That closing paragraph is just precious. Jesus apparently has not done too well protecting people from scam artists using his name. I'm thinking of Jim Bakker and Kent Hovind's "Ark Encounter" among countless others.The Real Agenda Concerning Our Currency Exchanges
[Rothschild and Queen of England paranoia deleted]
Since we were all designed by Our Father God in His spirit image and given a body and a soul, He also gave us all a brain to think with and we are expected to use it wisely.
The Rothschild Family didn't spend trillions of dollars out of the goodness of their hearts to construct thousands of redemption centers fully staffed for us to exchange our currency if they didn't believe they could confiscate the vast amounts of wealth from us. This is only my opinion.
The Zim Gold Backed Bonds are the quintessential keys in all of this. We have been hearing from people like Kent Dunn who says that the Zim rates are astronomically high and at face value. If we sign an NDA, we could call the shots at the available rate set at close to $125,000.00 per note. Since the funds will be in digital format, this to me isn't hard to fathom.
I understand the reasoning in accepting such a rate is that we know we will never see another opportunity to receive this vast amount of wealth ever again in our lifetime. I get it.
The point here is that I feel we are being setup by the cabal in being told about the enormously high rates so that when we have agreed to the NDA requirements, the banks will eventually confiscate them!
My advice to all is DO NOT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES SIGN AN NDA because, if you do, you could lose it all over a short time. Once one signs the initial NDA binding document, guaranteed there will be subsequent mandated second and third part documents which bank regulators will force one to sign since the signing of the original document is legally binding. These people mean business!
Use your brains and don't be greedy as you will have enough $$$ if you accept the street rates for your currencies. And, if at all possible, transfer your $$$ from your bank to insurance policies where your money will be safe out of the hands of the cabal.
God bless and trust God, if you belong to Christ. Then He will protect you and your funds as you begin to help those who desperately need financial help.
But the most amusing thing in this is the idea that what's presumably a $1,000 Zimbabwe Gold Backed Bond (which almost certainly doesn't actually exist) is worth $125,000. If you have studied bond finance, there's an inverse relationship between bond prices and the interest rate on the bond. Bond prices change driven by the difference between the "nominal yield," the interest rate printed on the bond (i.e., 5.0%) and the "current yield," which is the market interest rate for bonds of a similar risk level. The point is that all bonds of a given risk level should pay the same current yield. Prices will converge until this is approximately the case. So if the current interest rate is 3.0% and you have a bond with a nominal yield of 5%, then the price of that bond will increase to be 1.4x the $1,000 face value of the bond. The exact math is way more complicated than this, and I'm a stock guy and not a bond guy so my ability to nail this stuff precisely is limited.
That's why, by the way, when interest rates rise it's a bad thing because prices of bonds with low interest rates can decline dramatically. If you own $100 million of bonds with a 2% coupon (nominal yield) and the interest rate goes to 10%, then those bonds are only going to be worth $20 million, which is a devastating loss to a bond investor if they need to sell their bonds before maturity and they get the $1,000 loaned to the issuer repaid. (If you hang onto the bond until maturity, you get the $1,000 face value of the bond back even if the market price is much lower.)
So the only way that a Zim Gold Backed Bond can be worth $125,000 when the current yield of 10-year Treasury bonds is 3.0% is if the nominal interest rate on the Zim bonds is something like 450%. And no serious issuer in the world is going to issue 450% bonds, with the possible exception of one in a hyper-inflationary environment. But of course with runaway inflation of tens of millions of percentage points per year (as happened in 2008), no investor is going to buy a bond paying "only" 450%.
The Zimbabwe government did issue "bond notes" denominated in US Dollars which were essentially printing money to buy gold to try to build FX reserves to use to support a new currency. But these are basically fiat money, something the poots usually object to. Not the same thing as a bond actually backed by gold reserves. But not surprising that suckers who have bought into a new story every week about how something has pushed the revaluation back another week have bought into this.