Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow. To join, email foggy at thefogbow dot com.


All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 320 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 13  Next   
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 6:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 12:48 am
Posts: 5269
Occupation: Professional pain in the ass.
And, he has a press release! (Cuz he's running for president, too.)

Quote:
Quixotic as it may appear at first blush, given the vagrancies of the Electoral
College system, Montgomery could be elected President with only 13% of the nation-wide popular
vote cast in 26 select states and the District of Columbia as detailed in the attached chart.

snippy

Accordingly, Montgomery has filed in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia a Quo Warranto suit seeking
to oust Barrack Hussein Obama II as President of the United States and/or preventing him from
holding the franchise of being on the ballot for that office on November 6, 2012, insomuch as he is
not a “natural born Citizen” of the United States as required by Article II, §1 of the Constitution.
At the time of the adoption of the Constitution, that phrase was defined as: “The natives, or
natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.” (The Law of
Nations, Emerich de Vattel, 1758, Chapter 19, § 212). Notably, there are thus two plain
requirements: being born (i) in the United States and (ii) of two parents, both of whom must be
United States citizens.

Significantly, Congress exercised its authority to expand the definition of “natural born
Citizen” in the Act of 1790 stating: “the children of citizens of the United States, that may be born
beyond sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural-born citizens:
Provided, that the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons whose fathers have never been
resident in the United States.” 1 Stat. 104. Notably, Congress subsequently removed the legal-termof-
art “natural born Citizen” from all citizenship statutes post-1790 and now only confers
“citizenship”. See: 8 U.S.C. §1401 – “Nationals and citizens of the United States at birth”, “The
following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth . . . “.

Snippy (Obama says his dad wasn't a citizen).

Moreover, even allowing for an in futuro judicially-by-fiat-created definition of “natural born
Citizen” to include one born within the United States to only one United States citizen parent, the
significant questions concerning the location of the birth of Barrack Hussein Obama, II raised by his
publicly released “Certificates of Live Birth” would nonetheless challenge his eligibility to be
President of the United States. A detailed analysis of the apparent tampering with Barrack Hussein
Obama, II’s putative “Certificates of Live Birth” is contained in the Quo Warranto lawsuit.

_________________
Pity the poor Birthers, for they know not how to Think.

Turning the Scale.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 8:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 26487
More from Sibley...

Motion to Inform Grand Jury

and
[which I believe BFB had posted above, but put it with the docket entry]

Added lotsa defendants :D

Quote:
01/31/2012 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR, RONALD C. MACHEN, JR, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II filed by MONTGOMERY BLAIR SIBLEY.(dr) (Entered: 01/31/2012)

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


Image x 3 Image x 21


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 11:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 1:01 am
Posts: 23540
Location: Planet Earth (most the time)
Occupation: I'm not at liberty to say.
I kinda wish he was in on the Georgia thing. All that video needed was Sibley in his kilt.

Why oh why did this clown not get in on the big show? :(( He's going to just get his case dismissed with no fanfare.

A shame his performance won't be seen.

_________________
Yes We Can! ~ Thomas Jefferson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 12:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 1:01 am
Posts: 23540
Location: Planet Earth (most the time)
Occupation: I'm not at liberty to say.
nolu has a folder on scribd of sibley's disbarment and other stuff. I guess he's writing about him somewhere.

Here's nolu's sibley folder:

http://www.scribd.com/collections/34674 ... air-Sibley

nolu at scribd:
http://www.scribd.com/nolu%20chan

_________________
Yes We Can! ~ Thomas Jefferson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2012 8:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 26487
New Docket Entry...

Quote:
02/13/2012 7 NOTICE of Filing Rule 201 Necessary Information by MONTGOMERY BLAIR SIBLEY (dr) (Entered: 02/13/2012)



Sibley gives the Court notice of the GA Administrative hearing and attaches the transcript of the hearing.

link shortly

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


Image x 3 Image x 21


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2012 8:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 5:41 pm
Posts: 6938
Location: Edmonds, WA
realist wrote:
New Docket Entry...

Quote:
02/13/2012 7 NOTICE of Filing Rule 201 Necessary Information by MONTGOMERY BLAIR SIBLEY (dr) (Entered: 02/13/2012)



Sibley gives the Court notice of the GA Administrative hearing and attaches the transcript of the hearing.

link shortly


And what a surprise - no mention of the result of said hearing.

And I can't see what the point to a transcript of Dr. Orly's performance might be, except to tell the court "see, there's a worse lawyer out there!"

_________________
Bad Fiction - The Intersection of Bad Movies and Worse Politics


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2012 10:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 1:08 pm
Posts: 661
Location: Betwixt the Big and Black Cypress Bayous.
Occupation: Disabled. Krebb's disease.
PatGund wrote:
realist wrote:
New Docket Entry...

Quote:
02/13/2012 7 NOTICE of Filing Rule 201 Necessary Information by MONTGOMERY BLAIR SIBLEY (dr) (Entered: 02/13/2012)



Sibley gives the Court notice of the GA Administrative hearing and attaches the transcript of the hearing.

link shortly


And what a surprise - no mention of the result of said hearing.

And I can't see what the point to a transcript of Dr. Orly's performance might be, except to tell the court "see, there's a worse lawyer out there!"
Dr. Orly's plan is working to perfection.

Orly and her flying monkeys can now become part of the record in every case thereafter without each plaintiff spending all the money to bring forth the "experts".

Someone needs to tell Sibley that he forgot the most important part. The zibits.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2012 4:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 26487
Sibley v Obama - Sibley Notice of Vacation

:lol:

It was not necessary.

Sibley v Obama - Order Denying Petition for Writ of Mandamus or in the Alternative a writ "procedendum ad justicium"

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


Image x 3 Image x 21


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2012 4:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 12:38 am
Posts: 3007
Well at least the attempt to speed up the lower court's ruling on Quo Warranto was rejected..

_________________
- Credimus quod credere volumus -


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 1:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 26487
Docket Update...

Quote:
SIBLEY v. OBAMA et al
Assigned to: Judge John D. Bates
Demand: $1,000,000 :P
Cause: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

Date Filed: 01/03/2012
Jury Demand: Plaintiff
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other
Jurisdiction: Federal Question


03/09/2012 11 Amended MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint (Unopposed) by BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Soskin, Eric) (Entered: 03/09/2012)

03/09/2012 MINUTE ORDER: Upon consideration of 11 defendants' unopposed amended motion for an extension of time to respond to plaintiff's complaint, and the entire record herein, it is hereby ORDERED that defendants' motion is GRANTED; it is further ORDERED that defendants shall respond to plaintiff's complaint by not later than April 2, 2012; and it is further ORDERED that 10 defendants' motion for an extension of time to respond to plaintiff's complaint is DENIED AS MOOT. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge John D. Bates on 3/9/2012. (lcjdb2) (Entered: 03/09/2012)


_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


Image x 3 Image x 21


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 3:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 5:27 pm
Posts: 8265
Location: Intersection of Godwin Dr. and Poe Blvd.
Occupation: Personal security.
Sibley is clearly not an aficionado of OrlyLaw. Orly would have opposed defendants' motion for extension of time.

_________________
Imagex3 Image
"You unlock this door with the key of imagination.
Beyond it is another dimension - a dimension of
unsound mind, a dimension of unreality, a dimension
of really, really bad law. You've just crossed over
into the Orly Zone."
-- Geritol


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 4:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 7:02 am
Posts: 4885
Location: Northwest Missouri
Occupation: Umpire
...and included a plaintiff's 1st amended complaint with her opposition (save on postage).

_________________
"You know boys, a nuclear reactor is a lot like women. You just have to read the manual and press the right button."
Image
Homer Simpson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 6:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Posts: 24300
Location: FEMA Camp 17 -- Malibu (Hey! You! Get off the lawn!)
Occupation: Schadenfreude artist.
Joseph Robidoux III wrote:
...and included a plaintiff's 1st amended complaint with her opposition (save on postage).

She would have combined them in one document. Along with a request for discovery.

And a default.

_________________
When there are a finite number of ways to screw something up, Orly Taitz will find an infinite number of ways to do so. (The Sternsig Rule.)

Realist lives to serve. Foggy does it for the children. I'm in it for the schadenfreude.


