AFFIRMED!! TRUSSELL v STATE OF FLORIDA - APPEAL

User avatar
Patagoniagirl
Posts: 3663
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2012 1:15 pm

Re: AFFIRMED!! TRUSSELL v STATE OF FLORIDA - APPEAL

#51

Post by Patagoniagirl » Fri Nov 02, 2018 2:18 pm

My friend is going to hand this off to someone else to share the whole letter.

Stay tuned.



User avatar
Slim Cognito
Posts: 5619
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2014 8:37 am

Re: AFFIRMED!! TRUSSELL v STATE OF FLORIDA - APPEAL

#52

Post by Slim Cognito » Sat Nov 03, 2018 8:10 am

A mutual friend sent these to me for posting. I tried to adjust the light so make them legible.
3.jpg
1.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.


ImageImageImage x4

User avatar
ArthurWankspittle
Posts: 1384
Joined: Sun May 05, 2013 12:38 pm

Re: AFFIRMED!! TRUSSELL v STATE OF FLORIDA - APPEAL

#53

Post by ArthurWankspittle » Sat Nov 03, 2018 12:11 pm

What ? "I'm where god wants me" "I blamed no one for my predicament" "The corrupt state attorneys judges? clerk of court sheriff...."
Do you also thank god for making you as stupid as you appear?


Going to Tibet now and deleting Facebook you have my email address.

User avatar
Foggy
Posts: 27766
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 12:00 pm
Location: Fogbow HQ
Occupation: Dick Tater

Re: AFFIRMED!! TRUSSELL v STATE OF FLORIDA - APPEAL

#54

Post by Foggy » Sat Nov 03, 2018 2:34 pm

If I believed in a god who is omnipotent, and who created the Universe and everything in it, and who controls the affairs of all creatures great and small ... I think I would be a little dismayed to find that He personally wanted me to be in prison at the age of 76, when other people are walkin' around going to nice restaurants and stuff.


In my whole life I have never faked a sarcasm.

User avatar
realist
Posts: 34665
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:33 pm

Re: AFFIRMED!! TRUSSELL v STATE OF FLORIDA - APPEAL

#55

Post by realist » Sat Nov 03, 2018 3:02 pm

So I don’t know he’s learning but it certainly does not include the fact that he and he alone is responsible for his “predicament.”

:brickwallsmall:


ImageX 4 ImageX36
Image

User avatar
Orlylicious
Posts: 8602
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 4:02 pm
Location: DHS Psy-Ops HQ

Re: AFFIRMED!! TRUSSELL v STATE OF FLORIDA - APPEAL

#56

Post by Orlylicious » Wed Nov 14, 2018 12:04 am

Hard to believe Terry will be in jail for another Thanksgiving. And he still doesn't seem to have learned anything. Enjoy the turkey Terry.

Is there anything else here or Terry's just in till 2024 or whatever?


Avatar Photo: Replaced by young Roger Stone because "Adam Samuel Ben-Canaan, who published "attempted murder charges against ... Fogbow" is a useless putz.

User avatar
realist
Posts: 34665
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:33 pm

Re: AFFIRMED!! TRUSSELL v STATE OF FLORIDA - APPEAL

#57

Post by realist » Tue Nov 20, 2018 10:17 am

Apologies if these entries have been previously posted, but FYI the Motion for Rehearing and Rehearing en banc has been DENIED.
10/08/2018 Grant Motion EOT for Rehearing 10/18/2018 Appellee's motion filed October 05, 2018, for extension of time to file a motion for rehearing is granted. Appellee's motion for rehearing shall be filed on or before October 18, 2018.

10/17/2018 RESPONSE Trisha Meggs Pate 0045489 to Motion for Rehearing and Motion for Rehearing En Banc

11/15/2018 Deny Appellant's Motion for Rehearing Appellant's motion filed September 25, 2018, for rehearing is denied.

11/15/2018 Denial of Rehearing En Banc Motion for rehearing en banc filed by the appellant on September 25, 2018, is denied.


ImageX 4 ImageX36
Image

User avatar
Slim Cognito
Posts: 5619
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2014 8:37 am

Re: AFFIRMED!! TRUSSELL v STATE OF FLORIDA - APPEAL

#58

Post by Slim Cognito » Tue Nov 20, 2018 10:45 am

Rooster at PFA is trying to get his followers (both of them) to write the new FL gov elect to beg for Trussell's pardon. Since Trussell never threatened to indict him for treason, I wonder what his chances are.


