Roy Moore - FORMER AL Supreme Court Chief Justice

User avatar
Azastan
Posts: 3724
Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2016 9:42 am

Re: Roy Moore - FORMER AL Supreme Court Chief Justice

#801

Post by Azastan » Sat Aug 03, 2019 10:50 am

Gregg wrote:
Sat Aug 03, 2019 10:34 am
He's " classified federally as a 'Wounded Warrior'"? WTF is that? For a football injury? Keep in mind that as far as I can tell the sum total of his military service was washing out of USMAPS where he was appointed because of an athletic scholarship, not the normal academic merit. In short, he didn't finish the USMAPS version of Basic Training, and from this statement it looks like he broke his ankle playing football.

And for this, he is 10% disabled? I thought you had to be a lot more disabled than 10% to be classified anything, and calling him a wounded warrior is a stretch if you ask me.
I, for one, am extremely impressed that he gave his all to his country. How dare you criticize a HERO!

He had to have six, SIX! surgeries. That's six more surgeries than Cadet Bonespurs!

User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 12465
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

Re: Roy Moore - FORMER AL Supreme Court Chief Justice

#802

Post by Notorial Dissent » Sat Aug 03, 2019 11:03 am

Orlylicious wrote:
Sat Aug 03, 2019 4:04 am
:lol: Thought the same thing Stern, it made just no sense especially for people who should be good at the written word. I fear about this, I'm seeing at least one typo a day on POLITICO and many others. They should have a typo button at the bottom of every page to just report it easily.

If the clients weren't running out the door already, here was another one:

Since there have been articles attacking Mr. Garmon and his skills, let it also be noted that I and countless colleagues consider Mr. Garmon to be a brilliant attorney and excellent trial lawyer.

They only let you do one free story with that AI rewrite news stories, but that release would be an interesting candidate... almost certainly it would do a better job even in its rough early stages. :lol:
There are probably also an equal number of people who believe that the earth is flat and that the moon landing was a fake, SO??????
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
Northland10
Posts: 8318
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:19 am
Location: Chicago area - North burbs

Re: Roy Moore - FORMER AL Supreme Court Chief Justice

#803

Post by Northland10 » Sat Aug 03, 2019 11:05 am

Um, I'm confused. Having legal marijuana Florida does not make it automatically legal in Alabama, does it? Whether or not it should be legal, if you are claiming to understand and honor the law, I would think the medical marijuana laws would be something you would understand. Driving while impaired is also a no brainier.

As some here can 'sternly' attest, I am most definitely not the grammar police. However, I have a suggestion for Mr. Garmon.

Do not drive while impaired. Do not PR while impaired. Also, do not let your driver or lawyer do the same
North-land: of the family 10

UCC 1-106 Plural is Singular, Singular is Plural.

User avatar
Slim Cognito
Posts: 6500
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2014 8:37 am

Re: Roy Moore - FORMER AL Supreme Court Chief Justice

#804

Post by Slim Cognito » Sat Aug 03, 2019 12:03 pm

Orlylicious wrote:
Fri Aug 02, 2019 7:57 pm
Missed this Trenton "Easy Peasy Lemon Squeezy" Garmon update. So what if it's medical, it was a DUI. Check out the incredibly long statement by his attorneys:
We have billboards all over warning people not to drive "baked." My own MJ doctor insisted I could take CBD during the day and save the THC for nighttime, but I can't. CBD (from a state dispensary, not gift shop hemp) makes me just as sleepy as the good stuff. I don't know if he's going to try to claim it was CBD, but it shouldn't stand up.
The girls prepare for our Jaws drive(way)-in movie tonight. ImageImageImage x4

User avatar
Gregg
Posts: 2867
Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2014 6:09 am
Location: Cincinnati, OH USA
Occupation: We build cars

