Carl Gallups' "BIG 'PLAN A'" - "It's in God's Hands Now!" "THIS STORY WILL MORPH" Starring Birthers Arpaio & Zullo

User avatar
Foggy
Posts: 29130
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 12:00 pm
Location: Fogbow HQ
Occupation: Dick Tater

Re: Carl Gallups' "BIG 'PLAN A'" - "It's in God's Hands Now!" "THIS STORY WILL MORPH" Starring Birthers Arpaio & Zullo

#10801

Post by Foggy » Sun Nov 03, 2019 7:12 am

Ten years ... I can really see the hand of doG in that ...


I put the 'fun' in dysfunctional.

User avatar
Sam the Centipede
Posts: 7377
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2012 3:25 pm

Re: Carl Gallups' "BIG 'PLAN A'" - "It's in God's Hands Now!" "THIS STORY WILL MORPH" Starring Birthers Arpaio & Zullo

#10802

Post by Sam the Centipede » Sun Nov 03, 2019 7:49 am

:cantlook: :brokenheart:
Foggy wrote:
Sun Nov 03, 2019 7:12 am
Ten years ... I can really see the hand of doG in that ...
Of course. He's eternal, so in no hurry to resolve the issue. Give it another millennium. Or two.

He is teaching his followers the virtue of patience. I'm surprised that such an eminent theologian and exponent of absurdist apologetics as Gallups doesn't appreciate that.

In the spirit of neutrality and fairness, I should mention that other gods are available.
:sarcasm:



User avatar
bob
Posts: 27362
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Carl Gallups' "BIG 'PLAN A'" - "It's in God's Hands Now!" "THIS STORY WILL MORPH" Starring Birthers Arpaio & Zullo

#10803

Post by bob » Sun Nov 03, 2019 9:58 am

Gallups says he sees the Lord's hand in Stockman's first being cursed with a plague of birthers, and then being sentenced to a decade in prison.

No disagreement with that divine judgement.


Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
ArthurWankspittle
Posts: 1582
Joined: Sun May 05, 2013 12:38 pm

Re: Carl Gallups' "BIG 'PLAN A'" - "It's in God's Hands Now!" "THIS STORY WILL MORPH" Starring Birthers Arpaio & Zullo

#10804

Post by ArthurWankspittle » Sun Nov 03, 2019 3:07 pm

plague of birthers ?
conspiracy of birthers?
falsehood of birthers?
perjury of birthers?


Going to Tibet now and deleting Facebook you have my email address.

User avatar
Estiveo
Posts: 8312
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 7:31 pm
Location: Trouble's Howse

Re: Carl Gallups' "BIG 'PLAN A'" - "It's in God's Hands Now!" "THIS STORY WILL MORPH" Starring Birthers Arpaio & Zullo

#10805

Post by Estiveo » Sun Nov 03, 2019 3:58 pm

Cesspool of birthers?


Image Image Image Image Image

User avatar
Orlylicious
Posts: 10423
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 4:02 pm
Location: With Pete Buttigieg and the other "open and defiant homosexuals" --Bryan Fischer AFA
Occupation: "Do Nothing Democrat Savage" -- Donald, 9/28/19 and "Scalawag...Part of an extreme, malicious leftist internet social mob working in concert with weaponized, socialized governments to target and injure political opponents.” -- Walt Fitzpatrick

Re: Carl Gallups' "BIG 'PLAN A'" - "It's in God's Hands Now!" "THIS STORY WILL MORPH" Starring Birthers Arpaio & Zullo

#10806

Post by Orlylicious » Sun Nov 03, 2019 4:52 pm

I think we decided a group of birthers is a...

"Fail of Birthers" :P


Photo: Merry Christmas from the titular Mama June. Santa (aka Sugar Bear) and her lovely family!
Hey! Don't miss The Fogbow's Favorite TV Show starring the titular Mama June Shannon -- "Mama June: From Not To Hot!"

User avatar
bob
Posts: 27362
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Carl Gallups' "BIG 'PLAN A'" - "It's in God's Hands Now!" "THIS STORY WILL MORPH" Starring Birthers Arpaio & Zullo

#10807

Post by bob » Mon Nov 04, 2019 5:47 pm


Does "misogyny, blasphemy, profanity, and sexual immorality" also describe someone in the news daily? :think:


Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
Reality Check
Posts: 15887
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: Carl Gallups' "BIG 'PLAN A'" - "It's in God's Hands Now!" "THIS STORY WILL MORPH" Starring Birthers Arpaio & Zullo

#10808

Post by Reality Check » Mon Nov 04, 2019 6:23 pm

bob wrote:
Mon Nov 04, 2019 5:47 pm
:snippity: Does "misogyny, blasphemy, profanity, and sexual immorality" also describe someone in the news daily? :think:
Oh the irony.


"“If you’re not outraged, you’re not paying attention.”

Heather Heyer, November 2016

User avatar
Orlylicious
Posts: 10423
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 4:02 pm
Location: With Pete Buttigieg and the other "open and defiant homosexuals" --Bryan Fischer AFA
Occupation: "Do Nothing Democrat Savage" -- Donald, 9/28/19 and "Scalawag...Part of an extreme, malicious leftist internet social mob working in concert with weaponized, socialized governments to target and injure political opponents.” -- Walt Fitzpatrick

Re: Carl Gallups' "BIG 'PLAN A'" - "It's in God's Hands Now!" "THIS STORY WILL MORPH" Starring Birthers Arpaio & Zullo

#10809

Post by Orlylicious » Fri Nov 08, 2019 9:48 pm

Hadn't seen this, it's from last year... Jim Bakker is still around?! With a new blonde.
Carl Gallups: ‘Satan In Raising Up Antagonism’ Against Trump
By Kyle Mantyla | June 28, 2018 11:32 am

Trump-loving right-wing pastor and rabid conspiracy theorist Carl Gallups appeared on Jim Bakker’s television program yesterday, where he warned that opposition to President Trump is “very demonic.” “I think that is why there is so much of an attack on Donald Trump in America,” Gallups said. “I think this is very spiritual … and, at some levels, very demonic, a demonic attack.” Gallups said that “Satan hates” Trump’s support for Israel and so “Satan is raising up antagonism right here in America” against the president. “A lot of people don’t know it, they think it is all political,” he added. “I think a lot of it is deeply, deeply spiritual. You talk about the deep state? There is a deeper state.”

