John Darash/Vidurek and the National LIberty Alliance

User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 8585
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

Re: John Darash/Vidurek and the National LIberty Alliance

#15551

Post by Notorial Dissent » Wed Jul 12, 2017 11:35 am

I wondered how long it would take Johnny Two Names to wax wroth over being ignored by the mean ole Federal Judge, who isn't at all impressed by his powaful paypuhs.. I suspect he figured 15 minutes was long enough since he doesn't expect his puppet chorus to go along with whatever he says.


The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
Sam the Centipede
Posts: 4990
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2012 3:25 pm

Re: John Darash/Vidurek and the National LIberty Alliance

#15552

Post by Sam the Centipede » Wed Jul 12, 2017 11:40 am

I like the way John "Squiggle" Vidurek writes in his hilarious paypah Writ of Error Coram Nobis:
John Vidurek :rolleye: Darash wrote:If self-appointed U.S. District Judge Lawrence E. Kahn read our papers, he would understand that, unlike the unjust courts he presides over, this is an Article III Court in which indictments will be filed and criminal cases will be tried.
Is this inadvertant praise from John "pig Latin" Vidurek as he refers to Judge Kahn as "self-appointed"? Because who on this planet appointed Vidurek to be anything other than an irritating asswipe? Certainly not the people of the USA nor their elected government. Only himself.



User avatar
Slim Cognito
Posts: 4010
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2014 8:37 am

Re: John Darash/Vidurek and the National LIberty Alliance

#15553

Post by Slim Cognito » Mon Jul 17, 2017 10:23 am

Worst cliff hanger ever:
john@nationallibertyalliance.org Jul 16 at 1:28 PM
To
John Darash
Message body
John Darash has sent you a group email from National Liberty Alliance.
NEWS ALERT! - On Wednesday, July 12, 2017 the Unified United States Common Law Grand Jury indicted U.S. District Judge Lawrence E. Kahn of the Northern District of New York.
Join our Monday call, July 17 at 9 PM EST for discussion. Go to https://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/mondaycall for instructions to join us.

Only the People can save America, NOW IS THE TIME TO TAKE A STAND and support NLA by volunteering an hour a week or more and support us financially. Go to https://www.nationallibertyalliance.org ... y-alliance and donate $5 a month or more.

John Darash



User avatar
Flatpointhigh
Posts: 7275
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 1:05 pm
Location: Hotel California, PH23
Occupation: Voice Actor, Podcaster, I hold a Ph.D in Procrastination.
Contact:

Re: John Darash/Vidurek and the National LIberty Alliance

#15554

Post by Flatpointhigh » Mon Jul 17, 2017 10:36 am

Slim Cognito wrote:Worst cliff hanger ever:
john@nationallibertyalliance.org Jul 16 at 1:28 PM
To
John Darash
Message body
John Darash has sent you a group email from National Liberty Alliance.
NEWS ALERT! - On Wednesday, July 12, 2017 the Unified United States Common Law Grand Jury indicted U.S. District Judge Lawrence E. Kahn of the Northern District of New York.
Join our Monday call, July 17 at 9 PM EST for discussion. Go to https://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/mondaycall for instructions to join us.

Only the People can save America, NOW IS THE TIME TO TAKE A STAND and support NLA by volunteering an hour a week or more and support us financially. Go to https://www.nationallibertyalliance.org ... y-alliance and donate $5 a month or more.

John Darash
he's no Jay Ward.



"It is wrong to say God made rich and poor; He only made male and female, and He gave them the Earth as their inheritance."- Thomas Paine, Forward to Agrarian Justice
Cancer broke me

User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 8585
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

Re: John Darash/Vidurek and the National LIberty Alliance

#15555

Post by Notorial Dissent » Mon Jul 17, 2017 12:27 pm

And in the real world, grass is still (usually)green, and water is wet. Now back to our regularly scheduled psycho-drama.