Re: Roy Moore - FORMER AL Supreme Court Chief Justice

#805

Post by Gregg » Sat Aug 03, 2019 10:57 pm

Somebody tell him that Vodka is legal in both states, you still can't drive when you're drinking it.
Honorary Commander, 699th Airborne Assault Dachshund Regiment
Deadly Sausage Dogs from the Sky

User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 12465
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

Re: Roy Moore - FORMER AL Supreme Court Chief Justice

#806

Post by Notorial Dissent » Sat Aug 03, 2019 11:27 pm

Is marijuana even legal in AL, considering their attitude towards alcohol I doubt it.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
pipistrelle
Posts: 6677
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 11:26 am

Re: Roy Moore - FORMER AL Supreme Court Chief Justice

#807

Post by pipistrelle » Sat Aug 03, 2019 11:42 pm

Notorial Dissent wrote:
Sat Aug 03, 2019 11:27 pm
Is marijuana even legal in AL, considering their attitude towards alcohol I doubt it.
I bet they also tsk tsk pornography.

https://www.al/news/2018/01/alabama_lan ... op_of.html

User avatar
Dan1100
Posts: 3457
Joined: Sat Oct 18, 2014 3:41 pm

Re: Roy Moore - FORMER AL Supreme Court Chief Justice

#808

Post by Dan1100 » Sun Aug 04, 2019 12:11 am

Slim Cognito wrote:
Sat Aug 03, 2019 12:03 pm
Orlylicious wrote:
Fri Aug 02, 2019 7:57 pm
Missed this Trenton "Easy Peasy Lemon Squeezy" Garmon update. So what if it's medical, it was a DUI. Check out the incredibly long statement by his attorneys:
We have billboards all over warning people not to drive "baked." My own MJ doctor insisted I could take CBD during the day and save the THC for nighttime, but I can't. CBD (from a state dispensary, not gift shop hemp) makes me just as sleepy as the good stuff. I don't know if he's going to try to claim it was CBD, but it shouldn't stand up.
Thing may be different now with some objective criteria, but "back in the day" it was impossible to make a DUI case for driving while stoned unless you got them to admit it.
Hidden Content
This board requires you to be registered and logged-in to view hidden content.
"Devin Nunes is having a cow over this."

-George Takei

User avatar
Northland10
Posts: 8318
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:19 am
Location: Chicago area - North burbs

Re: Roy Moore - FORMER AL Supreme Court Chief Justice

#809

Post by Northland10 » Sun Aug 04, 2019 7:17 am

Notorial Dissent wrote:
Sat Aug 03, 2019 11:27 pm
Is marijuana even legal in AL, considering their attitude towards alcohol I doubt it.
The Alabama Senate did actually pass a medical marijuana bill earlier this year, but it languished in the house. Instead, the state passed a bill to set up a commission to study medical marijuana with the intent for there to be a new bill in the session next year. Still, in Alabama, I would not be surprised if it still died.

https://www.al.com/news/2019/06/medical ... study.html
Dan1100 wrote:
Sun Aug 04, 2019 12:11 am
Things may be different now with some objective criteria, but "back in the day" it was impossible to make a DUI case for driving while stoned unless you got them to admit it.
One of the concerns from some local officials regarding legal recreational marijuana in Illinois is the lack of ways to test for impairment in the same way they can test for alcohol impairment.
North-land: of the family 10

UCC 1-106 Plural is Singular, Singular is Plural.

User avatar
Slim Cognito
Posts: 6500
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2014 8:37 am

Re: Roy Moore - FORMER AL Supreme Court Chief Justice

#810

Post by Slim Cognito » Sun Aug 04, 2019 7:52 am

Dan said: Things may be different now with some objective criteria, but "back in the day" it was impossible to make a DUI case for driving while stoned unless you got them to admit it.
I've heard it discussed that's a problem here, as well. I take medical MJ every night. I never take it during the day, not even CBD. But if I were to get pulled over, say at 1:pm for "reckless driving" and if they somehow got a blood test on me, I'd show positive for marijuana. But when did I take it, 30 minutes before I left the house or five days ago?
The girls prepare for our Jaws drive(way)-in movie tonight. ImageImageImage x4

User avatar
Dr. Blue
Posts: 907
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2012 10:01 am
Occupation: Call the doctor!

