Laura Loomer

Post Reply
Grumpy Old Guy
Posts: 2057
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2015 10:24 am
Occupation: Retired, unemployed, never a lawyer

Re: Laura Loomer

#126

Post by Grumpy Old Guy » Mon Feb 25, 2019 12:51 pm

Sugar Magnolia wrote:
Mon Feb 25, 2019 12:36 pm
Azastan wrote:
Mon Feb 25, 2019 10:18 am
I wonder if the FBI will have a chat with Ali about what appears to be body armour.
Is he a convicted felon?
Are felons not allowed to possess body armour?

User avatar
neonzx
Posts: 6112
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 9:27 am

Re: Laura Loomer

#127

Post by neonzx » Mon Feb 25, 2019 12:55 pm

Grumpy Old Guy wrote:
Mon Feb 25, 2019 12:51 pm
Sugar Magnolia wrote:
Mon Feb 25, 2019 12:36 pm
Azastan wrote:
Mon Feb 25, 2019 10:18 am
I wonder if the FBI will have a chat with Ali about what appears to be body armour.
Is he a convicted felon?
Are felons not allowed to possess body armour?
No. And that's a Federal law.
Edit: Looks like only for convicted of a 'violent' felony
To which Trump replied, Fuck the law. I don't give a fuck about the law. I want my fucking money.

User avatar
Dan1100
Posts: 3472
Joined: Sat Oct 18, 2014 3:41 pm

Re: Laura Loomer

#128

Post by Dan1100 » Mon Feb 25, 2019 12:59 pm

Grumpy Old Guy wrote:
Mon Feb 25, 2019 12:51 pm
Sugar Magnolia wrote:
Mon Feb 25, 2019 12:36 pm
Azastan wrote:
Mon Feb 25, 2019 10:18 am
I wonder if the FBI will have a chat with Ali about what appears to be body armour.
Is he a convicted felon?
Are felons not allowed to possess body armour?
Violent felons
18 U.S. Code § 931. Prohibition on purchase, ownership, or possession of body armor by violent felons

(a)In General.—Except as provided in subsection (b), it shall be unlawful for a person to purchase, own, or possess body armor, if that person has been convicted of a felony that is—
(1) a crime of violence (as defined in section 16); or
(2) an offense under State law that would constitute a crime of violence under paragraph (1) if it occurred within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States.
(b) Affirmative Defense.—
(1)In general.—It shall be an affirmative defense under this section that—
(A) the defendant obtained prior written certification from his or her employer that the defendant’s purchase, use, or possession of body armor was necessary for the safe performance of lawful business activity; and
(B) the use and possession by the defendant were limited to the course of such performance.
(2)Employer.—
In this subsection, the term “employer” means any other individual employed by the defendant’s business that supervises defendant’s activity. If that defendant has no supervisor, prior written certification is acceptable from any other employee of the business.
footnote definition of crime of violence
(4)the term “crime of violence” means— (A)an offense that has as an element of the offense the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person or property of another; (B)any other offense that is a felony and that, by its nature, involves a substantial risk that physical force against the person or property of another may be used in the course of committing the offense; or (C)any felony under chapter 77, 109A, 110, or 117; and
"Devin Nunes is having a cow over this."

-George Takei

User avatar
Sugar Magnolia
Posts: 10349
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2012 6:44 am

Re: Laura Loomer

#129

Post by Sugar Magnolia » Mon Feb 25, 2019 1:07 pm

Ninja'ed on my own post! I was just coming back to edit it to say "violent" felon but y'all beat me to it.

So, is he a violent convicted felon or not?

User avatar
bob
Posts: 26937
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Laura Loomer

#130

Post by bob » Mon Feb 25, 2019 2:16 pm

Sugar Magnolia wrote:
Mon Feb 25, 2019 1:07 pm
So, is he a violent convicted felon or not?
The previously posted screenshot shows that he was arrested for car burglary. I don't know if he was convicted of that charge. And without further research, my WAG is that car burglary isn't considered a crime of violence under the applicable federal law.
Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
Suranis
Posts: 16793
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 7:04 am

Re: Laura Loomer

#131

Post by Suranis » Mon Feb 25, 2019 2:17 pm

Good twitter thread on the Ali Wohl Loomer show. Includes actual film with them going about with their security detail... who turns out to be one guy with a camcorder.

https://twitter.com/webster/status/1098995716498907136

Also they need money, money, money, money, money, money, money, and Prayer. Nice to know they have their priorities right.
Learn to Swear in Latin. Profanity with class!
https://blogs.transparent.com/latin/lat ... -in-latin/

Grumpy Old Guy
Posts: 2057
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2015 10:24 am
Occupation: Retired, unemployed, never a lawyer

Re: Laura Loomer

#132

Post by Grumpy Old Guy » Mon Feb 25, 2019 3:30 pm

Thanks everyone for the replies about felons and body armour.

