lauro actually met the former guy?Trump’s lawyer John Lauro said: “President Trump will scrupulously abide by his conditions of release.”
INDICATED #3! USA v. Donald Trump, Defendant - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith
Full order is out
Philly Boondoggle
- raison de arizona
- Posts: 20219
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:21 am
- Location: Nothing, Arizona
- Occupation: bit twiddler
- Verified: ✔️ he/him/his
INDICATED #3! USA v. Donald Trump, Defendant - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith
Hide the ketchup bottles!
He's going to violate it. Guaranteed.
He's going to violate it. Guaranteed.
“Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.” —John Adams
INDICATED #3! USA v. Donald Trump, Defendant - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith
And when he does, what will the consequences be?raison de arizona wrote: ↑Fri Aug 11, 2023 3:57 pm Hide the ketchup bottles!
He's going to violate it. Guaranteed.
What do our lawyerly members think?
INDICATED #3! USA v. Donald Trump, Defendant - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith
NOT. A. DAMN. THING. (but IANAL)
He slides/slithers-away on most everything ... because of who he is.
He should be remanded to pre-trial custody but it is not going to happen. Mark my words.
- raison de arizona
- Posts: 20219
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:21 am
- Location: Nothing, Arizona
- Occupation: bit twiddler
- Verified: ✔️ he/him/his
INDICATED #3! USA v. Donald Trump, Defendant - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith
I'm with you, but we shall see.
https://twitter.com/AWeissmann_/status/ ... 01472?s=20
Andrew Weissmann (weissmann11 on Threads)🌻 @AWeissmann_ wrote: Not messing around: Judge Chutkan after warning against "inflammatory" public statements: “I will take whatever measures are necessary to safeguard the integrity of these proceedings."
“Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.” —John Adams
- Gregg
- Posts: 5502
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 1:54 am
- Location: Cincinnati, Gettysburg
- Occupation: We build cars
INDICATED #3! USA v. Donald Trump, Defendant - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith
He wants to be remanded.
Because he knows he will at most spend a night or a weekend in actual jail and will make millions, tens of millions, in the fundraising he will do afterwards.
Because he knows he will at most spend a night or a weekend in actual jail and will make millions, tens of millions, in the fundraising he will do afterwards.
Supreme Commander, Imperial Illuminati Air Force
You don't have to consent, but I'm gonna tase you anyway.
You don't have to consent, but I'm gonna tase you anyway.
- Gregg
- Posts: 5502
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 1:54 am
- Location: Cincinnati, Gettysburg
- Occupation: We build cars
INDICATED #3! USA v. Donald Trump, Defendant - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith
The over/under on the Judge demanding a response to a Show Cause Order is Wednesday at noon.
Supreme Commander, Imperial Illuminati Air Force
You don't have to consent, but I'm gonna tase you anyway.
You don't have to consent, but I'm gonna tase you anyway.
- Tiredretiredlawyer
- Posts: 8043
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 10:07 pm
- Location: Rescue Pets Land
- Occupation: 21st Century Suffragist
- Verified: ✅🐴🐎🦄🌻5000 posts and counting
INDICATED #3! USA v. Donald Trump, Defendant - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith
Yes. Yes, there is.somerset: There's a certain irony in tfg being forced to comply with what is basically a NDA
"Mickey Mouse and I grew up together." - Ruthie Tompson, Disney animation checker and scene planner and one of the first women to become a member of the International Photographers Union in 1952.
- RTH10260
- Posts: 16633
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:16 am
- Location: Switzerland, near the Alps
- Verified: ✔️ Eurobot
INDICATED #3! USA v. Donald Trump, Defendant - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith
comments on T lawyer Lauro