Taitz v Colvin (Maryland District Court)

User avatar
Sterngard Friegen
Posts: 43902
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Location: Over the drawbridge

Taitz v Colvin (Maryland District Court)

#1551

Post by Sterngard Friegen » Tue Jul 29, 2014 8:59 am

Not so far fetched. Some NLRB members were disqualified by SCOTUS under the Recess Appointment Clause in NLRB v. Canning just a month ago.





But the way for Taitz to have standing (be directly affected by an Obama-appointee) would require her first to be held in contempt. And then appeal that all the way to SCOTUS.





So, Taitz needs to do what she did in Rhodes if she wants to succeed.



User avatar
SueDB
Posts: 27756
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:02 pm
Location: FEMA Camp PI Okanogan, WA 98840

Taitz v Colvin (Maryland District Court)

#1552

Post by SueDB » Tue Jul 29, 2014 9:38 am

Not so far fetched. Some NLRB members were disqualified by SCOTUS under the Recess Appointment Clause in NLRB v. Canning just a month ago.





But the way for Taitz to have standing (be directly affected by an Obama-appointee) would require her first to be held in contempt. And then appeal that all the way to SCOTUS.





So, Taitz needs to do what she did in Rhodes if she wants to succeed.Uh....so Taitz needs to be in labor and actually harmed before anything can happen??? I would think that we are little over-ripe for that....


“If You're Not In The Obit, Eat Breakfast”

Remember, Orly NEVAH disappoints!

User avatar
ZekeB
Posts: 14595
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 10:07 pm
Location: Northwest part of Semi Blue State

Taitz v Colvin (Maryland District Court)

#1553

Post by ZekeB » Tue Jul 29, 2014 10:07 am

So, Taitz needs to do what she did in Rhodes if she wants to succeed.Taitz couldn't possibly match CELIII's wit when it comes to answering an OSC. I think it's time she kissed and made up with him.


Ano, jsou opravdové. - Stormy Daniels

rosy
Posts: 1485
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2012 4:36 pm

Taitz v Colvin (Maryland District Court)

#1554

Post by rosy » Tue Jul 29, 2014 12:42 pm

What a marvellous smackdown from Judge Hollander. It's just a pity that Orly's narcissism and poor reading comprehension will prevent the full meaning from penetrating her thick skull.



User avatar
realist
Posts: 34492
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:33 pm

Taitz v Colvin (Maryland District Court)

#1555

Post by realist » Tue Jul 29, 2014 2:55 pm

Can't wait to see this "brief". Over/under on the number of flat-out lies to the Court?





:toxic: [/break1]orlytaitzesq.com/taitz-v-colvin-was-appealed-to-the-4th-circuit/]http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/taitz-v-col ... h-circuit/ :toxic:





Taitz v Colvin was appealed to the 4th Circuit


Posted on | July 29, 2014 | No Comments


ImageX 4 ImageX36
Image

User avatar
bob
Posts: 24419
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Taitz v Colvin (Maryland District Court)

#1556

Post by bob » Tue Jul 29, 2014 3:49 pm

Taitz v Colvin was appealed to the 4th Circuit


Posted on | [highlight]July 29, 2014[/highlight] | No CommentsThe district court disposed of this case in an [/break1]scribd.com/doc/224356314/Taitz-v-Colvin-Ecf-37-Order]order dated [highlight]May 13, 2014[/highlight].





:-





Hidden Content
This board requires you to be registered and logged-in to view hidden content.


Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
realist
Posts: 34492
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:33 pm

Taitz v Colvin (Maryland District Court)

#1557

Post by realist » Tue Jul 29, 2014 4:00 pm

Taitz v Colvin was appealed to the 4th Circuit


Posted on | [highlight]July 29, 2014[/highlight] | No CommentsThe district court disposed of this case in an [/break1]scribd.com/doc/224356314/Taitz-v-Colvin-Ecf-37-Order]order dated [highlight]May 13, 2014[/highlight].





:-





Hidden Content
This board requires you to be registered and logged-in to view hidden content.
Yes. I seem to remember Judge Hollander saying something along the lines of Orly could have appealed the case but instead chose to file her POS Motion. :P


ImageX 4 ImageX36
Image

User avatar
Sterngard Friegen
Posts: 43902
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Location: Over the drawbridge

Taitz v Colvin (Maryland District Court)

#1558

Post by Sterngard Friegen » Tue Jul 29, 2014 4:15 pm

Taitz will argue her motion to "reconsider," or whatever the hell it was, extended the date. I don't think the very helpful "Notice of Treason," however, extends anything.Orly Taitz, Clounselor at Law.



