Orly Taitz - NOT California's New Secretary of State

User avatar
TollandRCR
Posts: 20727
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2009 11:17 pm

Orly Taitz - NOT California's New Secretary of State

#3526

Post by TollandRCR » Thu Jul 19, 2012 2:12 pm

Which, unless I've missed (or forgotten) something is true.How does that square with [link]this,http://www.thefogbow.com/forum/viewtopi ... ad#p399467[/link]?


“The truth is, we know so little about life, we don’t really know what the good news is and what the bad news is.” Kurt Vonnegut

User avatar
realist
Posts: 34556
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:33 pm

Orly Taitz - NOT California's New Secretary of State

#3527

Post by realist » Thu Jul 19, 2012 2:14 pm

Which, unless I've missed (or forgotten) something is true.How does that square with [link]this,http://www.thefogbow.com/forum/viewtopi ... ad#p399467[/link]?Fees and costs are not the same.In addition, the costs were awarded for the appeal, not the lower court case.


ImageX 4 ImageX36
Image

User avatar
esseff44
Posts: 12507
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:40 am

Orly Taitz - NOT California's New Secretary of State

#3528

Post by esseff44 » Thu Jul 19, 2012 2:14 pm

Which, unless I've missed (or forgotten) something is true.What is true? Now, I am really confused. Doesn't the order say that Dunn gets to recover costs from Taitz? :-?



User avatar
realist
Posts: 34556
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:33 pm

Orly Taitz - NOT California's New Secretary of State

#3529

Post by realist » Thu Jul 19, 2012 2:15 pm

Which, unless I've missed (or forgotten) something is true.What is true? Now, I am really confused. Doesn't the order say that Dunn gets to recover costs from Taitz? :-?For the appeal, yes.The remarks quoted from Taitz's site referred to fees. Fees and costs are not the same.


ImageX 4 ImageX36
Image

User avatar
TollandRCR
Posts: 20727
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2009 11:17 pm

Orly Taitz - NOT California's New Secretary of State

#3530

Post by TollandRCR » Thu Jul 19, 2012 2:31 pm

For the appeal, yes.The remarks quoted from Taitz's site referred to fees. Fees and costs are not the same."Fees" would refer to payments to Dunn's lawyers, while "costs" would refer to money paid to the court, which would presumably be just a fraction of Dunn's expenses?


“The truth is, we know so little about life, we don’t really know what the good news is and what the bad news is.” Kurt Vonnegut

User avatar
realist
Posts: 34556
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:33 pm

Orly Taitz - NOT California's New Secretary of State

#3531

Post by realist » Thu Jul 19, 2012 3:11 pm

For the appeal, yes.The remarks quoted from Taitz's site referred to fees. Fees and costs are not the same."Fees" would refer to payments to Dunn's lawyers, while "costs" would refer to money paid to the court, which would presumably be just a fraction of Dunn's expenses?The costs are to reimburse Dunn for direct costs incurred in the appeal... a nominal amount.


ImageX 4 ImageX36
Image

User avatar
Suranis
Posts: 15935
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 7:04 am

Orly Taitz - NOT California's New Secretary of State

#3532

Post by Suranis » Thu Jul 19, 2012 4:36 pm

But not "absolutely nothing"


Irony can be pretty ironic sometimes.

User avatar
bob
Posts: 24978
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Orly Taitz - NOT California's New Secretary of State

#3533

Post by bob » Tue Sep 11, 2012 7:26 pm

From (the draft amended complaint in) [/break1]thefogbow.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=8248]Judd v. Obama:


While at the hearing the three judge penal appeared to be willing to grant a leave to amend, later the same panel came up with a ruling confirming the decision of the lower court, decision that was not supported by the facts of the case and the law.





The most egregious part of the ruling, was flagrant lying by the judges fo the Court of Appeal, fraudulent statement by this three judge panel that Taitz did not pursue fraud claim originally, but brought fraud claim only some 9 month later, after the Defendant filed a motion for a ruling on the pleadings.





In reality the three judge panel had in front of them the original complaint that had multiple causes of action of fraud, including fraud by Defendant Dunn in not disclosing his voter registration in Florida, not disclosing his voter registration in Texas, in not disclosing that he registered there as a Democrat, while running in California as a Republican and allegations of fraud by the alleged nominators, who stated in a recorded video interview, shown on TV, that they never nominated Dunn.





