Luck v Klayman, Judicial Watch Inc., Cuyahoga County Court

User avatar
bob
Posts: 26821
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Luck v Klayman, Judicial Watch Inc., Cuyahoga County Court

#76

Post by bob » Mon Oct 01, 2018 2:39 pm

wrote:So, of course, Klayman filed a cert. petition:
SCOTUS Dkt. No. 18-181 wrote:Aug 07 2018 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 10, 2018)
The petition, but Klayman's heart isn't in it; he knows he'll never see that $181k.
SCOTUS wrote:Sep 26 2018 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/12/2018.
Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
bob
Posts: 26821
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Luck v Klayman, Judicial Watch Inc., Cuyahoga County Court

#77

Post by bob » Mon Oct 15, 2018 4:42 pm

SCOTUS wrote:Sep 26 2018 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/12/2018.
No surprise: cert. denied. (Meaning: ex-Mrs. Klayman should finally be able to get that money. And that Klayman will never see it.)
Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
realist
Posts: 34804
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:33 pm

Re: Luck v Klayman, Judicial Watch Inc., Cuyahoga County Court

#78

Post by realist » Mon Oct 15, 2018 5:00 pm

bob wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 4:42 pm
SCOTUS wrote:Sep 26 2018 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/12/2018.
No surprise: cert. denied. (Meaning: ex-Mrs. Klayman should finally be able to get that money. And that Klayman will never see it.)
:thumbs:
ImageX 4 ImageX36
Image

Post Reply

Return to “Lesser Lights”