Medical Dental Development, LLC v Pierson, et al

User avatar
Sterngard Friegen
Posts: 43902
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Location: Over the drawbridge

Re: Medical Dental Development, LLC v Pierson, et al

#576

Post by Sterngard Friegen » Wed Jan 04, 2017 11:02 am

bob wrote:Thanks for getting these. Taitz's briefs are not particularly good, but they were not written by her, e.g., at no point in these papers does she accuse anyone of committing fraud.
Somebody erased the metadata. But the author gave Taitz a fairly clean document. Which in each case she butchered by not being able to figure out how to get her signature block correct. The signature block in each document is different, and each is wholly incompetent.

In a decade Taitz has learned only to hire ghost writers. She still cannot even get her signature right on a document. (Years ago my sig mocked Taitz's inability to do this correctly on a document filed in PACER: /s.)



User avatar
bob
Posts: 24969
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Medical Dental Development, LLC v Pierson, et al

#577

Post by bob » Wed Jan 04, 2017 1:31 pm

Sterngard Friegen wrote:In a decade Taitz has learned only to hire ghost writers.
I'm trying to decide whether Taitz hired a ghostwriter for these two remaining cases because her dentistry (and punditry :roll: ) keep her too bizzy to DIY, or because there's real money on the table and "somebody" "convinced" her to do so.


Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
Sterngard Friegen
Posts: 43902
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Location: Over the drawbridge

Re: Medical Dental Development, LLC v Pierson, et al

#578

Post by Sterngard Friegen » Wed Jan 04, 2017 3:39 pm

bob wrote:
Sterngard Friegen wrote:In a decade Taitz has learned only to hire ghost writers.
I'm trying to decide whether Taitz hired a ghostwriter for these two remaining cases because her dentistry (and punditry :roll: ) keep her too bizzy to DIY, or because there's real money on the table and "somebody" "convinced" her to do so.
Her appeal is more than a longshot. It's frivolous (based on my knowledge of bankruptcy law -- which is not much, but I know frivolity when I see it). So someone may have talked her into it and found an easy mark to fleece. Too bad he didn't train her on how to create a signature block that looks like a real lawyer's. Of course, every document filed by anyone else constitutes such a signature block, so I doubt 6-8 hours of training would help. (Query -- would it be good for MCLE credit?)



User avatar
ZekeB
Posts: 14721
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 10:07 pm
Location: Northwest part of Semi Blue State

Re: Medical Dental Development, LLC v Pierson, et al

#579

Post by ZekeB » Wed Jan 04, 2017 4:59 pm

Sterngard Friegen wrote:(Query -- would it be good for MCLE credit?)
If Taitz were teaching the course, would you attend just for the laugh?


Ano, jsou opravdové. - Stormy Daniels

Nech mě domluvit! - Orly Taitz

User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 10622
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

Re: Medical Dental Development, LLC v Pierson, et al

#580

Post by Notorial Dissent » Wed Jan 04, 2017 5:08 pm

bob wrote:Thanks for getting these. Taitz's briefs are not particularly good, but they were not written by her, e.g., at no point in these papers does she accuse anyone of committing fraud.
Then the spelling and punctuation must have at least been properly done, and no multiple fonts. That is always one sure give away of her unique style.


The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
Orlylicious
Posts: 8097
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 4:02 pm
Location: DHS Psy-Ops HQ

Re: Medical Dental Development, LLC v Pierson, et al

#581

Post by Orlylicious » Wed Jan 04, 2017 5:15 pm

ZekeB wrote:
Sterngard Friegen wrote:(Query -- would it be good for MCLE credit?)
If Taitz were teaching the course, would you attend just for the laugh?
If Stern was willing to be in a room with La Taitz for an extended period of time, I would fly anywhere in the world to witness it! :P



User avatar
Sterngard Friegen
Posts: 43902
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Location: Over the drawbridge

Re: Medical Dental Development, LLC v Pierson, et al

#582

Post by Sterngard Friegen » Wed Jan 04, 2017 5:30 pm

Orlylicious wrote:
ZekeB wrote:
Sterngard Friegen wrote:(Query -- would it be good for MCLE credit?)
If Taitz were teaching the course, would you attend just for the laugh?
If Stern was willing to be in a room with La Taitz for an extended period of time, I would fly anywhere in the world to witness it! :P
:fingerwag:
Your air miles are safe. I've been in 3 rooms with Taitz in my life. Each experience was more horrible than the previous.



