Rhodes v. MacDonald et al - Georgia, 9/4/09

User avatar
ZekeB
Posts: 18269
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 10:07 pm
Location: The nuttiest congressional district of a nut job state.

Re: Rhodes v. MacDonald et al - Georgia, 9/4/09

#3026

Post by ZekeB »

Sterngard Friegen wrote: Tue Sep 03, 2019 9:08 pm
Hidden Content
This board requires you to be registered and logged-in to view hidden content.
[Cross-posted]
Hidden Content
This board requires you to be registered and logged-in to view hidden content.


Trump: Er hat eine größere Ente als ich.

Putin: Du bist kleiner als ich.
User avatar
Maybenaut
Posts: 6781
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 8:58 am
Location: Maybelot

Re: Rhodes v. MacDonald et al - Georgia, 9/4/09

#3027

Post by Maybenaut »

Sterngard Friegen wrote: Tue Sep 03, 2019 9:08 pm
Hidden Content
This board requires you to be registered and logged-in to view hidden content.
[Cross-posted]
Hidden Content
This board requires you to be registered and logged-in to view hidden content.


"Hey! You know, we left this England place because it was bogus. So if we don't get some cool rules ourselves, pronto, we'll just be bogus too." - Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 14401
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

Re: Rhodes v. MacDonald et al - Georgia, 9/4/09

#3028

Post by Notorial Dissent »

La Taitz definitely gives a whole new meaning to the phrase double down stupid. Poster child in fact.


The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.
User avatar
Sterngard Friegen
Posts: 47277
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Location: Over the drawbridge

Re: Rhodes v. MacDonald et al - Georgia, 9/4/09

#3029

Post by Sterngard Friegen »

Hidden Content
This board requires you to be registered and logged-in to view hidden content.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.


Addie
Posts: 45368
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 6:22 am
Location: downstairs

Re: Rhodes v. MacDonald et al - Georgia, 9/4/09

#3030

Post by Addie »

:-D
Sterngard Friegen wrote: Tue Sep 03, 2019 9:08 pm
Hidden Content
This board requires you to be registered and logged-in to view hidden content.
[Cross-posted]


User avatar
bob
Posts: 31312
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Rhodes v. MacDonald et al - Georgia, 9/4/09

#3031

Post by bob »

Hidden Content
This board requires you to be registered and logged-in to view hidden content.
Edit: Type-O.


Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2
TexasFilly
Posts: 20544
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 12:52 pm

Re: Rhodes v. MacDonald et al - Georgia, 9/4/09

#3032

Post by TexasFilly »

Hidden Content
This board requires you to be registered and logged-in to view hidden content.


I love the poorly educated!!!

Kevin McCarthy: Paul Ryan playing with a head injury -- Jon Lovett
User avatar
Sterngard Friegen
Posts: 47277
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Location: Over the drawbridge

Re: Rhodes v. MacDonald et al - Georgia, 9/4/09

#3033

Post by Sterngard Friegen »

Hidden Content
This board requires you to be registered and logged-in to view hidden content.


User avatar
Reality Check
Posts: 16787
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: Rhodes v. MacDonald et al - Georgia, 9/4/09

#3034

Post by Reality Check »

Didn't the Balling Ball write the reply to the sanctions order and that resulted in the doubling of the fine?


"“If you’re not outraged, you’re not paying attention.”

Heather Heyer, November 2016
User avatar
Sterngard Friegen
Posts: 47277
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Location: Over the drawbridge

Re: Rhodes v. MacDonald et al - Georgia, 9/4/09

#3035

Post by Sterngard Friegen »

Reality Check wrote: Tue Sep 03, 2019 11:35 pm Didn't the Balling Ball write the reply to the sanctions order and that resulted in the doubling of the fine?
Yes. It was in his overly wrought style and the contumacious response was written by a native English speaker. For Taitz, English is an afterthought language, so we assumed it was her paramour who wrote it and "showed" Judge Land. He was writing her other dribble then, too.


User avatar
Orlylicious
Posts: 13668
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 4:02 pm
Location: @orly_licious With Pete Buttigieg and the other "open and defiant homosexuals" --Bryan Fischer AFA
Occupation: LDIT Supporters are "Shooketh"! -- Ali Akbar 11/29/20 #StuggersForBiden "Do Nothing Democrat Savage" -- Donald, 9/28/19 and "Scalawag...Part of an extreme, malicious leftist internet social mob working in concert with weaponized, socialized governments to target and injure political opponents.” -- Walt Fitzpatrick
Contact:

Re: Rhodes v. MacDonald et al - Georgia, 9/4/09

#3036

Post by Orlylicious »

Hidden Content
This board requires you to be registered and logged-in to view hidden content.


