Mueller's investigation of Trump

User avatar
Kendra
Posts: 7725
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2016 7:53 am

Re: Mueller's investigation of Trump

#1051

Post by Kendra » Fri Jul 14, 2017 11:05 am

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/rus ... d_nn_tw_ma

Today might get interesting now that the name of another person in the now infamous meeting with Jr. has come out.

:snippity: On April 4, Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, chairman of the Judiciary Committee, wrote a letter to the Homeland Security department seeking information about Akhmetshin, saying that Akhmetshin admitted to being a Soviet counterintelligence officer. Grassley said Akhmetshin had failed to register as a foreign agent even though he had been lobbying in the U.S. for Russian interests. Grassley also charged that Akhmetshin had been working with Fusion GPS, an opposition-research firm that had compiled a highly disputed dossier on Donald Trump. :snippity:

The letter: https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/me ... chment.pdf



SLQ
Posts: 2031
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 12:33 am

Re: Mueller's investigation of Trump

#1052

Post by SLQ » Fri Jul 14, 2017 11:14 am

So MSNBC is reporting BREAKING NEWS that Goldstone is the other (another?) person who was at the meeting. Ahem. See upthread. I have it on Good Authority that Rachel received a tip showing that Don Jr. essentially said this in the Hannity interview.



User avatar
bob
Posts: 23814
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Mueller's investigation of Trump

#1053

Post by bob » Fri Jul 14, 2017 11:36 am

Kendra wrote:Is there any exposure to them when all the facts come out?
Legally, lying is only a crime if it obstructs justice (e.g., lying to the FBI) or if done under oath (i.e., perjury).

Politically, Republicans live in a post-consequences world.


Imagex5 Imagex2 Imagex3 Imagex2

SLQ
Posts: 2031
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 12:33 am

Re: Mueller's investigation of Trump

#1054

Post by SLQ » Fri Jul 14, 2017 11:37 am

Also, before that breaking news was breaking news that a Russian lobbyist and ex-soviet spy was at the meeting: http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/rus ... am-n782851

Funny, transparent Don didn't mention that.

(On my phone so will affix the formatting later.)



User avatar
Sterngard Friegen
Posts: 43503
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Location: Over the drawbridge

Re: Mueller's investigation of Trump

#1055

Post by Sterngard Friegen » Fri Jul 14, 2017 11:55 am

Remember - whatever the news is reporting now Mueller's team has known for weeks. And unlike reporters, they have subpoena power. The patriot leaking at the White House is also probably known to Mueller's team and is probably their "useful idiot." As the leaks continue to come out, the rats will scramble from the light. And leave trails for Mueller's team to follow.

And one thing the team is following is the money. Jared Kushner's actions toward Qatar because one of its citizens refused to bail him out is just another string being followed on that basis.

When the indictments start to come down this is going to explode. We are in kindergarten right now. Mueller is in law school. Teaching a class of 3Ls.



SLQ
Posts: 2031
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 12:33 am

Re: Mueller's investigation of Trump

#1056

Post by SLQ » Fri Jul 14, 2017 11:59 am

Sterngard Friegen wrote:When the indictments start to come down this is going to explode. We are in kindergarten right now. Mueller is in law school. Teaching a class of 3Ls.
Thank God! I have to keep reminding myself that Trump & Co.'s PR spin is meaningless as to the Mueller investigation.

George W. Bush
There's an old saying in Tennessee — I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee — that says, fool me once, shame on — shame on you. Fool me — you can't get fooled again.
You also can't fool a seasoned federal prosecutor with BS propaganda.



User avatar
Addie
Posts: 25384
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 6:22 am
Location: downstairs

Re: Mueller's investigation of Trump

#1057

Post by Addie » Fri Jul 14, 2017 12:10 pm

Bloomberg
Trump to Hire Lawyer Ty Cobb to Respond to Russia Probes

President Donald Trump plans to put a veteran Washington lawyer, Ty Cobb, in charge of overseeing the White House’s legal and media response to investigations into Russian meddling in the 2016 campaign.

Top administration officials want someone to enforce discipline in the White House regarding Russia matters -- and that includes the president, who frequently vents his frustrations about the investigations on Twitter, a White House official said. The official requested anonymity because Cobb’s hiring hasn’t been announced. ...

Cobb will be the central in-house figure on matters related to the investigations into Russian interference in the election and the Trump campaign’s possible involvement, working closely with Trump’s outside legal team led by Marc Kasowitz and John Dowd.

