I mean, that's my favorite example of where they went, here.
They're building a whack-a-mole game. Appease this shit at your peril.
![Brick Wall (small) :brickwallsmall:](./images/smilies/brickwall.gif)
p0rtia wrote: ↑Mon Sep 12, 2022 2:40 pm So...I'm reading the "aggressive rebuke."
So far, those aren't the first words that come to mind as an accurate characterization. Sort of like describing an Orly Taitz filing as a "taking a forthright stand for democracy."
I mean seriously, normalizing this bullying, condescending pack of lies as a viable position in the real world is digusting.
Zoe Tillman @ZoeTillman wrote: New: Trump objects to DOJ's proposed special master candidates, says they prefer not to say why on the public record to be "respectful," they'll tell the judge later if she asks for more info https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... 3.85.0.pdf
Waiting to hear from DOJ on Trump's list
Context: The bar is supposed to be high for something to be submitted to the judge in camera (not on the public record). Besides "respect," Trump's lawyers don't articulate the types of privacy/security/etc. issues we'd expect to see in a request to argue something in private
Maybe someone ought to bring up the possibility of anything Judge Karen calls not classified is gonna be subject to FOIA requests and she might be the one who okays them being on the front page of the WaPo if she does. See how that looks on you bio, Sparky.
Problem is, all TFG's lawyers are doing is delaying. They are intentionally ignoring some facts and lying about others--all to delay. If the DOJ has to spend time whacking down this shit, TFG is winning.
It's an abuse of the legal process, and tfg has both done it and gotten away with it for his entire life. He wields it as a sword against his enemies.p0rtia wrote: ↑Mon Sep 12, 2022 4:03 pm Problem is, all TFG's lawyers are doing is delaying. They are intentionally ignoring some facts and lying about others--all to delay. If the DOJ has to spend time whacking down this shit, TFG is winning.
BTW, TFG says that this Special Master deal is supposed to last "three months."
It's disgusting. That's the word I keep coming back to.
Question: is it possible that the Reinhart court can make orders re the seized material that undermine Cannon court ruling, past and futures? Like the DOJ would be asking such in the secreted motions.Greatgrey wrote: ↑Mon Sep 12, 2022 5:26 pm Meanwhile over in Magistrate Reinhart’s courtroom…
7045825D-E81F-41AC-B5B7-02822C63BD5C.jpeg
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/64 ... h-warrant/
That's just a screwball pro se litigant appealing the denial of his screwball motion to intervene.Greatgrey wrote: ↑Mon Sep 12, 2022 5:26 pm Meanwhile over in Magistrate Reinhart’s courtroom…
7045825D-E81F-41AC-B5B7-02822C63BD5C.jpeg
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/64 ... h-warrant/
IANACrL, but I doubt it. Whatever the juridical thing is that Trump shopped to Judge Cannon, if any kind of federal judge has jurisdiction over it, it wouldn't be a magistrate judge. A Rule 41(g) motion can't be made to a magistrate judge (absent consent of both parties). Similarly any ancillary a/k/a anomalous equitable power (although it's not clear what kind of jurisdiction it's ancillary to, since Trump disclaimed having filed a Rule 41(g) motion) could only be exercised by an Article III judge.
Hugo Lowell @hugolowell 9m
New: Justice Dept says it will accept as the Special Master to review seized Mar-a-Lago docs former US district court chief judge Raymond Dearie — one of Trump’s picks — as well as its own two candidates, suggesting he’s likely be named. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... 3.86.0.pdf
Ummm, the 4 sealed itemschancery wrote: ↑Mon Sep 12, 2022 6:55 pmThat's just a screwball pro se litigant appealing the denial of his screwball motion to intervene.Greatgrey wrote: ↑Mon Sep 12, 2022 5:26 pm Meanwhile over in Magistrate Reinhart’s courtroom…
7045825D-E81F-41AC-B5B7-02822C63BD5C.jpeg
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/64 ... h-warrant/