Avatar: LDIT's Court FAILS. Fogbow's Favourite TV Show™ starring titular Mama June returns 3/21. TVShowsAce featured Fogbow love 5/26/20: https://bit.ly/2TNxrbS[/b]
User avatar
Sterngard Friegen
Posts: 47277
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Location: Over the drawbridge

Re: Rhodes v. MacDonald et al - Georgia, 9/4/09

#3037

Post by Sterngard Friegen »

bob wrote: Tue Sep 03, 2019 10:52 pm
Hidden Content
This board requires you to be registered and logged-in to view hidden content.
Hidden Content
This board requires you to be registered and logged-in to view hidden content.


Somerset
Posts: 5023
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 5:52 am
Location: Silicon Valley
Occupation: Lab rat

Re: Rhodes v. MacDonald et al - Georgia, 9/4/09

#3038

Post by Somerset »

Orlylicious wrote: Wed Sep 04, 2019 12:54 am
Hidden Content
This board requires you to be registered and logged-in to view hidden content.
Hidden Content
This board requires you to be registered and logged-in to view hidden content.


User avatar
RTH10260
Posts: 29949
Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 8:52 am
Location: Near the Swiss Alps

Re: Rhodes v. MacDonald et al - Georgia, 9/4/09

#3039

Post by RTH10260 »

:like:

I think I am getting old(er) - a decade of Taitz along with TFB and its transitions.

:thumbs:


User avatar
realist
Posts: 35660
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:33 pm

Re: Rhodes v. MacDonald et al - Georgia, 9/4/09

#3040

Post by realist »

Sterngard Friegen wrote: Tue Sep 03, 2019 9:08 pm
Hidden Content
This board requires you to be registered and logged-in to view hidden content.
[Cross-posted]
Hidden Content
This board requires you to be registered and logged-in to view hidden content.


ImageX 4 ImageX36
Image
User avatar
Tiredretiredlawyer
Posts: 11389
Joined: Tue May 10, 2016 2:56 pm
Location: Animal Planet
Occupation: Permanent probationary slave to 2 dogs, 1 cat, and 1 horse, and 4 granddogs and one grandcat.

Re: Rhodes v. MacDonald et al - Georgia, 9/4/09

#3041

Post by Tiredretiredlawyer »

Hidden Content
This board requires you to be registered and logged-in to view hidden content.


"Why Iron-man and why not Fe-male? This joke is not for everyone." - Monde Mobsinner Bakaqana to The Science Nerds on Twitter.
User avatar
Maybenaut
Posts: 6781
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 8:58 am
Location: Maybelot

Re: Rhodes v. MacDonald et al - Georgia, 9/4/09

#3042

Post by Maybenaut »

realist wrote: Wed Sep 04, 2019 8:10 am
Sterngard Friegen wrote: Tue Sep 03, 2019 9:08 pm
Hidden Content
This board requires you to be registered and logged-in to view hidden content.
[Cross-posted]
Hidden Content
This board requires you to be registered and logged-in to view hidden content.
Hidden Content
This board requires you to be registered and logged-in to view hidden content.


"Hey! You know, we left this England place because it was bogus. So if we don't get some cool rules ourselves, pronto, we'll just be bogus too." - Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
Sterngard Friegen
Posts: 47277
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Location: Over the drawbridge

Re: Rhodes v. MacDonald et al - Georgia, 9/4/09

#3043

Post by Sterngard Friegen »

Hidden Content
This board requires you to be registered and logged-in to view hidden content.


User avatar
RTH10260
Posts: 29949
Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 8:52 am
Location: Near the Swiss Alps

Re: Rhodes v. MacDonald et al - Georgia, 9/4/09

#3044

Post by RTH10260 »

PS. did we evah get to hear the resolution of the Leaking Taiz Castle where they intended to sue the builders for a pony?


User avatar
SuzieC
Posts: 1407
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 1:27 pm
Location: Blue oasis in red state
Occupation: Attorney since 1977. Litigator for 33 years. For 10 years Admin Law Judge for 4 state agencies.

Re: Rhodes v. MacDonald et al - Georgia, 9/4/09

#3045

Post by SuzieC »

Sterngard Friegen wrote: Wed Sep 04, 2019 12:02 am
Reality Check wrote: Tue Sep 03, 2019 11:35 pm Didn't the Balling Ball write the reply to the sanctions order and that resulted in the doubling of the fine?
Yes. It was in his overly wrought style and the contumacious response was written by a native English speaker. For Taitz, English is an afterthought language, so we assumed it was her paramour who wrote it and "showed" Judge Land. He was writing her other dribble then, too.
A link for our giggling pleasure this fair September morning?