Cobb is a relative of the baseball Hall of Famer of the same name. He has a reputation for managing crises and dealing with corruption allegations, and he’s familiar with the workings of the Justice Department and FBI. He represented figures involved in government investigations during former President Bill Clinton’s administration, according to Reuters, which reported on July 3 that Trump had met with him.


¡Qué vergüenza!

User avatar
Dan1100
Posts: 2130
Joined: Sat Oct 18, 2014 3:41 pm

Re: Mueller's investigation of Trump

#1058

Post by Dan1100 » Fri Jul 14, 2017 12:18 pm

Kendra wrote: :snippity:
Life insurance policies cover suicide?
It is a matter of state law. Most (all??) states have a statute that says that suicide has to be covered after a certain waiting period. Missouri is one year. I looked up the statute in a different thread.


"Let's say you're on trial for armed robbery. You say to the judge, 'I forgot armed robbery was illegal.' "

-Steve Martin

Sunrise
Posts: 632
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2016 3:29 pm

Re: Mueller's investigation of Trump

#1059

Post by Sunrise » Fri Jul 14, 2017 12:21 pm

Will any of this new crew of 45's lawyers be paid* by the OSG himself, or will he manage to make it a White House expense that we taxpayers fund?

* If it's the former, the question becomes moot, since it's well known that Teh Donald doesn't believe in paying his bills.


"I am no longer accepting the things I cannot change. I am changing the things I cannot accept."
Angela Davis

User avatar
Kendra
Posts: 7725
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2016 7:53 am

Re: Mueller's investigation of Trump

#1060

Post by Kendra » Fri Jul 14, 2017 12:28 pm

Sunrise wrote:Will any of this new crew of 45's lawyers be paid* by the OSG himself, or will he manage to make it a White House expense that we taxpayers fund?

* If it's the former, the question becomes moot, since it's well known that Teh Donald doesn't believe in paying his bills.
I can't recall where I read it (so many news stories!) but there was chatter on one of perhaps the RNC being expected to pony up if it was legal to do so, if not set up some speshul fund for it.



User avatar
Addie
Posts: 25384
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 6:22 am
Location: downstairs

Re: Mueller's investigation of Trump

#1061

Post by Addie » Fri Jul 14, 2017 12:31 pm

Yeah, I read that, too. I think it was only yesterday, but I'm damned if I remember where. :oops:
Kendra wrote:I can't recall where I read it (so many news stories!) but there was chatter on one of perhaps the RNC being expected to pony up if it was legal to do so, if not set up some speshul fund for it.


¡Qué vergüenza!

User avatar
much ado
Posts: 1198
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 12:56 am
Location: The Left Coast

Re: Mueller's investigation of Trump

#1062

Post by much ado » Fri Jul 14, 2017 12:36 pm

Sterngard Friegen wrote:When the indictments start to come down this is going to explode.
:thumbs: Any guess about how many months we can expect to wait before the first indictments are announced? Are they likely to start with the smaller fish and work their way up the food chain?


A man needs a reason to go shopping; a woman just needs a place. - much ado
(prompted by daughter ado's enthusiasm to visit a mall with no specific goal)

User avatar
Addie
Posts: 25384
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 6:22 am
Location: downstairs

Re: Mueller's investigation of Trump

#1063

Post by Addie » Fri Jul 14, 2017 12:44 pm

Somebody's mad :lol:

Raw Story
Ex-RNC head Steele explodes on Trump for dragging the GOP through his ‘crap — every single frigging day’

Appearing on MSNBC Friday morning, a livid Michael Steele lit into the Trump Administration for the daily “drip, drip, drip” of information about links to Russian involvement in the 2016 presidential election, saying the Republican Party is going to be decimated by it.

Speaking with host Stephanie Ruhle, the former chairman of the Republican National Committee was asked about NBC’s bombshell report that an ex-Soviet agent met with Donald Trump Jr., Jared Kushner and Paul Manafort in Trump Tower on June 9th.

Steele became quite animated about the long term implications for the Republican Party with a reeling President Donald Trump as the face of the party.

“I think it works along the lines of a general belief that no one will know what actually happened because there was no third party source to validate or corroborate who was in the meeting,” Steele began. “But, you know, we have a press corps, we have individuals as we’ve learned in this administration who do like to talk. And that information gets out — the drip, drip, drip. I’ve said it now for six months, the drip, drip, drip from this campaign and now into this administration will be its death knell, and it rings every frigging day for the Republican Party, and they better wake their butts up.”

