VOELTZ - FL BALLOT CHALLENGE (ACTS I II & III)

User avatar
bob
Posts: 24522
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

VOELTZ - FL BALLOT CHALLENGE (ACTS I II & III)

#1051

Post by bob » Tue Mar 12, 2013 9:30 pm

Sorry, too lazy to check up the thread and find the name of said dumbass.Larry Klayman!


Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
bob
Posts: 24522
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

VOELTZ - FL BALLOT CHALLENGE (ACTS I II & III)

#1052

Post by bob » Wed Mar 13, 2013 12:46 pm

[/break1]242.69.70/pls/ds/ds_docket?p_caseyear=2012&p_casenumber=3489&psCourt=1&psSearchType=]SCOFL review requested in 1D12-3489.


Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

A Legal Lohengrin
Posts: 10415
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:56 pm

VOELTZ - FL BALLOT CHALLENGE (ACTS I II & III)

#1053

Post by A Legal Lohengrin » Wed Mar 13, 2013 2:03 pm

[/break1]242.69.70/pls/ds/ds_docket?p_caseyear=2012&p_casenumber=3489&psCourt=1&psSearchType=]SCOFL review requested in 1D12-3489.So which are they doing, moving for a written opinion or demanding immediate review? Why would they think the trial court has the jurisdiction to issue new material in the case now, when they are awaiting review (DENINED) by SCOFL?Morons.
Edit: To anyone who wonders why Orly Taitz isn't disbarred, look at this assclown Larry Klayman. He has been doing this stupid shit since the Clinton Administration.



User avatar
realist
Posts: 34510
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:33 pm

VOELTZ - FL BALLOT CHALLENGE (ACTS I II & III)

#1054

Post by realist » Fri Apr 05, 2013 12:54 pm

Voeltz Appeal Docket Update...2/08/2013 Dismissed - Per Curiam Opinion 02/08/2013 SS Restyle of Case-General-186 This Court sua sponte changes the style of this case to Michael Voeltz v. Barack Hussein Obama, Florida Democratic Party Nominee for President to the 2012 Democratic National Convention; Ken Detzner, Secretary of State of Florida; and Florida Elections Canvassing Commission. 02/08/2013 Deny Expediting-77A Motion to expedite, filed December 26, 2012, is denied. Amended motion for leave to file brief of amicus curiae, filed December 26, 2012, is denied. 02/28/2013 Motion for Written Opinion Larry Klayman 246220 03/11/2013 RESPONSE Mark Herron 0199737 in opposition to mot for written opinion ******NOTED****** 03/11/2013 Notice of Appeal to Supreme Court Larry Klayman 246220 03/11/2013 RESPONSE Ashley E. Davis, A. G. C. 48032 in opposition to mot for written opinion ******NOTED****** 03/11/2013 REPLY Larry Klayman 246220 in support of mot for written opinion ******NOTED****** [highlight]03/12/2013 NOTICE OF DISCRETN. JURISDICTN NOTICE OF DISCRETN. JURISDICTN[/highlight] [highlight]03/12/2013 Review Sent to Supreme Court NOTICE OF DISCRETN. JURISDICTN[/highlight] 03/22/2013 [highlight]Deny Miscellaneous Motion-79A [Motion for Written Opinion[/highlight]


ImageX 4 ImageX36
Image

User avatar
bob
Posts: 24522
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

VOELTZ - FL BALLOT CHALLENGE (ACTS I II & III)

#1055

Post by bob » Wed Apr 10, 2013 5:57 pm

Voeltz v. Obama, No. [/break1]flcourts.org/pls/docket/ds_docket?p_caseyear=2013&p_casenumber=560&psCourt=FSC&psSearchType=]13-560 (Fla. filed Mar. 12, 2013):


Petitioner's notice [of appeal], filed in this Court on March 12, 2013, [highlight]has been treated as a petition for writ of mandamus seeking reinstatement of the proceedings in the district court of appeal below[/highlight] [1D12-3489]. Petitioner is allowed to and including [highlight]April 29, 2013[/highlight], in which to file a proper petition for writ of mandamus; that complies with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.100, addressing why the proceedings in the district court of appeal should not have been dismissed. The failure to file a proper petition with this Court within the time provided could result in the imposition of sanctions, including dismissal of this case. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.410. Please understand that once this case is dismissed, it may not be subject to reinstatement.The court of appeal case was the one in which Klayman moved for a written opinion (and was denied). I would guess SCOFL was confused by what Klayman wanted, and read his NOA as a petition to direct the lower court(s) to write an opinion.