Joseph Robidoux III
Posts: 5619
Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 6:02 am

Taitz v Colvin (Maryland District Court)

#1559

Post by Joseph Robidoux III » Tue Jul 29, 2014 4:22 pm

Why, it's almost as if T88 never attended a law school or passed a bar exam.



jonbeck
Posts: 1604
Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2012 10:59 pm
Location: Oceanside, CA

Taitz v Colvin (Maryland District Court)

#1560

Post by jonbeck » Tue Jul 29, 2014 4:39 pm

Being the consummate attention whore that she is, Orly will not let a missed deadline get in the way of any possibility of oral arguments in front of a judge or two. She may have missed the deadline to appeal the original case, but the motion to reconsider gives her the opportunity to bring all her garbage to another court de novo. Brilliant strategy Lady Liberty. Never mind that you will be mocked and then ignored, the important thing is that Orly has a platform and some unlucky person will have to hear you out. Deja vous all over again.



User avatar
bob
Posts: 24419
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Taitz v Colvin (Maryland District Court)

#1561

Post by bob » Tue Jul 29, 2014 4:54 pm

She may have missed the deadline to appeal the original case, but the motion to reconsider gives her the opportunity to bring all her garbage to another court de novo.Yup:42 ORDER Denying 38 Motion for Reconsideration ; Granting in Part and Denying in Part 40[RECAP] Motion to Expedite, Motion to Forward to the Federal Grand Jury, Notice of Treason. Signed by Judge Ellen L. Hollander on 06/13/2014. (bas, Deputy Clerk)(c/m 6/16/14 bca) (Entered: [highlight]06/16/2014[/highlight])If a party timely files in the district court any of the following motions under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the time to file an appeal runs for all parties from the entry of the order disposing of the last such remaining motion:[...](iv) to [highlight]alter or amend the judgment under Rule 59[/highlight];(v) for a new trial under Rule 59; or(vi) for relief under Rule 60 if the motion is filed no later than 28 days after the judgment is entered.


Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

Judge Mental
Posts: 697
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2011 10:29 am

Taitz v Colvin (Maryland District Court)

#1562

Post by Judge Mental » Tue Jul 29, 2014 5:55 pm

Ah bob....maybe you are forgetting that in birtherville it's still March, so she has umpteen days yet :P



User avatar
ZekeB
Posts: 14595
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 10:07 pm
Location: Northwest part of Semi Blue State

Taitz v Colvin (Maryland District Court)

#1563

Post by ZekeB » Tue Jul 29, 2014 5:58 pm

Why, it's almost as if T88 never attended a law school or passed a bar exam.We know she didn't do one of the above. We're pretty darned sure she didn't do the other.


Ano, jsou opravdové. - Stormy Daniels

User avatar
Mark
Posts: 2307
Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 8:47 pm

Taitz v Colvin (Maryland District Court)

#1564

Post by Mark » Tue Jul 29, 2014 8:43 pm

Why, it's almost as if T88 never attended a law school or passed a bar exam.So that's what Judge Hollander meant in her decision's discussion about school children knowing more than Orly. :point:


And that's all I have to say about that. :smoking:

User avatar
bob
Posts: 24419
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Taitz v Colvin (Maryland District Court)

#1565

Post by bob » Mon Aug 04, 2014 1:29 pm

Taitz v Colvin, dealing with Obama’s use of a stolen CT SSN 042-68-4425 is in the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals :twisted: [/break1]orlytaitzesq.com/taitz-v-colvin-dealing-with-obamas-use-of-a-stolen-ct-ssn-042-68-4425-is-in-the-4th-circuit-court-of-appeals/]http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/taitz-v-col ... f-appeals/ :twisted:





"For completeness," do we know the 4th's case number yet?





Nb.:


NOTICE OF APPEAL [highlight]as to 44 Memorandum and Order, 45 Order on Motion to Reopen Case[/highlight] by Orly Taitz.(Fee Status: Filing Fee Not Paid) (sls, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 08/01/2014)It would appear Taitz appealed only her (second) motion for reconsideration (and motion to recuse, treason notice, etc.).


Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
Reality Check
Posts: 14800
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: USA
Contact:

Taitz v Colvin (Maryland District Court)

#1566

Post by Reality Check » Mon Aug 04, 2014 1:46 pm

It would appear Taitz appealed only her (second) motion for reconsideration (and motion to recuse, treason notice, etc.).She didn't appeal the actual POS case then? If that is the case it should be dumped fairly quickly I assume.


