TISDALE v OBAMA (4th Cir.)

User avatar
Sterngard Friegen
Posts: 45323
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Location: Over the drawbridge

TISDALE v OBAMA (4th Cir.)

#101

Post by Sterngard Friegen » Thu Mar 22, 2012 10:59 am

And once again Apuzzo fails to deal with the dissent of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court in Wong. Which completely disagrees with his "interpretation."





Apuzzo remains an idiot. He's just decided to prove it more often.



User avatar
realist
Posts: 34975
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:33 pm

TISDALE v OBAMA (4th Cir.)

#102

Post by realist » Thu Mar 22, 2012 11:00 am

» Thu Mar 22, 2012 7:53 amApuzzo is actually arguing that Wong Kim Ark confirmed the definition of NBC from Minor.I've heard several birther types make that ridiculous claim.I love who these buffoons like The Putz and the Paraclete and the Pidge, et al. believer the courts are all stupid.Of course, it's a win/win for birthers. If a court is stupid, great, and if they're not, they're just wrong and corrupt.I've also already read where if the Selective Service responds to Joe (though what he really wants is for them not to respond and "prove" they have something to hide) that it means they've forged a new SS card. :lol:


ImageX 4 ImageX36
Image

User avatar
PatGund
Posts: 7767
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 4:41 pm
Location: Edmonds. WA
Contact:

TISDALE v OBAMA (4th Cir.)

#103

Post by PatGund » Thu Mar 22, 2012 1:17 pm

[The stupidity goes on for pages]It's Mario Apuzzo. He would need pages and pages simply to state he's taking a dump.



User avatar
realist
Posts: 34975
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:33 pm

TISDALE v OBAMA (4th Cir.)

#104

Post by realist » Tue Apr 03, 2012 7:28 am

I'd bet this article is a doozie. :lol:





Exclusive: Atty. Mario Apuzzo Files Amicus Brief with Court of Appeals in Eligibility Case





[highlight]FEDERAL JUDGE RENDERED DECISION ON THE MERITS WITHOUT A HEARING[/highlight] by Sharon Rondeau (Apr. 2, 2012) — A civil rights lawsuit was filed on January 12, 2012 by Charles Tisdale pro se in the U.S District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia at Richmond naming Barack Hussein Obama; Neil H. MacBride, the U.S. Attorney [...] :yankyank:


ImageX 4 ImageX36
Image

A Legal Lohengrin
Posts: 10415
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:56 pm

TISDALE v OBAMA (4th Cir.)

#105

Post by A Legal Lohengrin » Tue Apr 03, 2012 7:45 am

I'd bet this article is a doozie. :lol:





Exclusive: Atty. Mario Apuzzo Files Amicus Brief with Court of Appeals in Eligibility Case :yankyank:I'm just glad Rondooo is hiding beneath a slimy rock where nobody has to see this crap. If only all the birfers would do the same.



User avatar
Epectitus
Posts: 3669
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 2:55 pm

TISDALE v OBAMA (4th Cir.)

#106

Post by Epectitus » Tue Apr 03, 2012 8:10 am

I kinda get a kick out of this particular tap-dance in a footnote on page 18 re: Vattel:





The pre-1797 editions used the words “natives, or indigenes.” The 1797 edition replaced those words with “natives, or natural-born citizens,” as did all other subsequent U.S. Supreme Court decisions such as Dred Scott, 60U.S. at 476, Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162, 167 (1875), and U.S. v.Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649, 680 (1898). This is strong evidence that even after the Constitution was adopted in 1787 the definition of an Article II“natural born Citizen” was thought to come from VattelIn particular, because IIRC the Venus case (one of Mario's favorites) does not use the anachronistic 1797 translation, and Minor never cites Vattel at all.


"Hell, I would wear a dress and ruby red slippers all year if we can prove this" - Mike Zullo

User avatar
realist
Posts: 34975
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:33 pm

TISDALE v OBAMA (4th Cir.)

