In Re: Douglas Vogt

User avatar
verbalobe
Posts: 8511
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 5:27 pm

In Re: Douglas Vogt

#1476

Post by verbalobe » Tue May 20, 2014 10:00 pm

doug vogt will get his comeuppance when this is over...When will "it" be "over"??When Obama is blocked from a 3rd term? When all the history books are asterisked? When orly shuffles off this mortal coil? At the Rapture? When Anderson Cooper provides Lakin with Obama's LFBC? When apuzzo admits defeat??I fear there is no end. No comeuppance.



User avatar
mighty dawg
Posts: 1572
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2012 10:27 am
Location: Pacific NW
Occupation: Professional Bureaucrat

In Re: Douglas Vogt

#1477

Post by mighty dawg » Wed May 21, 2014 8:21 am

doug vogt will get his comeuppance when this is over...When will "it" be "over"??





When Obama is blocked from a 3rd term? When all the history books are asterisked? When orly shuffles off this mortal coil? At the Rapture? When Anderson Cooper provides Lakin with Obama's LFBC? When apuzzo admits defeat??





I fear there is no end. No comeuppance.In some peoples' minds it will never be over. Twenty years from now there will still those believing the fruits of the Obama Presidency can be unraveled by "proving" he was never eligible to serve in the first place. They will find some way to link this to Area 51 and Whitewater. The cornspiracy will grow ever larger and more intricate.


"A man should look for what is, and not for what he thinks should be" - Albert Einstein

User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 10400
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

In Re: Douglas Vogt

#1478

Post by Notorial Dissent » Wed May 21, 2014 9:00 am

Of what? That Vogt is an idiot and that Booth is a fool? I thought we already had iron clad proof of both contentions.


The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
realist
Posts: 34494
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:33 pm

In Re: Douglas Vogt

#1479

Post by realist » Wed May 21, 2014 9:02 am

[/break1]facebook.com/?sk=welcome#!/miki.booth/posts/10202096968131086]Teh Facebook:supreme court rejects doug vogt's affidavits. Phew, I was sweating bullets. LOL[...]doug vogt will get his comeuppance when this is over. In the meantime I won't give obots the satisfaction of arguing with vogt. [...] or communicating with him at all. :((As if the little "Princess" could prevent communication with Vogt. :roll:


ImageX 4 ImageX36
Image

User avatar
Reality Check
Posts: 14813
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: USA
Contact:

In Re: Douglas Vogt

#1480

Post by Reality Check » Wed May 21, 2014 10:44 am



"“If you’re not outraged, you’re not paying attention.”

Heather Heyer, November 2016

User avatar
bob
Posts: 24427
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