ImageImageImage x4

User avatar
realist
Posts: 34665
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:33 pm

Re: AFFIRMED!! TRUSSELL v STATE OF FLORIDA - APPEAL

#59

Post by realist » Fri Dec 14, 2018 10:11 am

And as Tes would say ... just for *completeness*

"New Docket Entries"
12/06/2018 Mandate
12/06/2018 Returned Records np filed
12/06/2018 Case Permanent
12/06/2018 West Publishing


ImageX 4 ImageX36
Image

User avatar
Sam the Centipede
Posts: 6693
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2012 3:25 pm

Re: AFFIRMED!! TRUSSELL v STATE OF FLORIDA - APPEAL

#60

Post by Sam the Centipede » Sat Dec 15, 2018 3:23 am

Wot!?!?

Shouldn't this list read:
Vindication.
Liberation.
Canonization.

That's the sovcit drwam!



User avatar
Orlylicious
Posts: 8602
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 4:02 pm
Location: DHS Psy-Ops HQ

Re: AFFIRMED!! TRUSSELL v STATE OF FLORIDA - APPEAL

#61

Post by Orlylicious » Sat Dec 15, 2018 3:57 am

What do those docket entries mean? Are there super secret clues that show Terry will be given a red carpet exit and key to the city? Where is Inger Garcia? Why hasn't she made this happen? And Morburger. Seems only we at Fogbow have a sense of urgency about this, with the (maybe) Seraquel they're giving Terry, he just thinks God wants him in jail. Just waiting for the excitement to begin again, Terry should demand a NEW TRIAL for Fogbow member's amusement.


Avatar Photo: Replaced by young Roger Stone because "Adam Samuel Ben-Canaan, who published "attempted murder charges against ... Fogbow" is a useless putz.

User avatar
ArthurWankspittle
Posts: 1384
Joined: Sun May 05, 2013 12:38 pm

Re: AFFIRMED!! TRUSSELL v STATE OF FLORIDA - APPEAL

#62

Post by ArthurWankspittle » Sat Dec 15, 2018 4:41 am

Sam the Centipede wrote:
Sat Dec 15, 2018 3:23 am
Wot!?!?

Shouldn't this list read:
Vindication.
Liberation.
Adulation.
Canonization.

That's the sovcit drwam!
FTFY


Going to Tibet now and deleting Facebook you have my email address.

User avatar
bob
Posts: 25992
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: AFFIRMED!! TRUSSELL v STATE OF FLORIDA - APPEAL

#63

Post by bob » Sat Dec 15, 2018 12:47 pm

Orlylicious wrote:
Sat Dec 15, 2018 3:57 am
What do those docket entries mean?
That the case is final, and closed.

I infer it means that Trussell didn't appeal to SCOFL, but I'm happy to be corrected.


Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
Northland10
Posts: 7568
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:19 am
Location: Chicago area - North burbs

Re: AFFIRMED!! TRUSSELL v STATE OF FLORIDA - APPEAL

#64

Post by Northland10 » Sat Dec 15, 2018 1:40 pm

bob wrote:
Sat Dec 15, 2018 12:47 pm
Orlylicious wrote:
Sat Dec 15, 2018 3:57 am
What do those docket entries mean?
That the case is final, and closed.

I infer it means that Trussell didn't appeal to SCOFL, but I'm happy to be corrected.
This was posted on the appellate docket yesterday.
12/14/2018 NOTICE OF DISCRETN. JURISDICTN FILED BY: Robert David Malove
12/14/2018 Review Sent to Supreme Court NOTICE OF DISCRETN. JURISDICTN
If I have understood correctly, they barely made the 30 days if the clock started at the denial of the rehearing. However, since it was a denial of a rehearing, would the clock start tolling after the opinion since that is where the question invoking jurisdiction would be derived?

I could see the clock starting early if only to prevent people from using a motion for rehearing as a delaying tactic.


North-land: of the family 10
UCC 1-106 Plural is Singular, Singular is Plural.

User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 11564
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

Re: AFFIRMED!! TRUSSELL v STATE OF FLORIDA - APPEAL

#65

Post by Notorial Dissent » Sat Dec 15, 2018 6:28 pm

What I see is just more billable hours to no purpose.


The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
Orlylicious
Posts: 8602
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 4:02 pm
Location: DHS Psy-Ops HQ

Re: AFFIRMED!! TRUSSELL v STATE OF FLORIDA - APPEAL

#66

Post by Orlylicious » Sat Dec 15, 2018 11:26 pm

I hope they find a way to get Terry Trussell out early, I'm so curious to see when he gets out if he's seen the light and will be a good, quiet citizen, or will he go right back to the antics that put him in jail? Kinda like a lab rat, I want to see the next step. What will Rodger B. Dowdell Jr. be doing in 2024?

Terry 24.JPG

But if not, Realist, Kate and Foggy have tons of time to make TRUSSELL 2024 swag like bumper stickers, coffee mugs, etc. Cafepress.com, here we come! :lol:
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.


