GimmyTruth's Constitutional Fan Fiction Thread

GimmyTruth
Posts: 364
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2014 3:43 pm

GimmyTruth's Constitutional Fan Fiction Thread

#1

Post by GimmyTruth » Sat Aug 23, 2014 2:34 pm

The Common Law Grand Jury for the State of Florida was established today! Look out you Lawyers, were comin' for ya. :shock:



User avatar
gatsby
Posts: 18444
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2012 10:29 pm
Location: West Egg, Long Island

GimmyTruth's Constitutional Fan Fiction Thread

#2

Post by gatsby » Sun Aug 24, 2014 3:39 pm

The Common Law Grand Jury for the State of Florida was established today! Look out you Lawyers, were comin' for ya. :shock:No, they'll be coming for you. ;)


843.0855 [highlight]Criminal actions[/highlight] under color of law or [highlight]through use of simulated legal process[/highlight].--





(1) As used in this section:


(a) The term "legal process" means a document or order issued by a court or filed or recorded for the purpose of exercising jurisdiction or representing a claim against a person or property, or for the purpose of directing a person to appear before a court or tribunal, or to perform or refrain from performing a specified act. "Legal process" includes, but is not limited to, a summons, lien, complaint, warrant, injunction, writ, notice, pleading, subpoena, or order.


(b) The term "person" means an individual, public or private group incorporated or otherwise, legitimate or illegitimate legal tribunal or entity, informal organization, official or unofficial agency or body, or any assemblage of individuals.


(c) The term "public officer" means a public officer as defined by s. 112.061.


(d) The term "public employee" means a public employee as defined by s. 112.061.





(2) Any person who deliberately impersonates or falsely acts as a public officer or tribunal, public employee or utility employee, including, but not limited to, marshals, judges, prosecutors, sheriffs, deputies, court personnel, or any law enforcement authority in connection with or relating to any legal process affecting persons and property, or otherwise takes any action under color of law against persons or property, commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.





(3) [highlight]Any person who simulates legal process, including, but not limited to,[/highlight] actions affecting title to real estate or personal property, [highlight]indictments[/highlight], subpoenas, warrants, injunctions, liens, orders, judgments, or any legal documents or proceedings, knowing or having reason to know the contents of any such documents or proceedings or the basis for any action to be fraudulent, [highlight]commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.[/highlight]





(4) [highlight]Any person who falsely under color of law attempts in any way to influence, intimidate, or hinder a public officer or law enforcement officer in the discharge of his or her official duties by means of, but not limited to, threats of or actual physical abuse or harassment, or through the use of simulated legal process, commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.[/highlight]





(5)(a) Nothing in this section shall make unlawful any act of any law enforcement officer or legal tribunal which is performed under lawful authority.


(b) Nothing in this section shall prohibit individuals from assembling freely to express opinions or designate group affiliation or association.


(c) Nothing in this section shall prohibit or in any way limit a person's lawful and legitimate access to the courts or prevent a person from instituting or responding to legitimate and lawful legal process.[/break1]justia.com/codes/florida/2005/TitleXLVI/ch0843.html]http://law.justia.com/codes/florida/200 ... h0843.html





-xx



User avatar
Sugar Magnolia
Posts: 9626
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2012 6:44 am

GimmyTruth's Constitutional Fan Fiction Thread

#3

Post by Sugar Magnolia » Sun Aug 24, 2014 3:47 pm

The Common Law Grand Jury for the State of Florida was established today! Look out you Lawyers, were comin' for ya. :shock:If lawyers are so horrible and not deserving of any respect, why do you capitalize it?



User avatar
kate520
Posts: 15212
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 3:02 pm
Location: Dark side of the Moon
Occupation: servant of cats, chicken wrangler
Contact:

GimmyTruth's Constitutional Fan Fiction Thread

#4

Post by kate520 » Sun Aug 24, 2014 4:30 pm

The Common Law Grand Jury for the State of Florida was established today! Look out you Lawyers, were comin' for ya. :shock:Hey Jimmy! We're ready for ya! :towel:


DEFEND DEMOCRACY

User avatar
Piffle
Posts: 6987
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 12:39 pm

GimmyTruth's Constitutional Fan Fiction Thread

#5

Post by Piffle » Sun Aug 24, 2014 4:32 pm

The Common Law Grand Jury for the State of Florida was established today! Look out you Lawyers, were comin' for ya. :shock: =)) =)) -xx
Edit: Oops, I almost forgot my manners. Welcome to the Fogbow. Seriously!



