ANKENY v DANIELS - DOCKET (Ind.)

Post Reply
User avatar
realist
Posts: 34494
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:33 pm

ANKENY v DANIELS - DOCKET (Ind.)

#1

Post by realist » Mon Oct 04, 2010 7:46 pm

Docket and Documents Only to be Posted Here.


================================================


ANKENY, STEVE, ET AL. V. GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF INDIANA


================================================


LINKS TO DOCUMENTS:


[link]Jack's Scribd Page,http://www.scribd.com/document_collections/2337302[/link]


================================================


*Color Key*


Plaintiff-Ankeny Filings


Defendant-Indiana Governor Filings


Third Party Filings


Appellate Court Orders


Supreme Court Orders


================================================





DOCKET


DATE-------TEXT


================================================


INDIANA TRIAL COURT - MARION SUPERIOR COURT


Cause No. 49D10-0812-PL-05511


================================================


We do not yet have the complete trial court docket. However, a few trial court documents have been published online, and we provide links to those here.





1/30/09 ---- [link]Defendant's Motion to Dismiss,http://tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_ ... ismiss.pdf[/link]


1/30/09 ---- [link]Defendant's Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss,http://tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_ ... ismiss.pdf[/link]


2/__/09 ---- [link]Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss,http://tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_ ... ismiss.pdf[/link] (This one is not signed and, as such, may have been a draft.)





================================================


INDIANA COURT OF APPEALS


[link]Case Number: 49 A 02 - 0904 - CV - 00353,http://hats.courts.state.in.us/ISC3RUS/ISC2menu.jsp[/link]


================================================


4/13/09 ----"NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED"





5/05/09 ----NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF CLERK'S RECORD (1) *TRANSCRIPT NOT YET COMPLETED* KB 05/11/09





5/20/09 ----****RECEIVED 05/20/09: ACS, FILED STAMPED COPY OF NOTICE OF APPEAL MISSING. APPELLANT INFORMED AND ALL COPIES OF ACS GIVEN BACK. AS 05/20/09





5/20/09 ----APPELLANT'S CASE SUMMARY BY STEVE ANKENY AND BILL KRUSE, PRO-SE APPELLANTS (2) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE (2) MAIL GP 5/26/09





5/26/09 ----APPELLANT'S RULE 56 REQUEST FOR TRANSFER (6) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE (6) BY MAIL 5/20/09 GP 05/28/09





5/29/09 ----NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF TRANSCRIPT (1) EF 06/03/09





6/02/09 ----ISSUED THE ENCLOSED ORDER:





6/02/09 ----MOTIONS FOR TRANSFER UNDER RULE 56(A) MUST BE VERIFIED. SEE IND. APPELLATE RULE 56(A). APPELLANTS' MOTION IS NOT; THEREFORE, IT IS DENIED. TO THE EXTENT THAT APPELLATE JURISDICTION EXISTS IN THIS APPEAL, IT REMAINS WITH THE INDIANA COURT OF APPEALS. WE FURTHER OBSERVE THAT, EVEN IF APPELLANTS' MOTION HAD BEEN PROPERLY VERIFIED, IT WOULD NOT WARRANT TRANSFER UNDER RULE 56(A), WHICH IS RESERVED FOR "RARE CASES" INVOLVING "A SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW OF GREAT PUBLIC IMPORTANCE" AND "AN EXISTING EMERGENCY...REQUIRING A SPEEDY DETERMINATION." ID. THE ALLEGATIONS MADE IN APPELLANTS' MOTION DO NOT SUGGEST THIS TO BE SUCH A "RARE CASE." RANDALL T. SHEPARD, CHIEF JUSTICE KJ





6/03/09 ----****** ABOVE ENTRY MAILED ******





6/26/09 ----****RECEIVED 06/29/09: APPELLANT'S BRIEF (9) AND ONE (1) VOLUME APPENDIX. BRIEF DOESN'T COMPLY WITH APP.R. 46(A)(10), APPENDIX IS MISSING A CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. GP 06/29/09





6/30/09 ----**** NOTICE OF DEFECT MAILED **** *BRIEF* GP 06/30/09





6/30/09 ----**** NOTICE OF DEFECT MAILED **** *APPENDIX* GP 06/30/09





7/10/09 ----APPELLANT'S BRIEF (9) AND ONE (1) VOLUME APPENDIX FILED CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE (9) BY MAIL 7/10/09 GP 07/15/09





7/10/09 ----**** NOTICE OF DEFECT CURED: BRIEF & APPENDIX **** GP 07/15/09





7/20/09 ----NOTICE OF APPEARANCE BY FRANCES BARROW, DAG (2) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE (2) BY MAIL ON DATE 07/20/09. PA 07/21/09





8/12/09 ----APPELLEE'S BRIEF (9) AND ONE (1) VOLUME APPENDIX FILED CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE (9) BY MAIL DATE 08/12/09 JS 08/13/09





