House v. Hankinson (A Trussell Rescue Lawsuit)

User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 10408
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

Re: House v. Hankinson (A Trussell Rescue Lawsuit)

#101

Post by Notorial Dissent » Sat Aug 06, 2016 7:44 pm

It's all whosever fault it was that started the House Harkonen comment, now I can't get it out of my head either.

On to topic:
I just really love all the ranting and beating of breasts or whatever of the pretend CLGJ crowd. They seem to realize, if dimly, that TT's getting smacked and sent to prison really is "a prime example of discrediting any work that the grand jury has done in FL", they just don't get it that it discredits it, because it is a KROCK, and that he got sent to prison for doing what they are now clamoring to do, again. Who said stupidity is repetitive? Although, oddly, there doesn't seem to be any great rush for any of them to step up to the plate and be the next one to go to the slammer, maybe the lesson has sunk in, just a little.


The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
Sam the Centipede
Posts: 5984
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2012 3:25 pm

Re: House v. Hankinson (A Trussell Rescue Lawsuit)

#102

Post by Sam the Centipede » Sun Aug 07, 2016 2:20 am

bob wrote:I was going to say that the only thing these people learned from Trussell was to not file their magik papers with the court clerk.

But I don't think they learned even that.
Bob :fingerwag: , don't use offensive language! "Learning" is a filthy liberal idea rejected by all true pootriots! That's why Common Core must be resisted!

If a tactic is guaranteed to succeed (because fantasy gurus tell us so) then each successive failure can only make success more certain next time; the Law of Averages tells us that*. The polling and statistics wonks here can understand it in Bayesian terms: the potatotriots are updating a posterior probability in light of expected outcomes**. It's called a posterior probability because that's where they pull it from.

* Yes, I know.
** Yes, yes, I said I know!



User avatar
Northland10
Posts: 6885
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:19 am
Location: Chicago area - North burbs

Re: House v. Hankinson (A Trussell Rescue Lawsuit)

#103

Post by Northland10 » Thu Aug 11, 2016 8:54 pm

And so it ends.
O R D E R
Pending before the Court is ECF No. 4, a document entitled “Notice of Error.” Mr. House previously filed a document entitled criminal complaint, which the Clerk opened as a miscellaneous case. After screening the filing the Court ordered Plaintiff either to pay the filing fee or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 2. Plaintiff now advises that he never intended to file a case and instead was filing a report of some sort of criminal conduct.

As the Court previously advised a private citizen has no authority to file a “criminal complaint” in federal court against another individual or to file a report. Because it is evident that Mr. House does not intend to pay a filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, and that Mr. House does not want to file a court case, this miscellaneous case should not have been opened as a case and therefore should be closed. The Court will not take any further action in this matter.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

The Clerk is directed to close this case and terminate any pending motions.

DONE AND ORDERED this 8 day of August, 2016.
Here pauseth the stupidity.


North-land: of the family 10
UCC 1-106 Plural is Singular, Singular is Plural.

User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 10408
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

Re: House v. Hankinson (A Trussell Rescue Lawsuit)

#104

Post by Notorial Dissent » Thu Aug 11, 2016 9:27 pm

But most likely only pauseth, I wouldn't be surprised if he isn't back shortly with something else or another complaint.


The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
realist
Posts: 34494
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:33 pm

Re: House v. Hankinson (A Trussell Rescue Lawsuit)

#105

Post by realist » Thu Aug 11, 2016 9:37 pm

Do you have a linky for Rikker?


ImageX 4 ImageX36
Image

User avatar
Northland10
Posts: 6885
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:19 am
Location: Chicago area - North burbs

Re: House v. Hankinson (A Trussell Rescue Lawsuit)

#106

Post by Northland10 » Thu Aug 11, 2016 10:06 pm

08/08/2016 5 ORDER - The Clerk is directed to close this case and terminate any pending motions. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES on 8/8/2016. (atm) (Entered: 08/09/2016)
HOUSE v HANKINSON dismissal.pdf
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.


North-land: of the family 10
UCC 1-106 Plural is Singular, Singular is Plural.

