John Darash/Vidurek and the National LIberty Alliance

User avatar
Techno Luddite
Posts: 2512
Joined: Sat May 16, 2015 5:23 pm

Re: John Darash/Vidurek and the National LIberty Alliance

Post by Techno Luddite » Tue Jun 13, 2017 9:46 pm

Northland10 wrote:My ability to be concerned for the guy keeps going. Maybe the fact that he bought a 2.7 Million dollar house in 2014, and appears to still own it, could be a reason.
Mr. Sprouse must have won the lottery to get the riches, and had the polar opposite of bad luck when it comes to his analytical abilities. That complaint is just begging for a dismissal. Maybe even the sua sponte variety, as previously attained by private attorney douchebag general Anthony Williams, on several occasions. Winning!

User avatar
Sterngard Friegen
Posts: 40882
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Location: Trump International - Malibu

Re: John Darash/Vidurek and the National LIberty Alliance

Post by Sterngard Friegen » Tue Jun 13, 2017 10:00 pm

ORDER by Judge George H. King: Denying 1 Application for Leave to Proceed in Forma. IT WAS RECOMMENDED that the request of plaintiff/petitioner to file the action prepayment of the filing be DENIED by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. Reason for denied: District Court lacks jurisdiction; No facts concerning federal question jurisdiction or diversity jurisdiction are alleged. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated.) (et) (Entered: 10/03/2014)
George King, recently retired from the district court, officed with my firm for 10 years before he became a magistrate judge. (And then years later, a district court judge.) Great guy.

User avatar
Northland10
Posts: 5689
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:19 am
Location: Chicago area - North burbs

Re: John Darash/Vidurek and the National LIberty Alliance

Post by Northland10 » Thu Jun 15, 2017 8:47 pm


First, a song


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=egX9N8yOgaU

Today's song is in honor of the court's response to VD.
06/14/2017 27 DECISION AND ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice; and it is further ORDERED, that if Plaintiff wishes to proceed with this action, it must obtain counsel within thirty days of this Decision and Order; and it is further ORDERED, that if Plaintiff fails to obtain counsel within thirty days, the Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) shall be dismissed with prejudice, without further order of the Court. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on June 14, 2017. (Copy served via regular and certified)(sas) (Entered: 06/14/2017)

http://ia801501.us.archive.org/17/items ... 3.27.0.pdf
I guess he could get counsel to represent Mr. Squiggly Signature Grand Jury Foreman, in 30 days.

:rotflmao:

Well, there goes his $400.
North-land: of the family 10
UCC 1-106 Plural is Singular, Singular is Plural.

User avatar
NotaPerson
Posts: 2643
Joined: Mon May 18, 2015 9:33 pm

Re: John Darash/Vidurek and the National LIberty Alliance

Post by NotaPerson » Thu Jun 15, 2017 9:18 pm

:clap:
Am I being detained?

User avatar
Turtle
Posts: 1681
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2014 5:27 pm

Re: John Darash/Vidurek and the National LIberty Alliance

Post by Turtle » Thu Jun 15, 2017 9:27 pm

Maybe if he faxes over a Writ of Mandumbass he can keep the case going. Sounds expensive though, he will need to raise more funds...

User avatar
ZekeB
Posts: 13794
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 10:07 pm
Location: Northwest part of Semi Blue State

Re: John Darash/Vidurek and the National LIberty Alliance

Post by ZekeB » Thu Jun 15, 2017 9:48 pm

Northland10 wrote:
First, a song
That's in Do Wop. Do you have a SPEBSQSA version?
Vím o prasatech hodně zajímavých věcí.

User avatar
Sterngard Friegen
Posts: 40882
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Location: Trump International - Malibu

Re: John Darash/Vidurek and the National LIberty Alliance

Post by Sterngard Friegen » Thu Jun 15, 2017 9:49 pm

I think Orly Taitz's docket is pretty open these days.

User avatar
Foggy
Posts: 24507
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 12:00 pm
Location: Fogbow HQ (Rawly NC)
Occupation: Dick Tater

Re: John Darash/Vidurek and the National LIberty Alliance

Post by Foggy » Thu Jun 15, 2017 10:15 pm

Sterngard Friegen wrote:I think Orly Taitz's docket is pretty open these days.
Oh please.
If dogs run free, why not we?