“Why is the Republican Party letting this happened?” Steele was asked.

“They’re scared of one-tenth of 1 percent of a base that is lockstep with Donald Trump, and the leadership is frozen,” Steele replied as his voice rose and he began to tick off the lack of any progress the Republicans have made since taking over the White House and both houses of Congress. “They have cement around their feet and they refuse to move. They can’t get an agenda passed, seven years on health care? This is a joke. Infrastructure won’t happen, tax reform? Forget about it.”


¡Qué vergüenza!

User avatar
Northland10
Posts: 6518
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:19 am
Location: Chicago area - North burbs

Re: Mueller's investigation of Trump

#1064

Post by Northland10 » Fri Jul 14, 2017 1:17 pm

I am still dumbfounded at how they let their activities get so close to the center of the campaign. Have they never heard of the concept of using intermediaries when involved with dirty trick politics? If you are looking for dirt, you do not let the provider anywhere near the campaign leadership. That's just stupid.

It doesn't help that this crew does not care one wit about the actual law or even the consequences from appearing to be doing something illegal. In politics, appearances matter.

They do appear to be making Mueller's job a little easier. Now he can spend more time on the deeper stuff.


North-land: of the family 10
UCC 1-106 Plural is Singular, Singular is Plural.

User avatar
much ado
Posts: 1198
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 12:56 am
Location: The Left Coast

Re: Mueller's investigation of Trump

#1065

Post by much ado » Fri Jul 14, 2017 1:22 pm

Northland10 wrote:I am still dumbfounded at how they let their activities get so close to the center of the campaign. Have they never heard of the concept of using intermediaries when involved with dirty trick politics? If you are looking for dirt, you do not let the provider anywhere near the campaign leadership. That's just stupid.
I think they lacked a clear understanding that what they wanted to do was illegal. It was just business as usual to them.


A man needs a reason to go shopping; a woman just needs a place. - much ado
(prompted by daughter ado's enthusiasm to visit a mall with no specific goal)

noblepa
Posts: 939
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 5:54 pm
Location: Bay Village, Ohio
Occupation: Network Engineer

Re: Mueller's investigation of Trump

#1066

Post by noblepa » Fri Jul 14, 2017 1:27 pm

qbawl wrote:
GlimDropper wrote:GOP Operative Who Sought Hillary Clinton Emails from Russian Hackers Killed Himself

:snippity: :snippity:
Umm, don't life insurance policies generally frown on suicide?
:snippity:
Yes but only during the first 2 years in force if my memories of long ago LOMA classes are correct.
That's the way my two whole-life policies are worded.



noblepa
Posts: 939
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 5:54 pm
Location: Bay Village, Ohio
Occupation: Network Engineer

Re: Mueller's investigation of Trump

#1067

Post by noblepa » Fri Jul 14, 2017 1:39 pm

much ado wrote:
Sterngard Friegen wrote:When the indictments start to come down this is going to explode.
:thumbs: Any guess about how many months we can expect to wait before the first indictments are announced? Are they likely to start with the smaller fish and work their way up the food chain?[/quote]

That's the way conspiracy prosecutions usually work. They will try to get the smaller fish to roll over on the bigger fish.



noblepa
Posts: 939
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 5:54 pm
Location: Bay Village, Ohio
Occupation: Network Engineer

Re: Mueller's investigation of Trump

#1068

Post by noblepa » Fri Jul 14, 2017 1:47 pm

much ado wrote:
Northland10 wrote:I am still dumbfounded at how they let their activities get so close to the center of the campaign. Have they never heard of the concept of using intermediaries when involved with dirty trick politics? If you are looking for dirt, you do not let the provider anywhere near the campaign leadership. That's just stupid.
I think they lacked a clear understanding that what they wanted to do was illegal. It was just business as usual to them.
They still lack that understanding. They honestly believe that they did nothing wrong. I think that they're aware that others may think it is wrong; hence the stonewalling.

Even if there was no actual crime committed, why can't they understand that letting a foreign power, especially our principle rival for world leadership, Russia, be involved in our election, is just plain WRONG?

