Eastman contends the agents "forced" him to unlock his phone.
That's interesting. I wonder what they did?
Don’t know what her source was, but last night Rachel said they held the phone up to his face to unlock it.
The wonders of face recognition
Now for me, mafia style chop off your fingers to unlock by finger print So when the FBI knocks on your door, rush to the kitchen stove and scortch your finger tips
Eastman contends the agents "forced" him to unlock his phone.
That's interesting. I wonder what they did?
Don’t know what her source was, but last night Rachel said they held the phone up to his face to unlock it.
Saw something from the ACLU a while back. Seems that cops unlocking your phone via fingerprint or facial recognition isn’t protected, but using a passcode is, they can’t demand that you tell them the code.
Eastman contends the agents "forced" him to unlock his phone.
That's interesting. I wonder what they did?
Don’t know what her source was, but last night Rachel said they held the phone up to his face to unlock it.
That would do it.
"Choose your leaders with wisdom and forethought. To be led by a coward is to be controlled by all that the coward fears… To be led by a liar is to ask to be told lies." -Octavia E. Butler
Sounds like what we're going to hear today is that they started planning all of this back in September 2020; before the election even took place when the polls showed that trump was going to lose. From the guardian article that's attached:
On the night of the first presidential debate, Trump’s top former strategist Steve Bannon said in an interview with The Circus on Showtime that the outcome of the election would be decided at the state level and eventually at the congressional certification on January 6.
“They’re going to try and overturn this election with uncertified votes,” Bannon said. Asked how he expects the election to end, Bannon said: “Right before noon on the 20th, in a vote in the House, Trump will win the presidency.”
Foggy wrote: ↑Tue Jun 28, 2022 8:03 am
That's interesting. I wonder what they did?
Don’t know what her source was, but last night Rachel said they held the phone up to his face to unlock it.
Saw something from the ACLU a while back. Seems that cops unlocking your phone via fingerprint or facial recognition isn’t protected, but using a passcode is, they can’t demand that you tell them the code.
I recall something about that as well, but it is irrelevant in this case, as the search warrant clearly specified that Eastman was required to unlock all devices, including any biometric locks.
“Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.” —John Adams
FIRST MAJOR NEWS OF THE HEARING: Rudy Giuliani told Hutchinson on Jan. 2 that Trump would be going to the Capitol on Jan. 6. She asked Meadows about this and he told her that "things might get real, real bad on Jan. 6."
I thought concealed carry was okayed by the Supremes.
"Mickey Mouse and I grew up together." - Ruthie Tompson, Disney animation checker and scene planner and one of the first women to become a member of the International Photographers Union in 1952.
texts to Tony O - "He" was trump and he was pissed that the crowd at the ellipse wasn't big enough. Wanted more ppl brought in.
She attended the rally via presidential motorcade. Behind the stage, trump was very concerned about the "shot" bc the space wasn't full of ppl. "He wanted it to be full..." "He felt ??? was at fault for not letting everyone in." He wanted people with weapons allowed in?? Did I hear that right?
trump "I don't care if they have weapons. They're here to see me. They aren't going to hurt me. Take the fucking mags* away."
"They're having trouble stacking bodies" meaning SS was becoming aware security at the Capitol. would not be adequate.
after talking to Ornato, she went to talk to Meadows. She tried to warn Meadows by opening the car door, but he slammed it shut before she could speak to him. He was on the phone.
it happened a 2nd time.
It was 20-25 minutes before she could talk to him.
when CH was finally able to tell Meadows, "he almost had a lack of reaction. He asked, How much longer does the prez have left in his speech?"
Many discussions about the rhetoric of the jan 6 speech, "it would be foolish to include the language the prez requested, fight for trump, fight for me, fight for the movement, things about the vp at the time, too. Herschman and ??? urged speech writers not to include those things for legal concerns..."
talking about trump's plan to walk to the Capitol. He planned to travel to the Capitol on Jan 6.
talking about Off The Record movements, which are not scheduled. You can pull that together in less than an hour to circumvent releasing it to the press, or not have as many security parameters put in place.
back to trump's plan. Cipollone sp? was concerned about trump wanting to go to the Capitol and agreed with the SS trump should not go.
"We need to make sure this doesn't happen...We have serious legal concerns if he goes to the Capitol that day." Keep relaying that to Meadows as he believed Meadows was pushing for the trip.
Cipollone said "please make sure we don't go up to the Capitol. Keep in touch wiht me. We will get charged with every crime imaginable if that happens."
what crimes? obstructing justice, defrauding the electoral count.