#107

Post by realist » Tue Apr 03, 2012 8:43 am

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit


Court of Appeals Docket #: 12-1124


Docketed: 01/30/2012


Nature of Suit: 2441 Civil Rights Voting





Charles Tisdale v. Barack Obama





04/02/2012 [link]14,[/link] REPLY by Charles Tisdale to Response/Answer to motion for other relief [9]. [12-1124]--[Edited 04/02/2012 by CH] (CH)




ImageX 4 ImageX36
Image

User avatar
Sterngard Friegen
Posts: 45323
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Location: Over the drawbridge

TISDALE v OBAMA (4th Cir.)

#108

Post by Sterngard Friegen » Tue Apr 03, 2012 9:30 am

Exclusive: Atty. Mario Apuzzo Files Amicus Brief with Court of Appeals in Eligibility Case





[highlight]FEDERAL JUDGE RENDERED DECISION ON THE MERITS WITHOUT A HEARING[/highlight] by Sharon Rondeau (Apr. 2, 2012) — A civil rights lawsuit was filed on January 12, 2012 by Charles Tisdale pro se in the U.S District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia at Richmond naming Barack Hussein Obama; Neil H. MacBride, the U.S. Attorney [...]Rondeau is too dumb to know that the judge was required to do what he did without a hearing. Too bad she won't allow people to educate her
Hidden Content
This board requires you to be registered and logged-in to view hidden content.
.


Still an ignorant, hateful, buffoon.



User avatar
bob
Posts: 27372
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

TISDALE v OBAMA (4th Cir.)

#109

Post by bob » Tue Apr 03, 2012 10:44 am

04/02/2012 [link]14,[/link] REPLY by Charles Tisdale to Response/Answer to motion for other relief [9]. [12-1124]--[Edited 04/02/2012 by CH] (CH)Tisdale argues (sans authority, natch) that the FEC lacks "standing" to file motions in the appellate court because it did not make an appearance in the district court.





:-bd


Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
realist
Posts: 34975
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:33 pm

TISDALE v OBAMA (4th Cir.)

#110

Post by realist » Tue Apr 03, 2012 2:29 pm

New (insane) Docket Entry...








04/02/2012 [link]13,[/link] MOTION by Appellant Charles Tisdale to disqualify/recuse judge Names of Judge(s) to be disqualified/recused: Judge Davis, Judge Keenan, Judge Wynn, Judge Diaz and Judge Floyd.. Date and method of service: 04/02/2012 US mail [998824063] [12-1124] (CH)







ImageX 4 ImageX36
Image

User avatar
Whatever4
Posts: 12321
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 6:36 am
Location: Mainely in the plain
Occupation: Visiting doctors.

TISDALE v OBAMA (4th Cir.)

#111

Post by Whatever4 » Tue Apr 03, 2012 2:32 pm

New (insane) Docket Entry...











04/02/2012 [link]13,[/link] MOTION by Appellant Charles Tisdale to disqualify/recuse judge Names of Judge(s) to be disqualified/recused: Judge Davis, Judge Keenan, Judge Wynn, Judge Diaz and Judge Floyd.. Date and method of service: 04/02/2012 US mail [998824063] [12-1124] (CH)





Respectfully.


"[Moderate] doesn't mean you don't have views. It just means your views aren't predictable ideologically one way or the other, and you're trying to follow the facts where they lead and reach your own conclusions."
-- Sen. King (I-ME)

User avatar
bob
Posts: 27372
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

TISDALE v OBAMA (4th Cir.)

#112

Post by bob » Tue Apr 03, 2012 3:45 pm

04/02/2012 [link]13,[/link] MOTION by Appellant Charles Tisdale to disqualify/recuse judge Names of Judge(s) to be disqualified/recused: Judge Davis, Judge Keenan, Judge Wynn, Judge Diaz and Judge Floyd.. Date and method of service: 04/02/2012 US mail [998824063] [12-1124] (CH)"We the Purple" made the same argument in the 3d Third against Obama appointees. Which went sooo well.


Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
Princess foofypants
Posts: 3029
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2015 9:31 pm

TISDALE v OBAMA (4th Cir.)