Later in the broadcast, Bakker urged viewers to support his network, saying that God wants his daily television program to remain on the air because it is not only important to Trump personally but vital to helping Republicans maintain control of Congress in the upcoming midterm elections. Bakker claimed that Trump called him directly after the 2016 election and spent 20 minutes thanking him and telling him that his show “was one of the things that made a big difference in this election.”

“The spirit of Antichrist is trying to destroy all Gospel,” Bakker warned. “Christian television, if the enemy, if the opposition ever gets a hold of this country again; believe me, you have no idea how much this world hates the Gospel of Jesus Christ.” “They hate Trump so bad, I’m afraid they might even have him assassinated,” Bakker said :shock: asking Gallups what will happen “if we have a switch back to an anti-Christ government” in the midterms. “The light will go out and it will get dark quickly,” Gallups responded.
https://www.rightwingwatch.org/post/car ... nst-trump/



Well, Carl, Democrats won in the midterms. Did it get dark for you?


Photo: Merry Christmas from the titular Mama June. Santa (aka Sugar Bear) and her lovely family!
Hey! Don't miss The Fogbow's Favorite TV Show starring the titular Mama June Shannon -- "Mama June: From Not To Hot!"

User avatar
bob
Posts: 27362
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Carl Gallups' "BIG 'PLAN A'" - "It's in God's Hands Now!" "THIS STORY WILL MORPH" Starring Birthers Arpaio & Zullo

#10810

Post by bob » Sat Nov 09, 2019 1:28 pm

P&E: Zullo Responds to P&E Commenter on Obama Birth Certificate.

Wow! Zullo went from taking down a present to comment-section sniping. :violin: Continuing:
“THE FACT IS, IT DIDN’T HAVE TO BE SCANNED”

On Wednesday, The Post & Email published an article titled, “What Other Big Story Did the Mainstream Media Squelch?” referring to a lengthy criminal investigation into the Obama “long-form” birth-certificate virtually unreported by legacy media outlets.

* * *

Several members of “The Fogbow,” a pro-Obama forum purporting that the long-form birth certificate image is authentic and that Obama was constitutionally-eligible to serve as president, frequently read The Post & Email’s articles about the birth certificate, Obama’s inconsistent life narrative, and the “natural born Citizen” requirement for the president in Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution.

The “Obots,” as they are sometimes called, use screen names which change from time to time and often leave comments attempting to convince readers of the birth-certificate image’s genuineness. As The Post & Email’s “Comment” policy states, comments containing obvious propaganda are not published.

* * *

[Commenter “Earlington Smith” wrote]:
Zullo said the quantization tables matched other PDFs created by the White House on a Xerox 7655. Therefore there was a paper document that was scanned on a Xerox 7655 to create the birth certificate PDF.
In 2013, “Obots” claimed that a Xerox “WorkCentre” 7655 copier could produce the birth-certificate image exactly as it appears online, a claim Zullo has continuously refuted.

On Friday, The Post & Email reached out to Zullo for comment on Smith’s statement, and Zullo responded:
Obviously, there had to be paper documents that things were taken from, but that birth certificate displayed was never a paper document. It is a creation done digitally that could only become paper once you press the button to print it. It’s a nice try, but it’s not reality. The reality is it wouldn’t matter how many different documents; that document does not exist. It resides in cyberspace because it was created in cyberspace. The quantization tables don’t mean anything and have nothing to do with the creation of the document. The quantization tables mean it was printed out of a 7655. That doesn’t matter. The 7655 can only print something that was created and then printed out. So the chain of creation of a digital document ultimately culminates in it being printed onto paper. Prior to it being printed onto paper, it is digital.

The fact that he’s saying there was a paper document that was scanned doesn’t matter. The fact is, it didn’t have to be scanned. There was a paper document created when they falsified the birth certificate. They created it digitally and printed it on paper. The end result of what you see was a fabrication that can only be transferred to paper by the use of printing it from a scanner. That’s all it is: taking a PDF file and printing it.

People will throw red herrings out there. You don’t even have to worry about a quant table; just look at all those items that were pulled over from Ah’Nee. That should settle the matter right there.
Zullo said it, Rondeau believes it, THAT SETTLES IT.


Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 13017
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

Re: Carl Gallups' "BIG 'PLAN A'" - "It's in God's Hands Now!" "THIS STORY WILL MORPH" Starring Birthers Arpaio & Zullo

#10811

Post by Notorial Dissent » Sat Nov 09, 2019 1:46 pm

And yeah, that is pretty much how EVERYTHING gets printed today. So what????


The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
Reality Check
Posts: 15887
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: Carl Gallups' "BIG 'PLAN A'" - "It's in God's Hands Now!" "THIS STORY WILL MORPH" Starring Birthers Arpaio & Zullo

#10812

Post by Reality Check » Sat Nov 09, 2019 2:57 pm

Notorial Dissent wrote:
Sat Nov 09, 2019 1:46 pm
And yeah, that is pretty much how EVERYTHING gets printed today. So what????
Yes, you are correct. On modern multi function machines like the Xerox Workcentre when documents are copied they are first scanned to an uncompressed bitmap file then printed at whatever resolution the printer is capable of printing in dpi. I don't recall the specs on the Xerox but it is something like 1200 X 1200.

If the document is being scanned to a file or email then the uncompressed bitmap file (.bmp) is run through an appropriate compression algorithm for whatever type of desired file format and file qulaity settings are chosen. It's a PDF file in most cases.

Zullo is a poor liar and an idiot. That gibberish of an explanation he gave Sharon was worthy of Cody Robert Judy.


"“If you’re not outraged, you’re not paying attention.”

Heather Heyer, November 2016

User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 13017
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

Re: Carl Gallups' "BIG 'PLAN A'" - "It's in God's Hands Now!" "THIS STORY WILL MORPH" Starring Birthers Arpaio & Zullo

#10813

Post by Notorial Dissent » Sat Nov 09, 2019 3:49 pm

Basically, modern printers are just scanners without the scanning bed and some of the bells and whistles. It's all naughtes and oneses sitting in a file in temp memory until they are jiggery-pokered into a picture or a document.