The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
Techno Luddite
Posts: 2512
Joined: Sat May 16, 2015 5:23 pm

Re: John Darash/Vidurek and the National LIberty Alliance

#15556

Post by Techno Luddite » Mon Jul 17, 2017 2:07 pm

They must not be getting enough attention, what with the other, more aggressive fake law nut jobs all having prominent trials. I predict this will generate a fax, which gets the typical prominent placement in the roundfile of whatever court receives it. Losers.



User avatar
JohnPCapitalist
Posts: 685
Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2016 10:29 pm
Location: Wall Street
Occupation: Investment management in the financial industry. Deep knowledge of stocks, tech and economics.

Re: John Darash/Vidurek and the National LIberty Alliance

#15557

Post by JohnPCapitalist » Mon Jul 17, 2017 2:11 pm

Johnny Two-Names has finally posted his "powahful" pretend indictment of real Judge Lawrence Kahn on his site.

I'm intrigued by how full of verbiage it is and how little action the pretend indictment actually proposes to take. Vidurek is apparently petrified that he'll suffer the same fate as Terry Trussell and the Colorado pretend judge/grand jury/marshal LARPer brigade if he actually commands anyone to do anything like take Judge Kahn into custody.

And I am sure we all spotted the prime piece of idiocy in this document: that Vidurek is mad because Judge Kahn inserted himself in the case, not understanding that the presiding judge is the guy who signs off on the order to dismiss; the magistrate works for him. And yet this basic fact of the federal court system apparently eludes someone who claims to have an awesome understanding of the law.

And I am sure sorry that Johnny Two-Names didn't follow standard practice from real courts of providing just enough detail about the lurid charges in the indictment to give you a sense that the accused is GUILTY, GUILTY, GUILTY. That's especially unfortunate here given that Vidurek charges Judge Kahn with
murder; torture; manipulation of evidence, witnesses and juries in order to incarcerate innocent People who are a threat to exposing judicial and law enforcement corruption and RICO on a national level; conspiracy to supplant the Law of the Land with statutes, thereby replacing our Republic with Corporatism; political incarcerations; Denial of due process; robbing Peoples’ homes and estates; taking Peoples children; running debtors prisons; covering up and protecting pedophile rings, etc…
I wonder if Judge Kahn actually saw a copy of this so he could have a good laugh.



User avatar
Techno Luddite
Posts: 2512
Joined: Sat May 16, 2015 5:23 pm

Re: John Darash/Vidurek and the National LIberty Alliance

#15558

Post by Techno Luddite » Mon Jul 17, 2017 2:23 pm

Dear Mr. Vidurek, on behalf of the fogbow unified decentralized electronic grand jury, we hereby indict you for being a pendejo. Further affiant sayeth naught! :eek2:



User avatar
Sterngard Friegen
Posts: 40907
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Location: Trump International - Malibu

Re: John Darash/Vidurek and the National LIberty Alliance

#15559

Post by Sterngard Friegen » Mon Jul 17, 2017 2:25 pm

Why didn't Vidurek mention NATO, the UN and international banksters? He's slipping.



User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 8585
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

Re: John Darash/Vidurek and the National LIberty Alliance

#15560

Post by Notorial Dissent » Mon Jul 17, 2017 3:25 pm

Sterngard Friegen wrote:Why didn't Vidurek mention NATO, the UN and international banksters? He'slipping.
Be patient, he will, just give him time.


The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
Foggy
Posts: 24526
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 12:00 pm
Location: Fogbow HQ (Rawly NC)
Occupation: Dick Tater

Re: John Darash/Vidurek and the National LIberty Alliance

#15561

Post by Foggy » Mon Jul 17, 2017 5:54 pm

Techno Luddite wrote:Dear Mr. Vidurek, on behalf of the fogbow unified decentralized electronic grand jury, we hereby indict you for being a pendejo. Further affiant sayeth naught! :eek2:
That needs our official seal.

Image


If dogs run free, why not we?

