Page 310 of 312

BARNETT|KEYES v. OBAMA - II - DISCUSSION (9th Cir.)

Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 12:04 pm
by BillTheCat
Haha nice!It's all over the news, just heard it on KCBS in the Bay Area :-bd

BARNETT|KEYES v. OBAMA - II - DISCUSSION (9th Cir.)

Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 12:11 pm
by AnitaMaria
I never saw a single post in birferstan about this case going to the Supreme Court. This was the case where Orly promised everyone a trial, the case that spawned the "we can have him out of office in 30 days" video (featuring the recently-resurfaced Morgan Ward), the case that Orly has claimed spurred Obama to release his LFBC to distract attention away from the appeal hearing. And now nobody gives a shit about it. ;;)

BARNETT|KEYES v. OBAMA - II - DISCUSSION (9th Cir.)

Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 12:12 pm
by SueDB
Those in the know didn't give a shit about it from the beginning.

BARNETT|KEYES v. OBAMA - II - DISCUSSION (9th Cir.)

Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 3:40 pm
by bob
SJ Merc: [/break1]mercurynews.com/nation-world/ci_20831441/supreme-court-refuses-hear-birther-argument-again]Supreme Court refuses to hear 'birther' argument again





Executive summary: Denninined!





This was Kreep's clients; Taitz didn't bother to file a cert. petition.

BARNETT|KEYES v. OBAMA - II - DISCUSSION (9th Cir.)

Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 3:48 pm
by aarrgghh
[/break1]freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2894055/posts]freeper gulch: da fix iz in!!!





we are simply cash cows to be milked for the ruling elite’s enjoyment :(( :(( :(( :(( :((

BARNETT|KEYES v. OBAMA - II - DISCUSSION (9th Cir.)

Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 4:04 pm
by realist
Rocks really are smarter than freepers.

BARNETT|KEYES v. OBAMA - II - DISCUSSION (9th Cir.)

Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 4:11 pm
by Mr. Gneiss
Rocks really are smarter than freepers.Why, thank you realist! :-bd I guess. :-k

BARNETT|KEYES v. OBAMA - II - DISCUSSION (9th Cir.)

Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 6:22 pm
by SueDB
[/break1]freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2894055/posts]freeper gulch: da fix iz in!!!





we are simply cash cows to be milked for the ruling elite’s enjoyment by the unscrupulous likes of Corsi, Taitz, Von Aryan etc. :(( :(( :(( :(( :((fify

BARNETT|KEYES v. OBAMA - II - DISCUSSION (9th Cir.)

Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 6:35 pm
by bob
Sweet, sweet birther tears at [/break1]blogspot.com/2012/06/us-supreme-court-evades-another-obama.html?showComment=1339446423087#c2932155548843372507]ORYR:treasonous rulings/decisions are to be expected as the norm. We no longer can expect the constitution to be our governing document.No comment = no justice. Term limits are in order for SCOUTUS.The Constitution Killers...Why don't they consider that these individuals have 'legal standing' to file such a suit? They are U.S. Citizens, aren't they? Aren't we all equal?

BARNETT|KEYES v. OBAMA - II - DISCUSSION (9th Cir.)

Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 6:39 pm
by SueDB
Why don't they consider that these individuals have 'legal standing' to file such a suit? They are U.S. Citizens, aren't they? Aren't we all equal?No, there are 2 kinds of citizens natural/native born and naturalized. Naturalized citizens cannot serve as the US President. So...no, we are all NOT equal in the eyes of the US Constitution. ?( ?( ?(

BARNETT|KEYES v. OBAMA - II - DISCUSSION (9th Cir.)

Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 8:11 pm
by wavey davey
So, this case is not just merely dead, it's really most sincerely dead.

BARNETT|KEYES v. OBAMA - II - DISCUSSION (9th Cir.)

Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 8:18 pm
by BillTheCat
So, this case is not just merely dead, it's really most sincerely dead. :lol:

BARNETT|KEYES v. OBAMA - II - DISCUSSION (9th Cir.)

Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 8:36 pm
by AnitaMaria
Kreep sent out this fundraising email last week regarding this case. [/break1]activehosted.com/index.php?action=social&c=ec8956637a99787bd197eacd77acce5e.116]http://grassroots.activehosted.com/inde ... acce5e.116





...


We had received NO notice from the High Court that the Conference Committee on our case would be held this week. We discovered that the case had been distributed to the Justices when we checked the Supreme Court's website. Gee Gary. The Conference date has been posted on the Supreme Court web site since at least since May 22nd, but you just figured it out last week?





This is our high profile lawsuit that has been making its way through the federal court system since 2009. It is Barack Hussein Obama's worst nightmare. Hmmm...really, because the government didn't even submit an opposition to this case.


...


I need to raise $24,300 by Thursday, in order to pay for all of our computerized legal research, the "moot court" practice sessions, the printing of our briefs, and all of the other expenses of preparing our arguments and pleadings in this landmark case. I guess Gary owes the Supreme Court a thank you for saving him that $24,300.


...


Drake v. Obama is the case that could finally hold Mr. Obama accountable. This is our chance to change history.


That is why Barack Obama and his legal team are fighting us tooth and nail. They know that, if we win this case, states will have to certify that Barack Hussein Obama is eligible to serve as our President. No fight. No teeth. No nails. Any. Day. Now.

BARNETT|KEYES v. OBAMA - II - DISCUSSION (9th Cir.)

Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 8:51 pm
by chinacreekpj
Kreep sent out this fundraising email last week regarding this case. [/break1]activehosted.com/index.php?action=social&c=ec8956637a99787bd197eacd77acce5e.116]http://grassroots.activehosted.com/inde ... acce5e.116





...


We had received NO notice from the High Court that the Conference Committee on our case would be held this week. We discovered that the case had been distributed to the Justices when we checked the Supreme Court's website. Gee Gary. The Conference date has been posted on the Supreme Court web site since at least since May 22nd, but you just figured it out last week?





This is our high profile lawsuit that has been making its way through the federal court system since 2009. It is Barack Hussein Obama's worst nightmare. Hmmm...really, because the government didn't even submit an opposition to this case.


...


I need to raise $24,300 by Thursday, in order to pay for all of our computerized legal research, the "moot court" practice sessions, the printing of our briefs, and all of the other expenses of preparing our arguments and pleadings in this landmark case. I guess Gary owes the Supreme Court a thank you for saving him that $24,300.


...


Drake v. Obama is the case that could finally hold Mr. Obama accountable. This is our chance to change history.


That is why Barack Obama and his legal team are fighting us tooth and nail. They know that, if we win this case, states will have to certify that Barack Hussein Obama is eligible to serve as our President. No fight. No teeth. No nails. Any. Day. Now.I believe Kreep is likely the most successful birther fundraiser as I'm sure Farah is charging him mucho bucks to rent the WND email sucker list. If he didn't get more out of it than he put in, he wouldn't continue doing it.

BARNETT|KEYES v. OBAMA - II - DISCUSSION (9th Cir.)

Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 1:12 am
by jtmunkus
:mememe: Am I correct in assuming that the Supreme Court's refusal to hear the Kreep's case is in itself a precedent that can be cited to in the future?

BARNETT|KEYES v. OBAMA - II - DISCUSSION (9th Cir.)

Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 1:18 am
by Curious Blue
No. A denial of cert just means that the Court decided not to hear a case. It's not a ruling one way or another that can be cited. Generally a notation (cert denied) will be added when citing to the lower level case in the future, though it isn't technically necessary.

BARNETT|KEYES v. OBAMA - II - DISCUSSION (9th Cir.)

Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 1:46 am
by Piffle
No. A denial of cert just means that the Court decided not to hear a case. It's not a ruling one way or another that can be cited. Generally a notation (cert denied) will be added when citing to the lower level case in the future, though it isn't technically necessary.^^^ This.It is not only unnecessary, but some consider it proper to include only if the case is relatively recent (say, less than two years or so). In this context "cert denied" indicates that the lower court's decision is final and not still subject to being reversed, remanded or otherwise modified by a court of last resort.

BARNETT|KEYES v. OBAMA - II - DISCUSSION (9th Cir.)

Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 2:54 am
by RTH10260
So, this case is not just merely dead, it's really most sincerely dead.As Orlena is part of the fun, she shirley will need to bring it to the International Bar in The Hague ?(

BARNETT|KEYES v. OBAMA - II - DISCUSSION (9th Cir.)

Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 2:50 pm
by neonzx
5 Responses to “Supreme Court Refuses to Hear Birth Certificate Case”





Veritas


June 13th, 2012 @ 9:48 am





Might it reach them again, but in a modified form, as in Indiana?





orly taitz


June 13th, 2012 @ 10:15 am





no, you can’t do that


Well geez, I did not know that a denial to petition for writ of mandamus means you can't petition the court again?

BARNETT|KEYES v. OBAMA - II - DISCUSSION (9th Cir.)

Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 9:53 pm
by bob
On PPSimmons, someone claiming to be Harry Butler (a plaintiff in this case) claims he (and other military members) were arrested by the Secret Service for birthering:

BARNETT|KEYES v. OBAMA - II - DISCUSSION (9th Cir.)

Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 10:07 pm
by TexasFilly
Old Carl wasn't too interested in Harry's claim that he and other military types had been arrested. Why hasn't Orly been screaming about her Plaintiffs' being arrested?





Money quote from Harry Butler, saying he first learned about "this" back in 2007 when "I was traveling overseas: Saudi Arabia;Hawaii and the Middle East". :lol:





And what, exactly, is a "Gulfstream Aerospace Pilot"?

BARNETT|KEYES v. OBAMA - II - DISCUSSION (9th Cir.)

Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 10:08 pm
by Sterngard Friegen
:yankyank:

BARNETT|KEYES v. OBAMA - II - DISCUSSION (9th Cir.)

Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 10:19 pm
by raicha
Old Carl wasn't too interested in Harry's claim that he and other military types had been arrested. Why hasn't Orly been screaming about her Plaintiffs' being arrested?





Money quote from Harry Butler, saying he first learned about "this" back in 2007 when "I was traveling overseas: Saudi Arabia;Hawaii and the Middle East". :lol:





And what, exactly, is a "Gulfstream Aerospace Pilot"?[/break1]aviationjobs.me/2013/04/g550-non-type-rated-captains-gulfstream-aerospace-us.html]http://www.aviationjobs.me/2013/04/g550 ... ce-us.html

BARNETT|KEYES v. OBAMA - II - DISCUSSION (9th Cir.)

Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 10:26 pm
by TexasFilly
Gracias.

BARNETT|KEYES v. OBAMA - II - DISCUSSION (9th Cir.)

Posted: Sat Jul 13, 2013 9:38 am
by mimi
On PPSimmons, someone claiming to be Harry Butler (a plaintiff in this case) claims he (and other military members) were arrested by the Secret Service for birthering:Bull.