In re Berg (Pa. bar)

Post Reply
User avatar
bob
Posts: 24204
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

In re Berg (Pa. bar)

#1

Post by bob » Mon Jan 24, 2011 2:01 pm

I need your help in PA. I need people to come to this disciplinary hearing against Berg as witnesses. It is open to the public, but for some reason they were not willing to agree to allow members of the public to purchase the audiotape or transcript of the hearing. I did not get the audio tapes of the hearings in Philadelphia, PA and Santa Ana CA. I am extremely concerned about things that are happening





Please, call me . . . and let me know if you can be there as a witness, to record what was going on, particularly if you are an attorney or retired judge or [highlight]a court reporter[/highlight] or a member of law enforcement.xxx-http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?attachment_id=18290





According to the [/break1]org/pa_attorney_public.php?id=9867&attname=Philip+J.+Berg+&violations=4]Disciplinary Board of SCOPA, Berg has a hearing on Feb. 23.





:-bd


Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
Paul Lentz
Posts: 3666
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 7:56 pm
Location: Downtown O-town

In re Berg (Pa. bar)

#2

Post by Paul Lentz » Mon Jan 24, 2011 4:24 pm

I need your help in PA. I need people to come to this disciplinary hearing against Berg as witnesses.[highlight]It is open to the public[/highlight], but for some reason they were not willing to agree to allow members of the public to purchase the audiotape or transcript of the hearing. I did not get the audio tapes of the hearings in Philadelphia, PA and Santa Ana CA. I am extremely concerned about things that are happening

Gotta call bullshit on that one, Oily. According to the [link]Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania,http://www.padisciplinaryboard.org/faqs ... roceedings[/link] (the folks who are in charge of attorney discipline in the state of Pennsylvania):


Do I have the right to attend any disciplinary hearing that might be held in connection with my complaint?


No. A complainant is not a party to the disciplinary proceedings. The parties are the Office of Disciplinary Counsel and the Respondent. [highlight]The proceedings are closed to the public[/highlight]. However, in most cases that reach a hearing, the Office of Disciplinary Counsel calls the complainant as a witness.But, sure, Oily...you should definitely go to Pennsylvania for the hearing, even though--unless you were the complainant and called as a witness by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel--you won't get in. And you DEFINITELY should encourage your foolish "supporters" to spend their money for travel/lodging to/in Pennsylvania to appear as "witnesses" at a hearing which they cannot even attend, much less testify. Of course, that's money that they might have just sent directly to you to help pay for those sanctions, but what the heck...it's really better to make a fools out of yourself and them, on a nice February day in Pennsylvania.





=)) =))


The love of power will not win over the power of love.
Orlando, Florida 6/12/16

User avatar
Welsh Dragon
Posts: 2811
Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 3:29 pm

In re Berg (Pa. bar)

#3

Post by Welsh Dragon » Mon Jan 24, 2011 5:40 pm

I tried earlier to post at Orly's to pick her up on the hearing being public but I don't think it got through - her website was playing up at the time. Not that I mind I'm just as happy watching her make a bigger fool of herself.



Lea
Posts: 583
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2010 2:20 am

In re Berg (Pa. bar)

#4

Post by Lea » Tue Jan 25, 2011 12:01 am

She is not the complainant and it has nothing to do with the case filed against her and the other defendants.



User avatar
realist
Posts: 34430
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:33 pm

In re Berg (Pa. bar)

#5

Post by realist » Tue Jan 25, 2011 1:47 am

She is not the complainant and it has nothing to do with the case filed against her and the other defendants.We suspected as much when it first came up. She's an idiot, and she knows it has nothing to do with her, but it makes her look good to her flying monkeys... she's not going and she knows no one else is either... it's all for show.Although it would be great if 10 of her minions showed up and were turned away with a statement they have no idea who Orly Taitz is nor why she told them to appear. =))


ImageX 4 ImageX36
Image

User avatar
mimi
Posts: 31119
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 12:01 am

In re Berg (Pa. bar)

#6

Post by mimi » Tue Jan 25, 2011 10:39 am

She is not the complainant and it has nothing to do with the case filed against her and the other defendants.oh, another satisfied client. :P



User avatar
Res Ipsa
Posts: 2280
Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 1:31 am

In re Berg (Pa. bar)

#7

Post by Res Ipsa » Tue Jan 25, 2011 10:59 am

oh, another satisfied client. :PBerg should include a bar complaint form with his standard engagement letter.


