TAITZ v SEBELIUS, et al.

Post Reply
User avatar
realist
Posts: 34434
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:33 pm

TAITZ v SEBELIUS, et al.

#1

Post by realist » Thu Jul 05, 2012 3:37 pm

:evil: [/break1]orlytaitzesq.com/?p=148762]http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=148762 :evil:





Breaking news! New 113 page complaint with exhibits class action filed on behalf of Christian and Jewish US Citizens:Healthcare Obama Tax is illegal as it violates Equal protection clause, Due Process Clause, Establishment clause and Free exercise of religion clause of the US Constitution, as it exempt Muslim citizens and places a heavy tax burden on Christian and Jewish U. S. Citizens to pay a de facto Judeo-Christian Obama Tax not only for themselves, but also for Muslim citizens, who are exempt





Posted on | July 5, 2012 | No Comments





While this one is not "pure" birther on its face, based on the list of defendants... yeah, it is.





Press Release





Sent to 30,000 U.S. and International Media outlets





For Immediate Release





Breaking news!





New 113 page complaint with exhibits class action [highlight]filed on behalf of Christian and Jewish US Citizens[/highlight]:Healthcare Obama Tax is illegal as it violates Equal protection clause, Due Process Clause, Establishment clause and Free exercise of religion clause of the US Constitution, as it exempt Muslim citizens and [highlight]places a heavy tax burden on Christian and Jewish U. S. Citizens to pay a de facto Judeo-Christian Obama Tax[/highlight] not only for themselves, but also for Muslim citizens, who are exempt. Additionally, P[highlight]laintiff Attorney Orly Taitz, who is seeking a class action certification, is bringing forward a second challenge[/highlight] to Obama Tax, asserting that it is illegal, as it was signed into law by Barack Obama under false pretenses and by virtue of fraud, usurping the position of the U.S. President while using forged and fraudulently obtained identification papers: forged Selective service Certificate, forged Birth certificate and a fraudulently obtained Social security number. [highlight]Additional cause of action is RICO[/highlight], asserting that[highlight]Obama doe America is a de facto RICO organization created to procure fraud committed by Obama.[/highlight] Additional defendants are Attorney General Holder, Registrar of the Department of health of HI Alvin Onaka, former director of Selective Service William A. Chatfield, Commissioner of Social Security Michael Astrue, former Chair Woman of Democratic National Convention in 2008 Nancy Pelosi, former chairman of the Democratic Party of Hawaii Brian Schatz and a number of other defendants.





While the case was filed in the Southern Division of the Central District of California, it was moved by the clerk of the court to the western Division in Los Angeles. When asked, why was the case moved, the clerk stated that it is a violation of civil rights case, which affects the whole district.





Both DOCX and PDF versions of the complaint are attached





Dr.Orly Taitz, ESQmore soon





NOT from the court file, but from Orly's...





:evil: [link]Taitz v Sebelius pages 1-30,http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?attachment_id=148767[/link] :evil:





:evil: [link]Taitz v Sebelius pages 31-60,http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?attachment_id=148768[/link] :evil:





:evil: [link]Taitz v Sebelius pages p61-90,http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?attachment_id=148771[/link] :evil:





:evil: [link]Taitz v Sebelius pages p91-113,http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?attachment_id=148772[/link] :evil:





And mostly the "usual' zibits...





Exhibits





1 Affidavit of Sheriff Joseph M. Arpaio of Maricopa County, Arizona, stating that Barack Obama’s alleged Birth certificate, Selective service Certificate and Social Security number represent forgeries.


2 Affidavit of expert Douglas Vogt attesting to the fact that Obama’s birth certificate represent a forgery.


3 Affidavit of Felicito Papa attests to the fact that the alleged birth certificate of Obama is a computer generated forgery.


4 Affidavit of assistant registrar of the state of Hawaii Timothy Adams, attesting to the fact that there is no birth certificate for Obama in any hospital in Honolulu, Hawaii.


5 Affidavit of Adobe Illustrator expert Felicito Papa attesting to the fact that Barack Obama posted his full Connecticut Social security number 042-68-4425 on white House.gov with his 2009 tax returns and posted on April 15, 2010.


6 Affidavit of John Sampson, Senior Deportation officer of the department of homeland security, attesting to the fact that there was no legitimate reason for assigning a Connecticut Social security number to Barack Obama, resident of Hawaii.


7 Affidavit of Linda Jordan and attached e-verify attesting to the fact that Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425 issued to Obama was not assigned to Obama.