In Re: Douglas Vogt

#1481

Post by bob » Thu May 22, 2014 12:45 pm

Sibley's blog: [/break1]blogspot.com/2014/05/supreme-court-denies-vogts-petition.html]Supreme Court Denies Vogt’s PetitionIt is with real sadness that I report that the Supreme Court has denied Doug Vogt’s Petition which sought to re-affirm the right of every Citizen to Petition the Grand Jury to investigate criminal behavior. By denying Vogt’s Petition, the coup d’etat against the Grand Jury by the Executive Branch is now complete and the restoration of “Right Divine” is at hand for government actors can now act without fearing the consequence of a Grand Jury investigation. Nice work if you can get it!In sum, I believe that those rights secured by the Magna Carta have now been extinguished. Fitting, I suppose then, is little [/break1]britannia.com/history/docs/kipling.html]Kipling . . . The right to petition the Government for a redress of grievances (note: "the government" not "a grand jury") remains completely intact. Vogt has done so. And the Government has responded by consecutively dismissing and now denying that petition.The system has worked exactly as it was intended and the outcome is legally correct and (to all but the most delusional) logically ineluctable. In no rational world, governed by either natural or human law, would this petition ever have had a gnat's chance of serious consideration by any court. It failed because it deserved to fail, not because of some incoherent fantasy of a "coup de'tat."Quoting Kipling cannot turn a pathetic whine into a deserving call for sympathy. We all knew this outcome was inevitable. We did in fact tell you so. Anyone experiencing "real sadness" had spectacularly unreasonable expectations from the outset.It is beyond HistorianDude's comprehension that he rejoices in the abrogation of his own liberties.OH NO, YOU DID NOT JUST INVITE THE SMACKDOWN!:I rejoice each and every time the delusion of Birthism wrecks itself upon the rocks of reality. If you cannot parse fiction from truth then you lack the capacity to understand what the word "liberty" even means in the first place. I assure you, none of mine were abrogated by this denial. It was a decision both legally and morally correct. And that is worthy of rejoicing. But let's not pretend for a second that the case ever had anything to do with re-securing some inchoate "lost liberty." It was instead a sublime concatenation of ignorance and malice. My father always told me. "Never attribute to malice that which is more easily explained by ignorance." Birthism completely frustrates any attempt to apply that aphorism. As in every single Birther initiative before it, it consisted ultimately of a vigorous application of incompetence for the deliberate purpose of promoting prejudice. Birthism, in its every expression, IS malicious ignorance. So it becomes difficult to choose how one would prefer it be smacked down. There are so many independently sufficient reasons for rejecting Vogt's blundering efforts. They are technically incompetent. They are logically fallacious. They are factually spurious. They are legally defective. But more than any of these, they are also morally offensive. They are expressions of prejudice and hatred so despicable that they compel the reader to wash themselves after reading. When Birthers lose, good has triumphed over evil. And in that I certainly and shamelessly rejoice. =D> =D> =D>


Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
Northland10
Posts: 6877
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:19 am
Location: Chicago area - North burbs

In Re: Douglas Vogt

#1482

Post by Northland10 » Thu May 22, 2014 1:02 pm

I stand in awe. Bravo.


North-land: of the family 10
UCC 1-106 Plural is Singular, Singular is Plural.

User avatar
mimi
Posts: 31119
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 12:01 am

In Re: Douglas Vogt

#1483

Post by mimi » Thu May 22, 2014 1:14 pm

:-bd =D> \ :D /



User avatar
June bug
Posts: 6095
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 3:29 pm
Location: Northern San Diego County

In Re: Douglas Vogt

#1484

Post by June bug » Thu May 22, 2014 1:39 pm

Outstanding! =D> =D> =D>



User avatar
Sterngard Friegen
Posts: 43902
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Location: Over the drawbridge

In Re: Douglas Vogt

#1485

Post by Sterngard Friegen » Thu May 22, 2014 1:44 pm

:shock: :sterngard: :notworthy: =D>



User avatar
Addie
Posts: 26959
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 6:22 am
Location: downstairs

In Re: Douglas Vogt

#1486

Post by Addie » Thu May 22, 2014 1:47 pm

HistorianDude :xo


¡Sterngard! come home.

User avatar
kate520
Posts: 14825
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 3:02 pm
Location: Dark side of the Moon
Occupation: servant of cats, chicken wrangler
Contact:

In Re: Douglas Vogt

#1487

Post by kate520 » Thu May 22, 2014 1:49 pm

:swoon: :-bd :girlbutt:


DEFEND DEMOCRACY

User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 10400
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

In Re: Douglas Vogt

#1488

Post by Notorial Dissent » Thu May 22, 2014 2:02 pm

=D> :-bd \ :D / I think that is about as good a smackdown as mendacious Monty has gotten in quite some time, and entirely righteously deserved.The whining over a lost "right" that never existed in the first place is part of what irritates me about him to begin with. The man simply hasn't got an honest bone in his body.


