Liberi v. Taitz, et al.

User avatar
Dolly
Posts: 13613
Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2012 7:32 pm

Liberi v. Taitz, et al.

#5051

Post by Dolly » Mon Jun 17, 2013 4:19 pm

Edit: moved to [/break1]com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=5658&p=515421#p515421]http://thefogbow.com/forum/viewtopic.ph ... 21#p515421I posted in the wrong thread. :oops: Thanks, bob
Avatar by Tal Peleg Art of Makeup https://www.facebook.com/TalPelegMakeUp

User avatar
Piffle
Posts: 6987
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 12:39 pm

Liberi v. Taitz, et al.

#5052

Post by Piffle » Mon Jun 17, 2013 4:57 pm

More likely...





Judge Guilford: Throughout these proceedings, Dr. Taitz has consistently demonstrated to this Court that she has no grasp whatsoever of the law or of legal methods. She is, in fact, less able to research and interpret the law than the average middle school student. Accordingly, the Court finds that Dr. Taitz is as dumb as a box of rocks and twice as hard-headed. Although she was mistaken in her legal assertions, the cause of her failure to report sanctions that were not, technically speaking, "discovery sanctions", is as likely to have been incompetence as intentional lack of candor to the court.

User avatar
verbalobe
Posts: 8506
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 5:27 pm

Liberi v. Taitz, et al.

#5053

Post by verbalobe » Mon Jun 17, 2013 5:35 pm

More likely...





Judge Guilford: Throughout these proceedings, Dr. Taitz has consistently demonstrated to this Court that she has no grasp whatsoever of the law or of legal methods. She is, in fact, less able to research and interpret the law than the average middle school student. Accordingly, the Court finds that Dr. Taitz is as dumb as a box of rocks and twice as hard-headed. Although she was mistaken in her legal assertions, the cause of her failure to report sanctions that were not, technically speaking, "discovery sanctions", is as likely to have been incompetence as intentional lack of candor to the court.





The fact that Taitz's brief failed, in any coherent manner, to make this argument (that her omission was one of ignorance and/or incompetence), ironically reinforces this Court's conclusion. This Court has found that one who tries cleverness once will continue to do so -- a truism that surely shall never be leveled against Dr. Taitz.

User avatar
realist
Posts: 34737
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:33 pm

Liberi v. Taitz, et al.

#5054

Post by realist » Mon Jun 17, 2013 5:43 pm

We don't yet know what Judge Guilford said/held, AFAIK. It has certainly not been the norm that Orly's reporting of pleadings/rulings has been exactly totally accurate, and in most cases completely inaccurate. I believe he did not sanction her, for whatever reason, as she clearly lied to the Court, IIRC. As for the rest, I'll wait to see the judge's wording. Just sayin'.
ImageX 4 ImageX36
Image

PatriotTrue7
Posts: 106
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2014 12:14 pm

Liberi v. Taitz, et al.

#5055

Post by PatriotTrue7 » Thu Oct 16, 2014 11:39 am

I'm 97 pages in to this thing and I couldn't take the idiocy one step further. So I skipped to the end.



From what I can tell reading back four pages is this never got passed the jurisdictional question. It was severed by Robreno into a TX and CA case, appealed and denied, but was never pursued further? Or are there other threads? I really want to go back to finishing the Mississippi thread and then read CELIII. This was entertaining for a little while, but I'm not sure it's worth reading in its entirety.



Can someone here give me the three sentence breakdown?



Thanks!

User avatar
SueDB
Posts: 27756
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:02 pm
Location: RIP, my friend. - Foggy

Liberi v. Taitz, et al.

#5056

Post by SueDB » Thu Oct 16, 2014 11:42 am





I'm 97 pages in to this thing and I couldn't take the idiocy one step further. So I skipped to the end.



From what I can tell reading back four pages is this never got passed the jurisdictional question. It was severed by Robreno into a TX and CA case, appealed and denied, but was never pursued further? Or are there other threads? I really want to go back to finishing the Mississippi thread and then read CELIII. This was entertaining for a little while, but I'm not sure it's worth reading in its entirety.



Can someone here give me the three sentence breakdown?



Thanks!





Each iteration is an adventurous quest for to find the absolute bottom in human decency and behavior.



It's not quite what you asked for...but true in less than 3 sentences.
“If You're Not In The Obit, Eat Breakfast”

Remember, Orly NEVAH disappoints!

User avatar
Family Liberty Patriot
Posts: 4486
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2014 1:23 pm
Location: Southern Orlystan
Occupation: Czar of All the Russias

Liberi v. Taitz, et al.

#5057

Post by Family Liberty Patriot » Thu Oct 16, 2014 11:46 am

One sentence:

Liberi associated herself with Taitz, and that's a stink that don't wash off.