User avatar
Northland10
Posts: 5704
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:19 am
Location: Chicago area - North burbs

Re: John Darash/Vidurek and the National LIberty Alliance

#15562

Post by Northland10 » Mon Jul 17, 2017 6:24 pm

07/17/2017 36 TEXT ORDER: On June 14, 2017, the Court dismissed Plaintiff's complaint (Dkt. No. 1) without prejudice because Plaintiff, which appears to be an organization composed of thousands of members across the United States, was improperly proceeding without a lawyer. Dkt. No. 27 ("June Order") at 3-4. The Court gave Plaintiff thirty days to obtain counsel and warned that if it failed to do so, the Court would dismiss the action with prejudice. Id. While Plaintiff has filed several documents with the Court since the June Order, no lawyer has appeared on its behalf, and it has not requested an extension of time to obtain counsel. Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES this action with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the case. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on July 17, 2017. (Copy served via regular and certified)(sas) (Entered: 07/17/2017)
Last week, there were also some "Order to Show Cause" filings by his grand jury group through various "next friends."


North-land: of the family 10
UCC 1-106 Plural is Singular, Singular is Plural.

User avatar
Techno Luddite
Posts: 2512
Joined: Sat May 16, 2015 5:23 pm

Re: John Darash/Vidurek and the National LIberty Alliance

#15563

Post by Techno Luddite » Mon Jul 17, 2017 6:30 pm

Foggy wrote:
Techno Luddite wrote:Dear Mr. Vidurek, on behalf of the fogbow unified decentralized electronic grand jury, we hereby indict you for being a pendejo. Further affiant sayeth naught! :eek2:
That needs our official seal.

Image
:rotflmao:

We needz some old English fonts, too!



User avatar
Northland10
Posts: 5704
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:19 am
Location: Chicago area - North burbs

Re: John Darash/Vidurek and the National LIberty Alliance

#15564

Post by Northland10 » Wed Jul 19, 2017 10:55 pm

Because he has to keep filing
07/19/2017 38 ***STRICKEN***MOTION TO SHOW CAUSE/MEMORANDUM OF LAW: Filed by the Unified United States Common Law Grand Jury - Petitioner Messiah Johnson..(hmr) Modified on 7/19/2017 (sas). (Entered: 07/19/2017)

07/19/2017 39 TEXT ORDER: On July 19, 2017, Plaintiff moved for an order to show cause. Dkt. No. 38. The Court dismissed Plaintiff's Complaint with prejudice on July 17, 2017, Dkt. No. 36, and judgment has been entered for Defendants, Dkt. No. 37. This case is now closed, and Plaintiff's submission is improper. The clerk is instructed to STRIKE Plaintiff's July 19 submission, Dkt. No. 38. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on July 19, 2017. (Copy served via regular mail)(sas) (Entered: 07/19/2017)

07/19/2017 40 NOTICE by Grand Jury, Sovereigns of the Court titled "Grand Jury Indictment for Concealment." (jel, ) (Entered: 07/19/2017)
The Motion to Show Cause is another one of his filings for his minions with foreclosure issues. He dumped a bunch of other ones earlier.

VD's "Grand Jury Indictment for Concealment"
http://ia601501.us.archive.org/17/items ... 3.40.0.pdf


North-land: of the family 10
UCC 1-106 Plural is Singular, Singular is Plural.

User avatar
Northland10
Posts: 5704
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:19 am
Location: Chicago area - North burbs

Re: John Darash/Vidurek and the National LIberty Alliance

#15565

Post by Northland10 » Mon Jul 31, 2017 8:16 pm

He is persistent in sending all those "Orders to show cause" to the court.
43 TEXT ORDER: On July 19, 2017, Plaintiff moved for an order to show cause. Dkt. No. 38. The Court instructed the clerk to strike Plaintiff's submission because this case was closed on July 17, 2017. Dkt. No. 39. Apparently undeterred, Plaintiffs submitted two additional motions for orders to show cause on July 26, 2017. Dkt. Nos. 41, 42. This case remains closed, and Plaintiff's submissions are improper. The clerk is instructed to STRIKE Plaintiff's July 26 submissions, Dkt. Nos. 41, 42. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on July 27, 2017. (Copy served via regular mail)(sas,) (Entered: 07/27/2017)
Sorry, John, your "Court of Record" is closed.


North-land: of the family 10
UCC 1-106 Plural is Singular, Singular is Plural.

