Bundy Trials - Nevada
- Sugar Magnolia
- Posts: 12313
- Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2012 6:44 am
Re: Bundy Trials - Nevada Standoff
There already another with the same name. Old one renamed for Nevada.
- Sugar Magnolia
- Posts: 12313
- Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2012 6:44 am
Re: Bundy Trials - Nevada Standoff
I understand that, but the old one isn't actually about NV. It's 35 pages of OR posts. Searching on the board is hard enough as it is, and the 2 Bundy standoffs are already confusing. Changing from OR to NV 35 pages into a thread makes no sense. I specifically titled this one identically to Mike's to keep the trial stuff together.
- Sugar Magnolia
- Posts: 12313
- Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2012 6:44 am
- Slarti the White
- Posts: 7069
- Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 2:52 pm
Re: Bundy Trials - Nevada Standoff
Thanks Sugar! Can anyone do a summary (or point to summarizing posts) on what the current state of all of these threads are for those of us wandering over from the collapse of our 10-page a day Y'all Qaeda habit that don't have it in us to read 35 more pages?
"Strategy without tactics is the slowest route to victory. Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat."
---Sun Tzu (quoting Thomas Jefferson)
nam-myoho-renge-kyo---Thomas Jefferson (quoting Slartibartfast)
---Sun Tzu (quoting Thomas Jefferson)
nam-myoho-renge-kyo---Thomas Jefferson (quoting Slartibartfast)
- Sugar Magnolia
- Posts: 12313
- Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2012 6:44 am
Re: Bundy Trials - Nevada Standoff
Mike's OR thread has a list of the arrestees (although I think the group with Blaine Cooper, maybe?) related to the NV standoff because he's way more organized than I am and probably a better typist. There's a bunch of OR stuff in the other NV thread because it got renamed from OR to NV after 35 pages. This one was my attempt to have a place to put the Cliven Bundy stuff from 2 years ago in NV.Slartibartfast wrote:Thanks Sugar! Can anyone do a summary (or point to summarizing posts) on what the current state of all of these threads are for those of us wandering over from the collapse of our 10-page a day Y'all Qaeda habit that don't have it in us to read 35 more pages?
Or not.
- Sterngard Friegen
- Posts: 47324
- Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
- Location: Over the drawbridge
Re: Bundy Trials - Nevada Standoff
Here's the PACER index for Cliven Bundy in Oregon, where he was arrested and incarcerated:
Cliven will be transported back to Nevada, so this is the correct place to put this stuff even though it is temporarily from Oregon.
I attach the arrest warrant, which I don't believe we've seen.Date Filed # Docket Text
02/11/2016 1 Documents Received From Other Court as to Cliven D. Bundy from USDC District of Nevada(Las Vegas); Their Case No: 2:16-mj-000127-PAL. (Attachments: # 1[RECAP] arrest warrant from Las Vegas) (cib) (Entered: 02/11/2016)
02/11/2016 2 Defendant Information Relative to a Criminal Case Sheet as to Defendant Cliven D. Bundy. (In accordance with Fed. R. Crim. P. 49.1 this form document containing personal data identifiers is filed under seal). (cib) (Entered: 02/11/2016)
02/11/2016 3 Minutes of Proceedings: Initial Appearance pursuant to Rule Rule 5(c)(3) Proceedings before Magistrate Judge Janice M. Stewart as to Cliven D. Bundy on complaint from the District of Nevada. Defendant concedes identity. Defendant advised of rights and waived reading of the charges. Order Appointing Counsel Ruben L. Iniguez for Cliven D. Bundy for today only. Order appointing CJA panel attorney if defendant qualifies for appointed counsel. Financial Affidavit to be submitted. A Detention Hearing is set for Tuesday, 2/16/2016 at 01:30PM before the duty magistrate judge. A Preliminary Hearing is set for Friday, 2/19/2016 at 01:30PM before the duty magistrate judge. Order DETAINED pending the 2/16/16 detention hearing. Counsel Present for Plaintiff: Charles Gorder. Counsel Present for Defendant: Ruben Iniguez. (Court Reporter Jill Jessup) (jlr) (Entered: 02/11/2016)
Cliven will be transported back to Nevada, so this is the correct place to put this stuff even though it is temporarily from Oregon.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- GlimDropper
- Posts: 1485
- Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2014 12:35 pm
Re: Bundy Trials - Nevada
JJ of the numbered conspirators:
JJ MacNab @jjmacnab 26m26 minutes ago
Unnamed Conspirators:
#1 Ryan Bundy
#2 Ammon Bundy
#3 Ryan Payne
#4 Pete Santilli
JJ MacNab @jjmacnab 26m26 minutes ago
Unnamed Conspirators:
#1 Ryan Bundy
#2 Ammon Bundy
#3 Ryan Payne
#4 Pete Santilli
- Sterngard Friegen
- Posts: 47324
- Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
- Location: Over the drawbridge
Re: Bundy Trials - Nevada
So Santilli, who's prancing around fancying himself as an embedded reporter (remember his ill fated trip to the Mexican border?) now finds himself indicted or about to be indicted in two separate district courts. He'll be spending the next two years in court and then the following 10-15 in prison. Couldn't happen to a nicer guy. I hope the ACLU drops him now like the hot pistol that he is.