Re: Roy Moore - FORMER AL Supreme Court Chief Justice

#811

Post by Dr. Blue » Sun Aug 04, 2019 9:19 am

pipistrelle wrote:
Sat Aug 03, 2019 11:42 pm
Notorial Dissent wrote:
Sat Aug 03, 2019 11:27 pm
Is marijuana even legal in AL, considering their attitude towards alcohol I doubt it.
I bet they also tsk tsk pornography.

https://www.al/news/2018/01/alabama_lan ... op_of.html
And selling vibrators is illegal.... https://www.huffpost.com/entry/alabamas ... s_b_300491

User avatar
Northland10
Posts: 8318
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:19 am
Location: Chicago area - North burbs

Re: Roy Moore - FORMER AL Supreme Court Chief Justice

#812

Post by Northland10 » Fri Aug 09, 2019 7:46 am

bob wrote:
Thu Aug 01, 2019 9:38 pm
Law360: Dust-Up Between Atty Larry Klayman, NY Judge Resurfaces:
A Manhattan federal judge gave conservative lawyer Larry Klayman a week to apply to represent Alabama politician Roy Moore in Moore's defamation suit against comedian Sacha Baron Cohen Thursday after Klayman disclosed that he had been barred from another judge's courtroom in 1997.[*] The wrinkle in the normally uncontroversial pro hac vice application process for out-of-state lawyers emerged during a status conference called by U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter to discuss Moore's $95 million suit against Cohen, CBS Corp. and the network's Showtime Inc. unit.
The rest is behind Law360's paywall, but what's next is obvious enough: The court is going to deny Klayman's PHV application, and the suit will get quietly dismissed. (Just like what happened in the Antifa suit.)
08/01/2019 44 ORDER: As discussed in the August 1, 2019 proceeding, Plaintiff's counsel should submit his application to be admitted pro hac vice by August 8, 2019. Furthermore, the parties should submit a joint status report by August 22, 2019 detailing settlement discussions and, if necessary, provide proposed briefing schedules for the anticipated motion to stay and motion to dismiss. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 8/1/2019) (rj) (Entered: 08/01/2019)
:waiting: Nothing new on the docket yet.
North-land: of the family 10

UCC 1-106 Plural is Singular, Singular is Plural.

User avatar
woodworker
Posts: 2788
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 2:54 pm

Re: Roy Moore - FORMER AL Supreme Court Chief Justice

#813

Post by woodworker » Fri Aug 09, 2019 1:55 pm

But a denial of PHV is just the first step for GIL. Then comes the Motion for Reconsideration, the Motion for Recusal (if not already filed and denied), the appeal of each, the denial of each, the appeal for en banc review of each (and denial thereof) and request for SCOTUS intervention. Many opportunities for more grifting.
Pence / Haley -- 2020 "I Won't Call Her Mother" and "We Will Be The Best Team Ever, But Never Alone Together"

User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 12465
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

Re: Roy Moore - FORMER AL Supreme Court Chief Justice

#814

Post by Notorial Dissent » Fri Aug 09, 2019 2:24 pm

I thought he always filed those in batch to cut down on time.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
Jim
Posts: 3298
Joined: Fri May 04, 2012 4:05 pm

Re: Roy Moore - FORMER AL Supreme Court Chief Justice

#815

Post by Jim » Fri Aug 09, 2019 2:36 pm

Notorial Dissent wrote:
Fri Aug 09, 2019 2:24 pm
I thought he always filed those in batch to cut down on time.
I always imagined him practicing law by...

Image

but maybe that's just me.