:sterngard:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 7:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 9:42 am
Posts: 1484
Location: Garage Dubois, Choisy-le-Roi
Occupation: teacher (of English and translation), translator
PatGund wrote:
...
And I can't see what the point to a transcript of Dr. Orly's performance might be, except to tell the court "see, there's a worse lawyer out there!"


Ha, I think you've got the wrong end of the stick: for these people to be accused of plagiarizing Orly Taitz - the Brighton rock that unlike King Canute will withstand the Obama tsunamis - is in fact the greatest flattery they could ever expect.

When they are taking care of their briefs, they are thinking "Bend it like Orly!" "Smear it like Orly!" "Com(m)atize it like Orly!" "Massage it like Orly!" It adds gratification to their briefs.

_________________
Ja nigdy nie będę mówił, że Orly Taitz została usunięta z palestry, chyba że, w rzeczywistości, Orly Taitz została usunięta z palestry.
Я никогда не скажу, что Орли Тайц лишилась статуса адвоката - до того момента, когда, на самом деле, Орли Тайц лишилась статуса адвоката.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 8:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 12:36 pm
Posts: 2608
Paul Pieniezny wrote:

When they are taking care of their briefs, they are thinking "Bend it like Orly!" "Smear it like Orly!" "Com(m)atize it like Orly!" "Massage it like Orly!" It adds gratification to their briefs.


Only Chuck Lincoln thinks that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 3:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 1:01 am
Posts: 23540
Location: Planet Earth (most the time)
Occupation: I'm not at liberty to say.
Sibley filed another petition. It's here (via HuffPo)

PDF-> http://www.montgomeryblairsibley.com/li ... tition.pdf


The accompanying HuffPo article:
Birther Presidential Candidate Montgomery Blair Sibley Files Petition With Supreme Court

The Huffington Post | By Arin Greenwood Posted: 03/29/2012 3:01 pm

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/2 ... 88238.html

I don't understand this part of the article:

Quote:
He's asking the Supreme Court to take up the case on the grounds that the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia has been too slow in responding to the birther suit he filed against President "Barrack" Obama in January. (The misspelling was corrected in the subsequent filings.)

In a press release, Sibley says his "filings procedurally forces (sic) the Supreme Court to declare whether they will take up the question of Obama’s eligibility to be President or allow the question to be relegated to a judicial process that would not reach the Supreme Court until well after the November 6, 2012, election, let alone before the September 3, 2012, Democratic Convention."



What does he mean "too slow"? They denied his petition on March 6th, didn't they?

[ETA: bob answered my questions just a couple posts down. :D Thanks, bob.]

Even Sibley's own petition (the one attached above to this post) refers to the March 6th ruling:

Quote:
“The district court’s delay in ruling on the petition for writ of quo warranto is not so egregious or unreasonable as to warrant the extraordinary remedy of mandamus.”


He just doesn't give the sentence before that one. The one that says "Ordered that the petition be denied".

Can he get away with that?

The Order of March 6th at Jacks:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/84360439/Sibl ... 2012-03-06


Edit: Meant to include this part of the new petition: "The District Court to date has refused to rule upon that Petition." If he later quotes the March 6th Ruling, the one that said "denied", how can he lie like this?

_________________
Yes We Can! ~ Thomas Jefferson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 3:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:25 pm
Posts: 1945
Lunatic.

Expecting SCOTUS to care? Enjoy your continued visit to the "judicial desert" :roll:

_________________
"It’s time for this charade to stop” - Cold Case Posse Member Mike Zullo, destroying Irony Meters worldwide


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 4:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 1:22 pm
Posts: 12232
Location: Supreme Court of clerks
Occupation: Petite treason procurer
mimi wrote:
What does he mean "too slow"? They denied his petition on March 6th, didn't they?

The D.C. district court has not yet ruled on his petition.

So Sibly filed a petition with the D.C. circuit court, asking it to order the district court to hurry up. On March 6, the circuit court denied that request.