(Vera F. Dolan, take note. You have made a career-ending mistake.)
"The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness."

John Kenneth Galbraith (1908 - 2006)

User avatar
Sterngard Friegen
Posts: 44005
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Location: Over the drawbridge

Liberi v. Taitz, et al.

#5058

Post by Sterngard Friegen » Thu Oct 16, 2014 11:55 am

Stuck in the Ninth Circuit on an interlocutory appeal by Taitz of her unsuccessful anti-SLAPP motion. Had she not filed such a motion that case would be long over.

User avatar
bob
Posts: 26421
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Liberi v. Taitz, et al.

#5059

Post by bob » Thu Oct 16, 2014 11:56 am



It was severed by Robreno into a TX and CA case, appealed and denied, but was never pursued further?



The Texas head of this hydra whimpered off and died, but the California branch is still pending.

Very briefly: In the California case, Taitz filed an anti-SLAPP motion which the court denied, but Berg filed an amended complaint. Taitz appealed the denial of the anti-SLAPP motion, but the 9th Cir. dismissed the appeal because Berg had mooted the issue with the amended complaint. Taitz again filed an anti-SLAPP motion, which was again denied, and again appealed. That appeal is still pending.

And in the middle of all of it, Berg was suspended from the bar for two years (for conduct unrelated to this case, or birfering in general).
Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
SueDB
Posts: 27756
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:02 pm
Location: RIP, my friend. - Foggy

Liberi v. Taitz, et al.

#5060

Post by SueDB » Thu Oct 16, 2014 11:57 am

About the only thing Orly is good a is "Sternsigging" her cases.
“If You're Not In The Obit, Eat Breakfast”

Remember, Orly NEVAH disappoints!

PatriotTrue7
Posts: 106
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2014 12:14 pm

Liberi v. Taitz, et al.

#5061

Post by PatriotTrue7 » Thu Oct 16, 2014 12:35 pm

Thanks so much. I think I'll read CELIII next, then get back to Mississippi then read the California case. You're all awesome.

User avatar
Suranis
Posts: 16573
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 7:04 am

Liberi v. Taitz, et al.

#5062

Post by Suranis » Thu Oct 16, 2014 12:45 pm

Also; twu lowve
Learn to Swear in Latin. Profanity with class!
https://blogs.transparent.com/latin/lat ... -in-latin/

User avatar
SueDB
Posts: 27756
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:02 pm
Location: RIP, my friend. - Foggy

Liberi v. Taitz, et al.

#5063

Post by SueDB » Thu Oct 16, 2014 12:51 pm





Thanks so much. I think I'll read CELIII next, then get back to Mississippi then read the California case. You're all awesome.







Excellent choice. You can catch up on all the news that is hotter, wet....
“If You're Not In The Obit, Eat Breakfast”

Remember, Orly NEVAH disappoints!

User avatar
gupwalla
Posts: 2779
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:57 pm
Location: The mind of Cassandra

Liberi v. Taitz, et al.

#5064

Post by gupwalla » Thu Oct 16, 2014 12:54 pm

Birfer-watching used to be a lot more fun. Nothing quite compared to the Summer of Love.

I was just a lurker back then. But still, Oh the memories.
In a wilderness of mirrors, what will the spider do beyond the circuit of the shuddering Bear in fractured atoms? -TS Eliot (somewhat modified)

All warfare is based on deception. - Sun Tzu

User avatar
Northland10
Posts: 7868
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:19 am
Location: Chicago area - North burbs

Liberi v. Taitz, et al.

#5065

Post by Northland10 » Thu Oct 16, 2014 1:26 pm

Can someone here give me the three sentence breakdown?



Here is my thought on this case. If I pulled up the full docket summary on Pacer, I might have to declare bankruptcy.
North-land: of the family 10

UCC 1-106 Plural is Singular, Singular is Plural.

User avatar
SueDB
Posts: 27756
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:02 pm
Location: RIP, my friend. - Foggy

Liberi v. Taitz, et al.

#5066

Post by SueDB » Thu Oct 16, 2014 1:38 pm





Birfer-watching used to be a lot more fun. Nothing quite compared to the Summer of Love.

I was just a lurker back then. But still, Oh the memories.







Pass teh brain bleach please.
“If You're Not In The Obit, Eat Breakfast”

Remember, Orly NEVAH disappoints!

AnitaMaria
Posts: 4360
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2011 5:41 pm

Liberi v. Taitz, et al.

#5067

Post by AnitaMaria » Thu Oct 16, 2014 1:41 pm



One sentence:

Liberi associated herself with Taitz, and that's a stink that don't wash off.

(Vera F. Dolan, take note. You have made a career-ending mistake.)

