CLIVEN BUNDY v GLORIA NAVARRO, et al.

User avatar
Northland10
Posts: 6982
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:19 am
Location: Chicago area - North burbs

Re: CLIVEN BUNDY v GLORIA NAVARRO, et al.

#101

Post by Northland10 » Thu Sep 01, 2016 1:37 pm

There are various filings recently but I did not have time to post anything here (I did look at a couple briefly last night so RECAP may have picked them up). The one thing I did notice is that GIL's name is still on the filing's with Hansen and the tone of one I briefly scanned was all Klayman.


North-land: of the family 10
UCC 1-106 Plural is Singular, Singular is Plural.

User avatar
Northland10
Posts: 6982
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:19 am
Location: Chicago area - North burbs

Re: CLIVEN BUNDY v GLORIA NAVARRO, et al.

#102

Post by Northland10 » Fri Oct 14, 2016 3:00 pm

Docket update:
10/07/2016 43 STIPULATION of Dismissal with Prejudice of All Claims Against All Defendants by Defendants Gloria Navarro, Barack Obama, Kristen Orthman, Harry Reid, United States of America. (Addington, Gregory) (Entered: 10/07/2016)

10/12/2016 44 ORDER Granting 43 STIPULATION of Dismissal with Prejudice of All Claims Against All Defendants by Defendants Gloria Navarro, Barack Obama, Kristen Orthman, Harry Reid, United States of America., Case terminated. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 10/12/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM) (Entered: 10/13/2016)
It's dead Jim.

Unlike earlier filings, Klayman's name was nowhere to be found on the stipulation or on the previous request for more time on 30 September.
gov.uscourts.nvd.114975.44.0.pdf
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.


North-land: of the family 10
UCC 1-106 Plural is Singular, Singular is Plural.

User avatar
bob
Posts: 24537
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: CLIVEN BUNDY v GLORIA NAVARRO, et al.

#103

Post by bob » Fri Oct 14, 2016 3:06 pm

Northland10 wrote:Unlike earlier filings, Klayman's name was nowhere to be found on the stipulation or on the previous request for more time on 30 September.
It is as if Hansen belatedly realized that perhaps associating with Klayman was a wee improvident.


Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 10475
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

Re: CLIVEN BUNDY v GLORIA NAVARRO, et al.

#104

Post by Notorial Dissent » Fri Oct 14, 2016 5:31 pm

bob wrote:
Northland10 wrote:Unlike earlier filings, Klayman's name was nowhere to be found on the stipulation or on the previous request for more time on 30 September.
It is as if Hansen belatedly realized that perhaps associating with Klayman was a wee improvident.
He doesn't strike me as that bright, rather I'm betting the money ran out.


The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

Pallas_Athena
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2016 9:40 pm

Re: CLIVEN BUNDY v GLORIA NAVARRO, et al.

#105

Post by Pallas_Athena » Sat Oct 15, 2016 11:34 am

Found this regarding the facts Cliven asserts in his complaint about the Reids wanting his land.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/conspiracy/nevada.asp



User avatar
Northland10
Posts: 6982
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:19 am
Location: Chicago area - North burbs

Re: CLIVEN BUNDY v GLORIA NAVARRO, et al.

#106

Post by Northland10 » Sat Oct 15, 2016 12:11 pm

Pallas_Athena wrote:Found this regarding the facts Cliven asserts in his complaint about the Reids wanting his land.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/conspiracy/nevada.asp
That wouldn't have been a problem for Klayman. The land claims were only window dressing for the true purpose of the suit, harassment. GIL's specialty is harassing people with lawsuits.

Thanks for the link though. It is a reminder of how little Larry and Cliven care about for truth.


North-land: of the family 10
UCC 1-106 Plural is Singular, Singular is Plural.

Post Reply

Return to “Bundy Ranch/Malheur NWR”