The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
realist
Posts: 34494
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:33 pm

In Re: Douglas Vogt

#1489

Post by realist » Thu May 22, 2014 2:56 pm

Outstanding! =D> =D> =D>Indeed. :-bd


ImageX 4 ImageX36
Image

User avatar
RoadScholar
Posts: 7091
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 10:25 am
Location: Baltimore
Occupation: Historic Restoration Woodworker
Contact:

In Re: Douglas Vogt

#1490

Post by RoadScholar » Thu May 22, 2014 3:20 pm

Outstanding! =D> =D> =D>Indeed. :-bd :yeah: And two points each for "ineluctable" and "inchoate." If you can't teach them Legal Process, the Constitution or History, at least you gave them the opportunity to improve their Vocabulary.


The bitterest truth is healthier than the sweetest lie.
X3

User avatar
Sterngard Friegen
Posts: 43902
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Location: Over the drawbridge

In Re: Douglas Vogt

#1491

Post by Sterngard Friegen » Thu May 22, 2014 4:10 pm

I just used "concantenated" in an email.



User avatar
ProudObot
Posts: 1305
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2012 6:46 pm

In Re: Douglas Vogt

#1492

Post by ProudObot » Thu May 22, 2014 5:36 pm

Hidden Content
This board requires you to be registered and logged-in to view hidden content.



User avatar
bob
Posts: 24427
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

In Re: Douglas Vogt

#1493

Post by bob » Thu May 22, 2014 5:39 pm

Hidden Content
This board requires you to be registered and logged-in to view hidden content.
Hidden Content
This board requires you to be registered and logged-in to view hidden content.


Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
Paul Lentz
Posts: 3666
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 7:56 pm
Location: Downtown O-town

In Re: Douglas Vogt

#1494

Post by Paul Lentz » Thu May 22, 2014 6:31 pm

Epi, I'm enjoying your continuing comments on Sibley's blog. Very well done. =D> =D>


The love of power will not win over the power of love.
Orlando, Florida 6/12/16

User avatar
bob
Posts: 24427
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

In Re: Douglas Vogt

#1495

Post by bob » Thu May 22, 2014 7:00 pm

Epi, I'm enjoying your continuing comments on Sibley's blog. Very well done. =D> =D>I so want to jump in, but I'm enjoying this master class too much. -xx


Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
Foggy
Posts: 26459
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 12:00 pm
Location: Fogbow HQ
Occupation: Dick Tater

In Re: Douglas Vogt

#1496

Post by Foggy » Thu May 22, 2014 7:48 pm

Awesome.


Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity.

User avatar
Piffle
Posts: 6987
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 12:39 pm

In Re: Douglas Vogt

#1497

Post by Piffle » Thu May 22, 2014 9:58 pm

You da man, Eppy! :-bd



User avatar
Butterfly Bilderberg
Posts: 7646
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 2:26 pm

In Re: Douglas Vogt

#1498

Post by Butterfly Bilderberg » Thu May 22, 2014 11:47 pm

Wait a doggone minute, Historian Dude. I want my barony and castle guaranteed to me by the Magna Carta Libertatum. The Supreme Court took those away from me on Monday. :torches:


"Pity the nation that acclaims the bully as hero,
and that deems the glittering conqueror bountiful."
- Kahlil Gibran, The Garden of The Prophet

User avatar
aarrgghh
Posts: 1747
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 4:05 pm
Contact:

In Re: Douglas Vogt

#1499

Post by aarrgghh » Fri May 23, 2014 12:00 am




User avatar
Piffle
Posts: 6987
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 12:39 pm

In Re: Douglas Vogt

#1500

Post by Piffle » Fri May 23, 2014 12:52 am

Wait a doggone minute, Historian Dude. I want my [highlight]barony[/highlight] and castle guaranteed to me by the Magna Carta Libertatum. The Supreme Court took those away from me on Monday. :torches:Uh, what about the first 13th Amendment?I mean, which side are you on, Baroness BB?



Post Reply

Return to “Lesser Lights”