8 SSNVS (Social security verification systems) printout attesting to the fact that Connecticut social security number 042-68-4425 used by Obama was never issued to Obama


9 Affidavit of typesetting expert Paul Irey attests to the fact that Obama’s alleged long form is a forgery, as bits and pieces of the “certificate” were cut and pasted from different documents, as letters show different fonts and sizes


10 Certification of Nomination of Al Gore issued by Democratic Party of Hawaii to the Elections Division in the State of Hawaii in 2000.


11 Certification of Nomination of John Kerry issued by Democratic Party of Hawaii to the Elections Division in the State of Hawaii in 2004.


12 Certificate of Nomination of Barack Obama issued by Democratic Party of Hawaii to the Elections Division in the State of Hawaii in 2008.


13 Certificate of Nomination of John Kerry by Democratic National Committee sent to the State of Hawaii in 2004.


14 Certificate of Nomination for Barack Obama by Democratic National Committee in 2008 sent to 49 states.


15 Certificate of Nomination for Barack Obama by Democratic National Committee sent to the Office of Elections of the State of Hawaii in 2008 (with edited wording).


16 School registration #203 for Barack Obama from Assissi school in Jakarta Indonesia and showing Obama using his step father’s last name Soetoro as his legal name, as well as listing his citizenship as Indonesian and his religion Islam


17 Affidavit of Chris Strunk, authenticating passport records of Barack Obama’s mother, Ann Dunham, received by him under the FOIA request from the Department of State and showing Obama’s legal name in his mother’s passport records to be Barack Obama Soebarkah.


ImageX 4 ImageX36
Image

neonzx
Posts: 4413
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 9:27 am

TAITZ v SEBELIUS, et al.

#2

Post by neonzx » Thu Jul 05, 2012 3:39 pm

Ah ha! BEHOLD... "Plan B"



User avatar
esseff44
Posts: 12507
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:40 am

TAITZ v SEBELIUS, et al.

#3

Post by esseff44 » Thu Jul 05, 2012 3:53 pm

[/break1]snopes.com/politics/medical/exemptions.asp]http://www.snopes.com/politics/medical/exemptions.aspIt sounds as if her new case is based on this old internet rumor and smear. The word 'dhimmitude' sprang to mind as soon as I read it. She must have linked up with the likes of Pam Geller for this one. It just for the smear value.



User avatar
TollandRCR
Posts: 20384
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2009 11:17 pm

TAITZ v SEBELIUS, et al.

#4

Post by TollandRCR » Thu Jul 05, 2012 3:55 pm

[link]Orly is suing on the basis of a rumor,http://www.snopes.com/politics/medical/exemptions.asp[/link]. According to Snopes, it is likely that the Amish, Mennonites, and Hutterites will fall under the religious conscience exemption, but it is not clear that Muslims will do so. Nor is it clear that any Muslims would wish to be exempted. Muslims buy automobile insurance where it is required by law.


“The truth is, we know so little about life, we don’t really know what the good news is and what the bad news is.” Kurt Vonnegut

User avatar
realist
Posts: 34434
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:33 pm

TAITZ v SEBELIUS, et al.

#5

Post by realist » Thu Jul 05, 2012 3:57 pm

Off to her usual start.... :P





PARTIES, JURISDICTION, AND VENUE.





Plaintiff Orly Taitz is a citizen of the State of California, tax payer and a registered


voter with a business address of 29839 Santa Margarita, ste 100 Rancho Santa


Margarita CA 92688. [highlight]Taitz was subjected to persecution, harassment and


defamation due to her legal actions, and bringing forward evidence showing


Barack Hussein Obama, currently occupying the position of the President of the


US and a presumptive nominee for the 2012 Presidential general election, to be


usurping the US presidency by fraud and false pretences and use of forged


identification papers.[/highlight] :^o ](*,)


ImageX 4 ImageX36
Image

User avatar
realist
Posts: 34434
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:33 pm

TAITZ v SEBELIUS, et al.

#6

Post by realist » Thu Jul 05, 2012 3:59 pm

Defendant Alvin T. Onaka (hereinafter "Onaka") is being sued in his capacity as


the registrar of the Department of Health, who certified a computer forgery, claiming it to be a true and correct copy of Obama's 1961 typewritten birth


certificate. =)) =)) =))


ImageX 4 ImageX36
Image

neonzx
Posts: 4413
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 9:27 am

TAITZ v SEBELIUS, et al.