User avatar
Sam the Centipede
Posts: 4990
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2012 3:25 pm

Re: John Darash/Vidurek and the National LIberty Alliance

Post by Sam the Centipede » Thu Jun 15, 2017 11:24 pm

Foggy wrote:
Sterngard Friegen wrote:I think Orly Taitz's docket is pretty open these days.
Oh please.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N-aK6JnyFmk

User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 8563
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

Re: John Darash/Vidurek and the National LIberty Alliance

Post by Notorial Dissent » Fri Jun 16, 2017 1:36 am

I think Johnny Two Names and Orlena deserve each other.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
Northland10
Posts: 5689
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:19 am
Location: Chicago area - North burbs

Re: John Darash/Vidurek and the National LIberty Alliance

Post by Northland10 » Fri Jun 16, 2017 11:26 am

ZekeB wrote:
Northland10 wrote:
First, a song
That's in Do Wop. Do you have a SPEBSQSA version?
If I must.
https://youtu.be/6OXFatr2hI8
North-land: of the family 10
UCC 1-106 Plural is Singular, Singular is Plural.

User avatar
ZekeB
Posts: 13794
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 10:07 pm
Location: Northwest part of Semi Blue State

Re: John Darash/Vidurek and the National LIberty Alliance

Post by ZekeB » Fri Jun 16, 2017 12:00 pm

Thanks. I was hoping Storm Front did it, but apparently not.
Vím o prasatech hodně zajímavých věcí.

User avatar
Northland10
Posts: 5689
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:19 am
Location: Chicago area - North burbs

Re: John Darash/Vidurek and the National LIberty Alliance

Post by Northland10 » Fri Jun 16, 2017 12:38 pm

ZekeB wrote:Thanks. I was hoping Storm Front did it, but apparently not.
Not on YouTube at least.
North-land: of the family 10
UCC 1-106 Plural is Singular, Singular is Plural.

User avatar
Northland10
Posts: 5689
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:19 am
Location: Chicago area - North burbs

Re: John Darash/Vidurek and the National LIberty Alliance

Post by Northland10 » Sat Jun 17, 2017 5:57 pm

06/14/2017 27 DECISION AND ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice
A day late and a dollar short.
06/15/2017 28 MOTION for Default Judgment as to Lawrence K. Baerman, Clerk of Court filed by Grand Jury, Sovereigns of the Court. (Attachments: # 1 Mailing Envelope) (jmb) (Entered: 06/16/2017)

06/15/2017 29 MOTION for Default Judgment as to Governor A. Cuomo, NYS. Senate Majority Leader John J. Flanagan and NYS Assembly Speaker Carl E. Heastie filed by Grand Jury, Sovereigns of the Court, Pro Se. (Attachments: # 1 Mailing Envelope) (jmb) (Entered: 06/16/2017)
He mailed it, addressed to the MJ, on the 13th. The envelope had a nice note "Crime to intercept"
North-land: of the family 10
UCC 1-106 Plural is Singular, Singular is Plural.

User avatar
JohnPCapitalist
Posts: 683
Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2016 10:29 pm
Location: Wall Street
Occupation: Investment management in the financial industry. Deep knowledge of stocks, tech and economics.

Re: John Darash/Vidurek and the National LIberty Alliance

Post by JohnPCapitalist » Sat Jun 17, 2017 7:11 pm

Northland10 wrote:
06/14/2017 27 DECISION AND ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice
A day late and a dollar short.
06/15/2017 28 MOTION for Default Judgment as to Lawrence K. Baerman, Clerk of Court filed by Grand Jury, Sovereigns of the Court. (Attachments: # 1 Mailing Envelope) (jmb) (Entered: 06/16/2017)

06/15/2017 29 MOTION for Default Judgment as to Governor A. Cuomo, NYS. Senate Majority Leader John J. Flanagan and NYS Assembly Speaker Carl E. Heastie filed by Grand Jury, Sovereigns of the Court, Pro Se. (Attachments: # 1 Mailing Envelope) (jmb) (Entered: 06/16/2017)
He mailed it, addressed to the MJ, on the 13th. The envelope had a nice note "Crime to intercept"
Any chance you could post the filings? I've had a rough day and could use a chuckle. Well, actually, anything that says "crime to intercept" on the envelope ought to be good for a full-on guffaw rather than a mere chuckle.