User avatar
Highlands
Posts: 3600
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 12:19 am
Location: 3rd Rock From the Sun

GimmyTruth's Constitutional Fan Fiction Thread

#6

Post by Highlands » Sun Aug 24, 2014 4:44 pm

The Common Law Grand Jury for the State of Florida was established today! Look out you Lawyers, were comin' for ya. :shock:My dogs and I just formed The Common Law Grand Jury for the State of Sanity. We took a vote, and by an overwhelming majority, decided that The Common Law Grand Jury for the State of Florida will be indicted for crimes against rational people everywhere. Wear your best suit and don't be late, the judge (my Corgi pup) really hates a lack of decorum in his court.


If you took out all of the blood vessels in your body and lined them up, you would be dead. #science

User avatar
Foggy
Posts: 27096
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 12:00 pm
Location: Fogbow HQ
Occupation: Dick Tater

GimmyTruth's Constitutional Fan Fiction Thread

#7

Post by Foggy » Sun Aug 24, 2014 6:59 pm

The Common Law Grand Jury for the State of Florida was established today! Look out you Lawyers, were comin' for ya. :shock:If lawyers are so horrible and not deserving of any respect, why do you capitalize it?At least they don't make 'em sit in the back of the bus. ;;)


Mr. William L. Bryan is the root of a great deal of criminal mischief. And yet, Mr. Bryan remains at large.

GimmyTruth
Posts: 364
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2014 3:43 pm

GimmyTruth's Constitutional Fan Fiction Thread

#8

Post by GimmyTruth » Mon Sep 08, 2014 11:28 am

Sun Sep 07, 2014 at 07:07 AM PDT.Now For a Little Common Law Grand Jury Schadenfreude.by shades at midniteFollow .34 Comments / 0 NewIf anyone has been following the antics of the National Liberty Alliance (NLA) of late, you know they've started a common law grand jury movement by which they plan to take over the government, indicting corrupt official by corrupt official, working their way up to President Obama sometime this century. Actually, their time frame is in the 60 day range, but I don't think things are going according to plan. A couple of years ago Larry Klayman tried to indict President Obama for treason via a "common law" grand jury out of Ocala, Florida. After the humiliating reaction to that, you'd think this movement would have died a quick but painful death. You'd be wrong.If you haven't been following said debacle, here's the plan in a nutshell. Based on some half-wit's interpretation of a comment Scalia made in 1992 in US vs. Williams regarding grand juries, they've decided any person can go off half-cocked, form their own grand jury, indict and convict anyone they see fit, and judges/sheriffs, etc, are legally obligated to comply.The National Liberty Alliance, and its founder, RWNJ extraordinaire John Darash, have managed to convince a significant number of people this will work and they've been working diligently filing what they believe are true bills stamped ever so officially with seals they've purchased at Staples and any day now they'll be proudly announcing the first wave of many arrests to come.The best known of the most recent spate of common law (also called citizen's or people's) grand juries was announced throughout RWNJ-land August 13, 2014. It involves recent common law grand jury shenanigans in Dixie County, Florida. I prefer not to link to any of the crazy sites but most are easy enough to Google. If you want to read this particular announcement, google "common law grand jury Dixie County Florida" and you'll have plenty to chose from, mostly crazies but a few sane ones will pop up as well. The facts behind this grand jury are as follows. A court-sanctioned grand jury was convened in Dixie County and Terry Trussell (of Operation American Spring drone attack fame) was chosen, or volunteered, to be foreman. Once foreman, he attempted to hijack the legit grand jury for his own agenda. This was heralded as a breakthrough with high expectations from the looniverse.Now for the schadenfreude: State Attorney Siegmeister obviously didn't take too kindly to Mr. Trussell's mutiny and requested he be removed from the grand jury. This was granted by Judge Greg Parker. Mr. Trussell then formed his own CLGJ, indicted Mr. Siegmeister for treason (yes, apparently in NLA World, having irreconcilable differences with a grand jury foreman is treason) sending his own "true bill" to the state supreme court with a copy to Justice Scalia (Scalia is apparently getting copies like this from all over the United States if the NLA boards are to be believed.) On August 28, an update from Mr. Trussell was posted. He remained optimistic despite not yet receiving acknowledgement of his true bills. He also said, "Apparently our law enforcement has taken a long Memorial (sic) Day holiday. We have a plan to wake them up." That was a reference to his expectation State Attorney Siegmeister would be arrested for treason at any moment. Ironically, the following week Mr. Trussell himself was arrested for "simulating a legal process."The announcement of Mr. Trussell's arrest is slowly making its way across the looniverse, with only scant postings here and there. If you want to read one particularly pearl-clutching post from the RWNJ point of view, Google "Dixie County American Patriots Radio."Well, that's all I have for now. Once OAS died off, I've been entertaining myself by following this common law phenom which seems to have replaced the American Spring movement. I'd been hesitant to post a diary on it because, well, it's just so silly, but today I couldn't help myself