#113

Post by Princess foofypants » Tue Apr 03, 2012 6:15 pm

Amicus was advised that he would have to pass an examination on electronic case filing in the Fourth Circuit and then register for suchfiling. He was not informed that he had to be a member of the Fourth Circuit to beable to file electronically. On March 13, 2012, amicus took and passed the test. By email dated March 14, 2012, the Clerk’s Office advised amicus that he would also have to be a member of the Fourth Circuit Bar in order to be able to file the amicus brief. On March 14, 15, and 16, 2012, amicus [highlight]attempted to find a Virginia attorney who would move his admission application. He was not successful[/highlight]. On Monday,March 19, 2012, he contacted various attorneys in New Jersey and Pennsylvania.[*] He then called [highlight]Wayne Steedman in Maryland who agreed to sign his application[/highlight]. Upon receipt of the signed application by Mr. [/break1]callegarysteedman.com/staff.htm]Steedman, amicus uploaded it to the Court’sweb site and paid his $196.00 fee on March 19, 2012.* Don't tell Apuzzo, but:

Sekrit Stuffs!
Pennsylvania and New Jersery are in the Third Circuit.
Steedman's practice seems to be primarily dealing with the disabled. I bet the birthers fit right in... I consider birtherism an untreatable mental disability.



User avatar
SueDB
Posts: 27756
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:02 pm
Location: RIP, my friend. - Foggy

TISDALE v OBAMA (4th Cir.)

#114

Post by SueDB » Wed Apr 04, 2012 5:46 am

[The stupidity goes on for pages]It's Mario Apuzzo. He would need pages and pages simply to state he's taking a dump.I wonder when he is going to wander over to [/break1]com]http://CAAFlog.com again? He is about ready for another pummeling, again. They all had a wonderful time with him. ...


“If You're Not In The Obit, Eat Breakfast”

Remember, Orly NEVAH disappoints!

User avatar
realist
Posts: 34975
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:33 pm

TISDALE v OBAMA (4th Cir.)

#115

Post by realist » Tue Apr 24, 2012 5:26 pm

How to win friends and influence people by Charles Tisdale... :lol:





04/23/2012 [link]15,[/link] Letter to Honorable William B. Traxler, Jr. re: complaint concerning the process of this appeal by Appellant Charles Tisdale. [998837796] [12-1124]--[Edited 04/23/2012 by CH] (CH)


I want what I want and I WANT IT RIGHT NOW!!! ](*,)





This is not complicated. What's wrong with you people? =))


ImageX 4 ImageX36
Image

User avatar
BillTheCat
Posts: 4496
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2012 4:25 pm

TISDALE v OBAMA (4th Cir.)

#116

Post by BillTheCat » Tue Apr 24, 2012 5:51 pm

How to win friends and influence people by Charles Tisdale... :lol:





04/23/2012 [link]15,[/link] Letter to Honorable William B. Traxler, Jr. re: complaint concerning the process of this appeal by Appellant Charles Tisdale. [998837796] [12-1124]--[Edited 04/23/2012 by CH] (CH)


I want what I want and I WANT IT RIGHT NOW!!! ](*,)





This is not complicated. What's wrong with you people? =))

I notice recently that the birthers are starting to reach desperation levels with their "cases" sitting in the poo pile, sending letters like this to judges and such. :mrgreen:


'But I don't want to go among mad people,' said Alice. 'Oh, you can't help that,' said the cat. 'We're all mad here.'
-Lewis Carroll

User avatar
BillTheCat
Posts: 4496
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2012 4:25 pm

TISDALE v OBAMA (4th Cir.)

#117

Post by BillTheCat » Tue Apr 24, 2012 6:01 pm

haha I love how he says that the case isn't about the whole birther thing, he isn't one of them, Obama was born here, it's ok, he believes that - He is NOT A BIRTHER!!....followed by "He's not an NBC" :lol:


'But I don't want to go among mad people,' said Alice. 'Oh, you can't help that,' said the cat. 'We're all mad here.'
-Lewis Carroll

User avatar
Hektor
Posts: 2951
Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 6:04 pm
Location: Soviet Canukistan
Contact:

TISDALE v OBAMA (4th Cir.)