#7

Post by neonzx » Thu Jul 05, 2012 3:59 pm

Off to her usual start.... :PSee, it is correctly filed here in the Eligibility Lawsuits forum. No worries. ;)



DeeLite
Posts: 374
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 3:56 am

TAITZ v SEBELIUS, et al.

#8

Post by DeeLite » Thu Jul 05, 2012 3:59 pm

:evil: [/break1]orlytaitzesq.com/?p=148762]http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=148762 :evil:





Breaking news! New 113 page complaint with exhibits class action filed on behalf of Christian and Jewish US Citizens:Healthcare Obama Tax is illegal as it violates Equal protection clause, Due Process Clause, Establishment clause and Free exercise of religion clause of the US Constitution, as it exempt Muslim citizens and places a heavy tax burden on Christian and Jewish U. S. Citizens to pay a de facto Judeo-Christian Obama Tax not only for themselves, but also for Muslim citizens, who are exempt

Oy ](*,)





[/break1]snopes.com/politics/medical/exemptions.asp]http://www.snopes.com/politics/medical/exemptions.asp



User avatar
June bug
Posts: 6093
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 3:29 pm
Location: Northern San Diego County

TAITZ v SEBELIUS, et al.

#9

Post by June bug » Thu Jul 05, 2012 4:01 pm

Jeez - this is it? This is her "new" approach? Recycled scare tactics about the ACA, debunked here by [link]snopes,http://www.snopes.com/politics/medical/exemptions.asp[/link], plus, also, too, a list of her usual usurperin' and RICO charges against her usual suspects?Lena, you're startin' to :yawn: me.



User avatar
PatGund
Posts: 7763
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 4:41 pm
Location: Edmonds. WA
Contact:

TAITZ v SEBELIUS, et al.

#10

Post by PatGund » Thu Jul 05, 2012 4:01 pm

"New 113 page complaint with exhibits class action filed on behalf of Christian and Jewish US Citizens:Healthcare Obama Tax is illegal as it violates Equal protection clause, Due Process Clause, Establishment clause and Free exercise of religion clause of the US Constitution, as it exempt Muslim citizens and places a heavy tax burden on Christian and Jewish U. S. Citizens to pay a de facto Judeo-Christian Obama Tax not only for themselves, but also for Muslim citizens, who are exempt."There's a slight problem with the above.Dr. Orly is lying. (yeah, I know, shock and amazement)[link]Snopes,http://www.snopes.com/politics/medical/exemptions.asp[/link]"The fact is that the "Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act" (PPACA) legislation passed by Congress and signed into law by President Obama does not include language which specifically exempts members of any particular religion from health insurance requirements (nor does it use the word "dhimmitude").The bill contains a general "religious conscience" provision which establishes guidelines under which religious groups which have established conscientious objections to certain forms of insurance may seek exemption from health insurance requirements:RELIGIOUS CONSCIENCE EXEMPTION — Such term shall not include any individual for any month if such individual has in effect an exemption under section 1311(d)(4)(H) of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act which certifies that such individual is a member of a recognized religious sect or division thereof described in section 1402(g)(1) and an adherent of established tenets or teachings of such sect or division as described in such section.The key issue here is the determination of which religious groups' members might qualify for this exemption, an issue that has not yet been decided (and probably won't be for some time to come). Such members would have to be adherents of a religion or sect "described in section 1402(g)(1)" of the Internal Revenue Code, which governs exemptions from the payment of Social Security and Medicare taxes on self-employment income:"[link]FactCheck,http://www.factcheck.org/2010/05/dhimmi ... exemption/[/link]"Since we posted our article, we’ve obtained a list through the Freedom of Information Act of all the groups that have successfully applied for exemptions from payroll taxes. The overwhelming majority of them are explicitly Anabaptist — that is, Mennonite, Amish or Hutterite. Those that don’t specify their denomination are still explicitly Christian. Having gone through the list, we can say with certainty that no Muslim group, and indeed no non-Christian group, has ever qualified for an exemption under the statute used to define exempt religious groups in the health care law.Nor are they likely to want to, says Ibrahim Hooper of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, which opposes discrimination and defamation against Muslims. "I’ve never even heard it brought up as an issue," Hooper told us. "I have health insurance. We give health insurance to our employees. Every Muslim group I know of does the same thing." Hooper told us that he has seen some Muslims raise religious objections to life insurance, but not health insurance, and that, in fact, providing health coverage is very much in line with Islamic ideals of social justice.As for "dhimmitude," it’s a politically charged academic concept, not a tenet of Muslim faith. The term was coined by scholar Bat Ye’or to describe the condition of the "dhimmis," protected non-Muslims living in Muslim empires starting in the 7th century. Dhimmi populations, Ye’or says, were allowed by their lands’ Muslim conquerors to keep property and practice their faith, as long as they paid a poll tax. It is Ye’or’s assertion that the condition of dhimmitude still persists in countries under shari’a law, and that, furthermore, it is spreading worldwide. In particular, she says, Europeans are accepting a state of dhimmitude and moving toward becoming "Eurabia." This position is controversial, and Ye’or is not secretive about her political commitments. For instance, she is a vocal supporter of Geert Wilders, the Dutch politician who was once banned from the United Kingdom because of his inflammatory anti-Islam views. For the e-mail to present "dhimmitude" as an established Muslim value rather than a scholarly concept from an author with open political commitments is misleading."[link]About.com,http://usgovinfo.about.com/od/rightsand ... Reform.htm[/link]"Could Muslims seek exemption from the health care reform law? Yes, but they have given no indication of intending to do so.Muslims living in non-Islamic countries such as the United States do not believe it is a sin to comply with the health care reform law.The Muslim scholar Sheikh Muhammed Al-Munajjid advises those practicing Islam in such countries: "If you are forced to take out insurance and there is an accident, it is permissible for you to take from the insurance company the same amount as the payments you have made, but you should not take any more than that. If they force you to take it then you should donate it to charity."Until that belief changes, the email about Muslims exempt from the health care reform law being circulated by conspiracy theorists remains bogus."By citing something that's been openly debunked like this, Dr. Orly is rather openly showing her anti-Muslim bigotry and hatred.