Poor Zullops, such a putz, and a lying putz at that.


The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
Reality Check
Posts: 15887
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: Carl Gallups' "BIG 'PLAN A'" - "It's in God's Hands Now!" "THIS STORY WILL MORPH" Starring Birthers Arpaio & Zullo

#10814

Post by Reality Check » Sat Nov 09, 2019 4:23 pm

Notorial Dissent wrote:
Sat Nov 09, 2019 3:49 pm
Basically, modern printers are just scanners without the scanning bed and some of the bells and whistles. It's all naughtes and oneses sitting in a file in temp memory until they are jiggery-pokered into a picture or a document.

Poor Zullops, such a putz, and a lying putz at that.
Not to get too technical but it would be more accurate to say that modern copiers are also scanners. They scan the paper document to a temporary digital file just as you said then print that file. When printing from a computer the PC sends the file to the printer instead of the copier creating its own file from a scanned paper document. That's why almost all modern office machines can perform at least three functions. You need the scanner and printer to make a copier so all you need to add is software to get a scanned file out of the machine. Once you add a network card you can send emails and store scanned image files to servers.


"“If you’re not outraged, you’re not paying attention.”

Heather Heyer, November 2016

User avatar
bob
Posts: 27362
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Carl Gallups' "BIG 'PLAN A'" - "It's in God's Hands Now!" "THIS STORY WILL MORPH" Starring Birthers Arpaio & Zullo

#10815

Post by bob » Wed Nov 13, 2019 6:24 pm

P&E comments:
Bobbi wrote:Not sure what to say. Dr. Hands says that Moke Zullo did not have the competence to conclusively state that the “Hammer” is a fraud dr Janda :”facts of illegal surveillance versus the falsehoods from CIA linked Shipp. Shipp & Zullo have ZERO experience in the development , management or implementation of surveillance platforms. I suggest you watch the video posted regarding The Hammer issue addressed by the two MOST RESPECTED EXPERTS in the world on surveillance Bill Binney & Kirk Wiebe and don’t buy into the falsifications spewed by a CIA linked source who has ZERO experience with surveillance platforms. Watch this video: Are you aware of the following: From a recent article:”In early July, Zullo learned of Shipp’s position challenging the existence of The Hammer and parallel platforms. Zullo in turn contacted Shipp and advised him of the information gathered during the two-year MCSO investigation into that matter. Zullo provided Shipp with some new information and believed Shipp received some bad intel from his original source.This conversation with Zullo prompted Shipp to reconsider his initial opinion on the existence of “parallel platforms” and The Hammer. Zullo, was not Shipp’s original source.Based on his conversations with Zullo, Shipp changed his position on the existence of “parallel platforms” and removed from his YouTube channel a video in which he had denied the existence of “The Hammer.” https://www.thepostemail.com/2019/09/12 ... ged-email/
Rondeau wrote:Of course we are aware; we wrote and published the article with first-hand statements from Zullo.
This Montgomery civil war is even less thrilling than the birther civil war. But I can't wait for another decade-long lawsuit about who is the biggest liar!


Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
bob
Posts: 27362
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Carl Gallups' "BIG 'PLAN A'" - "It's in God's Hands Now!" "THIS STORY WILL MORPH" Starring Birthers Arpaio & Zullo

#10816

Post by bob » Mon Dec 02, 2019 2:37 pm

This Montgomery civil war is even less thrilling than the birther civil war.
See, e.g.: P&E: Zullo: “Mary Fanning Attempts To Mislead The President of the United States”:
“WHAT EVIDENCE DO YOU HAVE?”

“Mary Fanning appears to have taken on the role of PR person for Dennis Montgomery and not an investigative journalist as she purports to be. She is the unabashed purveyor of Dennis Montgomery’s propaganda. By writing articles painting Montgomery as credible all the while deliberately omitting a plethora of contradictory evidence and blatantly omitting Montgomery’s devastating 40-year history of legal turmoil illustrating all types of deceptive behavior, she willingly attempts to mislead even the highest official in the country, the President of the United States.” — Former Maricopa County, AZ Cold Case Posse lead investigator Mike Zullo
Oh, the irony. The irony in this article is so thick you could sell it wholesale. Continuing:
For an undisclosed and bewildering reason, in recent months The American Report‘s Mary Fanning and Alan Jones have aimed derogatory and false accusations at Zullo and this writer, labeling them, respectively, “liar,” “con man,” and “a tool” of former CIA Director John Brennan. Given that Fanning and this writer once communicated infrequently but cordially, the transformation is striking and appears to have occurred in conjunction with Fanning’s aggressive promotion of former NSA and CIA contractor Dennis L. Montgomery as a government “whistleblower.“

* * *

Some of Fanning’s ​recent ​disparaging ​and unprovoked ​comments toward Zullo and this writer include:






This writer has not communicated with Fanning or Jones since​ March 14, 2017​. In July, Zullo sent a “cease and desist” email to Fanning stemming from her inaccurate reporting and potentially legally-actionable statements ​invoking his name​ to which he said he received no response.

* * *

In March 2017, Fanning and Jones were seeking information from Zullo and this writer about “​The Hammer​,” said to be a super-computer constructed by Montgomery and used to spy on then-businessman Donald Trump, other prominent businessmen and media personalities, and government officials such as federal judges ​over a number of years.

* * *

Neither Clapper nor Brennan occupied his respective position in the Obama administration at that time. ​It is unlikely, Zullo told The Post & Email, that technology developed in 2004 and purportedly utilized in 2009 by the government as Montgomery alleges, would be effective to defeat current anti-intrusion systems. “It is inconceivable that a decade-old technology would still be effective in 2015 and beyond,” Zullo said.

Zullo had first ​mentioned ​”The Hammer” ​in a radio interview in late 2015 following his testimony in​ Melendres​, a civil-rights case brought against Arpaio​ in ​federal court​. ​ At that time, Zullo​ testified as to the information Montgomery had provided during his year working as a confidential informant for the MCSO.

* * *

Likewise, in a retaliatory effort, an MCSO Internal Affairs (IA) investigation launched in 2016 as a result of Montgomery’s frivolous allegation that Zullo threatened him in a text message was dismissed without any action, and a complaint filed with the Washington State Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS) in August naming this writer as an abuser of a “vulnerable adult” was dismissed in early September as unsubstantiated.