GimmyTruth
Posts: 364
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2014 3:43 pm

GimmyTruth's Constitutional Fan Fiction Thread

#9

Post by GimmyTruth » Tue Sep 16, 2014 6:41 am

This is what happened in Dixie County FLhttp://www.jasonwhoyt.com/blog/2014/9/13/exclu ... uxfs.gbpl=



GimmyTruth
Posts: 364
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2014 3:43 pm

GimmyTruth's Constitutional Fan Fiction Thread

#10

Post by GimmyTruth » Wed Sep 17, 2014 6:50 pm

I just checked the Dixie County docket for Trussell's case and saw this entry from (Action Date) 9/15. Text: Order Allowing Public Defender to Withdraw. What does that mean Terry Trussell does not trust the Lawyers. They take a oath to the Bar Assoc. not the Constitution!



GimmyTruth
Posts: 364
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2014 3:43 pm

GimmyTruth's Constitutional Fan Fiction Thread

#11

Post by GimmyTruth » Wed Sep 17, 2014 7:20 pm

[url=http://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/ ... hority.pdf]http://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/ ... hority.pdf



REBUTTALS TO ANTI-AMERICAN BAR INDOCTRINATED POSITIONS:

COMMON LAW v. CIVIL LAW By Brent Williams; (brief history)



Two fundamental traditions of law and government are active among humanity, each manifesting

contrary ideals: the common law and the civil law. The common law rests upon justice administered

by scriptural principles that presuppose and guard against the inherent imperfections of human reason.

The civil law, on the other hand, justifies its methods by presupposing and appealing to man's notions

of perfected reason. The common law tradition governs only a handful of countries and is

fundamentally consonant with Scripture, acknowledging the divine eternality of law as the measure of

all things. The civil law tradition, on the other hand, governs most modern nations and is

fundamentally Babylonian trusting human reason as the worthy measure of all things.

The common law tradition recognizes the necessity of human administration of law and government

while providing safeguards against man's weaknesses. The common law, however, does not teach that

we elect or appoint men to govern us. On the contrary, the eternal law is our governor and the

governor of those elected and appointed. Therefore, the duties of those administering government

are purely ministerial: God binds magistrates and other officials to remain consonant with His

character in word and deed; to arrogate more to elected officials is tantamount to idolatry. The

common law has fashioned its methods to seek and derive law from the revealed mind of God. By

contrast, civil law's ultimate source is the mind of man. In the common law tradition, all law is

derivative: men must derive law from God. On the other hand, under the traditional civil law, men

must make the law: i.e., law is a product of the human mind, un-derived from any source superior

to humanity.

Because the common law focuses on relationships, applicable common law standards aredetermined by first recognizing the kind of relationship that exists between contending parties.Once this question of fact is determined, out of this relationship arises a certain level of rights andresponsibilities. Civil law, on the other hand, is primarily determined by ascertaining the will ofthe state as expressed in legislation. The question of relationship determines law: rights andresponsibilities concerning life, liberty, and property. If the will of the state is the foremostconsideration, however, private and individual determination of relationships to choose one'srelationships and freedom to define one's associations by delineating one's commitments contractsare forfeited. Therefore, common law is not made, but discovered by first recognizing the dutydemanded by different categories of relationships; while civil law is the decreed by will of men,or a man, as the embodiment of the state. In the common law tradition, law is of eternal origin;
therefore, all men and the state are subject to it. By contrast, the civil law tradition holds thatbecause law is the will of man as expressed in the state's legislation, law may change asman's desire and will changes; further, since the state is the source of the law, the law issubject to the state and not the state to the law. Further, any freedom of private relationshipssuch as association or contract is subject to impairment of the legislative will.FEEBLE ARGUMENTS FROM THE STATUS QUOStatus quo - No legal authority: “This is a rogue band of citizens with no legal authority,” said WesOliver, Associate Professor and director of the criminal justice program at Duquesne University Schoolof Law. “To what extent there was ever a common law grand jury system that was self-creating, thereno longer is.” (No supporting authorities offered)REBUTTAL –In the Supreme Court case of United States v. Williams, 112 S.Ct. 1735, 504 U.S. 36, 118 L.Ed.2d 352(1992), Justice Antonin Scalia, writing for the majority, confirmed that the American grand jury isneither part of the judicial, executive nor legislative branches of government, but instead belongs to the

people. It is in effect a fourth branch of government "governed" and administered to directly by and on

behalf of the American people, and its authority emanates from the Bill of Rights.JUSTICE ANTONIN SCALIA WENT ON TO SAY: (in U.S v. Williams) “The grand jury is mentioned in theBill of Rights, but not in the body of the Constitution. It has not been textually assigned, therefore, toany of the branches described in the first three Articles. It is a constitutional fixture in its own right”.United States v. Chanen, 549 F.2d 1306, 1312 (CA9 1977) (quoting Nixon v. Sirica, 159 U.S.App.D.C. 58, 70, n. 54, 487 F.2d 700, 712, n. 54 (1973)), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 825, 98 S.Ct. 72, 54L.Ed.2d 83 (1977).; United States v. John H. Williams, Jr.; 112 S.Ct. 1735; 504 U.S. 36; 118 L.Ed.2d

352; No. 90-1972."All laws, rules and practices which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void" [Marbury v.Madison, 5th US (2 Cranch) 137, 180]“There can be no limitation on the power of the people of the United States (of America). By theirauthority the State Constitutions were made and by their authority the Constitution for the UnitedStates (of America) was established…” Hauenstein vs. Lynham (100 US 483).“The United States Supreme Court declares that the “Sovereignty” remains with the “people” andresides with the “people”…Yick Wo vs. Hopkins and Woo Lee Hopkins (118 US 356).“No action can be taken against a sovereign in the non-constitutional courts of either the United statesor the state courts and any such action is considered the crime of Barratry1. Barratry is an offense atcommon law.” State vs. Batson 17 S.E.2d 511. 512,513.1BARRETOR. In criminal law. A common mover, exciter, or maintainer of suits and quarrels either in courts or elsewhere in thecountry; a disturber of the peace who spreads false rumors and calumnies, whereby discord and disquiet may grow among neighbors.Co.Litt. 368. One who frequently excites and stirs up groundless suits and quarrels, either at law or otherwise. Mate v. Batson, 220 N.C.411, 17 S.E.2d 511, 512, 513. BARRETRY. In criminal law. The act or offense of a barretor, (q. v. ;) usually called "common barretry." 4Steph.Comm. 262.

Status quo - Common people are not capable of making such decisions: (No supporting authorities offered)REBUTTAL –“Whenever people are well-informed they can be trusted with their own government” - ThomasJefferson … “The constitutions of most of our states assert that all power is inherent in the people;that they may exercise it by themselves, in all cases to which they think themselves competent” -Thomas Jefferson, letter to John Cartwright; June 5, 1824; "Trust in the jury is, after all, one of thecornerstones of our entire criminal jurisprudence, and if that trust is without foundation we must reexaminea great deal more than just the nullification doctrine." - Judge David L. Bazelon

Status quo - Legal experts say that in 1946, the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure were established, doing away with the common law grand jury model. (No supporting authorities offered)REBUTTAL –“The Court of Appeals' rule would neither preserve nor enhance the traditional functioning of thegrand jury that the "common law" of the Fifth Amendment demands” - 1990, U.S v. Williams“The power of grand juries to inquire into the wilful misconduct in office of public officers, and to findindictments or to direct the filing of information’s in connection with such inquiries, shall never besuspended or impaired by law.” New York Constitution Article 1 §6

Status quo - Grand juries must be approved by the courts.REBUTTAL –“The grand jury is an institution separate from the courts, over whose functioning the courts do notpreside, we think it clear that, as a general matter at least, no such supervisory judicial authorityexists” - 1990, U.S v. WilliamsJUSTICE ANTONIN SCALIA SAID: “In fact the whole theory of its function is that it belongs to nobranch of the institutional government, serving as a kind of buffer or referee between the Governmentand the people”. Stirone v. United States, 361 U.S. 212, 218, 80 S.Ct. 270, 273, 4 L.Ed.2d 252 (1960);Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43, 61, 26 S.Ct. 370, 373, 50 L.Ed. 652 (1906); United States v. John H.Williams, Jr.; 112 S.Ct. 1735; 504 U.S. 36; 118 L.Ed.2d 352; No. 90-1972.