The docket also shows that [/break1]com/forum/search.php?keywords=Scott+Rille]Scott Rille sbumitted a request for judicial notice in this case (which was filed as a letter). :yankyank:


Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
bob
Posts: 24522
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

VOELTZ - FL BALLOT CHALLENGE (ACTS I II & III)

#1056

Post by bob » Fri Apr 12, 2013 9:41 pm

Klayman talks about Florida (mostly):











Executive summary: Florida courts are breaking the law, we're in a revolutionary state, etc.





The most interesting tidbig is that Klayman thinks SCOFL's latest OSC is a good thing.





](*,)


Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
Suranis
Posts: 15861
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 7:04 am

VOELTZ - FL BALLOT CHALLENGE (ACTS I II & III)

#1057

Post by Suranis » Sat Apr 13, 2013 12:31 am



Irony can be pretty ironic sometimes.

User avatar
RTH10260
Posts: 17267
Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 8:52 am
Location: Near the Swiss Alps

VOELTZ - FL BALLOT CHALLENGE (ACTS I II & III)

#1058

Post by RTH10260 » Sat Apr 13, 2013 12:51 am

https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.net/ ... gUnlimited data? Please please don't treat us with extended 'zibits :!: :twisted:



AnitaMaria
Posts: 4360
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2011 5:41 pm

VOELTZ - FL BALLOT CHALLENGE (ACTS I II & III)

#1059

Post by AnitaMaria » Sat Apr 13, 2013 4:40 pm

The most interesting tidbit is that Klayman thinks SCOFL's latest OSC is a good thing.


](*,)Klayman definitely misrepresented the court OSC in the interview. The OSC says Klayman can submit a writ of mandamus "addressing why the proceedings in the district court of appeal should not have been dismissed." But here's how he described it, from 3:03 in the interview:


The Florida Supreme Court says, 'Klayman, file a brief as to why we should not order the appellate courts to do their job and review the decision of the lower court,' suggesting that the issue is not moot.He switched the burden of proof around from what the Florida Supreme Court actually said. And, in doing so, he has set up the idiotic situation where he is claiming that the court is inclined to act in his favor but wants him to submit a brief to try to talk them out of it.





If Klayman weren't such a chronic liar, I'd give him the benefit of the doubt that he misspoke. However, to believe that, I would have to believe that he actually understands what the court asked him to do and still believes that it is a good thing for his case. And then there is that Magistrate judge who said this about Klayman in another case:


…[T]he Magistrate finds that the Plaintiff’s [Klayman’s] testimony is entitled to no weight. He is simply not credible.



User avatar
realist
Posts: 34510
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:33 pm

VOELTZ - FL BALLOT CHALLENGE (ACTS I II & III)

#1060

Post by realist » Sat Apr 13, 2013 6:38 pm

H/T to RC :-bd





I have some documents to post from the appeal court in FL that we did not have previously.





If the docket entry is not available, I'll just post the doc without reference to the docket We may or may not have some of these, but I'm posting them all here, FYI.





2/08/2013 Dismissed - Per Curiam Opinion








02/08/2013 SS Restyle of Case-General-186


This Court sua sponte changes the style of this case to Michael Voeltz v. Barack Hussein Obama, Florida Democratic Party Nominee for President to the 2012 Democratic National Convention; Ken Detzner, Secretary of State of Florida; and Florida Elections Canvassing Commission.





02/08/2013 Deny Expediting-77A


Motion to expedite, filed December 26, 2012, is denied. Amended motion for leave to file brief of amicus curiae, filed December 26, 2012, is denied.





02/28/2013 [link]Motion for Written Opinion,[/link]


Larry Klayman 246220





03/11/2013 [link]RESPONSE,[/link]


Mark Herron 0199737


in opposition to mot for written opinion ******NOTED******





03/11/2013 [link]Notice of Appeal to Supreme Court,[/link]


Larry Klayman 246220





03/11/2013 [link]RESPONSE,[/link]


Ashley E. Davis, A. G. C. 48032


in opposition to mot for written opinion ******NOTED******





03/11/2013 [link]REPLY,[/link]


Larry Klayman 246220


in support of mot for written opinion ******NOTED******





03/12/2013 NOTICE OF DISCRETN. JURISDICTN


NOTICE OF DISCRETN. JURISDICTN





03/12/2013 Review Sent to Supreme Court


NOTICE OF DISCRETN. JURISDICTN





03/22/2013[link]Deny Miscellaneous Motion-79A,[/link] [Motion for Written Opinion


[/break1]scribd.com/doc/135774524/SCOFL-VOELTZ-III-2013-04-08-Order-Re-Notice-of-Appeal] ... -of-Appeal




Edit: SCRIBD is throwing a fit right now. Will be back later with others.