As is exhaustively documented [by Fogbow member Tes], Montgomery has a 40-year history of litigation as both plaintiff and defendant and is currently a defendant in a criminal case stemming from an unpaid gambling debt incurred in Las Vegas in 2008. All defendants are constitutionally innocent until proven guilty.

Stated plainly, Montgomery has never produced proof of his claims and did not claim the role of “whistleblower” until he left government service in 2010 and after former CIA contractor Edward Snowden made his revelations about government surveillance in June 2013.

* * *

Between October 2013 and January 2014, and with his acknowledgement, Zullo both audio- and video-recorded Montgomery’s conversations with Arpaio, Mackiewicz and himself alleging widespread government surveillance. However, this year, Montgomery claimed to The American Report and this writer that he was recorded “illegally,” with Fanning and Jones oft repeating the meritless claim without contacting Zullo for comment.

As Zullo was overseeing Montgomery’s work on a day-to-day basis in 2014, he made arrangements for Montgomery to appear before U.S. District Court Judge Royce C. Lamberth in Washington, DC. On August 1, 2014, Zullo and Mackiewicz met Montgomery; his then-attorney, Larry Klayman, and another man outside of the courthouse, where Zullo captured photographs of the event. In their reporting, Fanning and Jones have not credited Zullo as the source of the photos nor of the information in their first “Hammer” report dated March 17, 2017.

The “Whistleblower Tapes,” which Fanning and Jones have erroneously claimed were released by the judge presiding over Melendres, were actually leaked to The Phoenix New Times by the ACLU, Zullo said, and were never intended for public consumption. Zullo has also noted that the initial recordings he made of Montgomery associate Tim Blixseth’s claims made to the MCSO contain “nothing more than hearsay due to the fact Blixseth himself was conveying information he obtained from Montgomery and he did not possess any firsthand knowledge of the matter.” Zullo contends that Fanning’s insistence on promoting the recordings as verified and factual is “remarkably misleading.“

Prior to the interview with Lamberth, Zullo arranged for Montgomery to engage in a “free talk” with then-Arizona Attorney General Tom Horn ​and for Montgomery to have legal counsel provided at no cost to him, Zullo said. Montgomery made a number of representations and promises during his free talk, Zullo said, and agreed to produce supporting evidence but failed to do so, thereby failing to fulfill the conditions of his agreement. “In other words, Montgomery breached his own immunity agreement with the state of Arizona, again failing to produce the data he claimed he had,” Zullo told The Post & Email. “Failing to produce as represented proves to be a recurring theme documented in Montgomery’s legal history.”

* * *

During an October 31 interview with former CIA officer Kevin Shipp, “Crowdsource the Truth” host Jason Goodman, and this writer, Zullo supplied a video depicting Montgomery fully aware of the video-recording in progress as he spoke to Mackiewicz. During the recording Montgomery clearly states, looking at the camera, “Just make sure you don’t get my grandkids on there…” (47:20-48:09). This video evidence soundly defeats Fanning’s claim that Montgomery was “illicitly” recorded.

Initially, Zullo said, Montgomery provided “verifiable” data to the MCSO on six thumb drives, which lent credibility to his claims of government surveillance of Maricopa County residents. As time went on, however, Zullo came to believe that the data Montgomery was placing on 47 hard drives was not what had been purported and obtained approval from Arpaio to seek out experts who could verify the drives’ contents.

* * *

As The Post & Email documented in numerous articles over the summer, Zullo recalls informing the analysts that Montgomery was the subject of a 2006 State Secrets Privilege (SSP) invocation by then-Director of National Intelligence John Negroponte and that, according to Montgomery, he was read into a Special Access Program (SAP) while working as a government contractor. The SSP came about as a result of Montgomery’s co-ownership of eTreppid, a business arrangement which soured in January 2006 and led to business partner Warren Trepp suing Montgomery in Nevada state court and Montgomery counter-suing Trepp in federal court.

Zullo said before making the trip that he asked Montgomery to place all of his credentials, particularly those involving his work for the government, on one of the hard drives for the analysts to review.

Zullo considers the Negroponte protective order, as well as articles in The New York Times and other publications released prior to 2012, as corroborative of Montgomery’s claim to have been in certain places at certain times as a government contractor. Montgomery included this and other information on the requested drive for review by Binney, Wiebe and Drake, Zullo informed us.

Binney was not present the entire time during which the analysis was performed, Zullo recalled, and did not sign the report produced on November 13, 2014. Although present, Mackiewicz became ill with food poisoning, Zullo said, necessitating that Zullo interact with the former analysts almost exclusively.

Drake and Wiebe stated in the report that the hard drives contained no classified information and “fake code files.” In an email prefacing the report sent the following day to then-MCSO Chief Deputy Gerard Sheridan, Drake wrote of Montgomery, “We have found that he is a complete and total FRAUD.”

The report concludes with Wiebe and Drake’s assessment that the data contained on the hard drives was “evidence of an outright and fraudulent con perpetrated on the government for personal gain and cover.” Zullo told The Post & Email that he was surprised at the language Wiebe and Drake employed in what he would have expected to be no more than a factual and dispassionate analysis of the hard drives’ contents. “They were never asked to assess Montgomery’s motive or character; they were asked to simply review the evidence he supplied,” Zullo said.

In email communications exchanged with this writer over the summer, Wiebe asserted that the wording of the report was Drake’s; however, it appears Wiebe signed the report without protest.​

In a series of interviews beginning in June, Wiebe and Binney told Janda that they believe Montgomery’s claims should be investigated, a finding with which Zullo agrees. In an email exchange on September 30 with this writer, Wiebe indicated that neither he nor Binney knew for certain if Montgomery possessed classified information at that time.

In a dramatic shift, during an October 28 interview with Janda, Wiebe and Binney vehemently defended Montgomery as “the real deal” after Wiebe claimed to have spoken with Montgomery for the first time the night before, a claim Zullo contends is not factual.

Based on Fanning and Jones’s claim that Zullo “misled” Wiebe and Binney about Montgomery’s history in 2014, Janda declined to host Zullo on his show.