User avatar
BillTheCat
Posts: 4496
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2012 4:25 pm

TAITZ v SEBELIUS, et al.

#11

Post by BillTheCat » Thu Jul 05, 2012 4:02 pm

She will never, ever stop until she is sanctioned into bankruptcy or disbarred. Ever. In other words, I look forward to at least 4 more years here at FB :)


'But I don't want to go among mad people,' said Alice. 'Oh, you can't help that,' said the cat. 'We're all mad here.'
-Lewis Carroll

AnitaMaria
Posts: 4360
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2011 5:41 pm

TAITZ v SEBELIUS, et al.

#12

Post by AnitaMaria » Thu Jul 05, 2012 4:04 pm

Disbarment won't stop her. Bankruptcy might, but disbarment won't.



User avatar
realist
Posts: 34434
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:33 pm

TAITZ v SEBELIUS, et al.

#13

Post by realist » Thu Jul 05, 2012 4:05 pm

Obama is a citizen of 4 countries, apparently. none of which are the U.S.3. There was no determination whether US citizens rights were violated dueto the fact that Barack Hussein Obama, ll (Hereinafter "Obama") theindividual who signed the Healthcare bill into law did so under falsepretenses, [highlight]being a foreign national, citizen of lndonesia, Kenya and GreatBritain,[/highlight] who got into the position of the US President and [highlight]signed the bill[/highlight] into law, [highlight]used a name that is not legally his[/highlight] and was never legitimate for the office, due to his use of forged and fraudulently obtained identificationpapers: a forged Birth Certificate, forged Selective Service Certificate and afraudulently obtained Social Security number, which was never assigned tohim.


ImageX 4 ImageX36
Image

User avatar
Sequoia32
Posts: 4706
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 5:47 pm

TAITZ v SEBELIUS, et al.

#14

Post by Sequoia32 » Thu Jul 05, 2012 4:05 pm

4 Affidavit of assistant registrar of the state of Hawaii Timothy Adams, attesting to the fact that [highlight]there is no birth certificate for Obama in any hospital[/highlight] in Honolulu, Hawaii.Well whaddaya know, a truthful statement for a change, except of course Timmeh was not an "assistant registrar".


So far every case of Ebola in this country got it by helping people. So relax, Republicans, you're in the clear. - Tina Dupuy

Mr. Gneiss
Posts: 1545
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 12:37 am

TAITZ v SEBELIUS, et al.

#15

Post by Mr. Gneiss » Thu Jul 05, 2012 4:07 pm

I can't decide if Orly is Ebeneezer Scrooge dragging around the chains of all her past cases or Madame Defarge knitting all of her previous legal failures into the final accounting of all who will hang for their treason.What a masterpiece of legal nitwittery!



