USA v Roger J. Stone, Jr., USDC-DC, Obstruction, False Statements, Witness Tampering

User avatar
Sterngard Friegen
Posts: 46707
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Location: Over the drawbridge

Re: USA v Roger J. Stone, Jr., USDC-DC, Obstruction, False Statements, Witness Tampering

#851

Post by Sterngard Friegen »

Notorial Dissent wrote:
Tue Nov 12, 2019 6:45 pm
Orbly did it and look where it got her. :rotflmao: GIL isn't any less of a klown.
One of the greatest moments in birferdom.

And I wasn't there. :crying:

(But I was working with our Georgia counsel and someone decided none of us should be there.)

User avatar
Orlylicious
Posts: 11994
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 4:02 pm
Location: @orly_licious With Pete Buttigieg and the other "open and defiant homosexuals" --Bryan Fischer AFA
Occupation: #StuggersForBiden "Do Nothing Democrat Savage" -- Donald, 9/28/19 and "Scalawag...Part of an extreme, malicious leftist internet social mob working in concert with weaponized, socialized governments to target and injure political opponents.” -- Walt Fitzpatrick
Contact:

Re: USA v Roger J. Stone, Jr., USDC-DC, Obstruction, False Statements, Witness Tampering

#852

Post by Orlylicious »

Anybody got the YouTube link to that? It was hilarious. Entertainment while waiting to see if Roger goes to jail.
6/12/20 Urine Drug Screening Tonight! Don't miss The Fogbow's Favourite TV Show™ starring the titular Mama June Shannon -- "Mama June: Family Crisis!" Fri 9/8c. TVShowsAce featured Fogbow's love 5/26/20: https://bit.ly/2TNxrbS

User avatar
Foggy
Posts: 30557
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 12:00 pm
Location: District Court of Bun-Dogs
Occupation: Ugly bag of mostly water

Re: USA v Roger J. Stone, Jr., USDC-DC, Obstruction, False Statements, Witness Tampering

#853

Post by Foggy »

There was no YouTube that I know of, but TWLITHOTU used to sell a video on a DVD. I think Dean Haskins made it. But remember I'm a :geezertowel:
For more information, read it again. || When science is outlawed, only outlaws will have science.

(Fogbow on PayPal)

User avatar
Tiredretiredlawyer
Posts: 9975
Joined: Tue May 10, 2016 2:56 pm
Location: Animal Planet
Occupation: Permanent probationary slave to 1 dog, 1 cat, and 1 horse, 4 granddogs, and one grandcat.

Re: USA v Roger J. Stone, Jr., USDC-DC, Obstruction, False Statements, Witness Tampering

#854

Post by Tiredretiredlawyer »

Thanks, All! I had forgots the charges against Stone. As they say, context is everything.
A 19th Amendment Centennial Moment:
The 19th Amendment was first introduced to Congress in 1878, yet it was not approved by Congress until 1919 – 41 years later.
- https://legaldictionary.net/19th-amendment/

User avatar
Suranis
Posts: 18094
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 7:04 am

Re: USA v Roger J. Stone, Jr., USDC-DC, Obstruction, False Statements, Witness Tampering

#855

Post by Suranis »

Orlylicious wrote:
Tue Nov 12, 2019 9:58 pm
Anybody got the YouTube link to that? It was hilarious. Entertainment while waiting to see if Roger goes to jail.
I think this is the same trial. YOu have no idea the amount of good hearted Condervitives I had to sacrifice to resurect this. Their patriotic bloot stung my foul skin as it gushed upon the tree io liberty.





The difference between the Middle Ages, and the Age of the Internet, is that in the Middle Ages no-one thought the Earth was flat.

User avatar
Sterngard Friegen
Posts: 46707
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Location: Over the drawbridge

Re: USA v Roger J. Stone, Jr., USDC-DC, Obstruction, False Statements, Witness Tampering

#856

Post by Sterngard Friegen »

Taitz actually boxed these embarrassments as a video set and hawked them on her website. She was so clueless, and so anxious to spread lies about President Obama, that she thought her performance somehow was good for her and her mudslinging and lies. It appears that she has not changed. She continues to be an embarrassment to lawyers everywhere.

Somerset
Posts: 4572
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 5:52 am
Location: Silicon Valley
Occupation: Lab rat

Re: USA v Roger J. Stone, Jr., USDC-DC, Obstruction, False Statements, Witness Tampering

#857

Post by Somerset »

Suranis wrote:
Wed Nov 13, 2019 11:53 am
Orlylicious wrote:
Tue Nov 12, 2019 9:58 pm
Anybody got the YouTube link to that? It was hilarious. Entertainment while waiting to see if Roger goes to jail.
I think this is the same trial. YOu have no idea the amount of good hearted Condervitives I had to sacrifice to resurect this. Their patriotic bloot stung my foul skin as it gushed upon the tree io liberty.
Thank you for your sacrifice, Suranis!!

