Robot Replacement of Human Workers

Jim
Posts: 2636
Joined: Fri May 04, 2012 4:05 pm

Re: Robot Replacement of Human Workers

Post #26 by Jim » Thu Mar 09, 2017 6:53 pm

TollandRCR wrote:I agree that being a garbage man is not a fit job for humans. I do think it is better than unemployment.


Helped put me through college...under the table. :D

Private collectors in our towns, worked with my BIL for his dad. Kinda of wild what you see at 3-5 am in a college town. :jawdrop:



User avatar
Sugar Magnolia
Posts: 7490
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2012 6:44 am

Re: Robot Replacement of Human Workers

Post #27 by Sugar Magnolia » Thu Mar 09, 2017 7:02 pm

SueDB wrote:
Volkonski wrote:More and more restaurants now have touch screen ordering and paying reducing the need for wait staff.

http://www.ziosk.com/


IMHO
And it cuts into their tips. Why pay full service for only half service?

It also pretty much puts the tip on the plastic VISA where it's reported to the IRS and allows management to make rules to steal the tips as they are in control of the cashbox.

We ate at a restaurant yesterday that has newly installed online ordering at the table and we loved it and so did the waitress. No hovering around while we perused the menu so she could jet to the next table, she kept our tea filled and was there instantly if we even looked like we needed something. She had more tables than she used to, but more time to give each table attention. No screw-ups in the orders either. Anyone who has ever eaten at a restaurant with me knows that at least one thing I order is going to be wrong. Every. Single. Time. And yes, she says her tips have increased "a lot" since the system went in.

Of course, I'm one of those weirdos who LOVE the self-checkout at the Kroger too.



User avatar
Lani
Posts: 1852
Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2012 4:01 pm
Location: Hawaii, East Kenya

Re: Robot Replacement of Human Workers

Post #28 by Lani » Fri Mar 10, 2017 3:12 am

Volkonski wrote:Sometimes it is not the direct cost of the workers, it is the liability in the event one of them gets injured.

When I was working we were sometimes able to justify the investment cost for mechanization/automation just on that.


That's why my small county switched to garbage trucks with arms. Lots of workers comp claims. Collecting garbage is hard work and does a lot of damage to backs and joints.


Insert signature here: ____________________________________________________

User avatar
SueDB
Posts: 27683
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:02 pm
Location: FEMA Camp PI Okanogan, WA 98840

Re: Robot Replacement of Human Workers

Post #29 by SueDB » Fri Mar 10, 2017 11:20 am

Politicians are always trying to get rid of Federal workers as they draw a retirement. They do this through - "privatization" where they hired some company that pays dirt wages and no retirement to manage very important functions.

Government by lowest bidder contract.


“Before you diagnose yourself with depression or low self esteem, first make sure that you are not, in fact, just surrounding yourself with assholes.”
? William Gibson

Remember, Orly NEVAH disappoints!

User avatar
TollandRCR
Posts: 18003
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2009 11:17 pm

Re: Robot Replacement of Human Workers

Post #30 by TollandRCR » Fri Mar 10, 2017 11:30 am

President Clinton put Al Gore in charge of reducing the Federal workforce. He succeeded by privatization of their jobs. Each privatized job cost the government more, because the private firms had their direct expenses on top of the salary and usually were also able to charge overhead. The Administration pointed with pride to how effectively it had done its job.


God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty. First Corinthians 1:27 AKJV

User avatar
SueDB
Posts: 27683
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:02 pm
Location: FEMA Camp PI Okanogan, WA 98840

Re: Robot Replacement of Human Workers

Post #31 by SueDB » Fri Mar 10, 2017 12:48 pm

You Want Fries With That?

Robots Could Change the Face of Food Delivery

by Janelle Richards



The next time you order takeout for dinner, the "deliveryperson" who comes to your door may not actually be a human being at all.

On Thursday, Starship Technologies went to Washington, D.C., for the latest launch of its robot delivery service, where automatons pick up orders from restaurants and deliver them to hungry customers.

"Our robot delivers take-away food, groceries, and parcels within a two-mile radius," said Henry Harris-Burland, head of marketing communications for Starship Technologies. "It can carry up to 20 pou


“Before you diagnose yourself with depression or low self esteem, first make sure that you are not, in fact, just surrounding yourself with assholes.”
? William Gibson

Remember, Orly NEVAH disappoints!

User avatar
magdalen77
Posts: 5364
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 1:43 pm
Location: Down in the cellar

Re: Robot Replacement of Human Workers

Post #32 by magdalen77 » Mon Mar 13, 2017 11:40 am

SueDB wrote:
Volkonski wrote:More and more restaurants now have touch screen ordering and paying reducing the need for wait staff.

http://www.ziosk.com/


IMHO
And it cuts into their tips. Why pay full service for only half service?

It also pretty much puts the tip on the plastic VISA where it's reported to the IRS and allows management to make rules to steal the tips as they are in control of the cashbox.


I use the touch screen to pay at one of the restaurants the man and I usually visit. I like it because it's more convenient than waiting for the waiter to pick up the check and bring the card back. Since I'm not a cheapskate I still pay the same tip.



User avatar
Sterngard Friegen
Posts: 39039
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Location: Trump International - Malibu

Re: Robot Replacement of Human Workers

Post #33 by Sterngard Friegen » Mon Mar 13, 2017 12:04 pm

SueDB wrote:Politicians are always trying to get rid of Federal workers as they draw a retirement. They do this through - "privatization" where they hired some company that pays dirt wages and no retirement to manage very important functions.