User avatar
Northland10
Posts: 5689
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:19 am
Location: Chicago area - North burbs

Re: John Darash/Vidurek and the National LIberty Alliance

Post by Northland10 » Mon Jun 19, 2017 7:45 pm

JohnPCapitalist wrote:Any chance you could post the filings? I've had a rough day and could use a chuckle. Well, actually, anything that says "crime to intercept" on the envelope ought to be good for a full-on guffaw rather than a mere chuckle.
Sorry I could not get to it on Saturday but, here you go.

The motion or "order" for the default against the Clerk:

http://ia601501.us.archive.org/17/items ... 3.28.0.pdf

The envelope
http://ia601501.us.archive.org/17/items ... 3.28.0.pdf

The motion or "order" for the default against the state defendants (I assume the envelope is the same).
http://ia601501.us.archive.org/17/items ... 3.29.0.pdf
North-land: of the family 10
UCC 1-106 Plural is Singular, Singular is Plural.

User avatar
Northland10
Posts: 5689
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:19 am
Location: Chicago area - North burbs

Re: John Darash/Vidurek and the National LIberty Alliance

Post by Northland10 » Mon Jun 19, 2017 8:37 pm

Last November, VD tried to reopen on his Vidurek v Krajick case that was dismissed because he would not pay the fee. The results were as expected.
11/21/2016 7 ORDER re: 6 Remark filed by John Vidurek. By order and judgment dated and entered September 4, 2015, the Court dismissed this action without prejudice. On August 11, 2016, Plaintiff filed a submission styled as a "Writ of Error Ex Parte Quae Coram Nobis Resident." (ECF No. 6.) For the reasons discussed below, the Court denies the motion. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. The Court construes Plaintiff's filing (ECF No. 6) as one for relief under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court denies the motion. The Clerk of Court is further directed not to accept any further submissions from Plaintiff in this action, with the exception of a notice of appeal. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 11/21/2016) (sac) (Entered: 11/23/2016)
North-land: of the family 10
UCC 1-106 Plural is Singular, Singular is Plural.

User avatar
NotaPerson
Posts: 2643
Joined: Mon May 18, 2015 9:33 pm

Re: John Darash/Vidurek and the National LIberty Alliance

Post by NotaPerson » Sun Jun 25, 2017 12:50 pm

Northland10 wrote: 27 DECISION AND ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice; and it is further ORDERED, that if Plaintiff wishes to proceed with this action, it must obtain counsel within thirty days of this Decision and Order; and it is further ORDERED, that if Plaintiff fails to obtain counsel within thirty days, the Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) shall be dismissed with prejudice, without further order of the Court. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on June 14, 2017. (Copy served via regular and certified)(sas) (Entered: 06/14/2017)
I was wondering about NLA's reaction to this so I went looking for the subsequent Monday night call on their website. Found this sloppily prepared transcript...

