p0rtia wrote: ↑Sat Feb 12, 2022 1:56 pm
Don’t tell DeSantis. He sign an executive order making it a felony to reveal the name of the charity “a portion of the proceeds” goes to. Freedom!
WTAF? What does that accomplish, exactly? Aside from preventing charities from getting a bit of awareness-raising/promotion, that is... DeSantis is just weird.
I bet some sarcasm smilie got lost while posting the post
p0rtia wrote: ↑Sat Feb 12, 2022 1:56 pm
Don’t tell DeSantis. He sign an executive order making it a felony to reveal the name of the charity “a portion of the proceeds” goes to. Freedom!
WTAF? What does that accomplish, exactly? Aside from preventing charities from getting a bit of awareness-raising/promotion, that is... DeSantis is just weird.
I bet some sarcasm smilie got lost while posting the post
Oh, ok - I see what happened. I read it as saying he had signed and EO making it a felony, not that he would if he found out what Melania was doing. Oops! My bad!
p0rtia wrote: ↑Sat Feb 12, 2022 1:56 pm
Don’t tell DeSantis. He sign an executive order making it a felony to reveal the name of the charity “a portion of the proceeds” goes to. Freedom!
WTAF? What does that accomplish, exactly? Aside from preventing charities from getting a bit of awareness-raising/promotion, that is... DeSantis is just weird.
I haven't noticed that DeSantis has done a single thing in the past two years with the intent to help anyone (except for his barons who made a mint off of COVID vaccines and monoclonal antibody treatment). He is all in on doing things that restrict rights, go counter to science, history, biology, the fucking bible, and any other social guide you can think of. He is truly all in for Earth 2 logic: too many gun deaths? We need more guns! Too many COVID deaths? Fewer mitigations. Too much poverty? Stop giving support to the poor.
It is Putin light. This ass-hole is on the road for "what we need is some purifying of the populace."
sad-cafe wrote: ↑Thu Mar 17, 2022 4:02 am
I don’t see any nude photos or legs in the. Air photos so it’s not real
Apparently 76 out of 3000 have been sold. Probably one real person and 75 versions of the family "buying" in to make it look like it's not the complete loser her first grift attempt turned out to be.
“A know-it-all is a person who knows everything except for how annoying he is.”
Chilidog wrote: ↑Sun May 15, 2022 10:24 am
Melania seems upset.
I want to see at least one recap of this article entitled "Anna Wintour really doesn't care. Do you?"
But the sunshine aye shall light the sky,
As round and round we run;
And the truth shall ever come uppermost,
And justice shall be done.
- Charles Mackay, "Eternal Justice"
I'm guessing there's an interview to go along with the cover. Exflotus wouldn't do that.
"Choose your leaders with wisdom and forethought. To be led by a coward is to be controlled by all that the coward fears… To be led by a liar is to ask to be told lies." -Octavia E. Butler
Pete Hegseth got a sit down with Melania, some of it aired on F&f this morning. Pete did note how FLOTUS and Kampala got covers and Melanie ever did. She talked about how much she loved being first lady.
There was mention of whatever this new business she's involved in (never understood what it was), and how a "portion" of the proceeds go to charity.
I imagine that it absolutely galls Melania that Kamala and Jill were featured on the cover of Vogue while she, while FLOTUS and supposedly a great beauty, was completely ignored.
MN-Skeptic wrote: ↑Sun May 15, 2022 1:08 pm
I imagine that it absolutely galls Melania that Kamala and Jill were featured on the cover of Vogue while she, while FLOTUS and supposedly a great beauty, was completely ignored.
MN-Skeptic wrote: ↑Sun May 15, 2022 1:08 pm
I imagine that it absolutely galls Melania that Kamala and Jill were featured on the cover of Vogue while she, while FLOTUS and supposedly a great beauty, was completely ignored.
Unlike Melanie, Dr Jill and VP Kamala are very beautiful on the inside.
MN-Skeptic wrote: ↑Sun May 15, 2022 1:08 pm
I imagine that it absolutely galls Melania that Kamala and Jill were featured on the cover of Vogue while she, while FLOTUS and supposedly a great beauty, was completely ignored.
Unlike Melanie, Dr Jill and VP Kamala are very beautiful on the inside.
...and Doc Jill and JD Kamala actually went to schools and obtained degrees. At one time I had a twinge of sympathy that Melanoma was stuck in an empty marriage. Turns out she is just as empty, selfish and ugly as trump.
MN-Skeptic wrote: ↑Sun May 15, 2022 1:08 pm
I imagine that it absolutely galls Melania that Kamala and Jill were featured on the cover of Vogue while she, while FLOTUS and supposedly a great beauty, was completely ignored.
Unlike Melanie, Dr Jill and VP Kamala are very beautiful on the inside.
And unlike Melania neither Jill or Kamala currently have or have ever had nude photos of themselves posted on line.
MN-Skeptic wrote: ↑Sun May 15, 2022 1:08 pm
I imagine that it absolutely galls Melania that Kamala and Jill were featured on the cover of Vogue while she, while FLOTUS and supposedly a great beauty, was completely ignored.
From coverage at the time, they offered her a cover shoot, but it had to go with a multi page interview. She wouldnt do the interview, so the Cover shoot got scrapped. If she had done the interview, they would have put her on the cover.
She’s been on the cover, clearly labeled as tfg’s latest bride.
054EB6AD-F8D0-40D5-A2EE-B91D3C8D8027.jpeg (36.12 KiB) Viewed 3920 times
“Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.” —John Adams
“Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.” —John Adams
noblepa wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 11:44 am
Do reputable auction houses, such as Christy's of Sotheby's, allow the seller to bid on their own auctions? It seems like a good way to fraudulently push the bidding higher.
Ooooooh yaaa. Putting up something like, for example, a comic up for sale then bidding it's price up yourself is an open secret way of inflating the worth of your own collection. And then you buy it yourself, and the thing you never intended on selling now has an on paper worth that has just gone up. The auction houses still take their commission so they don't give a fuck.
If you have a spare hour or so to listen to something, this is a pretty expose on the fraud that is going on in the Retro Games collectors market. I'm very certain that similar underhanded stuff is going on in all types of collector media.
Yes. This is rife on Discogs too, at least before Russia invaded Ukraine and got kicked off FX payment systems. It was quite comical to see certain records listed for $2000 by one dealer in Russia but $40 on everybody else's site. Then the max price value goes to $2000 so somebody has 'bought' it for that value. Its stupid and I expect its backgrounding for insurance fraud.
Be assured that a walk through the ocean of most souls Would scarcely get your feet wet
This account doesn't have a blue checkmark but I'm guessing this isn't fake based on the Fox headline. Oh, and that signature reminds me of something...can't place it...
FYR4nVVXEAMbszi.jpeg (216.63 KiB) Viewed 3443 times
Ms Grisham knew that the now exflotus was totally uninterested in politics and could care less that the person she was married to had lost a federal election. Ms Grisham knew that now exflotus could not be bothered what her male attachment was up to that (or any) day. Ms Grisham knew that the husband would bite back and retaliate to any suggestion on how to behave presidential that were proposed by the lady that ought to stand barefoot in his kitchen.
That form of address used to be reserved for widows, otherwise she's still Mrs Donald Trump (because etiquette requires that women not have their own bodily autonomy when their masters are alive).