Status quo - There is no statute or procedural rule that allows citizens to convene grand juries. (No supporting authorities offered)REBUTTAL –There is no statute or procedural rule that prevents people from convening grand juries.JUSTICE ANTONIN SCALIA SAID: “The grand jury requires no authorization from its constituting courtto initiate an investigation,” see Hale, supra, 201 U.S., at 59-60, 65, 26 S.Ct., at 373, 375, ).; UnitedStates v. John H. Williams, Jr.; 112 S.Ct. 1735; 504 U.S. 36; 118 L.Ed.2d 352; No. 90-1972.“The grand jury's functional independence from the judicial branch is evident both in the scope of itspower to investigate criminal wrongdoing, and in the manner in which that power is exercised. "Unlike[a] [c]ourt, whose jurisdiction is predicated upon a specific case or controversy, the grand jury 'caninvestigate merely on suspicion that the law is being violated, or even because it wants assurance thatit is not.'" United States v. R. Enterprises, 498 U.S. ----, ---- , 111 S.Ct. 722, 726, 112 L.Ed.2d 795(1991) (quoting United States v. Morton Salt Co., 338 U.S. 632, 642-643, 70 S.Ct. 357, 364, 94L.Ed. 401 (1950)). Blair v. United States, 250 U.S. 273, 282, 39 S.Ct. 468, 471, 63 L.Ed. 979(1919).; United States v. John H. Williams, Jr.; 112 S.Ct. 1735; 504 U.S. 36; 118 L.Ed.2d 352; No.90-1972.Status quo - Unless common law grand juries are officially recognized by the courts, prosecutors offered presentments or individuals subpoenaed by the self-formed grand juries would not be legally compelled to cooperate. (No supporting authorities offered)REBUTTAL –Prosecutors are not offered presentments; presentments are filed with the Supreme Court Chief Clerk

and once filed cannot be removed, anyone interfering with an official proceeding commits a crime

under US codes.

USC 18 §2076 - Clerk is to file: Whoever, being a clerk willfully refuses or neglects to make

or forward any report, certificate, statement, or document as required by law, shall be fined

under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

USC 18 §2071 - Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or

destroys, or attempts to do so, documents filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any

court, shall be fined or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

18 USC §1512b - Whoever knowingly uses intimidation, threatens, or corruptly persuades

another person, or attempts to do so, or engages in misleading conduct toward another person,

with intent to - (1) influence, delay, or prevent ... an official proceeding; (2) cause or induce

any person to - (a) withhold ... a document, or other object, from an official proceeding; (b)

alter, destroy, mutilate, or conceal an official proceeding; … shall be fined under this title or

imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.THE FOX & THE HEN HOUSEIf the government can select the jurors [like they do now], it will, of course, select those whom itsupposes will be favorable to its enactments [like they do now]. And an exclusion of any of thefreemen from eligibility is a selection of those not excluded [like they do now]. It will be seen, fromthe statutes cited, that the most absolute authority over the jury box that is, over the right of the peopleto sit in juries has been usurped by the government; Lysander Spooner, Trial by Jury, page 92, 1852“Men must be governed by God or they will be ruled by tyrants”. William PennAmendment V – “No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unlesson a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury...” It is in effect a fourth branch of government

"governed" and administered to directly by and on behalf of the American people.".[break1].[/break1]the jury shall have the right to determine the law and the fact". New York Constitution Article 1.§8 “As understood at common law and as used in constitutional provision, "jury" imports body oftwelve men.” [State v. Dalton, 206 N.C. 507, 174 S.E. 422, 424; People ex rel.Cooley v. Wilder, 255N.Y.S. 218, 222, 234 App.Div. 256; Hall v. Brown, 129 Kan. 859, 284 P. 396.]"The jury has a unalienable right to judge both the law as well as the fact in controversy." John Jay,1st Chief Justice United States Supreme Court, 1789."The jury has the right to determine both the law and the facts." Samuel Chase, U.S. SupremeCourt Justice 1796, Signer of the unanimous Declaration"The jury has the power to bring a verdict in the teeth of both law and fact." Oliver WendellHolmes, U.S. Supreme Court Justice, 1902.