Grumpy Old Guy
Posts: 900
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2015 10:24 am

Re: John Darash/Vidurek and the National LIberty Alliance

#15566

Post by Grumpy Old Guy » Mon Jul 31, 2017 8:25 pm

I thought Johnny boy and his three or four minions had already indicted that judge, so case closed, Johnny wins. :swoon: :sarcasm:



User avatar
Northland10
Posts: 5704
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:19 am
Location: Chicago area - North burbs

Re: John Darash/Vidurek and the National LIberty Alliance

#15567

Post by Northland10 » Sun Aug 06, 2017 2:06 pm

Johnny is upset that his filings were stricken so he has ordered the clerk to file future ones and informed the magistrate judge, directly, that the Judge Kahn has been removed by way of indictment by VD's grand jury. Johnny has informed the court that Kahn is no longer a judge and the previous ruling by the judge is hereby rescinded. The court is to accept no more orders from the dishonored and bad behavior judge.
08/02/2017 45 Motion from Grand Jury Foreman on behalf of Sovereigns of the Court requesting Writ of Mandamus Relief submitted to Judge Daniel J. Stewart. (Attachments: # 1 Copy of Motion - Sent to Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Stewart) (jmb) (Entered: 08/03/2017)

http://ia601501.us.archive.org/17/items ... 3.45.0.pdf
Now that the clerk has been ordered to file, VD sends more of his followers "order to show cause."
08/02/2017 46 Motion submitted by Grand Jury Foreman on behalf of Sovereigns of the Court requesting Show Cause Relief, references Petitioner Byron Gashler,submitted to Judge Daniel J. Stewart. (jmb) (Entered: 08/03/2017)

08/02/2017 47 Motion submitted by Grand Jury Foreman on behalf of Sovereigns of the Court requesting Show Cause Relief, references Petitioner Joseph Robert Eskel, submitted to Judge Daniel J. Stewart. (jmb) (Entered: 08/03/2017)


North-land: of the family 10
UCC 1-106 Plural is Singular, Singular is Plural.

User avatar
Sterngard Friegen
Posts: 40907
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Location: Trump International - Malibu

Re: John Darash/Vidurek and the National LIberty Alliance

#15568

Post by Sterngard Friegen » Sun Aug 06, 2017 2:47 pm

:yankyank:



User avatar
Sam the Centipede
Posts: 4990
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2012 3:25 pm

Re: John Darash/Vidurek and the National LIberty Alliance

#15569

Post by Sam the Centipede » Sun Aug 06, 2017 3:38 pm

As Vidurek continues to interfere, does the judge (or any other officer of the court) have power to call his ass into court and demand an explanation as to why he shouldn't be sanctioned in some way?

It would be rather juicy to see a subpoena issued and I am confident that Vidurek would respond to that with a flurry of paper bravado and refuse to appear. What then? I would hope to see U.S. Marshals (the real ones, not Supah Dupah Incontinental Martials under Spreem Commandah Haywood) drag his ass into the courtroom.

In some respects, his nonsense is fairly harmless, but its existence and persistence is an insult to law-abiding folk.



User avatar
JohnPCapitalist
Posts: 685
Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2016 10:29 pm
Location: Wall Street
Occupation: Investment management in the financial industry. Deep knowledge of stocks, tech and economics.

Re: John Darash/Vidurek and the National LIberty Alliance

#15570

Post by JohnPCapitalist » Sun Aug 06, 2017 4:37 pm

Northland10 wrote:Now that the clerk has been ordered to file, VD sends more of his followers "order to show cause."
08/02/2017 46 Motion submitted by Grand Jury Foreman on behalf of Sovereigns of the Court requesting Show Cause Relief, references Petitioner Byron Gashler,submitted to Judge Daniel J. Stewart. (jmb) (Entered: 08/03/2017)
Here's the steaming pile of nonsense from Byron Gashler: (on Scribd due to size limitations). It's all about Gashler's foreclosure in Salt Lake City... Hard to imagine there's anything even less relevant to the case in the Northern District of New York.