Thanks pal.

User avatar
Paul Lentz
Posts: 3666
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 7:56 pm
Location: Downtown O-town

In re Berg (Pa. bar)

#8

Post by Paul Lentz » Tue Jan 25, 2011 3:05 pm

oh, another satisfied client. :PBerg should include a bar complaint form with his standard engagement letter.It would certainly be more efficient and reality-based. Plus, it could be a money-maker for Berg...like a car dealer with their "prep fee," Berg could charge a non-refundable, upfront, bar complaint form fee (the "deluxe" fee if Berg also furnishes the proper Pennsylvania district address for filing it). :lol:


The love of power will not win over the power of love.
Orlando, Florida 6/12/16

LindainTX
Posts: 110
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 2:07 am

In re Berg (Pa. bar)

#9

Post by LindainTX » Thu Jan 27, 2011 9:52 pm

Berg should include a bar complaint form with his standard engagement letter.oh, another satisfied client. :PBerg should include a bar complaint form with his standard engagement letter. Posted: Tue Jan 25, 2011 9:59 am Ah res, we agree 1000%. I know what he's in trouble for and it has nothing to do with the lawsuit, or any of us. It has to do with a complaint involving his former paralegal Marie and his bad habits. Unfortunately for him, when his current paralegal was gossiping to me about his scandals and peccadillos, she blabbed his dirty little secrets to me. I seriously doubt his client who posts here was told the real reason he is getting hauled before the Disciplinary Board. I'd be very worried if he were representing me. She doesn't seem to comprehend what may be about to happen regarding her own liability; for making numerous false sworn affidavits, not to mention implication in some questionable fundraising. Did anyone else notice that he and felon paralegal are pointing at each other as to who prepared various statements? She sued her lawyer in CA along with God and everyone; and she lost. I have to wonder how long before they turn on her? They are going to say that they simply included what she told them. Even the other plaintiff said she never accused anyone of planning to kidnap her children - that was the invention of him and/or his felon paralegal. Tsk, tsk. I'd be very worried if I were one of his clients.



User avatar
Sterngard Friegen
Posts: 43902
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Location: Over the drawbridge

In re Berg (Pa. bar)

#10

Post by Sterngard Friegen » Thu Jan 27, 2011 10:06 pm

LindainTX - what's the basis for the current disciplline against Berg, then?



User avatar
raicha
Posts: 7344
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2010 5:10 pm
Contact:

In re Berg (Pa. bar)

#11

Post by raicha » Thu Jan 27, 2011 10:15 pm

LindainTX - what's the basis for the current disciplline against Berg, then?And while you're answering Mr. Friegen, would you like to give us your thoughts LindainTX regarding this notation in the San Bernardino Court records for Lisa Liberi?





01/19/2011 CERTIFIED COPY OF CASE PRINT SENT TO OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL.I suspect that neither Berg nor Taitz have any idea just how much trouble they both may be in, even though they have been warned repeatedly by Federal judges all across our great land.



LindainTX
Posts: 110
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 2:07 am

In re Berg (Pa. bar)

#12

Post by LindainTX » Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:11 pm

LindainTX - what's the basis for the current disciplline against Berg, then?And while you're answering Mr. Friegen, would you like to give us your thoughts LindainTX regarding this notation in the San Bernardino Court records for Lisa Liberi?





01/19/2011 CERTIFIED COPY OF CASE PRINT SENT TO OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL.I suspect that neither Berg nor Taitz have any idea just how much trouble they both may be in, even though they have been warned repeatedly by Federal judges all across our great land.I don't know anything about this at all. Exactly where was this psoted? Do you have a url?