"“If you’re not outraged, you’re not paying attention.”

Heather Heyer, November 2016

User avatar
bob
Posts: 24419
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Taitz v Colvin (Maryland District Court)

#1567

Post by bob » Mon Aug 04, 2014 1:51 pm

She didn't appeal the actual POS case then?It would be helpful to see the actual NOA. {SMILIES_PATH}/pray.gif


Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
Sterngard Friegen
Posts: 43902
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Location: Over the drawbridge

Taitz v Colvin (Maryland District Court)

#1568

Post by Sterngard Friegen » Mon Aug 04, 2014 2:01 pm

Judgments are appealable. Sternsig anyone?



TexasFilly
Posts: 17877
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 12:52 pm

Taitz v Colvin (Maryland District Court)

#1569

Post by TexasFilly » Mon Aug 04, 2014 2:26 pm

Judgments are appealable. Sternsig anyone? :lol:


I love the poorly educated!!!

I believe Anita Hill!

User avatar
Reality Check
Posts: 14800
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: USA
Contact:

Taitz v Colvin (Maryland District Court)

#1570

Post by Reality Check » Mon Aug 04, 2014 2:38 pm

It would be helpful to see the actual NOA. {SMILIES_PATH}/pray.gifI should have said the ruling in the actual case.


"“If you’re not outraged, you’re not paying attention.”

Heather Heyer, November 2016

User avatar
nbc
Posts: 4179
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 12:38 am

Taitz v Colvin (Maryland District Court)

#1571

Post by nbc » Mon Aug 04, 2014 2:48 pm

She is probably too late to appeal the original ruling but may appeal the Judge's ruling on Orly's latest motion.Of course, the issue is far more limited for that one.I doubt that Orly will get any traction. The issue has been settled, denial is rising to a boiling point. Expect some more desperate actions.



User avatar
Sterngard Friegen
Posts: 43902
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Location: Over the drawbridge

Taitz v Colvin (Maryland District Court)

#1572

Post by Sterngard Friegen » Mon Aug 04, 2014 2:48 pm

I've just reviewed the Notice of Appeal. I've sent it to Jack Ryan.It's perfect.
Hidden Content
This board requires you to be registered and logged-in to view hidden content.



User avatar
bob
Posts: 24419
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Taitz v Colvin (Maryland District Court)

#1573

Post by bob » Mon Aug 04, 2014 2:50 pm

It's perfect.
Hidden Content
This board requires you to be registered and logged-in to view hidden content.
:yeah: As I suspected. :-#


Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
realist
Posts: 34492
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:33 pm

Taitz v Colvin (Maryland District Court)

#1574

Post by realist » Mon Aug 04, 2014 3:10 pm

Docket Update...





08/01/2014 [link]46,[/link] NOTICE OF APPEAL as to 44 Memorandum and Order, 45 Order on Motion to Reopen Case by Orly Taitz.(Fee Status: Filing Fee Not Paid) (sls, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 08/01/2014)





08/01/2014 47 Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals re 46 Notice of Appeal. IMPORTANT NOTICE: To access forms which you are required to file with the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit please go to [/break1]ca4.uscourts.gov]http://www.ca4.uscourts.gov and click on Forms & Notices. (sls, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 08/01/2014)





08/01/2014 Assembled Electronic Record Transmitted to Fourth Circuit — Initial (sls, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 08/01/2014)As Stern sez... Absolute Perfection!!


ImageX 4 ImageX36
Image

User avatar
ObjectiveDoubter
Posts: 3436
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 6:19 pm
Location: Hollywood (more or less)

Taitz v Colvin (Maryland District Court)

#1575

Post by ObjectiveDoubter » Mon Aug 04, 2014 4:07 pm

Docket Update...





08/01/2014 [link]46,[/link] NOTICE OF APPEAL as to 44 Memorandum and Order, 45 Order on Motion to Reopen Case by Orly Taitz.(Fee Status: Filing Fee Not Paid) (sls, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 08/01/2014)





08/01/2014 47 Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals re 46 Notice of Appeal. IMPORTANT NOTICE: To access forms which you are required to file with the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit please go to [/break1]ca4.uscourts.gov]http://www.ca4.uscourts.gov and click on Forms & Notices. (sls, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 08/01/2014)





08/01/2014 Assembled Electronic Record Transmitted to Fourth Circuit — Initial (sls, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 08/01/2014)As Stern sez... Absolute Perfection!!Just wondering how much this little grandstanding nothing that has no legs is gonna cost her. It says that the fee hasn't been paid. btw.



Post Reply

Return to “Orly Taitz”