LIBERI, et al. v TAITZ, et al. (C.D. CA)

User avatar
ZekeB
Posts: 13552
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 10:07 pm
Location: Northwest part of Semi Blue State

Re: LIBERI, et al. v TAITZ, et al. (C.D. CA)

Post by ZekeB » Wed Sep 13, 2017 10:17 am

Foggy wrote:Where is CEL III when you really need him? :doh:
Since Yosi won't let Orly make payments on the installment plan anymore CEL III is not interested in Orly representing.

Whoops. I keep confusing my verbiage with that of another language.

User avatar
Orlylicious
Posts: 6020
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 4:02 pm

Re: LIBERI, et al. v TAITZ, et al. (C.D. CA)

Post by Orlylicious » Wed Sep 13, 2017 10:52 am

It's not going so well with Rule 1 :lol:
LIBERI et al v. TAITZ et al
Assigned to: Judge Andrew J. Guilford
Referred to: Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Wistrich
Case in other court: Pennsylvania Eastern, 2:09-cv-01898
Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Date Filed: 03/29/2011
Jury Demand: Both
Nature of Suit: 320 Assault Libel & Slander
Jurisdiction: Diversity
Do they have anniversary parties for these kinds of matters? How many hours has this taken and for what? :towel:
From Michael Moore: RESISTANCE CALENDAR! A one-stop site for all anti-Trump actions EVERY DAY nationwide: http://resistancecalendar.org

User avatar
Sterngard Friegen
Posts: 40317
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Location: Trump International - Malibu

Re: LIBERI, et al. v TAITZ, et al. (C.D. CA)

Post by Sterngard Friegen » Wed Sep 13, 2017 11:09 am

The lawsuit has diverted Taitz's attention, from time to time, from some of her more destructive activities. If that's so, it's not a total loss.

TexasFilly
Posts: 16760
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 12:52 pm

Re: LIBERI, et al. v TAITZ, et al. (C.D. CA)

Post by TexasFilly » Wed Sep 13, 2017 2:05 pm

I think I got lost at about page 50 of this thread. :dazed:
I love the poorly educated!!!

I never repeat myself. I never repeat myself. Trump 2/25/16

User avatar
Mikedunford
Posts: 7764
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 9:42 pm

Re: LIBERI, et al. v TAITZ, et al. (C.D. CA)

Post by Mikedunford » Wed Sep 13, 2017 2:35 pm

The judge has, perhaps, more patience than is reasonably prudent under the circumstances. There is an order that he can enter that might work to bring the case to an effective close:
► Show Spoiler
1 Cranch 137, 177

User avatar
kate520
Posts: 13236
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 3:02 pm

Re: LIBERI, et al. v TAITZ, et al. (C.D. CA)

Post by kate520 » Wed Sep 13, 2017 2:44 pm

:lol:
Service to others is the rent you pay for your room here on earth.

Mohammed Ali

TexasFilly
Posts: 16760
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 12:52 pm

Re: LIBERI, et al. v TAITZ, et al. (C.D. CA)

Post by TexasFilly » Wed Sep 13, 2017 2:47 pm

Excellent Mike! For some reason, I was once in a Family Law courtroom during docket call. The female judge, encountering people who were delinquent in their child support, heard a lot of excuses and "I'mma get this paid and caught up by tomorrow Judge!" Her universal response was "OK, you will appear again in one week, and if you haven't done every thing you've promised and paid every last cent, bring your toothbrush, 'cause you will go directly to jail." It was the judicial system as I always thought it should be.

And yes, the guys (and they were all guys) who showed up from the previous week who hadn't paid were remanded into the custody of the Harris County Sheriff, with no delay.
I love the poorly educated!!!

I never repeat myself. I never repeat myself. Trump 2/25/16

Post Reply

Return to “Phil Berg”