These guys need hockey pads, for when they fall on their rear ends.

User avatar
Orlylicious
Posts: 9682
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 4:02 pm
Location: With Pete Buttigieg and the other "open and defiant homosexuals" --Bryan Fischer AFA
Occupation: "Scalawag...Part of an extreme, malicious leftist internet social mob working in concert with weaponized, socialized governments to target and injure political opponents.” -- Walt Fitzpatrick

Re: Laura Loomer

#133

Post by Orlylicious » Mon Feb 25, 2019 10:09 pm

Suranis wrote:
Mon Feb 25, 2019 2:17 pm
Good twitter thread on the Ali Wohl Loomer show. Includes actual film with them going about with their security detail... who turns out to be one guy with a camcorder.

https://twitter.com/webster/status/1098995716498907136

Also they need money, money, money, money, money, money, money, and Prayer. Nice to know they have their priorities right.
That's a great thread, thanks for posting it. He's exactly right, they are grifters, that's really how they should be treated.
Avatar Photo: Rusty, the All American Squirrel, was given Karl P. Koenigs' gun. Rusty: "Sucks to be you, Karl."
Don't miss Fogbow's favorite show, "Mama June: From Not To Hot: "The Road To Intervention"

User avatar
Estiveo
Posts: 8045
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 7:31 pm
Location: Trouble's Howse

Re: Laura Loomer

#134

Post by Estiveo » Sat Mar 02, 2019 1:48 pm

Loomer kicked out of CPAC, press credential revoked.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/anti-musl ... -reporters
Screenshot_2019-03-02-10-45-22.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Image Image Image Image Image

Grumpy Old Guy
Posts: 2057
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2015 10:24 am
Occupation: Retired, unemployed, never a lawyer

Re: Laura Loomer

#135

Post by Grumpy Old Guy » Sat Mar 02, 2019 1:57 pm

Being kicked out of CPAC has to be some sort of low point, even for her.

Who will she blame now, Muslim security guards?

DrIrvingFinegarten
Posts: 682
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 11:11 pm

Re: Laura Loomer

#136

Post by DrIrvingFinegarten » Sat Mar 02, 2019 3:17 pm

Grumpy Old Guy wrote:
Sat Mar 02, 2019 1:57 pm
Being kicked out of CPAC has to be some sort of low point, even for her.

Who will she blame now, Muslim security guards?
When you're too nutty for CPAC...

Grumpy Old Guy
Posts: 2057
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2015 10:24 am
Occupation: Retired, unemployed, never a lawyer

Re: Laura Loomer

#137

Post by Grumpy Old Guy » Sat Mar 02, 2019 3:32 pm

DrIrvingFinegarten wrote:
Sat Mar 02, 2019 3:17 pm
Grumpy Old Guy wrote:
Sat Mar 02, 2019 1:57 pm
Being kicked out of CPAC has to be some sort of low point, even for her.

Who will she blame now, Muslim security guards?
When you're too nutty for CPAC...
They likely didn’t want her doing something stupid, such as interrupting Trump.

User avatar
Northland10
Posts: 8351
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:19 am
Location: Chicago area - North burbs

Re: Laura Loomer

#138

Post by Northland10 » Sat Mar 02, 2019 4:54 pm

Estiveo wrote:
Sat Mar 02, 2019 1:48 pm
Loomer kicked out of CPAC, press credential revoked.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/anti-musl ... -reporters
Screenshot_2019-03-02-10-45-22.jpg
:rotflmao:
North-land: of the family 10

UCC 1-106 Plural is Singular, Singular is Plural.

User avatar
RTH10260
Posts: 21749
Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 8:52 am
Location: Near the Swiss Alps

Re: Laura Loomer

#139

Post by RTH10260 » Sat Mar 02, 2019 10:17 pm

Grumpy Old Guy wrote:
Sat Mar 02, 2019 3:32 pm
DrIrvingFinegarten wrote:
Sat Mar 02, 2019 3:17 pm
Grumpy Old Guy wrote:
Sat Mar 02, 2019 1:57 pm
Being kicked out of CPAC has to be some sort of low point, even for her.

Who will she blame now, Muslim security guards?
When you're too nutty for CPAC...
They likely didn’t want her doing something stupid, such as interrupting throwing a shoe at Trump.
FIFY

User avatar
NMgirl
Posts: 4332
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2016 12:02 am

Re: Laura Loomer

#140

Post by NMgirl » Sun Mar 03, 2019 1:42 am



:cantlook:
Stern: Come back. My posts are becoming sloppy and ill-thought out.