User avatar
Family Liberty Patriot
Posts: 4486
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2014 1:23 pm
Location: Southern Orlystan
Occupation: Czar of All the Russias

GimmyTruth's Constitutional Fan Fiction Thread

#12

Post by Family Liberty Patriot » Wed Sep 17, 2014 7:22 pm

Terry Trussell does not trust the Lawyers. They take a oath to the Bar Assoc. not the Constitution!I'm no SovCit, but don't you have to spell it B.A.R. to make the majick work?EDIT: Your thoughtful and coherent cut-and-paste wall o' text has convinced me; where do I sign up?


"The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness."

John Kenneth Galbraith (1908 - 2006)

User avatar
nbc
Posts: 4179
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 12:38 am

GimmyTruth's Constitutional Fan Fiction Thread

#13

Post by nbc » Wed Sep 17, 2014 8:04 pm

Terry Trussell does not trust the Lawyers. They take a oath to the Bar Assoc. not the Constitution! Which certainly explains why he filed an indigence application to get a free one. ](*,) When it comes down to having to pay for one yourself....



GimmyTruth
Posts: 364
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2014 3:43 pm

GimmyTruth's Constitutional Fan Fiction Thread

#14

Post by GimmyTruth » Wed Sep 17, 2014 8:05 pm

If you would like to listen to a interview of Terry Trussel Go To -> http://www.jasonwhoyt.com/blog/2014/9/1 ... -judiciary



GimmyTruth
Posts: 364
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2014 3:43 pm

GimmyTruth's Constitutional Fan Fiction Thread

#15

Post by GimmyTruth » Sat Sep 20, 2014 1:40 pm

If any of you want to know about Terry Trussell? Just listen to him in a live interview? http://www.jasonwhoyt.com/blog/2014/9/1 ... -judiciary The Peoples Common Law Grand Jury can save this country. The Lawyers wont!



User avatar
Slim Cognito
Posts: 5262
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2014 8:37 am

GimmyTruth's Constitutional Fan Fiction Thread

#16

Post by Slim Cognito » Sat Sep 20, 2014 1:55 pm

If any of you want to know about Terry Trussell? Just listen to him in a live interview? http://www.jasonwhoyt.com/blog/2014/9/1 ... -judiciary The Peoples Common Law Grand Jury can save this country. The Lawyers wont!Yeah, Bernie Madoff talked himself up pretty big, too.


ImageImageImage x4

User avatar
Family Liberty Patriot
Posts: 4486
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2014 1:23 pm
Location: Southern Orlystan
Occupation: Czar of All the Russias

GimmyTruth's Constitutional Fan Fiction Thread

#17

Post by Family Liberty Patriot » Sat Sep 20, 2014 2:02 pm

If any of you want to know about Terry Trussell? Just listen to him in a live interview? http://www.jasonwhoyt.com/blog/2014/9/1 ... -judiciary The Peoples Common Law Grand Jury can save this country. The Lawyers wont!The Peoples (sic) Common Law Grand Jury isn't even a thing, and Terry Trussell is going to jail. But by all means, hitch your wagon to that star.


"The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness."

John Kenneth Galbraith (1908 - 2006)

GimmyTruth
Posts: 364
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2014 3:43 pm

GimmyTruth's Constitutional Fan Fiction Thread

#18

Post by GimmyTruth » Wed Oct 01, 2014 11:16 pm

Dana Johnson <djohnson@dixieclerk.com>Attached please find the documents recorded in Official Record Book 469 Pages 467 and 468. If you will note the information along the top of both documents are the data which verify the information is authentic. If you look at the “bill of information” items you will note there is no authentication along the top. If you have any additional questions let me know.

Dana JohnsonDixie County Clerk of CourtP O Box 1206Cross City FL 32628(352) 498-1200









The Clerk of Courts is corrupt

Dear Dana:(Clerk of Courts Dixie County FL) Thank you for your prompt response. I verified your assertion as to validity of the documents in question. According to my Clerk of Court, the first (please see attached) to be time-stamped would have to be the valid filed document. He also noted such an incidence would be most unusual, and cause for an investigation. He stated that in order to force the software to create two documents with all the same indicia information, except time-stamp, would require intentional manipulation of data, indicating possible violation of:Title 18 USC Crimes and Criminal ProcedurePart I Crimes

Chapter 101 Records and ReportsSection 2071 Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally

(a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

​ ​If your computer isn’t malfunctioning, perhaps you might want to correct clerk ‘CH’s’ understanding of the software and equipment. It appears she may not be in compliance with her duties and her oath of office. Also, it appears from the attached receipt, Mr. Trussell paid to have the bills of information filed (Note Instrument Numbers) prior to Mr. King’s filings. I may be in error, but could it appear the Trussell documents were removed to hide any possible appearance of impropriety in the Clerk’s office, and by Greg Parker? But I know that couldn’t be, could it? Please help me understand.