[...]





Decision by the California Court of Appeals was released shortly before Taitz ran for the U.S. Senate in 2012. In their decision judges of the Court of Appeals not only flagrantly lied, but also misrepresented the case in the light most favorable to defense. Their decision was picked up by the media and Taitz was further subjected by vicious attacks coming from the media defendants and other puppets of the establishment media with a clear goal of defaming her and effecting her 2012 campaign.


Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
Sterngard Friegen
Posts: 43902
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Location: Over the drawbridge

Orly Taitz - NOT California's New Secretary of State

#3534

Post by Sterngard Friegen » Tue Sep 11, 2012 11:01 pm

More lies.



User avatar
raicha
Posts: 7345
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2010 5:10 pm
Contact:

Orly Taitz - NOT California's New Secretary of State

#3535

Post by raicha » Tue Jan 22, 2013 9:55 am

Damon Dunn has announced his candidacy for mayor of Long Beach, California. I've met him a few times and heard him deliver some very inspirational speeches at youth conferences. He is one to watch.



User avatar
bob
Posts: 24978
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Orly Taitz - NOT California's New Secretary of State

#3536

Post by bob » Tue Jan 22, 2013 11:39 am

Damon Dunn has announced his candidacy for mayor of Long Beach, California. I've met him a few times and heard him deliver some very inspirational speeches at youth conferences. He is one to watch.I remember Bowen had a very backhanded compliment during the campaign, (word to the effect of) "He's great, he's talented, but inexperienced. Why is his first run a state-wide constitutional office, and not a local office where he can learn the ropes, etc."


Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
bob
Posts: 24978
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Orly Taitz - NOT California's New Secretary of State

#3537

Post by bob » Fri Aug 03, 2018 11:42 am

According to NY times only 16,000 voted for Cortez and look at all the noise she is making. In comparison more than half a million (540,000) voted for me when I ran in Republican primary for Secretary of State
:twisted: http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/according-t ... secretary/ :twisted:

Maybe because, unlike Taitz, she won her primary? And knocked off a top-ranking House member in the process? And will probably be elected in November? :shrug:


Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

Grumpy Old Guy
Posts: 1468
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2015 10:24 am
Occupation: Retired, unemployed, never a lawyer

Re: Orly Taitz - NOT California's New Secretary of State

#3538

Post by Grumpy Old Guy » Fri Aug 03, 2018 12:36 pm

California has many more Republican voters who did not vote for Orly than there were Democratic voters in that district who did not vote for Cortez.

Math is not O’s strong point.



User avatar
ZekeB
Posts: 14725
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 10:07 pm
Location: Northwest part of Semi Blue State

Re: Orly Taitz - NOT California's New Secretary of State

#3539

Post by ZekeB » Fri Aug 03, 2018 1:02 pm

Her math benefitted her when she multiplied her single digit percent of votes times all the voters in the U.S. and showed that she trounced her opponent.


Ano, jsou opravdové. - Stormy Daniels

Nech mě domluvit! - Orly Taitz

User avatar
Northland10
Posts: 7093
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:19 am
Location: Chicago area - North burbs

Re: Orly Taitz - NOT California's New Secretary of State

#3540

Post by Northland10 » Fri Aug 03, 2018 1:30 pm

A Hispanic young women who identifies as a socialist was an upset winner of a primary and is now getting a bunch of attention from the press. Orly's obligated to show her jealous rage.


North-land: of the family 10
UCC 1-106 Plural is Singular, Singular is Plural.

Grumpy Old Guy
Posts: 1468
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2015 10:24 am
Occupation: Retired, unemployed, never a lawyer

Re: Orly Taitz - NOT California's New Secretary of State

#3541

Post by Grumpy Old Guy » Fri Aug 03, 2018 3:51 pm

Northland10 wrote:
Fri Aug 03, 2018 1:30 pm
A Hispanic young women who identifies as a socialist was an upset winner of a primary and is now getting a bunch of attention from the press. Orly's obligated to show her jealous rage.

A brown person is successful. What is the world coming to?

:rolleye:



Post Reply

Return to “Orly Taitz”