User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 12514
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

Re: Laura Loomer

#141

Post by Notorial Dissent » Sun Mar 03, 2019 2:23 am

And here I just thought having no taste was a standard Loomer thing. Who knew??? But yeah, I agree.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
Estiveo
Posts: 8045
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 7:31 pm
Location: Trouble's Howse

Re: Laura Loomer

#142

Post by Estiveo » Sun Mar 03, 2019 10:49 am

Laura Loomer must be, I think, profoundly lonely.

Most photos of her are like the above. Alone, dressed like a schlub, vast empty areas between her and the next nearest human. The only times we see her having human contact are when she hires day workers as props, chains herself to something, or arranges a weekend of harassing innocent people along with equally lonely, friendless people like Jacob Wohl.

What got her thrown out of CPAC was getting in the face of legitimate journalists because nobody she admired wanted to be on camera with her.

Also, just looking at her, you know she smells.

As @HoarseWhisperer said:
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Image Image Image Image Image

User avatar
ZekeB
Posts: 15917
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 10:07 pm
Location: Northwest part of Semi Blue State

Re: Laura Loomer

#143

Post by ZekeB » Sun Mar 03, 2019 11:02 am

NMgirl wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2019 1:42 am
:cantlook:
Birth control pants.
Trump: Er hat eine größere Ente als ich.

Putin: Du bist kleiner als ich.

User avatar
Volkonski
Posts: 22691
Joined: Sat Mar 02, 2013 4:44 pm
Location: Texas Gulf Coast and North Fork of Long Island
Occupation: Retired Mechanical Engineer

Re: Laura Loomer

#144

Post by Volkonski » Sun Mar 03, 2019 1:57 pm

Can anyone here read what is on her shirt?
Image“If everyone fought for their own convictions there would be no war.”
― Leo Tolstoy, War and Peace

User avatar
pipistrelle
Posts: 6723
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 11:26 am

Re: Laura Loomer

#145

Post by pipistrelle » Sun Mar 03, 2019 2:03 pm

Doubt those are even wacky chef pants; otherwise, I'd have thought she was trying to infiltrate the kitchens.

User avatar
Estiveo
Posts: 8045
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 7:31 pm
Location: Trouble's Howse

Re: Laura Loomer

#146

Post by Estiveo » Sun Mar 03, 2019 2:05 pm

Volkonski wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2019 1:57 pm
Can anyone here read what is on her shirt?
Screenshot_2019-03-03-11-03-58.jpg
Notice that's not a MAGA hat she's wearing.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Image Image Image Image Image

User avatar
Suranis
Posts: 16793
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 7:04 am

Re: Laura Loomer

#147

Post by Suranis » Sun Mar 03, 2019 2:06 pm

I opened the image file from the tweet and blew it up, but its just too blurred. The image is a woman's face with tape over the mouth, and I can tell the top is a web site url, but that's about it. Can't read the hat either.

*edit* Ninjaed by someone more talented.
Learn to Swear in Latin. Profanity with class!
https://blogs.transparent.com/latin/lat ... -in-latin/

User avatar
Sam the Centipede
Posts: 7173
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2012 3:25 pm

Re: Laura Loomer

#148

Post by Sam the Centipede » Sun Mar 03, 2019 4:20 pm

Awww … freeloomer.com doesn't offer you a Free Loomer!

It's a whinefest about how unfair it is that social media companies and PayPal won't tolerate her hate speech, and it's all the fault of liberal-socialist-muslim-whatevas.

User avatar
Dan1100
Posts: 3472
Joined: Sat Oct 18, 2014 3:41 pm

Re: Laura Loomer

#149

Post by Dan1100 » Sun Mar 03, 2019 4:44 pm

Sam the Centipede wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2019 4:20 pm
Awww … freeloomer.com doesn't offer you a Free Loomer!

It's a whinefest about how unfair it is that social media companies and PayPal won't tolerate her hate speech, and it's all the fault of liberal-socialist-muslim-whatevas.
Domain info for freeloomer.com in spoiler. Looks like godaddy (who per wikipedia also owns Domains by Proxy, LLC)
► Show Spoiler
"Devin Nunes is having a cow over this."

-George Takei

User avatar
Foggy
Posts: 28475
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 12:00 pm
Location: Fogbow HQ
Occupation: Dick Tater

Re: Laura Loomer

#150

Post by Foggy » Sun Mar 03, 2019 5:06 pm

GoDaddy is the registrar for the domain name. Hosting company is Liquid Web. :|
Any time my questions are all fully answered, I know I'm asking the wrong questions. - Bernard Samson

Post Reply

Return to “Other Fringe Groups & Individuals”