Judge (Dishonorable) James C. Hankinson would not allow even a common routine Motion hearing, unless terry would be represented by a BAR Lawyer.
Remember this is the same Judge (Dishonorable) James C. Hankinson that arrested Terry while in court for failure to appear in court. You can call it what you want and of course I would defend your 1st amendment rights for you to say what you want even if I disagree, but the system is blatantly, obviously rigged!
A judge doesn't have to put up with someone babbling nonsense forever in his courtroom. That is what Terry T in pro per was doing.
Contrary to what certain nut burgers have written on the internet, there is no straw man, his name in caps means nothing, and there is no secret govt account he can access, etc. It's all nonsense Gimmy. Those of us in the legal profession know this. You have no proof to the contrary, but you believe to the contrary because you are gullible and duped.
But I'll engage you.
Tell us how the "system is rigged?"
Do you mean it was unfair for the jury to acquit TT of 9 of the charges? Was it rigged then?
Or was it rigged when the friends of the defendant (i.e., common law gj loons) wrote to the court saying he was exonerated, innocent, etc.? Do you believe that anyone accused of a crime should be able to avoid it because of letters from friends? Impromptu groups that call themselves fancy names such as NLA? How would anyone be held accountable? What if it were violent crime?
What is your evidence of rigging? Real evidence, not "the guy I was rooting for got found guilty."
He violated a law, he got prosecuted, he got convicted - on some counts but not others.
It's that simple.
Now what say you?