ImageX 4 ImageX36
Image

User avatar
Reality Check
Posts: 14880
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: USA
Contact:

VOELTZ - FL BALLOT CHALLENGE (ACTS I II & III)

#1061

Post by Reality Check » Sun Apr 14, 2013 2:28 pm

Thanks realist. It is interesting to read the final document then listen to Klayman's take on what is happening on Freaky Friday with Lyin' Carl Gallups. Klayman is delusional and/or lying. Here is the podcast of that part:[link]Klayman part 2,http://www.1330weby.com/media/com_podca ... gment4.mp3[/link]The discussion starts at about 1:30.


"“If you’re not outraged, you’re not paying attention.”

Heather Heyer, November 2016

User avatar
PatGund
Posts: 7763
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 4:41 pm
Location: Edmonds. WA
Contact:

VOELTZ - FL BALLOT CHALLENGE (ACTS I II & III)

#1062

Post by PatGund » Sun Apr 14, 2013 3:47 pm

I'll take "lying" for $300.



AnitaMaria
Posts: 4360
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2011 5:41 pm

VOELTZ - FL BALLOT CHALLENGE (ACTS I II & III)

#1063

Post by AnitaMaria » Mon Apr 29, 2013 10:04 pm

Today was the deadline for KKKlayman to file his brief telling the FL Supreme Court "why [it] should not order the appellate courts to do their job and review the decision of the lower court." OK, that's not really what the court asked for, but that's how Klayman described it to Gallups. There is nothing new on the court's docket but I don't know how long it takes for something to show up on the docket after it has been filed.



User avatar
nbc
Posts: 4179
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 12:38 am

VOELTZ - FL BALLOT CHALLENGE (ACTS I II & III)

#1064

Post by nbc » Tue Apr 30, 2013 12:24 am

Klayman's failure to timely file for a written opinion is hilarious... It is in line with his more recent court behaviors... Is Klayman not admitted to the FL Bar? Seems to me like a rookie mistake.



User avatar
nbc
Posts: 4179
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 12:38 am

VOELTZ - FL BALLOT CHALLENGE (ACTS I II & III)

#1065

Post by nbc » Tue Apr 30, 2013 2:52 pm

InterestingThis is the filing obtained by ORYR[/break1]scribd.com/doc/138651681/mcinnish-v-chapman-amicus-curiae-brief-obtained-from-alabama-democratic-party-4-23-2013] ... -4-23-2013It does not show the diamond pattern. Was this generated by the watermark?Is someone messing with the birthers :-)



User avatar
realist
Posts: 34510
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:33 pm

VOELTZ - FL BALLOT CHALLENGE (ACTS I II & III)

#1066

Post by realist » Wed May 01, 2013 6:35 am

Today was the deadline for KKKlayman to file his brief telling the FL Supreme Court "why [it] should not order the appellate courts to do their job and review the decision of the lower court." OK, that's not really what the court asked for, but that's how Klayman described it to Gallups. There is nothing new on the court's docket but I don't know how long it takes for something to show up on the docket after it has been filed.[link]OBC,http://obamaballotchallenge.com/new-pla ... ase-appeal[/link]Attorney Larry Klayman and Plaintiff Mike Voeltz have submitted their final Petition for Writ of Mandamus on the deadline day of 4-29-13. [highlight]The original case was dismissed for all the wrong reasons, making it eminently appealable.[/highlight]They have been keeping this case low profile lately, but are in action again to meet the filing deadline.IN THE SUPREME COURT OFTHE STATE OF FLORIDAMICHAEL C. VOELTZ,Petitioner,Case No.: SC13-560vs.BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, et. al.Respondents.PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUSPetitioner, Michael C. Voeltz, pursuant to Fla. App. R. 9.100 B, files thisPetition for “Writ of Mandamus” to compel the District Court of Appeal, FirstDistrict (“Court of Appeal”), [highlight]to reinstate the appeal of Voeltz v. Obama, et al, case no. 2012CA00467, 1D12- 3489, which was improperly dismissed by court order dated February 8, 2013.[/highlight].In the alternative, Petitioner files this Petition for a Writ of Mandamus todirect Florida Secretary of State, Ken Detzner, to comply with Florida Statute97.012(14), [highlight]and direct the Court of Appeal to issue an opinion regarding the eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama to serve as President of the United States.[/highlight]Read more: [/break1]scribd.com/doc/138831414/FINAL-Voeltz-v-Obama-Petition-for-Writ-of-mandamus?secret_password=11lyly32bm054pk9k0p3] ... 054pk9k0p3Docket Update here: [/break1]com/wp-contentsrc="uploads/2013/04/VoeltzFiling4-29-13.jpg]http://obamaballotchallenge.com/wp-cont ... -29-13.jpgI may be misremembering, but I don't believe this is what the Court asked for. 8>