Avatar Photo: Replaced by young Roger Stone because "Adam Samuel Ben-Canaan, who published "attempted murder charges against ... Fogbow" is a useless putz.

User avatar
realist
Posts: 34665
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:33 pm

Re: AFFIRMED!! TRUSSELL v STATE OF FLORIDA - APPEAL

#67

Post by realist » Fri Dec 21, 2018 11:56 am

Northland10 wrote:
Sat Dec 15, 2018 1:40 pm
bob wrote:
Sat Dec 15, 2018 12:47 pm
Orlylicious wrote:
Sat Dec 15, 2018 3:57 am
What do those docket entries mean?
That the case is final, and closed.

I infer it means that Trussell didn't appeal to SCOFL, but I'm happy to be corrected.
This was posted on the appellate docket yesterday.
12/14/2018 NOTICE OF DISCRETN. JURISDICTN FILED BY: Robert David Malove
12/14/2018 Review Sent to Supreme Court NOTICE OF DISCRETN. JURISDICTN
If I have understood correctly, they barely made the 30 days if the clock started at the denial of the rehearing. However, since it was a denial of a rehearing, would the clock start tolling after the opinion since that is where the question invoking jurisdiction would be derived?

I could see the clock starting early if only to prevent people from using a motion for rehearing as a delaying tactic.
One additional New Entry:
12/14/2018 NOTICE OF DISCRETN. JURISDICTN NOTICE OF DISCRETN. JURISDICTN FILED BY: Robert David Malove

12/14/2018 Review Sent to Supreme Court NOTICE OF DISCRETN. JURISDICTN

12/19/2018 Acknowledged Receipt from Supreme Court NOTICE OF DISCRETN. JURISDICTN


ImageX 4 ImageX36
Image

User avatar
ZekeB
Posts: 15218
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 10:07 pm
Location: Northwest part of Semi Blue State

Re: AFFIRMED!! TRUSSELL v STATE OF FLORIDA - APPEAL

#68

Post by ZekeB » Fri Dec 21, 2018 3:50 pm

Orlylicious wrote:
Sat Dec 15, 2018 11:26 pm
I hope they find a way to get Terry Trussell out early, I'm so curious to see when he gets out if he's seen the light and will be a good, quiet citizen, or will he go right back to the antics that put him in jail? Kinda like a lab rat, I want to see the next step. What will Rodger B. Dowdell Jr. be doing in 2024?
Pavlov Trussell?


Ano, jsou opravdové. - Stormy Daniels

Nech mě domluvit! - Orly Taitz

User avatar
bob
Posts: 25992
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: AFFIRMED!! TRUSSELL v STATE OF FLORIDA - APPEAL

#69

Post by bob » Thu Jan 31, 2019 8:29 pm

Cross-posting:

According SCOFL's docket (No. 18-2084), Trussel (in the COA) moved for rehearing (which was denied in November), so in December he sought a discretionary appeal. In January, the state opposed.

So I presume that Trussell can reply, and then SCOFL will decide whether to grant cert. (in SCOTUS' terms).

In SCOFL, Trussell is essentially repeating his argument (but with a fancier dress) about the prosecutor's closing argument contradicting the charging papers.
Edit: Type-O.


Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
Northland10
Posts: 7568
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:19 am
Location: Chicago area - North burbs

Re: AFFIRMED!! TRUSSELL v STATE OF FLORIDA - APPEAL

#70

Post by Northland10 » Thu Jan 31, 2019 8:33 pm

bob wrote:
Thu Jan 31, 2019 8:29 pm
In SCOFL, Trussell is essentially repeating his argument (but with a fancier dress) about the prosecutor's closing argument contracting the charging papers.
Did you mean contradicting?


North-land: of the family 10
UCC 1-106 Plural is Singular, Singular is Plural.

User avatar
bob
Posts: 25992
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: AFFIRMED!! TRUSSELL v STATE OF FLORIDA - APPEAL

#71

Post by bob » Thu Jan 31, 2019 8:34 pm

Northland10 wrote:
Thu Jan 31, 2019 8:33 pm
Did you mean contradicting?
:oops:

* * *
Northland10 wrote:
Thu Jan 31, 2019 8:26 pm
I am confused as the why all the Birther and loon lawyers, keep making all these motions for reconsideration and rehearings. I thought a rehearing at the appellate level and reconsideration at the trial level was not necessary to move the case to the next level. Yet, they seem to waste time doing this.
In Trussell's defense, there was a dissent. You aren't necessarily out in left field/being dilatory if you can point to a judge agreeing with your position.


Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

Post Reply

Return to “Terry Trussell”