Same is true about Cliven's fellow co-conspirators. How many of his own children can Cliven get incarcerated as members of his gang?
Same is true about Cliven's fellow co-conspirators. How many of his own children can Cliven get incarcerated as members of his gang?
Re: Bundy Trials - Nevada
The Nevada indictment is particularly unkind to Santilli (#4).
It's arguable that he was more reporter than participant in OR, but he was clearly an active participant, partner, and conspirator in NV. It's no wonder the DOJ pushed so hard to keep him detained - they knew that Santilli would be in a couple of worlds more hurt by the time this indictment hit the press.
It's arguable that he was more reporter than participant in OR, but he was clearly an active participant, partner, and conspirator in NV. It's no wonder the DOJ pushed so hard to keep him detained - they knew that Santilli would be in a couple of worlds more hurt by the time this indictment hit the press.
In a wilderness of mirrors, what will the spider do beyond the circuit of the shuddering Bear in fractured atoms? -TS Eliot (somewhat modified)
All warfare is based on deception. - Sun Tzu
All warfare is based on deception. - Sun Tzu
Re: Bundy Trials - Nevada
From a commentator at Lawyers Guns & Money:
A name like Cliven Bundy feels tailor made for a poem:
Cliven Bundy
Born on a Monday
Stole on a Tuesday
Insurrectionist on a Wednesday
Arrested on a Thursday
Stood trial on a Friday
Convicted on a Saturday
Imprisoned on a Sunday
That was the end of Cliven Bundy.
Re: Bundy Trials - Nevada
crossposting my question from the Oregon thread
RTH10260 wrote:Does anybody remember if we have SaintSilly clips from the Nevada Standoff in a thread on TFB? Do I need to search Youtube for remnants, if yes, anybody have a direct link for me before hunting myself? Thanks!Sterngard Friegen wrote:![]()
Cliven will never get out of prison -- assuming he is convicted. And I expect many, many more arrests. And if the ACLU thinks it can help get Santilli out of jail for the Oregon occupation, it will be a futile mission. Santilli is going to be spending a lot of time in prison for the 2014 Nevada "standoff," and he's not going to get bail.
Re: Bundy Trials - Nevada
Pete Santilli has his own channel on YouTube. All his stuff is archived there.
- Volkonski
- Posts: 34131
- Joined: Sat Mar 02, 2013 4:44 pm
- Location: Texoma and North Fork of Long Island
- Occupation: Retired Mechanical Engineer
- Contact:
Re: Bundy Trials - Nevada
GlimDropper wrote:JJ of the numbered conspirators:
JJ MacNab @jjmacnab 26m26 minutes ago
Unnamed Conspirators:
#1 Ryan Bundy
#2 Ammon Bundy
#3 Ryan Payne
#4 Pete Santilli
Aside from the fact that I find Santilli really really annoying, is there a real chance he will be indicted for his actions in 2014 at the Bundy Ranch?JJ MacNab @jjmacnab 4h4 hours ago
The 2014 Bundy Ranch criminal complaint didn't have any new info in it. http://www.seditionists.com/bundy_criminal1.pdf …
7 retweets 15 likes
Reply Retweet 7
Like 15
More
JJ MacNab @jjmacnab 4h4 hours ago
Unnamed Conspirators:
#1 Ryan Bundy
#2 Ammon Bundy
#3 Ryan Payne
#4 Pete Santilli
15 retweets 28 likes
Reply Retweet 15
Like 28
More
JJ MacNab @jjmacnab 4h4 hours ago
While I may have been defending Pete Santilli for some of his role in Oregon, I offer no such defenses for his role in Nevada.