User avatar
realist
Posts: 34494
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:33 pm

Re: House v. Hankinson (A Trussell Rescue Lawsuit)

#107

Post by realist » Fri Aug 12, 2016 7:52 am

Northland10 wrote:
08/08/2016 5 ORDER - The Clerk is directed to close this case and terminate any pending motions. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES on 8/8/2016. (atm) (Entered: 08/09/2016)
HOUSE v HANKINSON dismissal.pdf
Thank you.
:thumbs:

At Jack's Also Too:
08/08/2016 5 ORDER - The Clerk is directed to close this case and terminate any pending motions. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES on 8/8/2016. (atm) (Entered: 08/09/2016)


ImageX 4 ImageX36
Image

noblepa
Posts: 979
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 5:54 pm
Location: Bay Village, Ohio
Occupation: Network Engineer

Re: House v. Hankinson (A Trussell Rescue Lawsuit)

#108

Post by noblepa » Fri Aug 12, 2016 9:45 am

Turtle wrote:72:20 a guy says Terry lost because his first attorney Crawford filed some papers that allowed the court to have jurisdiction. He also was confused why Garcia didn't call the 3 expert witnesses who could have "educated the jury".
Didn't IG have such witnesses on her list? And didn't the court deny permission to call so-called "expert" witnesses on the law?

Tyranny!!



User avatar
Reality Check
Posts: 14814
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: House v. Hankinson (A Trussell Rescue Lawsuit)

#109

Post by Reality Check » Fri Aug 12, 2016 10:11 am

noblepa wrote:Didn't IG have such witnesses on her list? And didn't the court deny permission to call so-called "expert" witnesses on the law?

Tyranny!!
Yes, that was Garcia's "First Amendment expert" John Wolfgram. Judge Hankinson ruled his testimony would be irrelevant and not helpful to the jury.


"“If you’re not outraged, you’re not paying attention.”

Heather Heyer, November 2016

User avatar
NotaPerson
Posts: 3050
Joined: Mon May 18, 2015 9:33 pm

Re: House v. Hankinson (A Trussell Rescue Lawsuit)

#110

Post by NotaPerson » Fri Aug 12, 2016 10:32 am

08/08/2016 5 ORDER - The Clerk is directed to close this case and terminate any pending motions. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES on 8/8/2016. (atm) (Entered: 08/09/2016)
After seeing this I remembered the Wednesday night FL 4CD conference calls hosted by Rodger, so I went and gave this week's call a listen. Even though the case was closed on Monday, there was no mention of it whatsoever during the call. Instead, I learned that the fees we pay for such things as our driver's license, fishing license, and so on go directly to the Federal Reserve. :liar: And that our nation's prisons are filled with men who are there for no reason other being unable to afford court-mandated child support payments. :liar: :liar:

Late in the call, there was one very brief mention of Trussell. Bob Root reported that Terry said in a letter to him that his fellow prisoners love him. :smoking:

https://www.freeconferencecallhd.com/pl ... YLPw/j6uro


Am I being detained?

User avatar
Foggy
Posts: 26481
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 12:00 pm
Location: Fogbow HQ
Occupation: Dick Tater

Re: House v. Hankinson (A Trussell Rescue Lawsuit)

#111

Post by Foggy » Fri Aug 12, 2016 2:14 pm

NotaPerson wrote:... Terry said in a letter to him that his fellow prisoners love him.
Oh, good. He'll have lots of new friends, maybe even learn a new trade, like how to knock over a 7-11. :mrgreen:

I'm sure Marie will be glad to meet his new buddies. :blink:


Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity.

User avatar
Slim Cognito
Posts: 5004
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2014 8:37 am

Re: House v. Hankinson (A Trussell Rescue Lawsuit)

#112

Post by Slim Cognito » Fri Aug 12, 2016 2:22 pm

Foggy wrote:
NotaPerson wrote:... Terry said in a letter to him that his fellow prisoners love him.
Oh, good. He'll have lots of new friends, maybe even learn a new trade, like how to knock over a 7-11. :mrgreen:

I'm sure Marie will be glad to meet his new buddies. :blink:
And they'll all be thrilled to learn they can meet up at Denny's to indict the prosecutors who put them in jail.