Thank you.​Yours in Freedom​xxxxxxx

"There is a higher court than courts of justice and that is the court of conscience. It supersedes all other courts." -- Mahatma Mohandas K. Gandhi (1869-1948)



User avatar
Slim Cognito
Posts: 5262
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2014 8:37 am

GimmyTruth's Constitutional Fan Fiction Thread

#19

Post by Slim Cognito » Wed Oct 01, 2014 11:27 pm

Let me see if I can help you understand GT. Trussell's documents were fakes. Fake docs don't get to live in official record books. Glad I could be of service.


ImageImageImage x4

GimmyTruth
Posts: 364
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2014 3:43 pm

GimmyTruth's Constitutional Fan Fiction Thread

#20

Post by GimmyTruth » Thu Oct 02, 2014 5:26 pm

5:01 PM today 10/2/14Dixie County Sheriff's OfficeP.O. Box 470214 NE 351 Highway, Suite LCross City, Florida 32628To: Sheriff Dewey H. HatcherIt has come to my attention we have discovered that there are some serious criminal activities taking place in Dixie County Florida and lead to criminal activity as to Dana Johnson (Court Clerk) in the Dixie County Clerk of Court. It is my responsibility and yours, by law to act upon this immediately. Please see forwarded letter (e-mail) below that I sent to Dana Johnson (Court Clerk) this morning as to the criminal activity.TITLE 18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PART I - CRIMESCHAPTER 115 - TREASON, SEDITION, AND SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIESSec. 2382. Misprision of treasonWhoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the commission of any treason against them, conceals and does not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President or to some judge of the United States, or to the governor or to some judge or justice of a particular State, is guilty of misprision of treason and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both.Notice to principle is notice to agent and notice to agent is notice to principle. In the name of the People of Florida, including but not limited to Dixie County Florida.You must respond to me in writing no latter than October 9th 2014.Sincerelyxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxcc: Dana Johnson (Court Clerk)4:09 PM today 10/2/14To :D ana JohnsonDixie CountyCourt ClerkP O Box 1206Cross City FL 32628djohnson@dixieclerk.comTo Dana Johnson (Court Clerk):As to our conversation this morning. 1) You stated that Terry Trussells fillings dated 8/11/2014 were filed properly. 2) You also said that Trussells documents should not have been in the court record. 3) You then said the Trussell documents were retracted by you, the Court Clerk.Dixie County File On DemandNotice to Dixie County, Florida Court ClerkIn the name of the People of Florida, including but not limited to Dixie County Florida.The minute you (Court Clerk) receive any document, it is recorded according to the following case site. Biffle v. Morton Rubber Indus., Inc., 785 S.W.2d 143, 144 (Tex.1990). An instrument is deemed in law filed at the time it is delivered to the clerk, regardless of whether the instrument is file marked.Should you refuse to record any documents, once deposited with you, or remove, you are committing a crime under Title 18 USC § 2071 and it is punishable by fines and imprisonment. If your attorney told you not to file, remove any documents like Trussells, you are still responsible, as you must not accept any third party intervener's. Any attorney, district attorney, or anyone from the lawyering craft are all third parties and do not have a license to make a legal determination in this matter as they do not represent The People of Dixie County and you, the county clerk, and do not have the authority to represent Trussell.Title 18 USC Crimes and Criminal ProcedurePart I CrimesSection 2071 Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally(a)Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.(b)Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term ''office'' does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.Revised Statutes of The United States, 1st session, 43 Congress 1873-1874.Title LXX.---CRIMES.--- CH. 4. CRIMES AGAINST JUSTICESEC. 5403. (Destroying, &c., public records).Every person who willfully destroys or attempts to destroy, or, with intent to steal or destroy, takes and carries away any record, paper, or proceeding of a court of justice, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of such court, or any paper, or document, or record filed or deposited in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer, shall, without reference to the value of the record, paper, document, or proceeding so taken, pay a fine of not more than two thousand dollars, or suffer imprisonment, at hard labor, not more than three years, or both:[See § § 5408, 5411, 5412.1]SEC. 5407. (Conspiracy to defeat enforcement of the laws).If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire for the purpose of impeding, hindering, obstructing, or defeating, in any manner, the due course of justice in any State or Territory, with intent to deny to any citizen the equal protection of the laws, or to injure him or his property for lawfully enforcing, or attempting to enforce, the right of any person, or class of persons, to the equal protection of the laws, each of such persons shall be punished by a fine of not less than five hundred nor more than five thousand dollars, or by imprisonment, with or without hard labor, not less than six months nor more than six years, or by both such fine and imprisonment. See § § 1977-1991, 2004 2010, 5506-5510.1 SEC. 5408. (Destroying record by officer in charge.)Every officer, having the custody of any record, document, paper, or proceeding specified in section fifty-four-hundred-and-three, who fraudulently takes away, or withdraws, or destroys any such record, document, paper, or proceeding filed in his office or deposited with him or in his custody, shall pay a fine of not more than two thousand dollars, or suffer imprisonment at hard labor not more than three years, or both, and shall, moreover, forfeit his office and be forever afterward disqualified from holding any office under the Government of the United States.Notice to principle is notice to agent and notice to agent is notice to principle.In the name of the People of Florida, including but not limited to Dixie County Florida.Sincerelyxxxxxcc Sheriff Dewey H. Hatcher