8/26/09 ----REPLY BRIEF (9) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE (9) BY MAIL 8/26/09 GP 08/28/09





8/31/09 ----TRIAL COURT CLERK NOTIFIED TO TRANSMIT TRANSCRIPT. AB 08/31/09





9/03/09 ----RECEIVED: ONE (1) VOLUME TRANSCRIPT FROM TRIAL COURT CLERK. AB 09/04/09





9/04/09 ----FULLY BRIEFED INFORMATION: FILED 05/05/09 F.B. 09/04/09 O.A. NONE AB 09/04/09





9/04/09 ----TRANSMITTED APPEALS ************09/04/09*********** AB 09/04/09





11/12/09 ----ISSUED THE ENCLOSED [link]OPINION,[/link]:





11/12/09 ----2009 TERM AFFIRMED-------BROWN, J. CRONE, J., AND MAY, J., CONCUR. 19 PAGES KJ





11/12/09 ----****** ABOVE ENTRY MAILED ******





11/13/09 ----****RECEIVED 11/16/09: THREE (3) MANILLA ENVELOPES MARKED CONFIDENTIAL ADDRESSED TO COURT OF APPEALS' JUDGES. ENVELOPES CONTAIN "OBJECTION RE: ANKENY, ET AL. V. GOVERNOR OF INDIANA" FROM PAUL ANDREW MITCHELL. DOCUMENTS FORWARDED TO COURT OF APPEALS' ADMINISTRATION FOR REVIEW. MS 11/17/09





12/09/09 ----APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR REHEARING (9) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE (9) BY MAIL DATE 12/09/09 JS 12/11/09





12/31/09 ----0001958-98; EMAIL SENT REGARDING TRANSMISSION OF ORDERS, OPINIONS & NOTICES TO ATTORNEY GREGORY FRANCIS ZOELLER





12/31/09 ----0015115-22; EMAIL SENT REGARDING TRANSMISSION OF ORDERS, OPINIONS & NOTICES TO ATTORNEY FRANCES HALE BARROW





1/11/10 ----0015115-22;EMAIL RESPONSE RECEIVED REGARDING TRANSMISSION OF ORDERS, OPINIONS & NOTICES FROM ATTY FRANCES BARROW [DOCKET DATE MAY NOT REFLECT DATE RESPONSE RECEIVED. SEE FILE FOR ACTUAL DATE RECEIVED.]





1/15/10 ----APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR REHEARING DENIED. FOR THE COURT, JOHN G. BAKER, CHIEF JUDGE ALL PANEL JUDGES CONCUR. KJ





1/15/10 ----****** ABOVE ENTRY MAILED ******





================================================


INDIANA SUPREME COURT


================================================





2/11/10 ----APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR TRANSFER (9) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE (9) BY MAIL DATE 02/11/10 JS 02/15/10





2/26/10 ----APPELLEE'S NOTICE REGARDING TRANSFER (6) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE (6) BY MAIL 02/26/10. MC 03/01/10





3/02/10 ----***********TRANSMITTED ON TRANSFER 03/02/10*********** AB 03/02/10





4/01/10 ----THIS MATTER HAS COME BEFORE THE INDIANA SUPREME COURT ON A PETITION TO TRANSFER JURISDICTION FOLLOWING THE ISSUANCE OF A DECISION BY THE COURT OF APPEALS. THE PETITION WAS FILED PURSUANT TO APPELLATE RULE 57. THE COURT HAS REVIEWED THE DECISION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS. ANY RECORD ON APPEAL THAT WAS SUBMITTED HAS BEEN MADE AVAILABLE TO THE COURT FOR REVIEW, ALONG WITH ANY AND ALL BRIEFS THAT MAY HAVE BEEN FILED IN THE COURT OF APPEALS AND ALL THE MATERIALS FILED IN CONNECTION WITH THE REQUEST TO TRANSFER JURISDICTION. EACH PARTICIPATING MEMBER OF THE COURT HAS VOTED ON THE PETITION. EACH PARTICIPATING MEMBER HAS HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO VOICE THAT JUSTICE'S VIEWS ON THE CASE IN CONFERENCE WITH THE OTHER JUSTICES. BEING DULY ADVISED, THE COURT NOW DENIES THE APPELLANT'S PETITION TO TRANSFER OF JURISDICTION. RANDALL T. SHEPARD, CHIEF JUSTICE ALL JUSTICES CONCUR. KJ 04/05/10





4/05/10 ----****** ABOVE ENTRY MAILED ******





4/07/10 ----***************OPINION CERTIFIED*************** ED 04/07/10





4/13/10 ----***************RECEIPT RETURNED*************** AD





6/04/10 ----**** CASE CLOSED ****


ImageX 4 ImageX36
Image

Post Reply

Return to “Birther Case Docket”