9 retweets 23 likes
Reply Retweet 9
Like 23
More
JJ MacNab @jjmacnab 4h4 hours ago
Pete almost got someone killed when he falsely identified a rodeo cowboy as working for the feds just because the guy's truck was in town.

― Leo Tolstoy, War and Peace
Re: Bundy Trials - Nevada
Don't I remember Pete trying the same thing at Malheur - claiming a counter-protester was a federal plant?JJ MacNab @jjmacnab 4h4 hours ago
Pete almost got someone killed when he falsely identified a rodeo cowboy as working for the feds just because the guy's truck was in town.
Re: Bundy Trials - Nevada
Yes, just as the Sharp Family Singers were entertaining on the big day of the Signing, he was shrieking at one of the counter protesters accusing him of working for the feds.June bug wrote:Don't I remember Pete trying the same thing at Malheur - claiming a counter-protester was a federal plant?JJ MacNab @jjmacnab 4h4 hours ago
Pete almost got someone killed when he falsely identified a rodeo cowboy as working for the feds just because the guy's truck was in town.
Re: Bundy Trials - Nevada
The affidavit supporting the criminal complaint against Cliven Bundy for the 2014 Bundy Ranch conspiracy contains copious damning quotes from co-conspirator No. 4, quotes which have been reliably traced back to Santilli. So I think it's very likely that Santilli will be named in the indictment which will eventually supersede the criminal complaint.Volkonski wrote:GlimDropper wrote:JJ of the numbered conspirators:
JJ MacNab @jjmacnab 26m26 minutes ago
Unnamed Conspirators:
#1 Ryan Bundy
#2 Ammon Bundy
#3 Ryan Payne
#4 Pete Santilli
Aside from the fact that I find Santilli really really annoying, is there a real chance he will be indicted for his actions in 2014 at the Bundy Ranch?
In fact at first I was puzzled why you would consider the issue doubtful. I've concluded that your question is prompted by the absence of an obvious reason why Santilli is referred to anonymously as "co-conspirator" rather than being named as one of the defendants. Failure to name a co-conspirator can certainly sometimes reflect a policy decision not to prosecute a particular individual. Cheney, as I recall, was named anonymously as a co-conspirator in the Scooter Libby indictment but never charged. I doubt that a similar decision has been made not to prosecute Santilli here.
So why wasn't he named? My guess is as follows. The FBI has been working on this for a while. While I've never worked in law enforcement, I'm sure that such charging documents go through multiple revisions. I suspect that for a lengthy investigation, an effort is made to have a version ready at all times in usable final form (final form requiring multiple sign-offs from FBI & Justice Department management) for instant use if circumstances dictate an immediate arrest. But management sign-offs take work and time, so you don't update the "ready for immediate use version" every time the ongoing investigation turns up some new nuggets. Plus I suspect that the lawyers and FBI agents working on this had lots of other projects on their plate.
My guess is that the Bundy complaint was put into substantially its present form sometime in 2014, with the expectation that it would be used to arrest Bundy first, and then serve as a template for subsequent operations against the other 4, who were spread out in different locations. I'm also guessing that one of the reasons it wasn't used immediately was that arresting Bundy peacefully at his ranch presented difficulties. The government was probably still trying to come up with a satisfactory tactical plan while simultaneously hoping that a chance to jump him would emerge serendipitously.
When the Malheur occupation started to ramp up, I imagine that work on the Bundy Ranch 2014 complaint moved to the back burner as resources were shifted to Oregon. When the government realized this week that Bundy was about to drop himself into its lap at PDX, they probably grabbed last year's most recent "ready-to-go" version, did a quick check to make sure that subsequent events hadn't rendered any of it ill-advised, and then went ahead and filed it. A new version will issue in due course to arrest Santilli, but there's no urgency. He's not going anywhere. And come to think of it, if discussions have already started between the government and Santilli's lawyer, the government might want to use the fact that Santilli had not yet been indicted in the earlier event as an incentive for him to cut a deal ASAP.