User avatar
RoadScholar
Posts: 7275
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 10:25 am
Location: Baltimore
Occupation: Historic Restoration Woodworker
Contact:

Re: Medical Dental Development, LLC v Pierson, et al

#583

Post by RoadScholar » Wed Jan 04, 2017 6:21 pm

Just be glad she's not a urologist. :nooo:


The bitterest truth is healthier than the sweetest lie.
X3

User avatar
Sterngard Friegen
Posts: 43902
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Location: Over the drawbridge

Re: Medical Dental Development, LLC v Pierson, et al

#584

Post by Sterngard Friegen » Wed Jan 04, 2017 6:31 pm

:swoon:



User avatar
ZekeB
Posts: 14721
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 10:07 pm
Location: Northwest part of Semi Blue State

Re: Medical Dental Development, LLC v Pierson, et al

#585

Post by ZekeB » Wed Jan 04, 2017 6:45 pm

RoadScholar wrote:Just be glad she's not a urologist. :nooo:
Or proctologist.


Ano, jsou opravdové. - Stormy Daniels

Nech mě domluvit! - Orly Taitz

User avatar
Northland10
Posts: 7089
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:19 am
Location: Chicago area - North burbs

Re: Medical Dental Development, LLC v Pierson, et al

#586

Post by Northland10 » Wed Jan 04, 2017 7:22 pm

Appellant Opening Brief wrote:It is an anathema to the bankruptcy system for a debtor to walk away from the proceeding with far more money than it would take to make the creditor whole.
Yet, for her great love Trump, it is SOP.


North-land: of the family 10
UCC 1-106 Plural is Singular, Singular is Plural.

User avatar
Northland10
Posts: 7089
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:19 am
Location: Chicago area - North burbs

Re: Medical Dental Development, LLC v Pierson, et al

#587

Post by Northland10 » Wed Jan 04, 2017 7:32 pm

Appellant Opening Brief wrote: Law Offices of Orly Taitz
Rancho Santa Margarita Parkway, Ste. 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, California 92688

:snippity:
He was formerly a tenant in the building owned by Medical Dental Development, LLC (“MDD”) located at 29839 S. Margarita, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA.
Did she forget where her office was?


North-land: of the family 10
UCC 1-106 Plural is Singular, Singular is Plural.

User avatar
Orlylicious
Posts: 8097
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 4:02 pm
Location: DHS Psy-Ops HQ

Re: Medical Dental Development, LLC v Pierson, et al

#588

Post by Orlylicious » Wed Jan 04, 2017 11:40 pm

Wasn't that the place where Orly Taitz was renting to many MARIJUANA Dispensaries? Mark dug into this in 2012:
Mark wrote:I wonder why Orly, in her candidate statement, never mentioned her support of medical marijuana laws.Here are some interesting, perhaps interrelated facts, which journalists may be interested in pursuing: (1) Orly Taitz owns two buildings from which she conducts her dental practices: http://www.drtaitz.com/map.htm [Link now dead...Hmmm] (2) At one of her addresses, one of her tenants is a medical corporation whose doctors prescribe medical marijuana: http://ocmmes.com/contact.htm (3) At her other address, her other tenant was a pot dispensary: http://www.ocregister.com/articles/city ... uncil.html (4) The City of Santa Margarita, in 2011, voted for a moratorium on pot dispensaries: http://www.ocregister.com/articles/city ... uncil.html (5) OrlyTaitz, in 2012, becomes involved with Debbie Tharp's crusade against municipalities which ban pot dispensaries.(6) Is Orly Taitz's motivation an idealistic cause or the loss of rental income which these municipal laws have caused her? (7) Did Orly Taitz, as a licensed dentist, write prescriptions for medical marijuana or refer patients to other tenants in exchange for a referral fee or being able to send a bogus dental bill to Medi-Cal or insurance companies?
http://www.thefogbow.com/forum/posting. ... 88c1b8abca
Orly Taitz, Discredited Obama Birther Lawyer, Now MedPot Activist?
Wednesday, June 13, 2012 at 1:27 p.m. By Nick Schou

