In the Klayman v. Porter et al case in the Southern District of Florida, Judge Singhal has dismissed the case due to claim splitting (in other words, "litigating the same damn thing again").
The present case involves both the same parties and arises from the same transaction or series of transactions as the previously filed case. Although the Complaint only seeks injunctive relief, it involves the same alleged wrongdoing as the previous case. Plaintiff acknowledges as much by describing the present case as arising from “Defendants’ continued pattern and practice of unethical, illegal and unconstitutional conduct aimed at removing him from the practice of law by curtailing and ultimately silencing his conservative/libertarian private and public interest advocacy.”