GimmyTruth
Posts: 364
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2014 3:43 pm

GimmyTruth's Constitutional Fan Fiction Thread

#21

Post by GimmyTruth » Thu Oct 09, 2014 1:23 pm

Unfortunately Terry was taken 2 jail 4 failure 2 appear even though he announced he was present 4 the matter at hand.



User avatar
Gnarly Goat
Posts: 2020
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 5:19 pm

GimmyTruth's Constitutional Fan Fiction Thread

#22

Post by Gnarly Goat » Thu Oct 09, 2014 1:27 pm





Unfortunately Terry was taken 2 jail 4 failure 2 appear even though he announced he was present 4 the matter at hand.







Oh dear, Gimmy. What a terrible miscarriage of justice.



Will be nice to see an unbiased account of what transpired. Based on that one sentence-like statement I'm still betting that Terry opted for full on SovCit.


"Don't waste time mourning. Organize." - Joe Hill

User avatar
realist
Posts: 34570
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:33 pm

GimmyTruth's Constitutional Fan Fiction Thread

#23

Post by realist » Thu Oct 09, 2014 1:29 pm





Unfortunately Terry was taken 2 jail 4 failure 2 appear even though he announced he was present 4 the matter at hand.







He didn't appear but was taken to jail after announcing he was there? :roll:



Perhaps you could try that in English, GimmyT. :-?


ImageX 4 ImageX36
Image

User avatar
Slim Cognito
Posts: 5262
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2014 8:37 am

GimmyTruth's Constitutional Fan Fiction Thread

#24

Post by Slim Cognito » Thu Oct 09, 2014 1:37 pm





Unfortunately Terry was taken 2 jail 4 failure 2 appear even though he announced he was present 4 the matter at hand.





We'll see what the county docket says tonight.



Anyhoo, I did find this little gem. Not sure where Trussell posted and/or filed it but here's his affidavit regarding the Dixie County clerk's "Fraud upon the Court – Alteration/removal of public records."



The usual blah, blah, blah and he ends with this.



"...The Affiant herewith makes request that any and every Law Enforcement Agent and Agency having jurisdiction over this matter, make immediate and thorough investigation of the above information and take appropriate legal and lawful action. To do otherwise, may be construed as ‘Misprision of Felony’ and a violation of Title LXX, 5407, among others."



It's dated Oct 1. All this screaming they do about misprision. I think it could be construed as a threat.



http://scannedretina.com/2014/10/04/dix ... c-records/


ImageImageImage x4

GimmyTruth
Posts: 364
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2014 3:43 pm

GimmyTruth's Constitutional Fan Fiction Thread

#25

Post by GimmyTruth » Thu Oct 09, 2014 2:23 pm

TT was put in jail 4 failure 2 appear, not comtempt of court. TT anounced he was present, in corporate and in man. Judge did not care? No bond



Post Reply

Return to “FEMA Camp 7½”