Anyhow, complete speculation and excessively long-winded (it's a character flaw some of you may have already noticed), so take it for what it's worth.
- Mikedunford
- Posts: 10589
- Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 9:42 pm
Re: Bundy Trials - Nevada Standoff
The group with Blain Cooper were actually arrested, at least as far as I can tell from the brief indictment, for their Oregon actions. I believe Cliven is the only one (as of when I went to sleep 6.5 hours ago) to be arrested for anything related to the NV standoff.Sugar Magnolia wrote:Mike's OR thread has a list of the arrestees (although I think the group with Blaine Cooper, maybe?) related to the NV standoff because he's way more organized than I am and probably a better typist. There's a bunch of OR stuff in the other NV thread because it got renamed from OR to NV after 35 pages. This one was my attempt to have a place to put the Cliven Bundy stuff from 2 years ago in NV.Slartibartfast wrote:Thanks Sugar! Can anyone do a summary (or point to summarizing posts) on what the current state of all of these threads are for those of us wandering over from the collapse of our 10-page a day Y'all Qaeda habit that don't have it in us to read 35 more pages?
Or not.
"I don't give a fuck whether we're peers or not."
--Lord Thomas Henry Bingham to Boris Johnson, on being asked whether he would miss being in "the best club in London" if the Law Lords moved from Parliament to a Supreme Court.
--Lord Thomas Henry Bingham to Boris Johnson, on being asked whether he would miss being in "the best club in London" if the Law Lords moved from Parliament to a Supreme Court.
- Volkonski
- Posts: 34131
- Joined: Sat Mar 02, 2013 4:44 pm
- Location: Texoma and North Fork of Long Island
- Occupation: Retired Mechanical Engineer
- Contact:
Re: Bundy Trials - Nevada
Thanks, that's helpful. I find Santilli so really really annoying that my desire for him to be arrested for any and all infractions clouds my ability to rationally analyze his situation.chancery wrote:The affidavit supporting the criminal complaint against Cliven Bundy for the 2014 Bundy Ranch conspiracy contains copious damning quotes from co-conspirator No. 4, quotes which have been reliably traced back to Santilli. So I think it's very likely that Santilli will be named in the indictment which will eventually supersede the criminal complaint.Volkonski wrote:GlimDropper wrote:JJ of the numbered conspirators:
JJ MacNab @jjmacnab 26m26 minutes ago
Unnamed Conspirators:
#1 Ryan Bundy
#2 Ammon Bundy
#3 Ryan Payne
#4 Pete Santilli
Aside from the fact that I find Santilli really really annoying, is there a real chance he will be indicted for his actions in 2014 at the Bundy Ranch?
In fact at first I was puzzled why you would consider the issue doubtful. I've concluded that your question is prompted by the absence of an obvious reason why Santilli is referred to anonymously as "co-conspirator" rather than being named as one of the defendants. Failure to name a co-conspirator can certainly sometimes reflect a policy decision not to prosecute a particular individual. Cheney, as I recall, was named anonymously as a co-conspirator in the Scooter Libby indictment but never charged. I doubt that a similar decision has been made not to prosecute Santilli here.
So why wasn't he named? My guess is as follows. The FBI has been working on this for a while. While I've never worked in law enforcement, I'm sure that such charging documents go through multiple revisions. I suspect that for a lengthy investigation, an effort is made to have a version ready at all times in usable final form (final form requiring multiple sign-offs from FBI & Justice Department management) for instant use if circumstances dictate an immediate arrest. But management sign-offs take work and time, so you don't update the "ready for immediate use version" every time the ongoing investigation turns up some new nuggets. Plus I suspect that the lawyers and FBI agents working on this had lots of other projects on their plate.
My guess is that the Bundy complaint was put into substantially its present form sometime in 2014, with the expectation that it would be used to arrest Bundy first, and then serve as a template for subsequent operations against the other 4, who were spread out in different locations. I'm also guessing that one of the reasons it wasn't used immediately was that arresting Bundy peacefully at his ranch presented difficulties. The government was probably still trying to come up with a satisfactory tactical plan while simultaneously hoping that a chance to jump him would emerge serendipitously.
