In the never-ending Klayman v JW case, the original (from 2006), the magistrate made a recommendation on attorney fees, heavily lowering what JW had requested. So of course, GIL files:
OBJECTIONS TO REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL HARVEY, MOTION TO REFER TO ANOTHER INDEPENDENT COURT OUTSIDE OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, CROSS MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AND REFERRAL OF ATTEMPTED FRAUD TO THE COMMITTEE ON GRIEVANCES
Sorry, I reproduced the title as written on the filing, which is in all caps. It helps fit his style, though.
If I understand correctly, he got a win out of the magistrate, so he went screaming. The clerk, who apparently understands Klayman, created two docket entries, but both are pointed at one document. This way, the court and defendants can respond to the objection to the magistrate's report, which is one action, and the motion for all sorts of crap with another, even if GIL cannot seem to do separate filings.
Oh yeah, and GIL's droppings
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... .662.0.pdf
I guess the magistrate lowering the fee amount means that JW committee fraud or something.
JW responded to the bunch of crap motion:
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... .665.0.pdf
They were meanies by pointing out that just because the appellant panel asked him for clarification, it did not mean they ruled in the way he claimed.
The Panel never suggested that they would adopt this standard or that this case satisfied the standard. They only requested that Klayman articulate how a court could justify a collateral attack on another court’s judgment.
4. Klayman misread the Panel comments. This is confirmed by the Circuit Court’s opinion rejecting his appeal only a few short weeks later:
And their reply to Klayman's objections to the report:
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... .664.0.pdf
Klayman is engaged in an unprecedented abuse of the legal system to delay an inevitable outcome.
Well, duh.