User avatar
Sterngard Friegen
Posts: 47277
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Location: Over the drawbridge

Re: Rhodes v. MacDonald et al - Georgia, 9/4/09

#3046

Post by Sterngard Friegen »

SuzieC wrote: Wed Sep 04, 2019 10:43 am
Sterngard Friegen wrote: Wed Sep 04, 2019 12:02 am
Reality Check wrote: Tue Sep 03, 2019 11:35 pm Didn't the Balling Ball write the reply to the sanctions order and that resulted in the doubling of the fine?
Yes. It was in his overly wrought style and the contumacious response was written by a native English speaker. For Taitz, English is an afterthought language, so we assumed it was her paramour who wrote it and "showed" Judge Land. He was writing her other dribble then, too.
A link for our giggling pleasure this fair September morning?
Judge Land's order: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q ... BBlb1BktEd

The accusatory daffydavit is in this thread, on page 88. For lolz scroll up and down and go back and forward a few pages for the FogBar discussion: viewtopic.php?f=63&t=1007&start=2175


User avatar
RTH10260
Posts: 29949
Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 8:52 am
Location: Near the Swiss Alps

Re: Rhodes v. MacDonald et al - Georgia, 9/4/09

#3047

Post by RTH10260 »

this outside link picked from far above:

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/muckraker ... e-shove-it


User avatar
Maybenaut
Posts: 6781
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 8:58 am
Location: Maybelot

Re: Rhodes v. MacDonald et al - Georgia, 9/4/09

#3048

Post by Maybenaut »

Sterngard Friegen wrote: Wed Sep 04, 2019 9:19 am
Hidden Content
This board requires you to be registered and logged-in to view hidden content.
Off Topic
I went to law school at the University of San Francisco. The same case came up in crim law, crim pro, civ pro, contracts, property, wills and trusts, international law, and maritime law. It involved an alumnus of the Law school who had left a life estate to his wife, a small sum to his “secretary” (which is what they called boyfriends back in the day), and a substantial endowment to the school. He died, and the secretary convinced the wife to challenge the endowment. The wife continued to employ the secretary as sort of a Man Friday. The secretary also had a friend who was some sort of Russian orthodox priest or something like that. I might have mistaken some of these details — it’s been a while.

Anyway, while the endowment was in litigation, the wife and the secretary went on a cruise to Alaska. At some point during the cruise, when the ship was in the Straits of Juan De Fuca, the wife was murdered (discovered in her cabin by Michael Michael, the Corsican cabin boy - that detail I do remember).

So the initial question was who had jurisdiction? If the murder was in US waters, The US did. If it happened in Canadian waters, the Canadians did. If it happened in international waters, then jurisdiction was in the Bahamas because the ship was registered in the Bahamas (I think it was a Norwegian Cruise lines ship, but I can’t remember that detail).

There was apparently a huge trial just on the issue of jurisdiction. Ultimately it was decided that the Canadians had jurisdiction. So the secretary, whose name I cannot recall, was tried and convicted in a Canadian court.

Then there was a big fight about the validity of a codicil to the wife’s well leaving everything to the secretary, and some stuff to this Russian orthodox dude.

I think Ultimately the school got everything. Maybe the Russian orthodox dude got a little bit of money, I can’t remember. But the secretary didn’t get anything because he was convicted of killing her. So under California law he could not inherit. The dean of the school when I was a student there in the late 90s was still driving around in the woman’s Cadillac.

The Canadian defense attorney who represented the secretary in the criminal trial, William Deverell, wrote a book about it called Fatal Cruise. It’s a really good book. I used to have a copy, but I can’t find it. But I highly recommend it.


"Hey! You know, we left this England place because it was bogus. So if we don't get some cool rules ourselves, pronto, we'll just be bogus too." - Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
Chilidog
Posts: 11869
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 11:36 am

Re: Rhodes v. MacDonald et al - Georgia, 9/4/09

#3049

Post by Chilidog »

Hidden Content
This board requires you to be registered and logged-in to view hidden content.


User avatar
bob
Posts: 31312
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Rhodes v. MacDonald et al - Georgia, 9/4/09

#3050

Post by bob »

Hidden Content
This board requires you to be registered and logged-in to view hidden content.


Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2
Post Reply

Return to “Orly Taitz”