:notworthy:

jemcanada
Posts: 461
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2013 10:11 am

Re: USA v Roger J. Stone, Jr., USDC-DC, Obstruction, False Statements, Witness Tampering

#858

Post by jemcanada »

I remember this trial. Dr. Conspiracy is in the audience. I’m pretty sure Orly tried to enforce subpoenas from this trial in Georgia to demand Obama’s original birth records in Hawaii. There were some good hearings there with Foggy’s imaginary girlfriend Jill Nagamine. Good times!

User avatar
Foggy
Posts: 30557
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 12:00 pm
Location: District Court of Bun-Dogs
Occupation: Ugly bag of mostly water

Re: USA v Roger J. Stone, Jr., USDC-DC, Obstruction, False Statements, Witness Tampering

#859

Post by Foggy »

There were, in fact, at least 10 of us Obots in the room for that trial, but there were many dozens of birthers, too also. We made it a meetup. I was still suffering from the Guillain-Barré syndrome that hit me in October 2011, so was late to the hearing and didn't make it to the dinner that night. I ended up in the overflow room, watching the trial live on a Tee Vee and sitting next to Carl Swensson. I didn't introduce myself. :blink:

I think that day we had more than 600 posts on Fogbow, the highest one day total in all the time we've been online. And that was with me basically out of commission the entire day.
For more information, read it again. || When science is outlawed, only outlaws will have science.

(Fogbow on PayPal)

TexasFilly
Posts: 20514
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 12:52 pm

Re: USA v Roger J. Stone, Jr., USDC-DC, Obstruction, False Statements, Witness Tampering

#860

Post by TexasFilly »

Back on topic:



I love the poorly educated!!!

Kevin McCarthy: Paul Ryan playing with a head injury -- Jon Lovett

TexasFilly
Posts: 20514
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 12:52 pm

Re: USA v Roger J. Stone, Jr., USDC-DC, Obstruction, False Statements, Witness Tampering

#861

Post by TexasFilly »

Closings continue. Rogow, Stone's attorney:



Yes, his job is to "create" reasonable doubt. :lol: He's also questioning why the Government didn't call Corsi. Lots more, go to Darren Samuelson's thread (he's a Politico reporter who's covered this case all along).
I love the poorly educated!!!

Kevin McCarthy: Paul Ryan playing with a head injury -- Jon Lovett

User avatar
Sterngard Friegen
Posts: 46707
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Location: Over the drawbridge

Re: USA v Roger J. Stone, Jr., USDC-DC, Obstruction, False Statements, Witness Tampering

#862

Post by Sterngard Friegen »

Pro tip to Mr. Rogow: When you make an argument that the Government should have called somebody the Government didn't, even though there is an instruction on this point, jurors will nevertheless often wonder why Stone wasn't called to explain his own testimony. Jurors are, after all, only human beings.

User avatar
Foggy
Posts: 30557
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 12:00 pm
Location: District Court of Bun-Dogs
Occupation: Ugly bag of mostly water

Re: USA v Roger J. Stone, Jr., USDC-DC, Obstruction, False Statements, Witness Tampering

#863

Post by Foggy »

If he's claiming Corsi is such an important witness, won't the jury wonder why Stone didn't put him on the stand? :think: :confused:
For more information, read it again. || When science is outlawed, only outlaws will have science.

(Fogbow on PayPal)

Grumpy Old Guy
Posts: 2662
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2015 10:24 am
Occupation: Retired, unemployed, never a lawyer

Re: USA v Roger J. Stone, Jr., USDC-DC, Obstruction, False Statements, Witness Tampering

#864

Post by Grumpy Old Guy »

Foggy wrote:
Wed Nov 13, 2019 4:27 pm
If he's claiming Corsi is such an important witness, won't the jury wonder why Stone didn't put him on the stand? :think: :confused:
Will the prosecution get an opportunity to put that idea to the jury?

User avatar
Addie
Posts: 41223
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 6:22 am
Location: downstairs

Re: USA v Roger J. Stone, Jr., USDC-DC, Obstruction, False Statements, Witness Tampering

#865

Post by Addie »

Roll Call
Roger Stone’s lies caused inaccurate House Russia report, Mueller team says

Defense says the longtime Trump confidant had no 'motive' to lie


Lawyers delivered closing arguments Wednesday in the trial of Roger Stone, a longtime Republican political operative and confidant of President Donald Trump accused of lying to Congress about his interactions with the president’s 2016 campaign and his connections to WikiLeaks.

Stone pleaded not guilty in January to a seven-count indictment of lying to investigators, obstruction of justice and witness tampering. He faces up to 20 years in prison if convicted. The jury is expected to begin deliberations Thursday.

Stone and his lawyers have questioned prosecutors’ motives for pursuing the case against him, accusing them of trying to exact political retribution against Stone for his association with Trump.

Stone was the last person to be indicted by Robert S. Mueller III’s special counsel team. Trump routinely dismissed Mueller’s investigation into Russian election interference as a “witch hunt” and “hoax.”

But prosecutors argued Stone’s alleged lies to the House Intelligence Committee on Sept. 26, 2017, obstructed the congressional panel’s separate probe into Russian election interference and led lawmakers to issue incorrect conclusions.

In its final report, the committee concluded there was “no evidence” Stone had any advanced knowledge about WikiLeaks’ releases of the hacked Democratic emails. That’s because Stone’s repeated lies prevented the committee from obtaining that evidence, prosecutors said.

User avatar
tek
Posts: 4431
Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2012 6:02 pm
Location: Lake Humidity, FL
Occupation: Damned if I know

Re: USA v Roger J. Stone, Jr., USDC-DC, Obstruction, False Statements, Witness Tampering

#866

Post by tek »

DJT: "Roger who?"
There's no way back
from there to here

User avatar
bob
Posts: 28656
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: USA v Roger J. Stone, Jr., USDC-DC, Obstruction, False Statements, Witness Tampering

#867

Post by bob »

Poltico: Feds’ closing argument: Roger Stone made the House Russia report ‘not accurate’:
Prosecutors also implied that Stone’s misdirection caused special counsel Robert Mueller to potentially lose out on key evidence.

* * *

“Stone not only tried, he succeeded in impeding the committee’s investigation,” [AUSA Jonathan] Kravis said. “The committee report is not accurate.”

The prosecutor pointed to where the House panel declared in its March 2018 report that it “did not find any evidence contradicting Stone's claim” that everything he said when boasting about the damage to Hillary Clinton’s campaign came from publicly available information.

“No evidence? Really?” Kravis said. “How about that Aug. 2 email from Jerome Corsi?”

* * *

“The committee never saw any of those documents because Mr. Stone lied to the committee and told the committee that those did not exist,” Kravis said.

* * *

Kravis’ point, made for the first time near the end of his closing arguments, was intended to head off legalistic points from Stone’s defense that he’s not guilty because any possible misstatements or withheld emails were not “material” to the House committee’s probe. Stone’s attorneys have argued that the committee’s stated focus was Russian interference, not WikiLeaks or Assange.

“The documents were not relevant because they were not about Russian interference,” Stone defense attorney Bruce Rogow said in his own closing arguments. The lawyer added that Stone’s WikiLeaks-related communications with figures like Trump campaign deputy Rick Gates and campaign CEO Steve Bannon “had nothing to do” with Russian influence on the presidential race.

* * *

“There was no purpose for Mr. Stone to have to lie about anything to protect the campaign when the campaign was doing nothing wrong in being interested in this information,” Rogow said, who added the Trump team broke no laws when it expressed delight at the prospect of WikiLeaks document dumps at the detriment of Clinton.

Rogow in his closing argument also insisted the lying allegations don’t make sense given the GOP operative volunteered to testify. And he claimed there wasn’t even a reason for Stone to lie since his efforts to glean insight into WikiLeaks’ plans was not illegal.

“So much of this case deals with that question that you need to ask, ‘So what?’” Rogow said.

* * *

Michael Marando, a federal prosecutor who stepped in to make the government’s final points, became so animated as he railed against Stone's defense that fellow prosecutor Aaron Zelinsky poured extra water for his colleague and pushed it his way.

The government attorney then attacked Rogow’s “So what?” remark.

“So what? So what?” the prosecutor said, incredulously. “If that’s the state of affairs that we’re in, I’m pretty shocked. Truth matters. Truth still matters. OK?”

He barreled ahead.

“Mr. Stone came in and he lied to Congress, he obstructed their investigation and he tampered with a witness,” he added. “And that matters and you don't look at that and say, 'So what?' And for those reasons we ask you to find him guilty of the charged offenses."
Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
Sterngard Friegen
Posts: 46707
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Location: Over the drawbridge

Re: USA v Roger J. Stone, Jr., USDC-DC, Obstruction, False Statements, Witness Tampering

#868

Post by Sterngard Friegen »

Rogow didn't use the current magic words: "Get over it."

User avatar
Whatever4
Posts: 12921
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 6:36 am
Location: Mainely in the plain
Occupation: Visiting doctors.

Re: USA v Roger J. Stone, Jr., USDC-DC, Obstruction, False Statements, Witness Tampering

#869

Post by Whatever4 »

jemcanada wrote:
Wed Nov 13, 2019 1:13 pm
I remember this trial. Dr. Conspiracy is in the audience. I’m pretty sure Orly tried to enforce subpoenas from this trial in Georgia to demand Obama’s original birth records in Hawaii. There were some good hearings there with Foggy’s imaginary girlfriend Jill Nagamine. Good times!
That’s definitely the Atlanta ballot access hearing. In the first frames you can see The back heads of Doc C, Mrs. C, and Loren. I’m sitting directly behind Loren. You can see the top of my frizzy head in some shots.
"[Moderate] doesn't mean you don't have views. It just means your views aren't predictable ideologically one way or the other, and you're trying to follow the facts where they lead and reach your own conclusions."
-- Sen. King (I-ME)

User avatar
Orlylicious
Posts: 11994
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 4:02 pm
Location: @orly_licious With Pete Buttigieg and the other "open and defiant homosexuals" --Bryan Fischer AFA
Occupation: #StuggersForBiden "Do Nothing Democrat Savage" -- Donald, 9/28/19 and "Scalawag...Part of an extreme, malicious leftist internet social mob working in concert with weaponized, socialized governments to target and injure political opponents.” -- Walt Fitzpatrick
Contact:

Re: USA v Roger J. Stone, Jr., USDC-DC, Obstruction, False Statements, Witness Tampering

#870

Post by Orlylicious »

Gosh, thanks so much for finding these Suranis, hilarious! Here's Part 3, you have Part 2 twice above (took me a minute too so all good).

Part III has the magic moment at 17 minutes in... she jumps to testify and raises her right hand. Comedy Gold. Vattelvision sure had lousy equipment, hard to believe anyone could make Orly's voice harder to listen to but they did!



And the YouTube attempt at transcript makes as much sense as Orly Taitz:
17:53 actually personally contacted a high bar
17:56 inquired about it I was called their
17:59 interest about you did not see it's not
18:02 a problem I found this in the bar again
18:05 and I'd immediate investigation in which
18:08 time yep Obama's record with identity
18:11 was changed from galactic who ignored a
18:15 long practice for mr. Obama has to be
18:20 signed from the party diva just move
18:22 license then I believe I was a crowd is
18:26 not illegal
:lol:

It's really inspired. Great while waiting for Roger's verdict.
6/12/20 Urine Drug Screening Tonight! Don't miss The Fogbow's Favourite TV Show™ starring the titular Mama June Shannon -- "Mama June: Family Crisis!" Fri 9/8c. TVShowsAce featured Fogbow's love 5/26/20: https://bit.ly/2TNxrbS

User avatar
Foggy
Posts: 30557
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 12:00 pm
Location: District Court of Bun-Dogs
Occupation: Ugly bag of mostly water

Re: USA v Roger J. Stone, Jr., USDC-DC, Obstruction, False Statements, Witness Tampering

#871

Post by Foggy »

The jury is expected to begin deliberations Thursday.
Yeah, baby! That's what I'm talkin' about! :banana:
For more information, read it again. || When science is outlawed, only outlaws will have science.

(Fogbow on PayPal)

User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 13935
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

Re: USA v Roger J. Stone, Jr., USDC-DC, Obstruction, False Statements, Witness Tampering

#872

Post by Notorial Dissent »

I'm astounded that they actually did essentially a two day trial. I'm guessing since Roger Dodger didn't /couldn't testify without basically hanging himself, his email history having done a good enough job of that as it was, and since he couldn't call his former bestest bestie, Corsi, without further sinking his frail tissue of lies, and he didn't seem to have any other candidates, he was stuck with his lawyer saying repeatedly "he didn't done it", and the facts, nasty terrible things that they are, and emails, saying, "nunh uh oh yes he did" very loudly. Sucks to be him. Sucks to be Corsi, too also, but that is for another day. Wonder how long the jury will take.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
Sterngard Friegen
Posts: 46707
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Location: Over the drawbridge

Re: USA v Roger J. Stone, Jr., USDC-DC, Obstruction, False Statements, Witness Tampering

#873

Post by Sterngard Friegen »

The jury will be back tomorrow after lunch. The jurors do have to wade through enough of the emails, and discuss them, to give them assurance Stone did what the prosecution said he did. He'll be found guilty but will look to Trump after his sentencing next year for a pardon.

User avatar
Foggy
Posts: 30557
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 12:00 pm
Location: District Court of Bun-Dogs
Occupation: Ugly bag of mostly water

Re: USA v Roger J. Stone, Jr., USDC-DC, Obstruction, False Statements, Witness Tampering

#874

Post by Foggy »

Tomorrow after lunch? :o

:whisper: I'm not good at delayed gratification.
For more information, read it again. || When science is outlawed, only outlaws will have science.

(Fogbow on PayPal)


Post Reply

Return to “Courts, Law, and Legal Issues”