Zullo has repeatedly stressed that Montgomery failed to produce any evidence that he worked on “The Hammer”; that he was asked to alter Florida voter rolls, as he claimed; or that Brennan and Clapper were personally involved in illegal data-collection as Fanning and Jones have asserted. Despite that, Zullo has stressed that Montgomery’s claims should be investigated and that he “has a story to tell.” Zullo also advised that “even a con man has pearls of truth baked into the anatomy of the con, and those pearls of truth need to be investigated.“ Zullo also observed that “over and over for 40 years Montgomery has proven to be a less-than-truthful individual.“ Zullo points to a well-documented legal history and real-time 2014 emails, turned over to a federal court, among Det. Mackiewicz, Zullo, Klayman and Montgomery that document that point.

In response to Wiebe and Binney’s changed stance on Montgomery, Zullo observed:
Zullo wrote:I am astounded by the unabashed reversal and contradiction after performing a detailed forensic analysis of the evidence provided by Montgomery that they themselves found to be fictitious, and they now attempt to distance themselves from their own findings. In the process, they have successfully discredited themselves and their own work product and impeached their own credibility. It is beyond me how they can now issue outright declarations of Montgomery’s credibility where absolutely none exists.

In 2014, Wiebe had a 45-minute conversation with Montgomery and me; I initiated the call. I released that information publicly in 2015 and 2016, and if my memory serves, I testified to that in federal court. Wiebe contends that he never spoke with Montgomery until late October 2019. This is patently false. I had both of them on a conference call for 45 minutes. At the conclusion of the call Wiebe told me he believed Montgomery was the “real deal,” only to call him a fraud in writing some weeks later, after careful review of 47 hard drives of worthless information provided by Montgomery.

The second prevarication: they now state they never knew about Negroponte and the State Secrets Privilege. This is false. Both Mackiewicz and I told them that Montgomery was SSP’d when we met with them initially seeking their assistance. We didn’t have the document at that time, but they were advised, “This​ is why we thought there might be something to Montgomery’s story.” This was also public information at the time. The government would not have put that restriction on him in 2006 if he was not working for them in some capacity. In addition, none of them knew of Montgomery or The Hammer at the time we first interacted with them. None of them could substantiate even the existence of “The Hammer.” All of them had been released from government service some eight years prior to the creation of “The Hammer,” if it ever was created.

The Negroponte document was on the drive assembled by Montgomery himself. And why wouldn’t it be? It is Montgomery’s shining star. That document, along with others and government email correspondence, was on the drive that we took to Wiebe’s home to have them analyze all of Montgomery’s correspondence and supportive information.

We asked Montgomery to put together a drive of all pertinent documents supporting his claims and his employment documentation. Negroponte’s SSP came up; I was sitting next to Kirk when it did. It was there, and they said, “John Negroponte.” They recognized the name; they knew the name. I did not know the name, and all I said to them was, “Yeah, that’s the State Secrets Privilege,” and we confirmed it happened. With that, they continued on. Neither Wiebe nor Drake appeared very impressed with it at the time; it was a non-event.

Discovered on this very same drive were​ framed-up and fictitious emails Montgomery offered up as evidentiary proof that he was dialoguing with government officials. However, upon closer inspection Wiebe and Drake discovered the address information was misspelled and incorrect, which would have caused the email to bounce back to the sender, except it did not and received a framed-up response. The only problem in the response was the address information was still incorrect in the reply. This simply could not happen and was identified in their report as fictitious among others to the Sheriff’s Office.

Accusations of fictitious emails being created by Montgomery have been documented in prior legal proceedings. Montgomery has been suspected on more than one occasion of concocting falsified evidence to support his claims. Additionally a federal judge found that Montgomery had perjured himself in federal testimony. Truthfulness is not his strong suit. To take Montgomery’s claims at face value is a fool’s errand, something Fanning and company appear to be way too comfortable in doing. WHY?

Wiebe now says that had they known about the SSP, their analysis would have been different. This is astounding. I can’t believe these men would make such a claim. How does that claim reconcile with the fictitious 47 hard drives they reviewed in a sealed evidence box collected some six months prior to their analyses? Knowing the back story or not, this simply does not change the evidence in the box. The evidence must stand on its own and it didn’t; it was all a fraud as noted in Wiebe and Drake’s signed report. This​ contrived, distorted recollection of facts has zero bearing on the contents and finale analysis and of 47 fictitious hard drives manufactured by Montgomery. As far as I’m concerned, this type of outright duplicity defiles both Bill Binney and Kirk Wiebe’s own reputations and credibility. It defies all reason and investigational logic.

For some unknown reason Fanning, Jones, Wiebe, Binney and Janda have all purposely omitted any and all derogatory information pertaining to Montgomery from their reporting. They have purposely failed to interview any fact witness as to the wiles of Dennis Montgomery and disregarded first-hand accounts or documented court evidence that run counter to their ringing endorsement of Montgomery. In doing so they willingly deceive their readers and viewers and are blatantly attempting to mislead even the President of the United States.

Both Binney and Wiebe have been out of government service for almost 20 years now. Their claims are 20 years old and have been public just as long. The difference between Binney and Wiebe’s claims is their claims are true, they were NSA employees. It is so surprising to me that they would destroy their own reputations over such unsubstantiated claims as Montgomery’s. Montgomery’s claims on the other hand, for the most part are not substantiated at all. His claims of building technology that would breach a network firewall and retrieve information without being detected dates back to January 28, 2004, when Montgomery allegedly completed a product called MEDUSA to carry out the task while in the employ of eTreppid. To date Montgomery has failed to produce any corroborating evidence of his claims.

Suspiciously, Montgomery made his first allegation of illegal spying in 2013, only after Edward Snowden released NSA information to the public. Montgomery had never made even the slightest overture of illegal surveillance activity prior​ to the Snowden release. He has yet to provide any evidence to substantiate his claim. It​ should also be noted that MCSO investigators had observed Montgomery attempting to interject himself into​ current events, always pointing back to him and​ The Hammer. If it was in the news Montgomery now had a new story and claimed to have information about it, much like he is doing with the Flynn case.

In 2013, Montgomery claimed he left eTreppid because of illegal surveillance, but that’s not supported by the 2006 court records,​ which say he was fighting over different software applications and ownership of the same. This case ultimately settled without one mention of illegal surveillance,or other projects. The settlement was not to Montgomery’s favor. He had to pay over 20 million dollars to eTreppid, but never did and declared bankruptcy shortly after. I think when you settle and have to pay millions, it’s safe to say you lost.

Montgomery has never produced any evidence that his claimed 2004 MEDUSA breaching​ software was ever successfully developed or that it even worked, almost a decade and a half later and he has yet to prove any of it.

After leaving eTreppid Montgomery was out of government service for 3+ years, Montgomery reappeared in early 2009. At that time, a new company, BLXWARE, had​ entered into a contract with the federal government at a secret facility in Fort Washington, Maryland, according to Montgomery. Montgomery​ claims the U.S. government purchased a $5 million super-computer that was made up of high-end Tesla supercomputers, that the feds named this computer the HAMMER and illegal surveillance again took place. He claims the HAMMER​ went live on February 5, 2009, He claims MEDUSA was operating in that computer system. which is again are claims that cannot be substantiated.

By his own timeline he claims to have performed government surveillance work for the 24 months of his employment with eTreppid, and was out of government service for three years, didn’t go back to government employment until 2009 and then quit in 2010,yet he wants you to believe he was at the center of illegal surveillance.

Montgomery told Sheriff’s Office investigators that during 2009–2010 he removed over four​ hundred hard drives which collected and recorded “billions” of collected records from the Fort Washington facility. Keep in mind Montgomery now claims he has only 600 million records. He turned over only 47 fictitious hard drives to the Sheriff’s Office that were absolute garbage and he turned over only 47 hard drives to the FBI. So where are the remaining drives still in his possession?


He also told us that in the spring of 2010 the U.S. government decided to allow him to collect information for the HAMMER outside their building. He claimed the government was becoming concerned that the work being conducted could be leaking out. He claimed the government purchased a $12,000-per-month VPN line into the Hammer.

According to him he was able to monitor the HAMMER and download the data at will, remotely! It should be noted that it is also during​ this time frame when he alleges he illegally and covertly removed over 400 hard drives of downloaded information retrieved by this government computer and retained it for his own purposes. Again another claim that cannot be substantiated; however, it should be very alarming if true. Here you have a guy with a very lengthy litigation history, arrested on fraud-related charges only months before and reports of him conning the Pentagon and other government officials only three years earlier and now claiming he has access to a Top Secret government computer and can do anything at will from his living room. Again his MEDUSA claims have never been corroborated. As a matter of fact none of Montgomery’s government software claims have been validated in over 20 years even though he said he has the data to prove it all. He never proved any of it.

So Montgomery worked as a subcontractor, not a CIA employee. He was not an inside guy. Yet he claims he was involved in this illegal surveillance operation and he was​ at the center of it all. However, he provides zero credible evidence of its existence or operational data to support his claim. If you listen to Montgomery he paints himself as the CIA incarnate, he knows everything about everything, reminiscent of Walther Mitty.

In a new twist Wiebe claims Montgomery is the “real deal” after one phone call and pretends his analysis of Montgomery’s evidence was somehow tainted because he didn’t know something about Montgomery’s past.​ Montgomery could have been an altar boy or the devil himself and that would not have changed the evidence Wiebe reviewed or the conclusion he reached​.​ It​ was all a fraud! Wiebe seems to also have difficulty recalling the numerous phone conversations he and I had in the years after the Montgomery case closed in 2015. In those conversations Montgomery’s SSP and other issues of his lack of credibility were discussed at length. Wiebe never altered his view on Montgomery or his findings until Mary Fanning got a hold of him. Once she did the factual history has now changed. WHY?

Montgomery was an employee of a company doing subcontract work of the government. He was not an employee of the CIA, NSA, DOD or any government agency. Montgomery’s story is very convincing when he tells it. He tells it under the cover of Governmental Privileged Information, the cloak of security clearances that he claims has but doesn’t. He believes this will prevent anyone from challenging his narrative. However, when you dig into him and his story, it all falls apart. Falsified documents, lies, changing stories, fraudulent data, manipulated records and evidence, sabotage, fraudulent representations, criminal history of fraud, restraining orders, sexual harassment complaints, gambling debts, perjury allegations, and the list go on.

All of this was encountered by investigators in 2014 while working with Montgomery. This is what Fanning does not want you to know about. This is who Kirk Wiebe and Bill Binney call the “real deal” and stake their reputations on. This is the secret Fanning does not want told. This is why she attempts to discredit me and anyone who reports on his troubled background.

Mary Fanning just wants you to swallow Montgomery’s story, hook, line and sinker and report it in such a way as to portray all his claims as undeniable fact. Fanning is not behaving like a reporter but rather, as Montgomery’s PR person and a well-used dupe.

This is not only the height of intellectual dishonesty, but it is downright dangerous to the futures of individuals and the nation as a whole to try to interject Montgomery’s tale of woe and his unsubstantiated story into current litigation such as that involving Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn (Ret), the Russia Collusion Hoax and anything else that Montgomery finds as the flavor of the day. Montgomery​ and his story is a train wreck that just doesn’t stop crashing. To inject Montgomery into any legal proceeding will derail the entire defense, including in the Flynn case and Russia collusion narrative. Montgomery was out of the contracting business since 2010. How could he have any relevant knowledge of operations taking place in 2015 and beyond? The answer is he can’t. And Fanning, it would appear, is just not smart enough to put that together.

The biggest problem with all of this, they are taking the word of Dennis Montgomery as if it is gospel truth, then regurgitating it plus trying to connect dots off of it. It’s like the problem you have with a logical discussion:​ if your foundational premise is wrong, your conclusion ends up being wrong. He does have a story to tell, but it’s just a story, and until it’s proven out by substantial factual evidence, it is nothing more than just a story. His story has been inconsistent over time, and timelines that he puts forth absolutely do not work by his own prior admissions., If you are to believe his story at all he spent a limited amount of time around illegal surveillance yet he wants you to believe he and he alone was at the epicenter of everything going on. He and Fanning want you to believe without him none of this could have happened. They want you to believe he developed the most powerful breaching software known to man and after a decade later it still has no equal. They want you to believe that time has stopped and the federal government is at a standstill because Dennis Montgomery no longer works for them so the software cannot be improved, or something else that is superior has yet to be created. And in true Montgomery fashion he just wants to say it and you are to believe it without question and no evidence that any of it works.