User avatar
bob
Posts: 26902
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Roy Moore - FORMER AL Supreme Court Chief Justice

#816

Post by bob » Fri Aug 09, 2019 2:56 pm

woodworker wrote:
Fri Aug 09, 2019 1:55 pm
But a denial of PHV is just the first step for GIL. Then comes the Motion for Reconsideration, the Motion for Recusal (if not already filed and denied), the appeal of each, the denial of each, the appeal for en banc review of each (and denial thereof) and request for SCOTUS intervention. Many opportunities for more grifting.
I'm torn on whether Klayman will do "the usual" (as you describe), or just move on to the next grift (like he did in the Antifa case) and passively let the case get dismissed.

I mean, is Moore really much of a gravy train for Klayman anymore? Klayman trotted Moore out at the D.C. hearing (to transfer) and all he got was a few articles noting that the judge had mocked Moore (by not addressing him by his past "Chief Justice" honorific).

And on Klayman's show, Moore was whining that this case was too slow and too costly. Doesn't Moore have a Senate race to lose?
Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 12465
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

Re: Roy Moore - FORMER AL Supreme Court Chief Justice

#817

Post by Notorial Dissent » Fri Aug 09, 2019 4:17 pm

Moore is slow on the uptake, egotistical, and still has money, so an ideal KKKlayman griftee. Also, too, pickings seem to be a bit slim at the moment, so I suspect he'll hang on til it runs dry.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
woodworker
Posts: 2788
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 2:54 pm

Re: Roy Moore - FORMER AL Supreme Court Chief Justice

#818

Post by woodworker » Sun Aug 11, 2019 2:59 pm

I don't think GIL is looking to grift Moore, but is using Moore to grift the RWNJ/s.
Pence / Haley -- 2020 "I Won't Call Her Mother" and "We Will Be The Best Team Ever, But Never Alone Together"

User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 12465
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

Re: Roy Moore - FORMER AL Supreme Court Chief Justice

#819

Post by Notorial Dissent » Sun Aug 11, 2019 4:39 pm

woodworker wrote:
Sun Aug 11, 2019 2:59 pm
I don't think GIL is looking to grift Moore, but is using Moore to grift the RWNJ/s.
That wouldn't be surprising, but most RWNJ's don't like dirty old men who like little girls.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
Sugar Magnolia
Posts: 10343
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2012 6:44 am

Re: Roy Moore - FORMER AL Supreme Court Chief Justice

#820

Post by Sugar Magnolia » Sun Aug 11, 2019 5:04 pm

Notorial Dissent wrote:
Sun Aug 11, 2019 4:39 pm
woodworker wrote:
Sun Aug 11, 2019 2:59 pm
I don't think GIL is looking to grift Moore, but is using Moore to grift the RWNJ/s.
That wouldn't be surprising, but most RWNJ's don't like dirty old men who like little girls.
Tell that to the trump supporters.

User avatar
bob
Posts: 26902
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Roy Moore - FORMER AL Supreme Court Chief Justice

#821

Post by bob » Sun Aug 11, 2019 5:08 pm

Sugar Magnolia wrote:
Sun Aug 11, 2019 5:04 pm
Notorial Dissent wrote:
Sun Aug 11, 2019 4:39 pm
woodworker wrote:
Sun Aug 11, 2019 2:59 pm
I don't think GIL is looking to grift Moore, but is using Moore to grift the RWNJ/s.
That wouldn't be surprising, but most RWNJ's don't like dirty old men who like little girls.
Tell that to the trump supporters.
Or the 650,000 voters who voted for Moore in 2017.
Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 12465
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

Re: Roy Moore - FORMER AL Supreme Court Chief Justice

#822

Post by Notorial Dissent » Sun Aug 11, 2019 6:38 pm

bob wrote:
Sun Aug 11, 2019 5:08 pm
Sugar Magnolia wrote:
Sun Aug 11, 2019 5:04 pm
Notorial Dissent wrote:
Sun Aug 11, 2019 4:39 pm


That wouldn't be surprising, but most RWNJ's don't like dirty old men who like little girls.
Tell that to the trump supporters.
Or the 650,000 voters who voted for Moore in 2017.
Except we're talking about people from AL, and I won't repeat what a friend from MS says about them.