In the absence of John, Gerard hosted the call

We received paperwork back from the third district court
The judge jumped up and dismissed the case made a decision in order to throw us out because he said that we are an association and we cannot come in without an attorney.
They always want to give you a name and make you a corporate entity. He doesn’t recognize us as the People. Now we are going to give a Writ of Error because he wasn’t even the judge that was on this case. This judge that came in, and we actually had a magistrate, and this judge came in and made this decision. If you read his decision he said we were asked to look it over and make a ruling. First of all he wasn’t the judge assigned to the case. And if they asked him to do something they should have filed a motion in the case They shouldn’t be sending ex parte letters to the chief judge when the magistrate that is running the case , that’s seeing the paperwork come in and out, hasn’t said anything.
They already accepted our case based on the parameters that we put in that this is common law that the judge is not to make any decisions this was all put out in a memorandum and so they can’t say that they didn’t know it. So now he’s going to come in and say Oh no, you’re not an attorney you can’t come in. Well that’s a mistake.
Because right away they do the knee jerk thing that is going to discredit them in the long run.
NLA has a paper that John wrote in response to that.
Most of the time in these things you do a lot of counterpunching.
Every time they punch us it lets us know exactly where they are coming from not that we don’t know It is always easier to counter punch
Gerard read the Writ of Error that John wrote
(3:12)
Writ of Error
The court comes now to review the facts , record , and process. The record shows that on June 14, 2017 without any constitutional authority self appointed U S District Judge Lawrence E Kahn ignoring the random selection process of Magistrate Daniel J Stewart to this case He conducted his own court without notice or concurrence of the parties. Without notice to the administrator Magistrate Daniel J Stewart without jurisdiction without due process and under color of law. And acted in an attempt to seize control of this court an act of a tyrant by manufacturing an unlawful order to dismiss this action without prejudice thereby aiding and abetting the covering up of murder, torture, manipulation of evidence, witnesses and juries in order to incarcerate innocent people who are threatening to expose judicial law and law enforcement corruption and RICO on a national level conspiracy to supplant the law of the land with statutes thereby placing our republic in corporatism political incarceration covering up murder of inventors who are a threat to corporate profits denying due process robbing people’s homes and estates taking people’s children, for running debtors’ prison covering up and protecting pedophile rings
The genius of a court of record is not to be undermined It is the unalienable right of every American to settle a criminal case in a court of record
Federal district courts are creatures of congress inferior to the one supreme court which is vested by We the People ourselves through the Constitution for the United States of America. Federal district court judges hold their office during good behavior.
That is to say obedience to the one supreme court under Article 3 Section 1 in the law of the land. Under Article 6 Clause 2 the unalienable right of free access to people’s courts is a settled law that all judges are bound by oath to obey. If self appointed U S District Judge Lawrence E Kahn read our papers he would understand that like the other unjust courts that he presides over this is an Article 3 court in which indictments will be filed and criminal cases will be tried We the People are acting as grand juries to indict people that the corrupt judiciary will not. Whereby untainted trial juries will preside over. The U S Attorney General will be providing U S prosecutors or approve a special common law prosecutor. Nevertheless the Sixth Amendment provides for assistance of counsel for defense not BAR or attorney counsel. Judge Lawrence E Kahn will also understand that we are not a corporation a partnership we are an association. We are the People under the authority of the grand jury because all federal juries have been seized by the judiciary.
The Writ ends as follows:
Therefore the Sovereigns of this court of record reminding all officers of the court record that any statute or rule repugnant to the Constitution is null and void in a court of record and thereby issue this Writ of Error Coram Nobis to wit reversing the order by Judge Lawrence E Kahn of the inferior court not of record from jurisdictions unknown thereby returning the court back to the Tribunal.
That’s the response It’s got lots of footnotes
:thumbs:
Am I being detained?

User avatar
Sterngard Friegen
Posts: 40882
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Location: Trump International - Malibu

Re: John Darash/Vidurek and the National LIberty Alliance

Post by Sterngard Friegen » Sun Jun 25, 2017 1:00 pm

More meaningless trash by John Vidurek.

User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 8563
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

Re: John Darash/Vidurek and the National LIberty Alliance

Post by Notorial Dissent » Sun Jun 25, 2017 1:09 pm

Sooprise sooprise sooprise, guess that means it's gonna get roundfiled WP come the 15th. Mooor Darash drivel indeed!!!!
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
Northland10
Posts: 5689
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:19 am
Location: Chicago area - North burbs

Re: John Darash/Vidurek and the National LIberty Alliance

Post by Northland10 » Sun Jun 25, 2017 2:03 pm

Yet again, they show their smarts by not having a clue about the role of a magistrate judge. I checked VD's page with all the documents and the earlier ones refer to Judge Kahn as a magistrate.

https://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/docket
North-land: of the family 10
UCC 1-106 Plural is Singular, Singular is Plural.