LM K
Posts: 8257
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 5:59 pm

In re Berg (Pa. bar)

#13

Post by LM K » Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:01 pm

Berg should include a bar complaint form with his standard engagement letter.oh, another satisfied client. :PBerg should include a bar complaint form with his standard engagement letter. Posted: Tue Jan 25, 2011 9:59 am Ah res, we agree 1000%. I know what he's in trouble for and it has nothing to do with the lawsuit, or any of us. It has to do with a complaint involving his former paralegal Marie and his bad habits. Unfortunately for him, when his current paralegal was gossiping to me about his scandals and peccadillos, she blabbed his dirty little secrets to me.I interpret this as a statement that shared that info with the PA board. I seriously doubt his client who posts here was told the real reason he is getting hauled before the Disciplinary Board. I'd be very worried if he were representing me. She doesn't seem to comprehend what may be about to happen regarding her own liability; for making numerous false sworn affidavits, not to mention implication in some questionable fundraising. :roll: Oh please. Berg's actions are his own. If you are referring to Lisa L as the client who should be worried, you are wrong. She isn't licensed for anything in PA. Berg is being disciplined for his actions and/or for allowing actions to happen in his name without proper supervision.Did anyone else notice that he and felon paralegal are pointing at each other as to who prepared various statements? She sued her lawyer in CA along with God and everyone; and she lost. I have to wonder how long before they turn on her? They are going to say that they simply included what she told them. Even the other plaintiff said she never accused anyone of planning to kidnap her children - that was the invention of him and/or his felon paralegal. Tsk, tsk. I'd be very worried if I were one of his clients.Again, revenge trumps over logic. =; I can see that you have stayed busy, Linda. You keep pointing out that Berg did unethical things and that those linked to him could face consequences. But weren't you linked to him for over 10 years, working very closely with him from July/Aug 2008 through March, 2009?



LindainTX
Posts: 110
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 2:07 am

In re Berg (Pa. bar)

#14

Post by LindainTX » Sun Jan 30, 2011 3:42 pm

Berg should include a bar complaint form with his standard engagement letter.oh, another satisfied client. :PBerg should include a bar complaint form with his standard engagement letter. Posted: Tue Jan 25, 2011 9:59 am Ah res, we agree 1000%. I know what he's in trouble for and it has nothing to do with the lawsuit, or any of us. It has to do with a complaint involving his former paralegal Marie and his bad habits. Unfortunately for him, when his current paralegal was gossiping to me about his scandals and peccadillos, she blabbed his dirty little secrets to me.I interpret this as a statement that shared that info with the PA board. I seriously doubt his client who posts here was told the real reason he is getting hauled before the Disciplinary Board. I'd be very worried if he were representing me. She doesn't seem to comprehend what may be about to happen regarding her own liability; for making numerous false sworn affidavits, not to mention implication in some questionable fundraising. :roll: Oh please. Berg's actions are his own. If you are referring to Lisa L as the client who should be worried, you are wrong. She isn't licensed for anything in PA. Berg is being disciplined for his actions and/or for allowing actions to happen in his name without proper supervision.Did anyone else notice that he and felon paralegal are pointing at each other as to who prepared various statements? She sued her lawyer in CA along with God and everyone; and she lost. I have to wonder how long before they turn on her? They are going to say that they simply included what she told them. Even the other plaintiff said she never accused anyone of planning to kidnap her children - that was the invention of him and/or his felon paralegal. Tsk, tsk. I'd be very worried if I were one of his clients.Again, revenge trumps over logic. =; I can see that you have stayed busy, Linda. You keep pointing out that Berg did unethical things and that those linked to him could face consequences. But weren't you linked to him for over 10 years, working very closely with him from July/Aug 2008 through March, 2009?No I didn't work closely with him for over 10 years. I said we knew each other and I once considered us friends. We didn't talk for a couple of years prior to Jan 2008. He was a Hillary supporter and I was an Edwards supporter who turned to Hillary. I did help him with some projects over the years, including writing a couple of speeches for him when he ran for office, but our closest association was in fighting against the Impeachment and removal of Clinton. It's not that we were on the outs as much as we were doing other things in our own lives. We did talk a lot, every day, between 1998 and 2002, but it slowed way, way down after 2002. We did talk quite a bit in 2004 due to my becoming a hot topic in msm. One jerk reporter investigated me for the NY Times trying to prove I was a different person with a past, but he couldn't find anything on me to report. And believe me, they were desperately trying everything to get me to talk to them or to prove that I was another person. Which Berg knew because he wanted to represent me on tv as my legal spokesperson. It would all be funny except some unidentified female called neighbors and told their kids who go to school with my son a bunch of crap about me and it went through the school causing my son an enormous amount of grief. All it did was hurt my sweet and innocent MINOR son by making him a target for bullying, harassment and even assaults at school. There are all kinds of consequences: legal, financial, or criminal. People are responsible for things they do. There are multiple plaintiffs and I phrased my comment in such a way as to not identify anyone. I just know that things I and the other defendants have been accused of doing, have actually been done TO some or all of us and/or our families and someone is going to answer for it. And I believe Berg won't be available.