LaRump's grossness is pointed at women of legal age, not an excuse but a difference.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
Gregg
Posts: 2867
Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2014 6:09 am
Location: Cincinnati, OH USA
Occupation: We build cars

Re: Roy Moore - FORMER AL Supreme Court Chief Justice

#823

Post by Gregg » Tue Aug 13, 2019 8:13 am

Notorial Dissent wrote:
Sun Aug 11, 2019 4:39 pm
woodworker wrote:
Sun Aug 11, 2019 2:59 pm
I don't think GIL is looking to grift Moore, but is using Moore to grift the RWNJ/s.
That wouldn't be surprising, but most RWNJ's don't like dirty old men who like little girls.
Objection! Facts not in evidence!
Honorary Commander, 699th Airborne Assault Dachshund Regiment
Deadly Sausage Dogs from the Sky

User avatar
woodworker
Posts: 2788
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 2:54 pm

Re: Roy Moore - FORMER AL Supreme Court Chief Justice

#824

Post by woodworker » Tue Aug 13, 2019 7:54 pm

Gregg wrote:
Tue Aug 13, 2019 8:13 am
Notorial Dissent wrote:
Sun Aug 11, 2019 4:39 pm
woodworker wrote:
Sun Aug 11, 2019 2:59 pm
I don't think GIL is looking to grift Moore, but is using Moore to grift the RWNJ/s.
That wouldn't be surprising, but most RWNJ's don't like dirty old men who like little girls.
Objection! Facts not in evidence!
Actually, I would object on the basis that they are mischaracterizing the record -- RWNJ/s love dirty old men who like little girls (and boys), as long as the dirty old men are republicans.
Pence / Haley -- 2020 "I Won't Call Her Mother" and "We Will Be The Best Team Ever, But Never Alone Together"

User avatar
bob
Posts: 26902
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Roy Moore - FORMER AL Supreme Court Chief Justice

#825

Post by bob » Wed Aug 14, 2019 4:07 pm

HuffPo: Roy Moore Still Watches ‘M*A*S*H,’ And It Makes Him Mad About LGBTQ Rights:
The GOP Senate candidate from Alabama ranted that a cross-dresser on the 1970s show would be promoted in today’s military. What?

Republican Senate candidate Roy Moore went on a predictable tirade about sodomy and transgender people over the weekend. But in the midst of it, he made a stunning revelation: He still watches “M*A*S*H.” And it makes him angry about LGBTQ rights.

“You know, the LGBTQ-VRSTUV, I don’t know what it is – LGBTQ, when they first came out, I said, ‘Transgender? Never. That’s dumb,’” Moore said on Saturday at the Dekalb County Republican Breakfast Club in Fort Payne, Alabama, according to the conservative news blog Yellowhammer News.

“Do you know what transgender is? That’s not Biblical,” Moore continued. “And when men want to be women? I was watching ‘M*A*S*H’ the other day, talking about Korea, Vietnam ... talking about what’s his name, Klinger. He wanted to get out of the Army because they didn’t accept transgender. Now, I guess he would get a promotion.”

There’s a lot to unpack here. For starters, is “M*A*S*H” even on TV anymore? Great show, but the last episode aired in 1983. Is this 72-year-old guy up at 3:45 a.m. watching reruns on channel 680, cursing into the darkness about queer people? That’s sad!

Also, Corporal Maxwell Q. Klinger’s character wasn’t transgender. He was a cisgender man who wore women’s clothes as a stunt to try to get a Section 8 discharge from the Army, a former designation for soldiers deemed mentally unfit for duty. His cross-dressing was the butt of jokes, and it had nothing to do with his actual sense of gender identity.
Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

Post Reply

Return to “General Politics”