User avatar
Whip
Posts: 1750
Joined: Mon Nov 09, 2015 12:31 pm

Re: John Darash/Vidurek and the National LIberty Alliance

Post by Whip » Sun Jun 25, 2017 2:16 pm

Image

User avatar
Slim Cognito
Posts: 4006
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2014 8:37 am

Re: John Darash/Vidurek and the National LIberty Alliance

Post by Slim Cognito » Wed Jul 12, 2017 9:36 am

Got this email yesterday for a sooper sekrit grand slam jury meeting tonight - by phone! if anyone's interested.
john@nationallibertyalliance.org Jul 11 at 8:43 AM
To
John Darash
Message body
John Darash has sent you a group email from National Liberty Alliance.
Dear NLA Member;
The Common Law Grand Jury is meeting this Wednesday Night (7-12-17) at 9PM EST to consider an indictment of a Federal Judge. The Grand Jury will comprise of all that attend. The Grand Jury meets and decides in secrete, therefore there will be no record of attendance.
The teleconference call in number is (605) 475-3250, enter access code 449389#. To join using your browser go to https://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/mondaycall for instructions.
The call is not expected to last more than 15 minutes.
To be prepared for your decisions go to https://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/docket and read papers: •1024 UnLawful Order to Dismiss and •1024-01 Writ of Error Final

User avatar
DejaMoo
Posts: 3210
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 1:19 pm
Occupation: Agent of ZOG

Re: John Darash/Vidurek and the National LIberty Alliance

Post by DejaMoo » Wed Jul 12, 2017 9:45 am

john@nationallibertyalliance.org Jul 11 at 8:43 AM

The Common Law Grand Jury is meeting this Wednesday Night (7-12-17) at 9PM EST ]to consider an indictment of a Federal Judge. The Grand Jury will comprise of all that attend. The Grand Jury meets and decides in secrete, therefore there will be no record of attendance.
Image

User avatar
JohnPCapitalist
Posts: 683
Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2016 10:29 pm
Location: Wall Street
Occupation: Investment management in the financial industry. Deep knowledge of stocks, tech and economics.

Re: John Darash/Vidurek and the National LIberty Alliance

Post by JohnPCapitalist » Wed Jul 12, 2017 10:17 am

Slim Cognito wrote:Got this email yesterday for a sooper sekrit grand slam jury meeting tonight - by phone! if anyone's interested.
john@nationallibertyalliance.org Jul 11 at 8:43 AM
To
John Darash
Message body
John Darash has sent you a group email from National Liberty Alliance.
Dear NLA Member;
The Common Law Grand Jury is meeting this Wednesday Night (7-12-17) at 9PM EST to consider an indictment of a Federal Judge. The Grand Jury will comprise of all that attend. The Grand Jury meets and decides in secrete, therefore there will be no record of attendance.
The teleconference call in number is (605) 475-3250, enter access code 449389#. To join using your browser go to https://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/mondaycall for instructions.
The call is not expected to last more than 15 minutes.
To be prepared for your decisions go to https://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/docket and read papers: •1024 UnLawful Order to Dismiss and •1024-01 Writ of Error Final
Wednesdays appear to be a hoppin' night in poot-land, with this call and the regularly scheduled call for the pretend judge/grand jury/marshal LARPers in Colorado having their weekly yawn-fest.

Sadly, I have plans and won't be able to attend. It would be interesting to count noses on the call and see just how many pretend grand jurors Vidurek is able to rouse at this late date in his fading scam.

If you look at the "powahful papahs" referenced in the e-mail, the judge (not the magistrate) in their case claiming whatever-it-is in Albany put Vidurek and company on notice that they have 30 days to get a real lawyer or face dismissal. The second paper, dated June 19, is a "writ of error coram nobis" that they crafted and filed shortly after the June 14 date of the order to show cause. So Johnny Two-Names is kind of running up against the deadline a bit, since tomorrow is 30 days from June 14th. Of course, he's not going to get an attorney, so the case will get tossed. I wonder how long it will take the court to get rid of this piece of arglebargle; the federal court in Colorado has not yet dumped the suit from pretend judge Bruce Doucette's crew, and the 30-day time period to cure the defects in their pretend legal paperwork passed quite some time ago.

Also, I love how the pretend grand jury thinks that 15 minutes is enough time to deliberate on the indictment of a real federal judge. Obviously, that gives them tons of time to weigh the evidence. But I'm surprised that pretend grand jury administrator Vidurek doesn't schedule a three hour call so he can show off his legal brilliance and also make multiple requests to Send Moar Money...

Post Reply

Return to “Sovereign Citizens, Private Militias, and Citizen Grand Juries”