#118

Post by Hektor » Tue Apr 24, 2012 6:02 pm

"It is uncontested the President's father was not a citizen of the United States"One of the things I love most about the birthers is their complete inability to see the obvious. According to the birther narrative, Obama is the prince of lies. Even accepting Tisdale's claims that he believes that Obama didn't forge his birth certificate and was born in Hawai'i, from his perspective for Obama (or any one else) to claim that the President is NBC is either lying or hopelessly ignorant. But since Obama taught constitutional law, it's a hard sell to believe he would be ignorant if the 2 citizen parent definition was the truth we all know. So the President is a liar, but a horribly bad one since rather than hide the fact that he had one foreign parent, he wrote a best selling book about it that helped to catapult him into the national spotlight. And everyone goes along with pretending the President is eligible when he won't even contest that he isn't.Or, you know, he isn't contesting something because it isn't an issue at all.



User avatar
Piffle
Posts: 6987
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 12:39 pm

TISDALE v OBAMA (4th Cir.)

#119

Post by Piffle » Tue Apr 24, 2012 10:49 pm

I want what I want and I WANT IT RIGHT NOW!!! ](*,)





This is not complicated. What's wrong with you people? =))Well, 'zactly. :lol:





And what's more, I WANT IT RIGHT NOW TOO!!! An on-point opinion by a Circuit Court of Appeals trashing the birfers' ridiculous interpretation of Minor would make my day. This guy's a trend-setter.





[BTW, I think he's got something there about the case not being complicated. Whenever a whacko demands the simultaneous disqualification of five circuit court judges, the case is not complicated. Trust me.]



User avatar
raicha
Posts: 7347
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2010 5:10 pm
Contact:

TISDALE v OBAMA (4th Cir.)

#120

Post by raicha » Tue Apr 24, 2012 10:53 pm

Bless his heart. :-*



User avatar
Reality Check
Posts: 15897
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: USA
Contact:

TISDALE v OBAMA (4th Cir.)

#121

Post by Reality Check » Wed May 02, 2012 10:16 am

I just noticed Tisdale's name came up in the US v Bank v Rivernider case in Florida. Orly wrote a long letter to the court to trash CELII. Orly says Henry Tisdale is the one who tipped her off that Lincoln was submitting an affidavit with lots of juicy goodness on Orly.[/break1]scribd.com/doc/25567986/RIVERNIDER-v-U-S-BANK-50-NOTICE-to-the-Court-re-forgery-by-Orly-Taitz-Gov-uscourts-flsd-342089-50-0] ... 42089-50-0


"“If you’re not outraged, you’re not paying attention.”

Heather Heyer, November 2016

User avatar
Sterngard Friegen
Posts: 45323
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Location: Over the drawbridge

TISDALE v OBAMA (4th Cir.)

#122

Post by Sterngard Friegen » Wed May 02, 2012 10:29 am

Different Tisdale -- Charles, not Henry.



User avatar
everalm
Posts: 1885
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 9:45 am

TISDALE v OBAMA (4th Cir.)

#123

Post by everalm » Wed May 02, 2012 10:32 am

Jeez...another 54 pages of cack, the woman is a one person ecological holocaust on the amount of paper she consumes and craps on.



User avatar
Reality Check
Posts: 15897
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: USA
Contact:

TISDALE v OBAMA (4th Cir.)

#124

Post by Reality Check » Wed May 02, 2012 10:48 am

Different Tisdale -- Charles, not Henry.I thought we had made the connection but it appears not.


"“If you’re not outraged, you’re not paying attention.”

Heather Heyer, November 2016

User avatar
Tomtech
Posts: 974
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 12:08 pm
Location: Betwixt the Big and Black Cypress Bayous

TISDALE v OBAMA (4th Cir.)

#125

Post by Tomtech » Wed May 02, 2012 3:08 pm

Jeez...another 54 pages of cack, the woman is a one person ecological holocaust on the amount of paper she consumes and craps on.This is great crap. Orly is basing everything on her "evidence" that Lisa Ostella forged Orly's signature on multiple documents while Ostella worked for Orly.The "forged signatures" appear on the set of subpoenas issued from Orly in Keyes vs. Bowen.Orly defended those subpoenas and complained during the [link]Keyes vs Bowen hearing,[/link] that "I have already subpoenaed, and uh,(sic) those records".In essence Orly is accusing Ostella of the forgery of here signature on documents which she defended the veracity of in court.IIRC: Orly is also on record declaring the she has never authorized anyone to sign her name for her.



Post Reply

Return to “Birther Case Discussion”