ImageX 4 ImageX36
Image

User avatar
nbc
Posts: 4179
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 12:38 am

VOELTZ - FL BALLOT CHALLENGE (ACTS I II & III)

#1067

Post by nbc » Wed May 01, 2013 1:11 pm

Klayman is trying to hide that he failed to timely file the motion for written opinion... He misread the Florida rules...He is now trying to appeal a non written opinion :-)Hilarious...The Supreme Court will just deny his petition.This explains why Klayman has chosen not to follow the order issued which was to issue a mandamus against the Appeal's Court to issue a written opinion...Oh what a mess he has created by not filing timely his motion for a written opinion.



User avatar
bob
Posts: 24522
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

VOELTZ - FL BALLOT CHALLENGE (ACTS I II & III)

#1068

Post by bob » Wed May 01, 2013 3:12 pm

WTF Klayman?





I can forgive Noonan thinking he has writ of mandate. Because Noonan is an ignorant moran.





But Klayman ought to know better. This is basically doing what he did in Ohio: He's treating the writ petition like an appeal. Except he has no right to an appeal to SCOFL (he has the right to request an appeal).





One-sentence denial in Klayman's future.


Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
realist
Posts: 34510
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:33 pm

VOELTZ - FL BALLOT CHALLENGE (ACTS I II & III)

#1069

Post by realist » Thu May 02, 2013 9:21 pm

Docket Update...4/29/2013 PROPER PETITION PT Michael Voeltz BY: PT Larry Elliot Klayman 246220 05/02/2013 ORDER-OTHER SUBSTANTIVE [highlight]Scott Rille's letter[/highlight] dated March 18, 2013, has been treated as a Motion to Take Judicial Notice, and said motion is stricken without prejudice to re-file after a proper motion for amicus curiae has been filed with this Court.


ImageX 4 ImageX36
Image

User avatar
mimi
Posts: 31119
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 12:01 am

VOELTZ - FL BALLOT CHALLENGE (ACTS I II & III)

#1070

Post by mimi » Thu May 02, 2013 9:52 pm

Can I haz 140 character explanation to tweet to birfers?It can start with "klayman screwed up again." :mrgreen:



User avatar
Butterfly Bilderberg
Posts: 7646
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 2:26 pm

VOELTZ - FL BALLOT CHALLENGE (ACTS I II & III)

#1071

Post by Butterfly Bilderberg » Thu May 02, 2013 10:58 pm

Docket Update...4/29/2013 PROPER PETITION PT Michael Voeltz BY: PT Larry Elliot Klayman 246220 05/02/2013 ORDER-OTHER SUBSTANTIVE [highlight]Scott Rille's letter[/highlight] dated March 18, 2013, has been treated as a Motion to Take Judicial Notice, and said motion is stricken without prejudice to re-file after a proper motion for amicus curiae has been filed with this Court. [link]Prolly just the same "letter" he sent to CJ Roberts last year,[/link]. Which was copied verbatim from the [link]amicus curiae brief that Scottie filed in the trial court,http://judicial.clerk.leon.fl.us/image_ ... ource=CRTV[/link] below.