When the Malheur occupation started to ramp up, I imagine that work on the Bundy Ranch 2014 complaint moved to the back burner as resources were shifted to Oregon. When the government realized this week that Bundy was about to drop himself into its lap at PDX, they probably grabbed last year's most recent "ready-to-go" version, did a quick check to make sure that subsequent events hadn't rendered any of it ill-advised, and then went ahead and filed it. A new version will issue in due course to arrest Santilli, but there's no urgency. He's not going anywhere. And come to think of it, if discussions have already started between the government and Santilli's lawyer, the government might want to use the fact that Santilli had not yet been indicted in the earlier event as an incentive for him to cut a deal ASAP.
Anyhow, complete speculation and excessively long-winded (it's a character flaw some of you may have already noticed), so take it for what it's worth.


― Leo Tolstoy, War and Peace
- Flatpointhigh
- Posts: 8215
- Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 1:05 pm
- Location: Hotel California, PH23
- Occupation: Voice Actor, Podcaster, I hold a Ph.D in Procrastination.
- Contact:
Re: Bundy Trials - Nevada
https://www.youtube.com/user/PeterSantilliTVesseff44 wrote:Pete Santilli has his own channel on YouTube. All his stuff is archived there.
https://www.youtube.com/user/PeterSantilliTV/videos
spreaker stream: audio only: http://www.spreaker.com/user/thepetesantillishow

- Volkonski
- Posts: 34131
- Joined: Sat Mar 02, 2013 4:44 pm
- Location: Texoma and North Fork of Long Island
- Occupation: Retired Mechanical Engineer
- Contact:
Re: Bundy Trials - Nevada
Happy to see this in the press.
I wonder if Deb Jordan and SSG Moe have seen this article?
4 Occupation Leaders Could Also Face Charges in Nevada
http://www.opb.org/news/series/burns-or ... mc.twitter


4 Occupation Leaders Could Also Face Charges in Nevada
http://www.opb.org/news/series/burns-or ... mc.twitter
The complaint does not name those co-conspirators, but details in the document make it possible to identify them as Cliven Bundy’s sons Ryan and Ammon Bundy, Montana militia leader Ryan Payne and Internet broadcasterPeter Santilli.
“On April 12, Bundy and his co-conspirators organized and led a massive armed assault against federal law enforcement officers,” the complaint states.
![]()
“I cannot confirm it, butI suspect that that Co-conspirator 4 may well be Pete Santilli,” said Santilli’s defense attorney, Tom Coan.
Coan said he is preparing for the possibility that his client will face charges in Nevada as well as in Oregon.

― Leo Tolstoy, War and Peace
Re: Bundy Trials - Nevada
You are not the only one. I know two people who really want Santilli in jail for a long time, because he is just that annoying. I find Santilli annoying too, but I will wait for a jury of his peers to pass judgment.Volkonski wrote:
Thanks, that's helpful. I find Santilli so really really annoying that my desire for him to be arrested for any and all infractions clouds my ability to rationally analyze his situation.
- Volkonski
- Posts: 34131
- Joined: Sat Mar 02, 2013 4:44 pm
- Location: Texoma and North Fork of Long Island
- Occupation: Retired Mechanical Engineer
- Contact:
Re: Bundy Trials - Nevada
Gargoyle @Patztense 3h3 hours ago
@jjmacnab @msbellows Anticipating impending legal action, Bundy militants are promoting jury nullification

― Leo Tolstoy, War and Peace
Re: Bundy Trials - Nevada
Now Santilli can work on prison reform from the inside. He's going to have a new point of view.
“If You're Not In The Obit, Eat Breakfast”
Remember, Orly NEVAH disappoints!
Remember, Orly NEVAH disappoints!
- Volkonski
- Posts: 34131
- Joined: Sat Mar 02, 2013 4:44 pm
- Location: Texoma and North Fork of Long Island
- Occupation: Retired Mechanical Engineer
- Contact:
Re: Bundy Trials - Nevada
Where will the courts find 12 people who are as annoying as Santilli?mmmirele wrote:You are not the only one. I know two people who really want Santilli in jail for a long time, because he is just that annoying. I find Santilli annoying too, but I will wait for ajury of his peers to pass judgment.Volkonski wrote:
Thanks, that's helpful. I find Santilli so really really annoying that my desire for him to be arrested for any and all infractions clouds my ability to rationally analyze his situation.


― Leo Tolstoy, War and Peace