At first, I thought this was a paperwork screw-up because the defendants in this case are not the same as the ones in the case they filed it under. But it's not a mistake because they actually have the correct case number on it. I guess the assumption is that now that they have seized control of the corrupt and eeebil gummint court with their "Article III" common law court, they can use this case (which was closed weeks ago) to complain about whatever they want.

I'm thinking this will piss the judge off even more. While I'm sure it's a lot more work for him to get Vidurek and company prosecuted for whatever, it sounds like they're coming a lot closer to crossing the line than they have in a while. Perhaps Vidurek is forgetting the lessons of pretend grand juror Terry Trussell already?



User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 8585
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

Re: John Darash/Vidurek and the National LIberty Alliance

#15571

Post by Notorial Dissent » Sun Aug 06, 2017 5:16 pm

My, My, I wonder if that is the same Byron Gashler who was a very loud voice and all around shill for the old Dorean Group mortgage scam out of CA. A particularly nasty piece of work as well.


The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
Northland10
Posts: 5704
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:19 am
Location: Chicago area - North burbs

Re: John Darash/Vidurek and the National LIberty Alliance

#15572

Post by Northland10 » Sun Aug 06, 2017 5:19 pm

JohnPCapitalist wrote:Here's the steaming pile of nonsense from Byron Gashler: (on Scribd due to size limitations). It's all about Gashler's foreclosure in Salt Lake City... Hard to imagine there's anything even less relevant to the case in the Northern District of New York.

At first, I thought this was a paperwork screw-up because the defendants in this case are not the same as the ones in the case they filed it under. But it's not a mistake because they actually have the correct case number on it. I guess the assumption is that now that they have seized control of the corrupt and eeebil gummint court with their "Article III" common law court, they can use this case (which was closed weeks ago) to complain about whatever they want.
All of the other "show cause" filings, that I have read, were for somebody's foreclosure. Since they are all 14 and 15 pages, I assume they are generally the same thing.

Here is the one for John Walter Sprouse. It is missing the "file on demand" but it was entered before the case was dismissed.



Poor two-names is assuming that he has now opened a "court of record" and therefore, he can file anything and it will be done.


North-land: of the family 10
UCC 1-106 Plural is Singular, Singular is Plural.

User avatar
Sterngard Friegen
Posts: 40907
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Location: Trump International - Malibu

Re: John Darash/Vidurek and the National LIberty Alliance

#15573

Post by Sterngard Friegen » Sun Aug 06, 2017 5:26 pm

All John Vidurek assumes is that he will raise more money from the dopes following his bullshit. He knows that what he cranks out is nonsense and he's so proud of it he uses a swirly illegible signature, no name and an address in a vacant lot. He really stands behind his bullshit. As far behind it as possible.



User avatar
Techno Luddite
Posts: 2512
Joined: Sat May 16, 2015 5:23 pm

Re: John Darash/Vidurek and the National LIberty Alliance

#15574

Post by Techno Luddite » Sun Aug 06, 2017 8:47 pm

JohnPCapitalist wrote: :snippity:
I'm thinking this will piss the judge off even more. While I'm sure it's a lot more work for him to get Vidurek and company prosecuted for whatever, it sounds like they're coming a lot closer to crossing the line than they have in a while. :snippity:
I think you are correct there. I suspect that he's having a tough time getting donations now that so many of his "colleagues" in the field of legal gibberish generation have gotten themselves ensnared in the system. At some point, he'll do something sufficiently stupid and reckless to cause the same fate to his bad self, if he hasn't already.



User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 8585
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

Re: John Darash/Vidurek and the National LIberty Alliance

#15575

Post by Notorial Dissent » Sun Aug 06, 2017 11:10 pm

I can't imagine that he has too many followers even left, he has regularly failed for the last what four years, and has solicited a great deal of money, although I don't know how much he has actually gotten. I would think that that he down to the truly brainless few at this point though. I think he has been reduced to harassing the NDNY and they aren't giving him any latitude at all. I do think he's dumb enough and egotistical enough that he will eventually cross the line and get swatted, but I have no idea what it will take to get there.


The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

Post Reply

Return to “Sovereign Citizens, Private Militias, and Citizen Grand Juries”