User avatar
Sterngard Friegen
Posts: 43902
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Location: Over the drawbridge

In re Berg (Pa. bar)

#15

Post by Sterngard Friegen » Sun Jan 30, 2011 3:48 pm

And yet, you associate yourself with Orly Taitz who is anathema to all your professed values.What am I missing?



User avatar
DaveMuckey
Posts: 4107
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 3:17 pm

In re Berg (Pa. bar)

#16

Post by DaveMuckey » Sun Jan 30, 2011 4:41 pm

And yet, you associate yourself with Orly Taitz who is anathema to all your professed values.What am I missing?Hip waders, I suspect. It's pretty deep, methinks.



User avatar
Kriselda Gray
Posts: 8645
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 4:17 am
Location: FEMA Camp 2112 - a joint project of the U.S. and Canada
Contact:

In re Berg (Pa. bar)

#17

Post by Kriselda Gray » Wed Feb 09, 2011 2:24 am

We did talk quite a bit in 2004 due to my becoming a hot topic in msm. One jerk reporter investigated me for the NY Times trying to prove I was a different person with a past, but he couldn't find anything on me to report. And believe me, they were desperately trying everything to get me to talk to them or to prove that I was another person. Which Berg knew because he wanted to represent me on tv as my legal spokesperson.Since I came late to the birther party and am not aware of your background, could you (or someone) elaborate on this, please? I'm just trying to understand what all is going on here...


Ignorance and prejudice and fear walk hand in hand... - "Witch Hunt" by Rush

SCMP = SovCits/Militias/Patriots.

Thor promised to slay the Ice Giants
God promised to quell all evil
-----
I'm not seeing any Ice Giants...

User avatar
Res Ipsa
Posts: 2280
Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 1:31 am

In re Berg (Pa. bar)

#18

Post by Res Ipsa » Thu Feb 17, 2011 4:29 pm

I'm just trying to understand what all is going on here.Birther persecution complex.For a bunch of paranoid simple-minded nitwits NOT to turn on one another would be the shocker.


Thanks pal.

LindainTX
Posts: 110
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 2:07 am

In re Berg (Pa. bar)