I think you have Lisa Liberi confused with Lisa Ostella. Lisa Liberi's career opportunities were ruined by her own criminal activity long before she ever heard of Orly Taitz.

User avatar
SueDB
Posts: 27756
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:02 pm
Location: RIP, my friend. - Foggy

Liberi v. Taitz, et al.

#5068

Post by SueDB » Thu Oct 16, 2014 1:46 pm









One sentence:

Liberi associated herself with Taitz, and that's a stink that don't wash off.

(Vera F. Dolan, take note. You have made a career-ending mistake.)



I think you have Lisa Liberi confused with Lisa Ostella. Lisa Liberi's career opportunities were ruined by her own criminal activity long before she ever heard of Orly Taitz.









Once you get Slimed by Taitz©, you're stinky forever...
“If You're Not In The Obit, Eat Breakfast”

Remember, Orly NEVAH disappoints!

User avatar
Family Liberty Patriot
Posts: 4486
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2014 1:23 pm
Location: Southern Orlystan
Occupation: Czar of All the Russias

Liberi v. Taitz, et al.

#5069

Post by Family Liberty Patriot » Thu Oct 16, 2014 1:51 pm



One sentence:

Liberi associated herself with Taitz, and that's a stink that don't wash off.

(Vera F. Dolan, take note. You have made a career-ending mistake.)

I think you have Lisa Liberi confused with Lisa Ostella. Lisa Liberi's career opportunities were ruined by her own criminal activity long before she ever heard of Orly Taitz.



You're right, thanks. Still, the advice is sound: associating one's self with Bloody Orly has proved to be inadvisable in every instance.
"The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness."

John Kenneth Galbraith (1908 - 2006)

User avatar
ZekeB
Posts: 15489
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 10:07 pm
Location: Northwest part of Semi Blue State

Liberi v. Taitz, et al.

#5070

Post by ZekeB » Thu Oct 16, 2014 5:04 pm





Stuck in the Ninth Circuit on an interlocutory appeal by Taitz of her unsuccessful anti-SLAPP motion. Had she not filed such a motion that case would be long over.





And decided while CEL3 Berg was still in the dog house.
Ano, jsou opravdové. - Stormy Daniels

Nech mě domluvit! - Orly Taitz

User avatar
realist
Posts: 34737
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:33 pm

Liberi v. Taitz, et al.

#5071

Post by realist » Thu Oct 16, 2014 9:23 pm





Stuck in the Ninth Circuit on an interlocutory appeal by Taitz of her unsuccessful anti-SLAPP motion. Had she not filed such a motion that case would be long over.







No longer...







Per this entry on the district court docket, the 9th Circuit denied Taitz's motion for reconsideration. Quote 2014-09-04 674 0 ORDER from 9th CCA filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals 643 filed by ORLY TAITZ, CCA # 13-56253. The appellant's opposed motion to reconsider the August 18, 2014 order is denied. The appellant's request to strike the supplemental excerpts of record for the answering brief is referred to the panel assigned to decide the merits of the appeal. Order received in this district on 9/4/2014. (car) (Entered: 09/04/2014

ImageX 4 ImageX36
Image

User avatar
Sterngard Friegen
Posts: 44005
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Location: Over the drawbridge

Liberi v. Taitz, et al.

#5072

Post by Sterngard Friegen » Thu Oct 16, 2014 9:38 pm

No, it's still there. Awaiting oral argument. I believe the Court of Appeals just refused to strike Berg's brief.

User avatar
Northland10
Posts: 7868
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:19 am
Location: Chicago area - North burbs

Liberi v. Taitz, et al.

#5073

Post by Northland10 » Mon Nov 03, 2014 8:52 pm

Docket update: 10/27/2014 675 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Andrew J. Guilford. Case should have been closed on entry dated 2/7/2014, when the last of the defendants who were not stayed were dismissed. Make JS-6. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (dro) (Entered: 10/28/2014)
North-land: of the family 10

UCC 1-106 Plural is Singular, Singular is Plural.

User avatar
GreatGrey
Posts: 9752
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2009 6:06 am
Location: Living in the Anthropocene

Liberi v. Taitz, et al.

#5074

Post by GreatGrey » Mon Nov 03, 2014 8:59 pm

Out with a whimper.
I am not "someone upthread".
Trump needs to be smashed into some kind of inedible orange pâté.

User avatar
Northland10
Posts: 7868
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:19 am
Location: Chicago area - North burbs

Liberi v. Taitz, et al.

#5075

Post by Northland10 » Mon Nov 03, 2014 9:05 pm





Out with a whimper.







The appeal is ongoing.
North-land: of the family 10

UCC 1-106 Plural is Singular, Singular is Plural.

Post Reply

Return to “Phil Berg”