ImageImageImage x4

User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 10408
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

Re: House v. Hankinson (A Trussell Rescue Lawsuit)

#113

Post by Notorial Dissent » Fri Aug 12, 2016 2:49 pm

Foggy wrote:
NotaPerson wrote:... Terry said in a letter to him that his fellow prisoners love him.
Oh, good. He'll have lots of new friends, maybe even learn a new trade, like how to knock over a 7-11. :mrgreen:

I'm sure Marie will be glad to meet his new buddies. :blink:
Nah, that would be work, and would require coordination and planning and maybe even a little thought, and we all know how well that works for TT. Besides some of those clerks, at least around here are mean sob's when you aggravate them, they hire them that way specifically for the late shift when stupid people, like TT, are likely to rob the place. He wouldn't survive the encounter. :point:


The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
Reality Check
Posts: 14814
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: House v. Hankinson (A Trussell Rescue Lawsuit)

#114

Post by Reality Check » Fri Aug 12, 2016 3:10 pm

Well the outcome of this case was certainly predictable.
► Show Spoiler


"“If you’re not outraged, you’re not paying attention.”

Heather Heyer, November 2016

User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 10408
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

Re: House v. Hankinson (A Trussell Rescue Lawsuit)

#115

Post by Notorial Dissent » Fri Aug 12, 2016 3:34 pm

But is it done yet? That kind of extra special stupid usually takes at least three or four attempts before the message sinks in.


The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
Reality Check
Posts: 14814
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: House v. Hankinson (A Trussell Rescue Lawsuit)

#116

Post by Reality Check » Fri Aug 12, 2016 3:55 pm

Notorial Dissent wrote:But is it done yet? That kind of extra special stupid usually takes at least three or four attempts before the message sinks in.
I think it goes like this:
  1. Motion for Reconsideration of the Denial of the Notice of Error
  2. Motion for Reconsideration of the Denial of the Motion for Reconsideration of the Denial of Notice of Error
  3. "Inditement" of the clerk, judge, US Attorney and other officials for Misprision of Felony for Treason
Except I think in most cases it goes right to step 3.


"“If you’re not outraged, you’re not paying attention.”

Heather Heyer, November 2016

User avatar
Turtle
Posts: 2503
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2014 5:27 pm
Occupation: SPACE FORCE COMMANDER

Re: House v. Hankinson (A Trussell Rescue Lawsuit)

#117

Post by Turtle » Fri Aug 12, 2016 4:42 pm

I've seen in Meads v. Meads where sovcits/freemen could be declared vexatious litigants. Does the US have something similar?



User avatar
bob
Posts: 24431
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: House v. Hankinson (A Trussell Rescue Lawsuit)

#118

Post by bob » Fri Aug 12, 2016 4:55 pm

Turtle wrote:I've seen in Meads v. Meads where sovcits/freemen could be declared vexatious litigants. Does the US have something similar?
Federal courts do have something similar, i.e., pre-filing injunctions/orders.

But there are First Amendment policy grounds as to why governments are reluctant to pursue them against citizens. Never say never, but no one is yet close enough in Trussell's case.


Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
Paul Lentz
Posts: 3666
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 7:56 pm
Location: Downtown O-town

Re: House v. Hankinson (A Trussell Rescue Lawsuit)

#119

Post by Paul Lentz » Fri Aug 12, 2016 4:59 pm

Turtle wrote:I've seen in Meads v. Meads where sovcits/freemen could be declared vexatious litigants. Does the US have something similar?
Absolutely, but it takes more than a few frivolous filings to get that done. If you looked at all the filings in all the US District Courts even in one single day, you'd find that (I'd estimate) a good 10-15% of them are junk filings, pretty much in the same class as this one. The courts spend very little time on them (and they generally fall into the in-basket of a magistrate judge, as opposed to one of the district court judges, and the magistrate judges are very accustomed to dealing with junk filings. While I think everyone wishes "we the people" would develop some actual smarts about court filings, it's not going to happen anytime soon.

House filed a form which he downloaded from a government website, and which clearly designates the form (within its category) for the use of prosecutors and grand juries, not for any joeblow off the street to bloviate petition for the redress of his whiny and misguided grievances.

But, as long as we have the 1st Amendment (and that's not going down anytime soon, and thank God for that), the courts, Congress, and the President/judicial branch, are obligated to deal with the misguided, right along with the folks who are proceeding correctly in their petitions for redress.


The love of power will not win over the power of love.
Orlando, Florida 6/12/16

Post Reply

Return to “Terry Trussell”