The deliberate omission of any derogatory information is intellectually and journalistically dishonest. The question is, Mary Fanning, “Why? Are you perhaps doing it for your own notoriety?” Money? Are you some kind of half-baked operative? Why not just do you job right and report the facts?

Montgomery frauded the Sheriff’s Office and produced 47 fake and phony hard drives, a story Mary Fanning tried her best to surgically remove from the public eye. She failed. Yet she wants you to believe every word that Montgomery speaks. Question: what makes you, Mary Fanning, think Montgomery will not play you as he does everyone else?

It has been my experience working with Montgomery if he believes he can further his agenda the story changes and he will all of a sudden come up with a new tale of illegal spying and the Hammer, even if the time frame is well outside of his purported participation. Case​ in point: Montgomery cannot have any direct knowledge or evidence of the Trump Tower or Flynn wiretaps for one simple reason: he has not been a government contractor since 2010. So how does he have any evidence that the Hammer or any other “parallel platform” was used? The simple answer is he doesn’t, but Fanning and Janda will not ask the hard questions. Why?…Don’t they owe it to their readers to ask the questions?​

The truth is they can’t because they are now trapped in Montgomery’s snare. They wanted all of this to be so true and now find themselves so heavily invested they have to hope it all works out, and if it does not they will just move on to the next tale they decide to tell you and hope you don’t notice.

Mary Fanning, what evidence do you have to support what Dennis Montgomery is telling you?

The answer…You have NONE!


Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 13017
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

Re: Carl Gallups' "BIG 'PLAN A'" - "It's in God's Hands Now!" "THIS STORY WILL MORPH" Starring Birthers Arpaio & Zullo

#10817

Post by Notorial Dissent » Mon Dec 02, 2019 4:02 pm

Oh, the dripping irony in that first quote, Rharon complaining about someone omitting critical background information.

Rharon Rhon doo doo a tool, who knew?????? :rotflmao: Personally, the only thing I can see that Fanning got wrong, is that John Brennan never heard of or would have reason to have heard of any of the lot of them.

Oooh funny, Zullo threatening legal action against someone cause hims fee fees got hurt, and then to add insult to injury to be totally ignored. It is to laugh. :rotflmao: Lots,

Otherwise, a whole lotta whinin' goin' on. Fanning certainly seems to have Zullo and Rharon's numbers, not like it takes much, why she is buying anything Montgomery is selling beyond me when he really is a thoroughly proven liar and fraud.

The only real question I have is did Zullo and Montgomery actually have a real meeting with Lamberth or did they just accost him on the street?

The whole lot of them think they're more important than they are or ever will be.


The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
bob
Posts: 27362
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Carl Gallups' "BIG 'PLAN A'" - "It's in God's Hands Now!" "THIS STORY WILL MORPH" Starring Birthers Arpaio & Zullo

#10818

Post by bob » Mon Dec 02, 2019 4:26 pm

Notorial Dissent wrote:
Mon Dec 02, 2019 4:02 pm
Fanning certainly seems to have Zullo and Rharon's numbers, not like it takes much, why she is buying anything Montgomery is selling beyond me when he really is a thoroughly proven liar and fraud.
DEEP STATE!!!! Fanning believes what Montgomery is selling, i.e., the federal government was (is) conducting widespread warrantless surveillance on U.S. citizens.
The only real question I have is did Zullo and Montgomery actually have a real meeting with Lamberth or did they just accost him on the street?
I've heard both Zullo's and Klayman's descriptions of the fabled meeting. Their stories are sufficiently consistent that I believe the meeting actually happened (in Lamberth's chambers).

Why it ever happened is a question for Lamberth, one that's he'll never (publically) answer or even acknowledge.

But it is sufficiently clear that, after seeing the dog-and-pony show, Lamberth politely said GTFOOMC (and go bother the FBI, which they did).


Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 13017
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

Re: Carl Gallups' "BIG 'PLAN A'" - "It's in God's Hands Now!" "THIS STORY WILL MORPH" Starring Birthers Arpaio & Zullo

#10819

Post by Notorial Dissent » Mon Dec 02, 2019 7:37 pm

bob wrote:
Mon Dec 02, 2019 4:26 pm
Notorial Dissent wrote:
Mon Dec 02, 2019 4:02 pm
Fanning certainly seems to have Zullo and Rharon's numbers, not like it takes much, why she is buying anything Montgomery is selling beyond me when he really is a thoroughly proven liar and fraud.
DEEP STATE!!!! Fanning believes what Montgomery is selling, i.e., the federal government was (is) conducting widespread warrantless surveillance on U.S. citizens.
The only real question I have is did Zullo and Montgomery actually have a real meeting with Lamberth or did they just accost him on the street?
I've heard both Zullo's and Klayman's descriptions of the fabled meeting. Their stories are sufficiently consistent that I believe the meeting actually happened (in Lamberth's chambers).

Why it ever happened is a question for Lamberth, one that's he'll never (publically) answer or even acknowledge.

But it is sufficiently clear that, after seeing the dog-and-pony show, Lamberth politely said GTFOOMC (and go bother the FBI, which they did).
Thanks. I didn't think my opinion of Lamberth could get any lower, but there is still time. I still can't imagine why he ever talked to those two losers. My opinion is that Montgomery is, and always has been, a complete and utter fraud. I think he has lied every step of the way, and whatever he had on those mythical drives was as the experts put it, garbage. I don't know if "Hammer" actually exists/existed, but I seriously doubt Montgomery ever had anything even remotely to do with it. If Montgomery is Deep State then they were doomed before they ever started. Amazing how far a little stupid goes.


The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
bob
Posts: 27362
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Carl Gallups' "BIG 'PLAN A'" - "It's in God's Hands Now!" "THIS STORY WILL MORPH" Starring Birthers Arpaio & Zullo

#10820

Post by bob » Mon Dec 02, 2019 7:46 pm

Notorial Dissent wrote:
Mon Dec 02, 2019 7:37 pm
I still can't imagine why he ever talked to those two losers.
Klayman.

Klayman and Lamberth bonded over their mutual hatred for the Clintons.


Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 13017
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

Re: Carl Gallups' "BIG 'PLAN A'" - "It's in God's Hands Now!" "THIS STORY WILL MORPH" Starring Birthers Arpaio & Zullo

#10821

Post by Notorial Dissent » Mon Dec 02, 2019 7:53 pm

bob wrote:
Mon Dec 02, 2019 7:46 pm
Notorial Dissent wrote:
Mon Dec 02, 2019 7:37 pm
I still can't imagine why he ever talked to those two losers.
Klayman.

Klayman and Lamberth bonded over their mutual hatred for the Clintons.
Yaknow, that's true, bet he's sorry now though with GIL trying to take his cases to him, last one didn't go so well, maybe the bromance is over.


The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
Foggy
Posts: 29130
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 12:00 pm
Location: Fogbow HQ
Occupation: Dick Tater

Re: Carl Gallups' "BIG 'PLAN A'" - "It's in God's Hands Now!" "THIS STORY WILL MORPH" Starring Birthers Arpaio & Zullo

#10822

Post by Foggy » Mon Dec 02, 2019 8:47 pm

Notorial Dissent wrote:
Mon Dec 02, 2019 7:37 pm
My opinion is that Montgomery is, and always has been, a complete and utter fraud. I think he has lied every step of the way, and whatever he had on those mythical drives was as the experts put it, garbage.
But remember that now there are at least two, maybe three different sets of 47 mythical drives full of garbage. The 47 mythical drives full of garbage that Klayman and Montgomery showed to Lamberth and the FBI are TOTALLY DIFFERENT from the 47 mythical drives full of garbage that Montgomery gave to Sheriff Joe.

Zullo the Clown assplained that not long ago. :thumbs:


I put the 'fun' in dysfunctional.

User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 13017
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

Re: Carl Gallups' "BIG 'PLAN A'" - "It's in God's Hands Now!" "THIS STORY WILL MORPH" Starring Birthers Arpaio & Zullo

#10823

Post by Notorial Dissent » Mon Dec 02, 2019 10:14 pm

Foggy wrote:
Mon Dec 02, 2019 8:47 pm
Notorial Dissent wrote:
Mon Dec 02, 2019 7:37 pm
My opinion is that Montgomery is, and always has been, a complete and utter fraud. I think he has lied every step of the way, and whatever he had on those mythical drives was as the experts put it, garbage.
But remember that now there are at least two, maybe three different sets of 47 mythical drives full of garbage. The 47 mythical drives full of garbage that Klayman and Montgomery showed to Lamberth and the FBI are TOTALLY DIFFERENT from the 47 mythical drives full of garbage that Montgomery gave to Sheriff Joe.

Zullo the Clown assplained that not long ago. :thumbs:
And that pretty well sums it up. He must have really found a good buy on (old, outdated, largely useless, junk)hard drives, or maybe there aren't. Let's just say I have a really hard time believing anything Montgomery says.


The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
Orlylicious
Posts: 10423
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 4:02 pm
Location: With Pete Buttigieg and the other "open and defiant homosexuals" --Bryan Fischer AFA
Occupation: "Do Nothing Democrat Savage" -- Donald, 9/28/19 and "Scalawag...Part of an extreme, malicious leftist internet social mob working in concert with weaponized, socialized governments to target and injure political opponents.” -- Walt Fitzpatrick

Re: Carl Gallups' "BIG 'PLAN A'" - "It's in God's Hands Now!" "THIS STORY WILL MORPH" Starring Birthers Arpaio & Zullo

#10824

Post by Orlylicious » Mon Dec 02, 2019 11:14 pm

Sure sounds Universe Shattering-ly Boring :lol:
This writer has not communicated with Fanning or Jones since​ March 14, 2017​. In July, Zullo sent a “cease and desist” email to Fanning stemming from her inaccurate reporting and potentially legally-actionable statements ​invoking his name​ to which he said he received no response.
How do we get to Fanning to get a copy of Zullo's "ceast and desist" letter? Bet that's fabulous!


Why aren't the birthersdemanding to get a witness into the impeachment hearings? With so many VVIPs onboard, clearly Congress would welcome it. This would bring sensational national attention focused on this timely and vital Birther issue -- what Robert Laity calls, "the mission of (his) life". It's constitutional experts on Wednesday... if only Roland Rotunda was still around. :( But Orly Taitz can travel on short notice, we've seen that, even if she has to run barefoot through Congress again. Sheriff's Kits for EVERYBODY this time! No doubt that's why it failed the first time around, just not enough of them printed and mailed.

Realist, if Sharon can pull together a witness like Orly for the Judiciary hearing, would you mind bring our Court Reporter/BOTG? Your country needs you! Start packing, you know how fast and effective Sharon Rondeau and the august Post and Email are -- Jerry Nadler will back right down and Orly can question and then take the stand. Even though there is no stand (don't tell her).


Photo: Merry Christmas from the titular Mama June. Santa (aka Sugar Bear) and her lovely family!
Hey! Don't miss The Fogbow's Favorite TV Show starring the titular Mama June Shannon -- "Mama June: From Not To Hot!"

W. Kevin Vicklund
Posts: 63
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 10:45 pm

Re: Carl Gallups' "BIG 'PLAN A'" - "It's in God's Hands Now!" "THIS STORY WILL MORPH" Starring Birthers Arpaio & Zullo

#10825

Post by W. Kevin Vicklund » Tue Dec 03, 2019 12:26 am

Notorial Dissent wrote:
Mon Dec 02, 2019 7:37 pm
I think he has lied every step of the way, and whatever he had on those mythical drives was as the experts put it, garbage.
I strongly suspect it is the flotsam from his first failed attempt at being a CIA consultant. There, he applied a "Bible code" to al-Jazeera broadcasts and, not surprisingly to anyone who knows anything about Bible codes, interpreted the output in a way that post-dicted some terrorist attacks. Of course, when he tried to apply it prospectively, it failed miserably and he was fired, but he was left with 40+ hard drives full of al-Jazeera broadcasts. Ever since then he's been trying to find a way to monetize those hard drives full of worthless* data. Every time I hear of him running a new scam, there's 40+ hard drives full of al-Jazeera programming - including the 47 hard drives turned over to Zullo.

*unless you are a historian of Middle Eastern media



Post Reply

Return to “Miscellaneous”