"Pity the nation that acclaims the bully as hero,
and that deems the glittering conqueror bountiful."
- Kahlil Gibran, The Garden of The Prophet

User avatar
Piffle
Posts: 6987
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 12:39 pm

VOELTZ - FL BALLOT CHALLENGE (ACTS I II & III)

#1072

Post by Piffle » Fri May 03, 2013 12:46 am

The no-written-opinion "issue" is a red herring that Klayman cooked up and then used to poison himself.As far as I know, appealing a summary affirmance by an intermediate court of appeals is effectively the same as appealing an affirmance accompanied by a lengthy opinion. Either way, the appeal to the supreme court is by permission (i.e., via certiorari or equivalent), not of right.If the state supreme court agrees to take such a case, the supremes merely review the opinion of the trial court. ](*,) =))



AnitaMaria
Posts: 4360
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2011 5:41 pm

VOELTZ - FL BALLOT CHALLENGE (ACTS I II & III)

#1073

Post by AnitaMaria » Wed Jun 19, 2013 10:24 am

A few new docket entries in the Florida Supreme Court. Klayman submitted something else a couple of weeks after he submitted the "proper petition"05/09/2013 PETITION-AMENDMENT/SUPPLEMENT PT Michael Voeltz BY: PT Larry Elliot Klayman 246220 FILED AS "NOTICE-APPEAL"05/17/2013 MOTION-AMICUS CURIAE DA1 Scott Rille BY: DA1 Scott Rille O&706/14/2013 ORDER-AMICUS CURIAE DY The "Motion for Leave to File Brief of Amicus Curiae" filed in the above cause by Scott Rille on behalf of petitioner is hereby denied.The court docket is [link]here,http://jweb.flcourts.org/pls/docket/ds_ ... earchType=[/link]



User avatar
realist
Posts: 34510
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:33 pm

VOELTZ - FL BALLOT CHALLENGE (ACTS I II & III)

#1074

Post by realist » Mon Jul 01, 2013 2:40 pm

Docket Update...Florida Supreme Court DocketCase DocketCase Number: SC13-560 - ActiveMICHAEL VOELTZ vs. BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, ETC., ET AL.Lower Tribunal Case(s): 1D12-3489, 2012-CA-00467 03/12/2013 PETITION-MANDAMUS PT Michael Voeltz BY: PT Larry Elliot Klayman 246220 FILED AS "NOTICE-APPEAL" & TREATED AS PETITION-MANDAMUS03/25/2013 REQUEST-JUDICIAL NOTICE DA1 Scott Rille BY: DA1 Scott Rille FILED AS "LETTER DATED 03/18/2013" ***STRICKEN. SEE ORDER DATED 05/02/2013***04/08/2013 Fee Due $300, but not billed DCA FORWARDING FILING FEE04/08/2013 ORDER-PROPER PETITION Petitioner's notice, filed in this Court on March 12, 2013, has been treated as a petition for writ of mandamus seeking reinstatement of the proceedings in the district court of appeal below. Petitioner is allowed to and including April 29, 2013, in which to file a proper petition for writ of mandamus; that complies with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.100, addressing why the proceedings in the district court of appeal should not have been dismissed. The failure to file a proper petition with this Court within the time provided could result in the imposition of sanctions, including dismissal of this case. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.410. Please understand that once this case is dismissed, it may not be subject to reinstatement.04/08/2013 ACKNOWLEDGMENT LETTER-NEW CASE Supreme Court Florida FSC BY: Supreme Court Florida FSC 04/29/2013 PROPER PETITION PT Michael Voeltz BY: PT Larry Elliot Klayman 246220 05/02/2013 ORDER-OTHER SUBSTANTIVE Scott Rille's letter dated March 18, 2013, has been treated as a Motion to Take Judicial Notice, and said motion is stricken without prejudice to re-file after a proper motion for amicus curiae has been filed with this Court.05/09/2013 PETITION-AMENDMENT/SUPPLEMENT PT Michael Voeltz BY: PT Larry Elliot Klayman 246220 FILED AS "NOTICE-APPEAL"05/17/2013 MOTION-AMICUS CURIAE DA1 Scott Rille BY: DA1 Scott Rille O&706/14/2013 ORDER-AMICUS CURIAE DY The "Motion for Leave to File Brief of Amicus Curiae" filed in the above cause by Scott Rille on behalf of petitioner is hereby denied.07/01/2013 [highlight]DISP-DENIED[/highlight][/break1]flcourts.org/pls/docket/ds_docket?p_caseyear=2013&p_casenumber=560&psCourt=FSC&psSearchType=]http://jweb.flcourts.org/pls/docket/ds_ ... earchType=


ImageX 4 ImageX36
Image

User avatar
Sterngard Friegen
Posts: 43902
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Location: Over the drawbridge

VOELTZ - FL BALLOT CHALLENGE (ACTS I II & III)

#1075

Post by Sterngard Friegen » Mon Jul 01, 2013 2:42 pm

:explode:



Post Reply

Return to “State Ballot Challenges”