If the latest round of news about Junior do result in criminal charges, I think that the case will revolve around Congressional intent for the words "anything of value". I'm sure that when Congress was crafting the law, they were thinking of bags of cash or cash equivalents. While I agree that "dirt" on Hillary would be valuable to the Trump campaign, I think that there is room for debate on whether it meets the meaning of the phrase in the statute. If it does not, then no crime has been committed.



User avatar
RoadScholar
Posts: 6734
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 10:25 am
Location: Baltimore
Occupation: Historic Restoration Woodworker
Contact:

Re: Mueller's investigation of Trump

#1069

Post by RoadScholar » Fri Jul 14, 2017 1:49 pm

I'm not sure you're right about that. It is possible that they do know that what they've been doing is wrong, but just do not care. In which case it's just a matter of them thinking they'd get away with it and whether they in fact will.


The bitterest truth is healthier than the sweetest lie.
X3

User avatar
Chilidog
Posts: 8438
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 11:36 am

Re: Mueller's investigation of Trump

#1070

Post by Chilidog » Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:06 pm

Off Topic
Trump's lawyers name reminds me of this bit of dialog

Ray Kinsella: Where'd they come from?

Shoeless Joe Jackson: Where did WE come from? You wouldn't believe how many guys wanted to play here. We had to beat 'em off with a stick.

Archie Graham: Hey, that's Smokey Joe Wood. And Mel Ott. And Gil Hodges!

Shoeless Joe Jackson: Ty Cobb wanted to play, but none of us could stand the son-of-a-bitch when we were alive, so we told him to stick it!



User avatar
RVInit
Posts: 6333
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2016 4:31 pm

Re: Mueller's investigation of Trump

#1071

Post by RVInit » Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:10 pm

I think the proof that Trump received something of value is that he has attempted to give value back. He wanted to eliminate the sanctions on Russia and the only reason he wasn't able to do it is because of all the press and investigations regarding his campaign and Russia. He clearly has treated Putin with a respect and admiration that he hasn't given to our best allies. And now he wants to give Putin an invitation (but "not yet") to the Oval office. FFS. Clearly he views Putin's efforts to have been "of value".


"I know that human being and fish can coexist peacefully"
--- George W Bush

ImageImage

User avatar
pipistrelle
Posts: 4186
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 11:26 am

Re: Mueller's investigation of Trump

#1072

Post by pipistrelle » Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:37 pm

http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la ... story.html
Op-Ed Why did Don Jr.'s emails surface? Because Robert Mueller is already changing Washington's lying ways



User avatar
much ado
Posts: 1198
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 12:56 am
Location: The Left Coast

Re: Mueller's investigation of Trump

#1073

Post by much ado » Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:47 pm

RoadScholar wrote:I'm not sure you're right about that. It is possible that they do know that what they've been doing is wrong, but just do not care. In which case it's just a matter of them thinking they'd get away with it and whether they in fact will.
Certainly that is quite possible.

I've wondered, though, if the real reason Trump wants so desperately to quash the Russia investigation is not that the election collusion amounted to much, perhaps it did not. But that any attention on Trump's Russian connections would uncover a large number of obviously very illegal transactions, dealings, arrangements, etc., which would likely include money laundering and income tax evasion at the very least.

But, too bad for Trump. Looks like it is too late!


A man needs a reason to go shopping; a woman just needs a place. - much ado
(prompted by daughter ado's enthusiasm to visit a mall with no specific goal)

User avatar
much ado
Posts: 1198
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 12:56 am
Location: The Left Coast

Re: Mueller's investigation of Trump

#1074

Post by much ado » Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:49 pm

Sad!


A man needs a reason to go shopping; a woman just needs a place. - much ado
(prompted by daughter ado's enthusiasm to visit a mall with no specific goal)

User avatar
Addie
Posts: 25384
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 6:22 am
Location: downstairs

Re: Mueller's investigation of Trump

#1075

Post by Addie » Fri Jul 14, 2017 3:05 pm

1. The US Attorney for the Southern District of New York, in charge of US v. Prevezon Holdings money laundering case, is fired (March 11 2017).

2. Trump phone conversation with Putin; Putin asks Trump to receive Lavrov (May 2, 2017).

3. The FBI Director is fired (May 9 2017).

4. Lavrov and Kislyak meet with Trump in the Oval Office (May 12 2017).

5. US v. Prevezon Holdings trial, a $230 million lawsuit, set to commence May 15, is settled out of court for $6M (May 13 2017).

6. Coinkydink or something of value? In return for what?


¡Qué vergüenza!

Post Reply

Return to “Trump Administration”