So now Sibley is asking SCOTUS to order the district court to hurry up. :roll:

_________________
Image Image Image Image Image Image

ASSUME ANYTHING WRITTEN HERE WILL END UP ON TAITZ'S SITE AND FACEBOOK. AND JEROME CORSI WILL POST SCREENSHOTS TO WND. AND WILL BE FILED BY A BIRTHER AS AN EXHIBIT IN FEDERAL COURT. NOW HAVE FUN!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 4:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 1:22 pm
Posts: 12232
Location: Supreme Court of clerks
Occupation: Petite treason procurer
Sibley v. D. D.C., No. 11-1185.

Sibley also recently filed for cert. in a case involving him suing his father's estate to enforce a promise made by Sibley's father to pay for Silbley's son's education.

_________________
Image Image Image Image Image Image

ASSUME ANYTHING WRITTEN HERE WILL END UP ON TAITZ'S SITE AND FACEBOOK. AND JEROME CORSI WILL POST SCREENSHOTS TO WND. AND WILL BE FILED BY A BIRTHER AS AN EXHIBIT IN FEDERAL COURT. NOW HAVE FUN!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 4:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:56 pm
Posts: 10413
bob wrote:
Sibley v. D. D.C., No. 11-1185.

Sibley also recently filed for cert. in a case involving him suing his father's estate to enforce a promise made by Sibley's father to pay for Silbley's son's education.


Isn't this one of those things they teach you in law school on the first goddamn day of contracts class?

_________________
"I no doubt deserved my enemies but I don't believe I deserved my friends." -- Walt Whitman


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 4:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 1:01 am
Posts: 23540
Location: Planet Earth (most the time)
Occupation: I'm not at liberty to say.
bob wrote:
Sibley v. D. D.C., No. 11-1185.

Sibley also recently filed for cert. in a case involving him suing his father's estate to enforce a promise made by Sibley's father to pay for Silbley's son's education.


So now he has sued his mother and his father, in separate suits.

his kids better get a lawyer on retainer.

_________________
Yes We Can! ~ Thomas Jefferson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 03, 2012 8:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 26487
Quote:
U.S. District Court
District of Columbia (Washington, DC)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:12-cv-00001-JDB

SIBLEY v. OBAMA et al
Assigned to: Judge John D. Bates
Demand: $1,000,000
Cause: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

Date Filed: 01/03/2012
Jury Demand: Plaintiff
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other
Jurisdiction: Federal Question

04/02/2012 12 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint by JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2, ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR, RONALD C. MACHEN, JR, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Soskin, Eric) (Entered: 04/02/2012)


_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


Image x 3 Image x 21


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 03, 2012 9:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Posts: 24300
Location: FEMA Camp 17 -- Malibu (Hey! You! Get off the lawn!)
Occupation: Schadenfreude artist.
There's a nice shout out at pp. 7-10 to Taitz's ridiculous quo warranto action, too. Sibley should thank Taitz for helping to clarify the law in D.C. that prohibits him from proceeding because, as usual, Taitz has made good law for those opposing the birthers. (And, at p. 11, as a lagniappe, Taitz's failure in the Barnett case before Judge Carter, and affirmed by the Ninth Circuit sub nomine, is cited as well.)

_________________
When there are a finite number of ways to screw something up, Orly Taitz will find an infinite number of ways to do so. (The Sternsig Rule.)

Realist lives to serve. Foggy does it for the children. I'm in it for the schadenfreude.


:sterngard:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 5:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 26487
2012-04-04 - DC - SIBLEY - Amended Notice of Vacation

Don't stress, Monty. You'll most likely never have to worry about it. :lol:

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


Image x 3 Image x 21


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 06, 2012 5:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 1:22 pm
Posts: 12232
Location: Supreme Court of clerks
Occupation: Petite treason procurer
Quote:
Sibley v. D. D.C., No. 11-1185.

Sibley's motion to expedite consideration (of his cert. pet.) to be heard at April 20 SCOTUS conference.

_________________
Image Image Image Image Image Image

ASSUME ANYTHING WRITTEN HERE WILL END UP ON TAITZ'S SITE AND FACEBOOK. AND JEROME CORSI WILL POST SCREENSHOTS TO WND. AND WILL BE FILED BY A BIRTHER AS AN EXHIBIT IN FEDERAL COURT. NOW HAVE FUN!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 320 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 13  Next   

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
View new posts | View active topics



Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group