An interesting news story came out of Costa Mesa yesterday, where a medical marijuana activist was arrested in front of Mother's Market. The activist, Deborah Tharp, was attempting to gather signatures for a proposed ballot initiative that would demand Costa Mesa city officials end their crackdown on marijuana dispensaries. Tharp had been ordered to leave, and when she refused, police arrested her for trespassing.

Here's the interesting part: for reasons that remain unclear, Tharp retained as her attorney none other than Orly Taitz, the wacky and pretty much completely discredited lawyer who keeps trying to prove President Barack Obama was born in Kenya.

In an interview with the Daily Pilot, which broke news of Thorpe's arrest yesterday, Taitz did a decent job of not sounding as completely insane as usual. She's already flushed her legal career and credibility down the toilet. "This was just intimidation and harassment of a journalist there to gather petitions," Taitz, who apparently doesn't understand the difference between journalism and signature gathering, said. "Miss Tharp did not commit any crime. If Mother's Market did not want her gathering signatures, they could've filed a civil matter."
http://www.ocweekly.com/news/orly-taitz ... st-6447193



User avatar
GreatGrey
Posts: 9549
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2009 6:06 am
Location: Living in the Anthropocene

Re: Medical Dental Development, LLC v Pierson, et al

#589

Post by GreatGrey » Thu Jan 05, 2017 4:16 am

Sterngard Friegen wrote:
Orlylicious wrote:
ZekeB wrote: If Taitz were teaching the course, would you attend just for the laugh?
If Stern was willing to be in a room with La Taitz for an extended period of time, I would fly anywhere in the world to witness it! :P
:fingerwag:
Your air miles are safe. I've been in 3 rooms with Taitz in my life. Each experience was more horrible than the previous.
Pfffftt... I was in an elevator with her.


I am not "someone upthread".
Trump needs to be smashed into some kind of inedible orange pâté.

User avatar
Sugar Magnolia
Posts: 9558
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2012 6:44 am

Re: Medical Dental Development, LLC v Pierson, et al

#590

Post by Sugar Magnolia » Thu Jan 05, 2017 4:20 am

GreatGrey wrote:
Sterngard Friegen wrote:
Orlylicious wrote:
If Stern was willing to be in a room with La Taitz for an extended period of time, I would fly anywhere in the world to witness it! :P
:fingerwag:
Your air miles are safe. I've been in 3 rooms with Taitz in my life. Each experience was more horrible than the previous.
Pfffftt... I was in an elevator with her.
Restroom for me.



User avatar
tek
Posts: 2607
Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2012 6:02 pm
Location: Happy Valley, MA
Occupation: Damned if I know

Re: Medical Dental Development, LLC v Pierson, et al

#591

Post by tek » Thu Jan 05, 2017 7:46 am

ZekeB wrote:
RoadScholar wrote:Just be glad she's not a urologist. :nooo:
Or proctologist.
This would explain where some of her arguments come from..


A truckload of bricks
In the soft morning light

User avatar
Sterngard Friegen
Posts: 43902
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Location: Over the drawbridge

Re: Medical Dental Development, LLC v Pierson, et al

#592

Post by Sterngard Friegen » Thu Jan 05, 2017 9:39 am

I was in two courtrooms and . . . wait for it . . .
► Show Spoiler
with her.

I win the Internet.



User avatar
Estiveo
Posts: 7355
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 7:31 pm
Location: Trouble's Howse

Re: Medical Dental Development, LLC v Pierson, et al

#593

Post by Estiveo » Thu Jan 05, 2017 11:01 am

Yabut, she was ackshully INSIDE Foggy's own mouf! :sick: :smoking:


Image Image Image Image Image

User avatar
bob
Posts: 24969
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Medical Dental Development, LLC v Pierson, et al

#594

Post by bob » Thu Jan 05, 2017 11:28 am

Sterngard Friegen wrote:I was in two courtrooms and . . . wait for it . . .
► Show Spoiler
with her.
You answered the Common Law Grand Jury's summons?


Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
Northland10
Posts: 7089
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:19 am
Location: Chicago area - North burbs

Re: Medical Dental Development, LLC v Pierson, et al

#595

Post by Northland10 » Thu Jan 05, 2017 12:55 pm

bob wrote:
Sterngard Friegen wrote:I was in two courtrooms and . . . wait for it . . .
► Show Spoiler
with her.
You answered the Common Law Grand Jury's summons?
Patrick failed to appear for his summons. They haven't cited him yet for failure to appear. Apparently Common Law Courts are slower than the 9th, and Wingate.


North-land: of the family 10
UCC 1-106 Plural is Singular, Singular is Plural.

User avatar
Orlylicious
Posts: 8097
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 4:02 pm
Location: DHS Psy-Ops HQ

Re: Medical Dental Development, LLC v Pierson, et al

#596

Post by Orlylicious » Thu Jan 05, 2017 2:03 pm

Stern, I remember when you were there with her, didn't you take this photo and have it painted? :P
Image



User avatar
Sterngard Friegen
Posts: 43902
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Location: Over the drawbridge

Re: Medical Dental Development, LLC v Pierson, et al

#597

Post by Sterngard Friegen » Sun Apr 16, 2017 3:59 pm

It's over (again). The district court has affirmed the bankruptcy court's refusal to re-open David Johnson, D.C.'s bankruptcy on the grounds of "fraud" cooked up asserted by Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. (See below.)

I fully expect a 9th Circuit appeal. And then a petition for a writ of certaki. (That writ is unique only to Taitz.)

Her reply brief, while deficient in overcoming hearsay and foundational issues, looked like something a real lawyer submitted (she must have hired a BK para legal). But she cited a 2016 case (In re Consolidated Freightways Bankruptcy) where the BK and district courts refused to re-open a long dead [2002] bankruptcy. She cited that case as precedent for re-opening.

Fun fact: My firm represented Consolidated Freightways for 15 years, right into CF's bankruptcy. Glad we could be of service, Orly.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.



User avatar
Flatpointhigh
Posts: 7660
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 1:05 pm
Location: Hotel California, PH23
Occupation: Voice Actor, Podcaster, I hold a Ph.D in Procrastination.
Contact:

Re: Medical Dental Development, LLC v Pierson, et al

#598

Post by Flatpointhigh » Fri Apr 28, 2017 12:50 pm

:thumbs: :thumbs: :thumbs:



"It is wrong to say God made rich and poor; He only made male and female, and He gave them the Earth as their inheritance."- Thomas Paine, Forward to Agrarian Justice
Cancer broke me

jonbeck
Posts: 1611
Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2012 10:59 pm
Location: Oceanside, CA

Re: Medical Dental Development, LLC v Pierson, et al

#599

Post by jonbeck » Fri Apr 28, 2017 1:37 pm

That order was a fun read as I just litigated a similar case, almost as stupid.

Orly could not resist accusing the Chapter 7 trustee of being involved in a vast conspiracy
In MDD’s view, panel trustee Weneta Kosmala either colluded with Dr. Johnson and his attorney
to defraud MDD and the other creditors
or, alternatively, failed to conduct any due diligence and
let a valuable asset (namely, the alleged value of Dr. Johnson’s chiropractic practice) slip away
without appropriating its value for the estate’s benefit.



User avatar
Flatpointhigh
Posts: 7660
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 1:05 pm
Location: Hotel California, PH23
Occupation: Voice Actor, Podcaster, I hold a Ph.D in Procrastination.
Contact:

Re: Medical Dental Development, LLC v Pierson, et al

#600

Post by Flatpointhigh » Sun Apr 30, 2017 1:05 pm

she's a sTrumpette



"It is wrong to say God made rich and poor; He only made male and female, and He gave them the Earth as their inheritance."- Thomas Paine, Forward to Agrarian Justice
Cancer broke me

Post Reply

Return to “Orly Taitz”