User avatar
BillTheCat
Posts: 4496
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2012 4:25 pm

TAITZ v SEBELIUS, et al.

#16

Post by BillTheCat » Thu Jul 05, 2012 4:09 pm

Disbarment won't stop her. Bankruptcy might, but disbarment won't.

Not clear on what you mean here. Are you saying that she would try to continue? Because as far as a I know, she would be breaking the law directly if she tried to continue practicing law after being disbarred? Am I incorrect on that?





I doubt she could be sanctioned out of the game. Not with a a rich husband.





Like I said - we are gauranteed 4 more years of this, at least. Because the Cal Bar will never, ever disbar her. And sanctions seem like a dream for us but not the reality (pathetically).


'But I don't want to go among mad people,' said Alice. 'Oh, you can't help that,' said the cat. 'We're all mad here.'
-Lewis Carroll

BFB
Posts: 5283
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:48 pm

TAITZ v SEBELIUS, et al.

#17

Post by BFB » Thu Jul 05, 2012 4:10 pm

This is just a potpourri of teh crazy.



User avatar
June bug
Posts: 6093
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 3:29 pm
Location: Northern San Diego County

TAITZ v SEBELIUS, et al.

#18

Post by June bug » Thu Jul 05, 2012 4:12 pm

To Bill, re: your question about disbarment vs. bankruptcy:Not speaking for Anita, but many of us think Orly will keep right on filing as a pro-se if she's disbarred.



User avatar
realist
Posts: 34434
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:33 pm

TAITZ v SEBELIUS, et al.

#19

Post by realist » Thu Jul 05, 2012 4:14 pm

A new Orlyword... Obamatax





"Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act"


(PPACA) ObamaTax (Hereinafter "Obamatax") :lol:





And she also appears to be equating the "Obamatax" to an Income Tax. ](*,)


ImageX 4 ImageX36
Image

User avatar
esseff44
Posts: 12507
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:40 am

TAITZ v SEBELIUS, et al.

#20

Post by esseff44 » Thu Jul 05, 2012 4:18 pm

No, she won't stop if she is disbarred. She would continue using lawsuits to smear and do it pro se as she has already done.It's all about sending out the news to 30,000 media outlets. Yulia must have been busy adding all those media outlets or is there some master list you can buy.



User avatar
Mikedunford
Posts: 9138
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 9:42 pm

TAITZ v SEBELIUS, et al.

#21

Post by Mikedunford » Thu Jul 05, 2012 4:18 pm

Yeah, this is gonna end well.


"I don't give a fuck whether we're peers or not."
--Lord Thomas Henry Bingham to Boris Johnson, on being asked whether he would miss being in "the best club in London" if the Law Lords moved from Parliament to a Supreme Court.

tjh
Posts: 2926
Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 4:18 pm

TAITZ v SEBELIUS, et al.

#22

Post by tjh » Thu Jul 05, 2012 4:20 pm

Note that it's TAITZ v .... barred or unbarred, just the same loony foos.



User avatar
realist
Posts: 34434
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:33 pm

TAITZ v SEBELIUS, et al.

#23

Post by realist » Thu Jul 05, 2012 4:23 pm

I thought it looked so earlier. Yep, dumbass is calling "Obamatax" an Income Tax. ](*,)





Consequently, new Obama Judeo-Christian


federal income tax was brought about by a foreign national, a Muslim


citizen of lndonesia Barack(Barry) Soetoro(Obama). lt heavily taxes


American citizens of Christian and Jewish religion, while exempting


Muslims and making Christians and Jews pay a Jizya for the cost of


Healthcare provided to Muslims.


ImageX 4 ImageX36
Image

AnitaMaria
Posts: 4360
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2011 5:41 pm

TAITZ v SEBELIUS, et al.

#24

Post by AnitaMaria » Thu Jul 05, 2012 4:23 pm

Not clear on what you mean here. Are you saying that she would try to continue? Because as far as a I know, she would be breaking the law directly if she tried to continue practicing law after being disbarred? Am I incorrect on that?She only needs a law license if she wants to represent clients. She doesn't need a law license to sue if she is the only plaintiff.



User avatar
realist
Posts: 34434
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:33 pm

TAITZ v SEBELIUS, et al.

#25

Post by realist » Thu Jul 05, 2012 4:27 pm

As to her request for class action certification and a class representative, plaintiff Taitz states...





Taitz will fairly and adequately [-( protect the interests of the class.


ImageX 4 ImageX36
Image

Post Reply

Return to “Birther Case Discussion”