#19

Post by LindainTX » Thu Feb 17, 2011 11:41 pm

And yet, you associate yourself with Orly Taitz who is anathema to all your professed values.What am I missing?What choice did I have as co-defendants in an $800 million suit? I felt a responsiblity to tell the truth. Other than over this lawsuit, Orly & I really do not talk. Why do you really think Res helped Orly at that hearing or escorted her to get some dinner? He took a lot of heat for his actions. He thought it was the right thing to do as a PA lawyer embarassed by Berg's conduct and as a gentleman not to send a woman out alone on a dark street in a large unfamiliar city with a high crime rate. Plaintiffs have lied throughtout ALL the pleadings. Not one of them has clean hands. Not one. I couldn't stay silent knowing the truth. I couldn't turn my back and let the other defendants twist in the wind with all the lies. It certainly would have been smarter. Are you familiar with the story of Julie Hiatt Steele? It would have been much smarter of her to let Clinton twist in the wind when the GOP and Ken Starr were after him. She knew Kathleen Willey lied about Clinton groping her in the Oval Office. KW is posting right wing pieces on WND now and we got into it. Ken Starr had an indictment written and prepared to take BC out of the Oval Office. His papers only needed a date. He offered JHS a deal if she would have a "new memory" that allowed his removal. Instead, she went public and told the truth and it cost her everything she had in this world. We became good friends after her trial was over in 1999.Res, it isn't birther paranoia anymore than it was Dem paranoia when we warned people what 43 would do when he was sworn in. We warned they would be illegally wiretapping all our phones, which was later proven we were right. But keep on with the insults.



User avatar
Highlands
Posts: 3600
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 12:19 am
Location: 3rd Rock From the Sun

In re Berg (Pa. bar)

#20

Post by Highlands » Fri Feb 18, 2011 12:13 am

Again, I ask the question: Who gives a crap what a bunch of nuts on the Internet say about you? Thousands of Obama-Haters say the most horrific things about the President and his family on the Internet every day, and guess what? He doesn't care, because, again, who gives a crap what a bunch of nuts on the Internet say about you?As far as the lawsuit goes:a. IANAL, but the first thing I would have done is to hire a competent lawyer. Instead, you have Orly Taitz, the worst lawyer in the world. ?( b. I'm pretty sure that none of you had a reputation to besmirch in the first place, so I'm not sure what the damages would be for sullying your good name. :roll: c. Are you really comparing this nonsense to the Clinton impeachment? Really? Please! You need to get over yourself. =;


If you took out all of the blood vessels in your body and lined them up, you would be dead. #science

User avatar
Sterngard Friegen
Posts: 43902
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Location: Over the drawbridge

In re Berg (Pa. bar)

#21

Post by Sterngard Friegen » Fri Feb 18, 2011 12:21 am

Are you really comparing this nonsense to the Clinton impeachment? Really? Please! You need to get over yourself. =;In the first draft it was probably the Crucifixion.



TexasFilly
Posts: 17731
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 12:52 pm

In re Berg (Pa. bar)

#22

Post by TexasFilly » Fri Feb 18, 2011 12:33 am

Are you really comparing this nonsense to the Clinton impeachment? Really? Please! You need to get over yourself. =;In the first draft it was probably the Crucifixion. :lol: :lol:


I love the poorly educated!!!

I believe Anita Hill!

User avatar
raicha
Posts: 7344
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2010 5:10 pm
Contact:

In re Berg (Pa. bar)

#23

Post by raicha » Fri Feb 18, 2011 12:46 am

a. IANAL, but the first thing I would have done is to hire a competent lawyer. Instead, you have Orly Taitz, the worst lawyer in the world. ?( Agreed, hiring a competent lawyer would be job one, except that costs money some people might not have.But it is my understanding that the world's worst lawyer does not represent LBS. LBS is on her own. While she is not accomplishing anything on her own behalf, at least she is not risking the further humiliation and possible monetary sanctions that Orly's fine lawyering skills bring into play.



User avatar
Paul Lentz
Posts: 3666
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 7:56 pm
Location: Downtown O-town

In re Berg (Pa. bar)

#24

Post by Paul Lentz » Fri Feb 18, 2011 7:08 am

Are you really comparing this nonsense to the Clinton impeachment? Really? Please! You need to get over yourself. =;In the first draft it was probably the Crucifixion. =)) =)) =)) =)) =)) =)) =)) =))











Ah, thank you, Stern!


The love of power will not win over the power of love.
Orlando, Florida 6/12/16

User avatar
bob
Posts: 24204
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

In re Berg (Pa. bar)

#25

Post by bob » Thu Feb 24, 2011 12:40 pm

Betting pool now open:Lacking the sekrit knowledge about these proceedings, nonetheless I predict: Actual suspension for 2-6 months.
Edit: And costs.


Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

Post Reply

Return to “Phil Berg”