Government by lowest bidder contract.

I don't disagree with anything you've written, but Government is inefficient and expensive by design. It's built into the Due Process clause. And checks and balances doubles and triples inefficiencies. Government jobs are often essentially sinecures.

I'm not saying there's anything wrong with that; just observing. So it's human nature to turn over such work to private industry which can treat its workers much more shabilly and then eventually automate them out of existence.

And in keeping with the title of this thread, remember what "robot" means in the original Czech. Not "worker," but "forced labor."



User avatar
RTH10260
Posts: 10692
Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 8:52 am
Location: Near the Swiss Alps

Re: Robot Replacement of Human Workers

Post #34 by RTH10260 » Mon Mar 13, 2017 12:58 pm

Sterngard Friegen wrote:remember what "robot" means in the original Czech. Not "worker," but "forced labor."

Sterngard Friegen quoting Frederick Douglass, correct?



User avatar
SueDB
Posts: 27683
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:02 pm
Location: FEMA Camp PI Okanogan, WA 98840

Re: Robot Replacement of Human Workers

Post #35 by SueDB » Mon Mar 13, 2017 1:30 pm

Robots are loyal to whomever programmed them and to the extent of the programming.

Do we need the "Robots Rules of Order?"


A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. A robot must obey orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.

Isaac Asimov's "Three Laws of Robotics"


“Before you diagnose yourself with depression or low self esteem, first make sure that you are not, in fact, just surrounding yourself with assholes.”
? William Gibson

Remember, Orly NEVAH disappoints!

User avatar
Volkonski
Posts: 11925
Joined: Sat Mar 02, 2013 4:44 pm
Location: Texas Gulf Coast and North Fork of Long Island
Occupation: Retired Mechanical Engineer

Re: Robot Replacement of Human Workers

Post #36 by Volkonski » Mon Mar 13, 2017 1:41 pm

SueDB wrote:Robots are loyal to whomever programmed them and to the extent of the programming.

Do we need the "Robots Rules of Order?"


A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. A robot must obey orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.

Isaac Asimov's "Three Laws of Robotics"


The second part of the 1st Law is problematic. Just how far should robots go to protect humans from harm? Would robots intervene to stop sporting events to prevent player injuries? Would robots ban alcoholic beverages and tobacco? What about firearms? Would robot servants refuse to prepare and serve fattening foods? Where does it end?


Image“If everyone fought for their own convictions there would be no war.”
― Leo Tolstoy, War and Peace

User avatar
SueDB
Posts: 27683
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:02 pm
Location: FEMA Camp PI Okanogan, WA 98840

Re: Robot Replacement of Human Workers

Post #37 by SueDB » Mon Mar 13, 2017 1:47 pm

Volkonski wrote:
SueDB wrote:Robots are loyal to whomever programmed them and to the extent of the programming.

Do we need the "Robots Rules of Order?"


A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. A robot must obey orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.

Isaac Asimov's "Three Laws of Robotics"


The second part of the 1st Law is problematic. Just how far should robots go to protect humans from harm? Would robots intervene to stop sporting events to prevent player injuries? Would robots ban alcoholic beverages and tobacco? What about firearms? Would robot servants refuse to prepare and serve fattening foods? Where does it end?


There are a whole bunch of sci-fi stories dealing with what happens when you turn over your ability to make risky choices over to robots.


“Before you diagnose yourself with depression or low self esteem, first make sure that you are not, in fact, just surrounding yourself with assholes.”
? William Gibson

Remember, Orly NEVAH disappoints!

User avatar
Sterngard Friegen
Posts: 39039
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Location: Trump International - Malibu

Re: Robot Replacement of Human Workers

Post #38 by Sterngard Friegen » Mon Mar 13, 2017 4:10 pm

Maybe we should merge this thread after the last few comments with the autonomous driving thread!



User avatar
Volkonski
Posts: 11925
Joined: Sat Mar 02, 2013 4:44 pm
Location: Texas Gulf Coast and North Fork of Long Island
Occupation: Retired Mechanical Engineer

Re: Robot Replacement of Human Workers

Post #39 by Volkonski » Sat Mar 18, 2017 10:04 pm

http://www.latimes.com/projects/la-fi-f ... migration/

Already, fewer Mexicans had been willing to risk border crossings as security and deportations escalated under the Obama Administration. At the same time, Mexico’s own economy was mushrooming, offering decent jobs for people who stayed behind.

With the grapevines he has left, Klein is doing what he can to pare his crews. Last year, he bought a leaf puller for $50,000, which turns the delicate process of culling grapevine canopies into an exercise in brute force. The puller hooks onto a tractor and, like an oddly shaped vacuum cleaner, sucks leaves from grapevines.

He used to spend $100 an acre culling the canopies, which allows the right amount of sunlight to hit the grapes and turn them into sugar balls. Now, he says, “It will cost me 20 bucks, and I can get rid of some labor.”

:snippity:

Well before we got to $25, there would be machines out in the fields, doing pruning or harvesting, or we would lose crops,” Martin says.


Trump may succeed in reducing the immigrant labor force. However, it may well be that the result will be increased automation not more high paying jobs for American workers.


Image“If everyone fought for their own convictions there would be no war.”
― Leo Tolstoy, War and Peace


Return to “Unions & Labor Issues”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest