Immigration Bills

User avatar
Volkonski
Posts: 17139
Joined: Sat Mar 02, 2013 4:44 pm
Location: Texas Gulf Coast and North Fork of Long Island
Occupation: Retired Mechanical Engineer

Re: Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA)/DREAM Act

#51

Post by Volkonski » Fri Sep 15, 2017 10:45 am

Some of Trump's base seem to be unhappy. ;)

Trump Supporters Burn MAGA Caps Over DACA Amnesty

http://www.ibtimes.com/watch-trump-supp ... picks=true
Videos of Trump supporters burning their “Make America Great Again” caps to a crisp in protest of the president striking a deal regarding the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program (DACA) with Democratic leaders flooded Twitter on Friday.

People who voted for Donald Trump in the 2016 elections took to Twitter to post videos where they set fire to red caps that bore Trump’s campaign slogan, with hashtags like “AmnestyDon,” “BurnMyMAGAHat,” “BuildTheWall” and “GoGetHimMueller.”


Image“If everyone fought for their own convictions there would be no war.”
― Leo Tolstoy, War and Peace

User avatar
pipistrelle
Posts: 4725
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 11:26 am

Re: Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA)/DREAM Act

#52

Post by pipistrelle » Fri Sep 15, 2017 11:53 am

IMG_3308.JPG
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.



User avatar
Whatever4
Posts: 11362
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 6:36 am
Location: Mainely in the plain
Occupation: Visiting doctors.

Re: Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA)/DREAM Act

#53

Post by Whatever4 » Fri Sep 15, 2017 4:56 pm

Answer: yes, you did the day before.


"[Moderate] doesn't mean you don't have views. It just means your views aren't predictable ideologically one way or the other, and you're trying to follow the facts where they lead and reach your own conclusions."
-- Sen. King (R-ME)

User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 10230
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

Re: Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA)/DREAM Act

#54

Post by Notorial Dissent » Fri Sep 15, 2017 5:32 pm

Volkonski wrote:Some of Trump's base seem to be unhappy. ;)

Trump Supporters Burn MAGA Caps Over DACA Amnesty

http://www.ibtimes.com/watch-trump-supp ... picks=true
Videos of Trump supporters burning their “Make America Great Again” caps to a crisp in protest of the president striking a deal regarding the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program (DACA) with Democratic leaders flooded Twitter on Friday.

People who voted for Donald Trump in the 2016 elections took to Twitter to post videos where they set fire to red caps that bore Trump’s campaign slogan, with hashtags like “AmnestyDon,” “BurnMyMAGAHat,” “BuildTheWall” and “GoGetHimMueller.”
Too bad, so sad, for the sTrumpets. Played like cheap fiddles and now seeing what they bought.


The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
maydijo
Posts: 2598
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2016 10:23 pm
Location: where women glow and men plunder
Occupation: harassing marsupials

Re: Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA)/DREAM Act

#55

Post by maydijo » Fri Sep 15, 2017 5:51 pm

Volkonski wrote:Some of Trump's base seem to be unhappy. ;)

Trump Supporters Burn MAGA Caps Over DACA Amnesty

http://www.ibtimes.com/watch-trump-supp ... picks=true
Videos of Trump supporters burning their “Make America Great Again” caps to a crisp in protest of the president striking a deal regarding the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program (DACA) with Democratic leaders flooded Twitter on Friday.

People who voted for Donald Trump in the 2016 elections took to Twitter to post videos where they set fire to red caps that bore Trump’s campaign slogan, with hashtags like “AmnestyDon,” “BurnMyMAGAHat,” “BuildTheWall” and “GoGetHimMueller.”
To reiterate: these people supported Trump after he said "both sides" were to blame for the violence in Charlottesville, but are pissed off about this. Is there any doubt now that they voted for Trump because they are racist scum?



User avatar
Fortinbras
Posts: 2642
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2015 10:08 am

Re: Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA)/DREAM Act

#56

Post by Fortinbras » Fri Sep 15, 2017 7:20 pm

The Trumpchumps who are burning their $40 MAGA caps may be too hasty. So far the Don hasn't kept most of his promises or deals, and it's just as likely that this supposed reconsideration of deporting DACA people will be scrapped and they will all be rounded up and sent away.

When that happens, a substantial portion of these people (I cannot guess the percentage) will be sent to countries where, for one thing, they don't know the language, where they don't know anybody and possibly have no relatives or at least none that could help them, where (while waiting for some process to enable their return to the US) they might be in great difficulty/danger because of local conditions, etc.



User avatar
MN-Skeptic
Posts: 2146
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 6:36 pm
Location: Twin Cities

Re: Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA)/DREAM Act

#57

Post by MN-Skeptic » Fri Sep 15, 2017 8:01 pm

If Trump wants to build the economy, deporting 800,000 young tax paying consumers is a really dumb idea. Moreover, American spouses could go with them - more tax paying consumers leaving our economy. Or the spouses could stay here and end up depending on government help. Dumb, dumb, dumb.


MAGA - Morons Are Governing America

User avatar
gupwalla
Posts: 2779
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:57 pm
Location: The mind of Cassandra

Re: Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA)/DREAM Act

#58

Post by gupwalla » Fri Sep 15, 2017 8:27 pm

Whatever4 wrote:Answer: yes, you did the day before.
That's not completely true. I hate being the defender of President Trump around here, but I do at least believe in fairness.

AG Sessions stated that he was not willing to defend DACA in federal court, or believed that such defense would not prove worthwhile. (I can't stand the elf and didn't bother to watch his presentation on the subject). The AG is quasi-independent from the White House, so President Trump was not able to force Sessions's hand on the matter.

CoS Kelly was able to negotiate with Sessions a 6-month period for Congress to act before Sessions stopped defending DACA. There is a window of opportunity for bipartisan compromise to enshrine DACA into law, which means that DREAMers would have legal status pending whatever steps necessary to obtain citizenship. Exactly what President Obama hoped Congress would do with them during his 2nd term.

Blame Judge Hanen of the Whatever District of Texas. Blame Trump for selecting Sessions as AG. But then blame Sessions, not Trump, for the final decision. This decision is driven by the AG. Trump is actually respecting the independence of the AG by accepting Sessions's decision on DACA while simultaneously pressuring Congress to find a legislative solution. Obama would have done the same if Holder or Lynch had said DACA was indefensible.


In a wilderness of mirrors, what will the spider do beyond the circuit of the shuddering Bear in fractured atoms? -TS Eliot (somewhat modified)

All warfare is based on deception. - Sun Tzu

User avatar
RoadScholar
Posts: 6989
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 10:25 am
Location: Baltimore
Occupation: Historic Restoration Woodworker
Contact:

Re: Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA)/DREAM Act

#59

Post by RoadScholar » Fri Sep 15, 2017 10:47 pm

I can't believe there's anyone who still thinks anything Trump says signifies anything.

Bob Dylan's song Idiot Wind comes to mind.


The bitterest truth is healthier than the sweetest lie.
X3

User avatar
bob
Posts: 24223
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA)/DREAM Act

#60

Post by bob » Mon Sep 18, 2017 2:36 pm

CNN: DACA judge reading Trump's tweets carefully:
Trump administration lawyers find themselves once again grappling with tweets from President Donald Trump that at times undercut arguments his own Justice Department is making in court.

Trump's tweets and extracurricular comments have played a significant role in the travel ban litigation, and now his Twitter feed could complicate a critical deadline in his efforts to phase out the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program.

The latest example came Thursday as a federal judge in New York heard arguments concerning the administration's planned termination of DACA, the Obama-era program meant to bring relief to undocumented immigrants who were brought to the United States illegally as children.

* * *

Later Trump tweeted: "Does anybody really want to throw out good, educated and accomplished young people who have jobs, some serving in the military? Really!"

That tweet caught the eye of Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis, who was nominated by President Bill Clinton and hearing a challenge brought by Dreamer Martin Batalla Vidal.

"I do follow the President's tweets," Garaufis said.

Garaufis read the tweet aloud in court, according to a transcript, and zeroed in on one aspect of the case: A deadline imposed by the Department of Homeland Security that requires the renewal of applications for certain category of individuals to occur before October 5.

Garaufis seemed concerned that the deadline could kick some out of the program if they weren't able to meet it.

"They pay taxes, they pay rent, they pay for mortgages, they support communities," the judge said of the individuals involved. He added that he was concerned with the government proceeding with "arbitrary deadlines."

* * *

Trump's "own statements would belie any effort to throw these people out without good cause and it would just seem to be arbitrary," Garaufis said.

* * *

If the October 5 deadline is not extended, the judge might entertain a request for a temporary restraining order from the challengers. But critically, if the deadline is extended, it could infuriate not only Trump's base, but several states who have insisted the program come to a quick end.

The parties are set to revisit the issue next week.


Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
Addie
Posts: 26510
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 6:22 am
Location: downstairs

Re: Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA)/DREAM Act

#61

Post by Addie » Mon Sep 25, 2017 7:25 am

McClatchy
GOP bill will offer Dreamers citizenship after ‘extreme vetting’

WASHINGTON

Sen. Thom Tillis will introduce his “conservative Dream Act” on Monday that would provide a pathway to citizenship for as many as 2.5 million young undocumented immigrants, but one that is long and involves “extreme vetting.”

The North Carolina Republican and cosponsor James Lankford, an Oklahoma Republican, will pitch the plan as “merit-based” relief that must be earned — and, critically, not “amnesty,” according to Republican talking points obtained by McClatchy. But unlike other merit-based immigration proposals that limit new immigrants from entering the country based on their job skills, this proposal would limit who can remain in the country based on their years of American education, work experience or military service.

“Choosing between either mass deportation of Dreamers or blanket amnesty is a false choice,” the lawmakers argue, according to the talking points. “There is a third option: an organized process by which talented and hard-working young Americans can earn legal status.”

All applicants will have to pass a medical examination and be “extreme vetted.” The vetting will include three separate rounds of security and background checks to ensure they have no criminal history and pose no national security threat. The first check would happen when the immigrant enters the program followed by a second check after five years. The third check comes after 15 years, if and when the immigrant applies to become a citizen.

The bill differs from previous iterations of the so-called Dream Act, which failed to pass a Democratic-controlled Senate in 2010. The Tillis-Lankford bill has a longer time frame and has a more expansive list of disqualifying crimes, for example.



User avatar
Foggy
Posts: 26227
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 12:00 pm
Location: Fogbow HQ
Occupation: Dick Tater

Re: Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA)/DREAM Act

#62

Post by Foggy » Mon Sep 25, 2017 8:33 am

Very mean-spirited, and thus an obvious winner! :madguy:

Wait, where are the anti-Muslim provisions? :confused:


The point of no return is no longer even visible in your rearview mirror. :-

User avatar
Addie
Posts: 26510
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 6:22 am
Location: downstairs

Re: Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA)/DREAM Act

#63

Post by Addie » Wed Sep 27, 2017 8:31 am

WaPo
Growing list of conservative demands threatens bipartisan deal on ‘dreamers’

An emerging list of conservative demands is threatening to derail the fledgling bipartisan effort to preserve the Obama administration program protecting from deportation 690,000 illegal immigrants brought to the United States as children.

President Trump discussed the outlines of a potential deal to protect those covered by the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program with Democratic congressional leaders at a White House dinner this month. The tentative deal would couple permanent protections for those immigrants with improved border security.

But key conservative Republicans in the House and Senate are coalescing around a broader suite of policies as a condition of backing a deal, and that has Democrats and moderate Republicans warning that the current, fragile consensus could quickly break apart. ...

Key White House officials, including senior adviser Stephen Miller, have worked with members of the hard-right House Freedom Caucus and other Republican lawmakers to hone a list of policy demands that go beyond the border security provisions on which Democrats have signaled they are willing to negotiate.

It is unclear to what extent Trump himself will support these provisions as part of the effort to negotiate a solution for “dreamers,” as the childhood arrivals are known. But the proposals are gaining adherents among some of the president’s strongest backers in Congress.



User avatar
Addie
Posts: 26510
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 6:22 am
Location: downstairs

Re: Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA)/DREAM Act

#64

Post by Addie » Tue Oct 03, 2017 5:36 pm

Talking Points Memo
GOP Sen. Says Trump Wants Congress To Protect Only Current DACA Recipients

After dining with President Donald Trump on Monday night, Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR) said Tuesday that the President wants legislation restoring the protections of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program to only apply to those who currently have DACA status.

“The president was very clear. Any effort to codify DACA needs to, one, be limited to DACA so the first criteria under the law should be you have a DACA permit today,” Cotton told Politico.

“Second, any deal has to end chain migration. And then third, it ought to include some kind of enhanced measures, whether it’s on the border or interior enforcement or what have you,” the senator added.

Cotton and several other Republican lawmakers joined Trump for dinner Monday night at the White House to discuss immigration. It appears that conversation differed from his talks with Democratic leaders.



User avatar
RTH10260
Posts: 16725
Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 8:52 am
Location: Near the Swiss Alps

Re: Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA)/DREAM Act

#65

Post by RTH10260 » Wed Oct 04, 2017 6:17 pm

Addie wrote:
Tue Oct 03, 2017 5:36 pm
Talking Points Memo
GOP Sen. Says Trump Wants Congress To Protect Only Current DACA Recipients

After dining with President Donald Trump on Monday night, Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR) said Tuesday that the President wants legislation restoring the protections of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program to only apply to those who currently have DACA status.
:snippity:
Is this conform with equalitiy rules/laws? Is it possible to exclude a whole segment of immigrants that grows up and goes to school in the US and then wishes to legally start to work? Apart that it becomes the same nonsense from exluding a possibly well educated group of young people from becoming well integrated residents and tax payers. Same issues as when Teh Donald intended to end DACA and leave these young generation stranded.



User avatar
Volkonski
Posts: 17139
Joined: Sat Mar 02, 2013 4:44 pm
Location: Texas Gulf Coast and North Fork of Long Island
Occupation: Retired Mechanical Engineer

Re: Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA)/DREAM Act

#66

Post by Volkonski » Mon Oct 09, 2017 4:35 am

:madguy:

Trump administration releases hard-line immigration principles, threatening deal on ‘dreamers’

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/pos ... 3290fe22a4
The Trump administration released a list of hard-line immigration principles late Sunday that threaten to derail a deal in Congress to allow hundreds of thousands of younger undocumented immigrants to remain in the country legally.
The administration's wish list includes the funding of a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border, a crackdown on the influx of Central American minors and curbs on federal grants to “sanctuary cities,” according to a document distributed to Congress and obtained by The Washington Post.


Image“If everyone fought for their own convictions there would be no war.”
― Leo Tolstoy, War and Peace

User avatar
RTH10260
Posts: 16725
Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 8:52 am
Location: Near the Swiss Alps

Re: Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA)/DREAM Act

#67

Post by RTH10260 » Mon Oct 09, 2017 5:44 pm

Volkonski wrote:
Mon Oct 09, 2017 4:35 am
:madguy:

Trump administration releases hard-line immigration principles, threatening deal on ‘dreamers’

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/pos ... 3290fe22a4
The Trump administration released a list of hard-line immigration principles late Sunday that threaten to derail a deal in Congress to allow hundreds of thousands of younger undocumented immigrants to remain in the country legally.
The administration's wish list includes the funding of a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border, a crackdown on the influx of Central American minors and curbs on federal grants to “sanctuary cities,” according to a document distributed to Congress and obtained by The Washington Post.
How much does Teh Donald want his wall? It could be a bargain, we let you build a few new miles of the new fancy wall under evaluation, but you quietly stand down on the other dreamer wishes ?



User avatar
Addie
Posts: 26510
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 6:22 am
Location: downstairs

Re: Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA)/DREAM Act

#68

Post by Addie » Tue Oct 10, 2017 11:12 am

Daily Beast: How Stephen Miller Submarined the Trump-Schumer-Pelosi DACA Deal

The top White House aide wants to avoid the spotlight for fear of incurring his boss’ wrath. But he’s still flexing his considerable influence.



User avatar
Addie
Posts: 26510
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 6:22 am
Location: downstairs

Re: Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA)/DREAM Act

#69

Post by Addie » Tue Oct 24, 2017 10:49 am

Politico
Republicans quietly craft Dreamers deal

Key Senate Republicans have begun privately discussing the contours of an immigration plan to shield the hundreds of thousands of Dreamers who will lose work permits and deportation protections starting early next year.

Preliminary talks show that influential GOP senators are eager to devise a legislative fix for Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals that could pass muster with both Democrats and President Donald Trump, who said he will start winding down the Obama-era program in March to force lawmakers to come up with a permanent DACA measure with significant border security and enforcement provisions attached.

In an interview, Senate Majority Whip John Cornyn (R-Texas) said the Senate Judiciary Committee chairman, Chuck Grassley of Iowa, has convened a working group on immigration that includes himself and GOP Sens. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, Thom Tillis of North Carolina and James Lankford of Oklahoma, as well as other lawmakers. Sens. David Perdue of Georgia and Jeff Flake of Arizona also are among the Republicans who have been engaged in the talks, according to sources.

“There’s a solution to be had there,” Cornyn said. “But we just need to get on with it.”

A bipartisan DACA deal is in no way imminent. Democrats are waiting for Republicans to offer their list of demands in exchange for legalizing Dreamers. And an immigration package that gets through the Senate, even with GOP sweeteners, may have trouble in the more conservative House.
Adding:
HuffPo: Paul Ryan Tells Conservatives DACA Will Be Part Of Spending Deal



User avatar
NotaPerson
Posts: 3018
Joined: Mon May 18, 2015 9:33 pm

Re: Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA)/DREAM Act

#70

Post by NotaPerson » Sun Nov 12, 2017 8:14 pm

Behind closed doors, and very quietly, lawmakers from both wings of both parties are scrambling to save DACA — a program that has protected from deportation nearly 800,000 young illegal immigrants who were brought to the U.S. as children.

:snippity:
......based on conversations with White House sources, top Hill aides from both parties, and immigration-restrictionist power-brokers, we have concluded that, at the moment, progressive Democrats hold a superior negotiating position to immigration hardliner Republicans.

This is because, on the DACA issue, President Trump has already blinked. Both publicly — in a Sep. 5 tweet, when he hinted he may reinstate DACA unilaterally if Congress can't save it — and privately, the president has indicated he doesn't have the stomach to let DACA die.
https://www.axios.com/democrats-versus- ... 07781.html

Very interesting read. Though I don't think the Dems' position is as strong as some think it is, since it depends on Trump not changing his damn mind. :cantlook:


Am I being detained?

User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 10230
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

Re: Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA)/DREAM Act

#71

Post by Notorial Dissent » Sun Nov 12, 2017 11:01 pm

NotaPerson wrote:
Sun Nov 12, 2017 8:14 pm
Behind closed doors, and very quietly, lawmakers from both wings of both parties are scrambling to save DACA — a program that has protected from deportation nearly 800,000 young illegal immigrants who were brought to the U.S. as children.

:snippity:
......based on conversations with White House sources, top Hill aides from both parties, and immigration-restrictionist power-brokers, we have concluded that, at the moment, progressive Democrats hold a superior negotiating position to immigration hardliner Republicans.

This is because, on the DACA issue, President Trump has already blinked. Both publicly — in a Sep. 5 tweet, when he hinted he may reinstate DACA unilaterally if Congress can't save it — and privately, the president has indicated he doesn't have the stomach to let DACA die.
https://www.axios.com/democrats-versus- ... 07781.html

Very interesting read. Though I don't think the Dems' position is as strong as some think it is, since it depends on Trump not changing his damn mind. :cantlook:
Assuming he follows through on any of his promises. As I said before, I'll believe when I see it.


The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
Addie
Posts: 26510
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 6:22 am
Location: downstairs

Re: Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA)/DREAM Act

#72

Post by Addie » Tue Nov 14, 2017 9:28 pm

The Hill
Ryan: DACA fix will be separate from spending bill

Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) said Tuesday that lawmakers are not planning on wrapping legislative relief for young undocumented immigrants into an end-of-year spending bill.

Asked by Fox News' Bret Baier in a town hall-style interview whether the spending bill would include measures to codify protections for beneficiaries of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, Ryan said lawmakers plan to consider the matters separately.

"No, we’re planning on doing that separately," Ryan told Baier. Asked to clarify, Ryan replied: "We’re planning on keeping that separate from spending." ...

Democratic and Republican lawmakers in both the House and the Senate have called for a legislative fix for DACA by the end of the year, a move that remains uncertain despite signs of bipartisan cooperation earlier this year.

Ryan has pushed back against attempts to tie DACA to other legislative priorities this year, saying earlier this month that it should be "considered separately" from end-of-year deadlines.



User avatar
Addie
Posts: 26510
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 6:22 am
Location: downstairs

Re: Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA)/DREAM Act

#73

Post by Addie » Tue Jan 09, 2018 11:28 pm

WaPo
Judge temporarily blocks Trump’s plan to rescind immigration protections for ‘dreamers’

A federal judge in San Francisco ruled that the Obama-era protections must remain in place while legal challenges to President Trump’s decision are pending.

Trump had ordered DACA, or Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, to end by March 5. Nearly 700,000 immigrants who were brought illegally to the United States as children could be at risk of deportation if DACA protections are revoked.

This is a developing story. It will be updated.



User avatar
Orlylicious
Posts: 7503
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 4:02 pm

Re: Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA)/DREAM Act

#74

Post by Orlylicious » Tue Jan 09, 2018 11:33 pm

Oh this is classic, Ann Coulter on Lou Dobbs. "When Kevin McCarthy is the hardliner in the room we can say it was the lowest day of the Trump presidency." She says the way Donald conducted himself today confirmed everything in Wolff's book... He doesn't listen, he has no command of the facts, he agrees with the last person he... Then Lou gets mad and cuts her off. Then he sputters a lot. They're just frustrated beyond belief. Hilarious.

She actually says his performance today reinforced the Wolff book! On Fox Business Channel!:

"He's not going to get good press from this, they still are going to say he has dementia...If anything they have more arguments now with him jumping around and abandoning his base ..."


:sharky;


She brings it home with her favorite: Deport Dreamers, they should go before MS13, they're just a Mexican ANTIFA, the worst of the illegals. :twisted:





Comment on the Bannon out story on Breitbart:

Breitbart.JPG
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.



User avatar
Addie
Posts: 26510
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 6:22 am
Location: downstairs

Re: Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA)/DREAM Act

#75

Post by Addie » Tue Jan 09, 2018 11:37 pm

Politico
Judge blocks Trump wind-down of Dreamers program

A federal judge has blocked President Donald Trump's effort to shut-down the Obama-era program that provides quasi-legal status and work permits to foreigners who entered the U.S. illegally as children.

In a ruling Tuesday evening, San Francisco-based U.S. District Court judge William Alsup ordered the administration to resume accepting renewal applications for the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, better known as DACA.

Alsup said Attorney General Jeff Sessions' conclusion that the program was illegal appeared to be "based on a flawed legal premise."

Unless halted by a higher court, the ruling will allow former DACA recipients who failed to renew by an October 5 deadline a chance to submit renewal applications and will also require the administration to allow renewal of applications expiring in the future. The decision does not permit new applications for DACA status.



Post Reply

Return to “Congress”